Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Tutorial
-
Radiographic Testing modeling
Reference : ENDE16T011Rev. 00
supportciva@extende.com
http://www.extende.com/
http://www-civa.cea.fr/
License
The information contained in this document is the ownership of EXTENDE and should be considered as confidential
EXTENDE SA 15 rue Emile Baudot, 91 300 Massy FRANCE SA au capital de 100 000 Fax: +33 (0)9 72 13 42 68 Siren 518 807 425
EXTENDE Inc. PO Box 461, Ballton Spa, NY 12020 USA Fax: +1-518-602-1368
The information contained in this document is the ownership of EXTENDE and should be considered as confidential
EXTENDE SA 15 rue Emile Baudot, 91 300 Massy FRANCE SA au capital de 100 000 Fax: +33 (0)9 72 13 42 68 Siren 518 807 425
EXTENDE Inc. PO Box 461, Ballton Spa, NY 12020 USA Fax: +1-518-602-1368
Table of Contents
1. General information .................................................................................................................... 5
1. Tutorial description ............................................................................................................. 7
2. Starting with CIVA .............................................................................................................. 9
2. Studied cases ........................................................................................................................... 19
1. Example of radiographic Inspection of a steel planar block using a gamma source ......... 21
2. Example of radiographic Inspection of an Inconel elbow using an X-ray source ............... 43
3. Example of radiographic Inspection of an aluminum stiffener using an X-ray source........ 59
This document can help to discover CIVA but it is not exhaustive. It is strongly recommended to
participate in a training course when starting to use the software.
A full user guide is also available to have more details about the different features, how to use them,
and their theoretical background. The user guide is available in a web browser format (Internet access
not required) by striking the F1 key in any menu of the software or by clicking on the “User manual”
in the CIVA desk.
Studied problems
In this document, three cases are proposed:
1. Radiographic Inspection of a steel planar block using a gamma source: You will discover how to
define the component, the source and the detector settings. Different kinds of calculations are
shown including direct calculation and Monte-Carlo calculation.
2. Radiographic Inspection of an Inconel elbow using an X-ray source: You will discover different
options for modeling the source.
3. Radiographic Inspection of an Aluminum stiffener using an X-ray source: In this example, you will
discover different possibilities offered by CIVA to optimize the simulation results.
This tutorial has been performed with the commercial release CIVA 2016.
This window enables you to activate the different modules available in the platform (UT, GW, ET
and RT-CT applications).
RT Modeling:
You can open the radiographic module by selecting the “RT” icon then by clicking on the “RT Sim-
ulation” tile. This will allows the user to have access to another window (the “Configuration wizard”)
in which the user has different possibilities to open CIVA RT (open a pre - modeled configuration or
a user-configuration or the last saved configuration...).
The user interface of the model page is then available and is organized as explained below.
From this new CIVA window, the user can create its RT configuration, launch computations and load
results.
Data are classified into different panels, available at the bottom of the window. Let us have a quick
look at the functions on the RT modeling window:
For instance click on the button “Specimen” to access to the “Specimen” panel.
Icons on the top right corner of the window let you display toolboxes, as well as modify the number
of views.
Click and hold the left mouse button to help move the image around the screen, click and hold the
right button for zooming, and press the scroll button to rotate the object around a center for a different
view.
This can also be done using the icons on the top of the “Model” window.
By right clicking on objects like specimen, source, scene etc. you get a pop-up menu which provides
access to several graphical tools, among them:
Display of the coordinate and dimensions of the component by right-clicking in the “Model” window
Help: Press F1
In any menu of the software, the help is available via the F1 key.
Interactive GUI
CIVA includes an interactive feature that provides complete control over the positioning of the differ-
ent objects of the configuration such as the source, detector, flaws, etc. Let’s see a few examples
of the usefulness of this feature.
To manipulate the source, we need to double click on the source or to right-click on it, and then its
orientation or position can be changed.
Flaw Manipulation
To manipulate flaws, we need to right-click on them, and then their orientations or positions can be
changed.
After clicking the Homogenized tab, you can display the cross-section data by visualizing the curves
representing the attenuation coefficients variation versus energy range. The numerical values of the
coefficients are also available:
Note:
The meaning of each coefficient is displayed when you click on the corresponding curve:
A gamma source of Cobalt will be defined (selected from the available database).
The emission cone is restricted to an angle of 45° and the effective size of the radioactive spot is
set at 3 mm x 3 mm.
A silver-bromide film KODAK M100 will be defined, selected from the film library of “NF EN ISO
11699-1 models”.
The model assumes that the film is made of AgBr with a thickness of 0.042 mm.
Geometry and parameters of the detector in the “Characteristics” tab in the “Detector” panel
This panel allows the user to define the positions of the source and the detector in the test piece
coordinate systems.
These positions are given below. It corresponds to a source to film distance of 301 mm.
You can also use the interactivity feature that will allow you to set the source and detector position
directly with the mouse. To enable this feature, you can double-click on the source or detector.
Geometry of the flaw defined in the “Geometry” tab in the “Flaw” panel
This flaw is defined as air (whose properties can be directly defined from the materials database).
The position of the flaw can be entered in the third tab of the flaw panel “Positioning”.
You can also use the interactivity feature that will allow you to set the flaw position directly with the
mouse. To enable this feature, you can double-click on the flaw or use the right-click button and
select the “manipulator”. The location in the Positioning tab is automatically updated when you use
the manipulator.
As shown below, keep the default settings for the “source” and “detector” options of the computation
parameters panel (meaning that this calculation will ignore geometric unsharpness due to the source
and will ignore as well the granularity of the film):
Finally, define an exposure time of 1000 seconds and run an analytic calculation.
This calculation mode means that only the direct radiation will be computed, using the Beer Lambert
law.
The beer-Lambert law uses the total attenuation coefficients given by the cross-section data and
computes the straight line attenuation value from the source to each pixel point on the film, using
the following formula:
-µ×x
I=I0×exp
µ: total attenuation coefficient for a given material and a given energy level.
From the analyzis window, the results window should appear like this:
In this case, the mean optical density is around 3.1 on the flaw and 2.9 on the zone around this flaw.
Note:
The Scan Explorer allows you to easily navigate through available images.
To display an image, for example curves showing optical density variations along X and Y axis, just
click on “Optical density X (or Y)” and drop it onto the default page.
The green light next to the image name indicates it is already open in the display. The images can be
adjusted according to user’s comfort by dragging them around the page and fitting with other images.
You can rotate the images using the icon from the toolbar available at the top of the window or
drag and drop the optical density image on the 3D view.
You can also have two cursors in order to measure directly the difference of optical density between
2 points (available using the icon from the toolbar available at the top of the window).
In order to keep these settings for the next analysis, you can right click on the top bar of the analysis
window and select “Define as default layout”:
IQI
In the IQI tab, select the following geometry: IQI-EN-Wire type then “IQI NF EN ISO 19232-1 W1”
type.
As the specimen is in Ferritic steel, the user will define the IQI in iron.
The wire IQI is positioned along the Y axis, at X = 65 mm and Y = 100 mm on the surface of the block.
The 7 wires with different diameters are visible as well as the crack.
Result of the computation of the direct radiation with a simple crack and IQI
The calculation is done photon per photon and is based on the interpretation of cross-section data
defined in the materials part, as probability of photons-matter interactions.
By running this method for a lot of photons you can realistically reproduce the influence of the scat-
tering.
In CIVA, you can combine the analytical method used (Beer-Lambert law) with this Monte-Carlo
method to obtain a final image including both the direct and the scattered radiation.
Monte-Carlo calculation
To define Monte-Carlo calculation settings, you have to input the number of photons to consider.
An estimator of the number of photons to simulate is available to help the user to define the number of
photons to simulate. Tick the “Enable Monte-Carlo” option and click on “Estimation” in the “Comput-
06
ing” tab / “Options” panel to activate it. This should give you values between 100 and 150E photons.
“Use accelerated mode” option allows the user to accelerate the computation by doing the approxi-
mation that all the photons are stopped when they arrive on the detector. Thanks to this method the
convergence of the result is faster than with the non-accelerated method (except if an object located
behind the detector emits back-scattered radiation).
On the left is displayed the optical density on the film and on the right is displayed profile lines of
optical density along the X and Y axis.
This calculation has been done with the same exposure time of 1000 s. With the addition of the
scattering, you can see that the film is saturated and flaw and IQI are not visible.
An interesting feature available in CIVA 2016 lets you re-use a Monte-Carlo calculation for additional
ones with other input parameters (for instance the exposure time).
Then, the combination of the initial Monte-Carlo result is recombined with another analytical one
accounting for the new parameters, which quickly provides new results.
In order to do that, enter the following information in the “Computing” tab (Options panel) in order to
define a new exposure time of 100 seconds and to indicate the path of the previous *.Civa calculation
including the Monte - Carlo on your hard drive (adapt the path to your case):
You should see that the flaw is now visible even if the influence of the scattering makes the detection
difficult in this quite thick test block.
In order to quantify the influence of the scattered radiation, you can display the image of the so-called
“Build-Up” quantity. It corresponds to “1+scattered/direct”.
You can use a colored scale in order to have a better view of it, as shown below:
Image of Build-up
In this case, the build-up values are spread between 5 and 6 which is quite high.
Finally, another way to highlight scattering phenomena is to use the “photon paths” tool by clicking
on "Activate" then modifying the number of photons traced from the toolbox (bottom of the “model”
window).
This is a “qualitative” tool which provides an idea of the proportion of photons that reaches the film
compared to those that are absorbed or deviated.
References:
[1] A. Schumm, U. Zscherpel, „Using the EN584-1 film characterization in radiographic modeling”, In-
ternational Symposium on Digital Industrial Radiology and Computed Tomography, Lyon, june 2007.
Geometry and type of source in the “General” tab in the “Source” panel
The physical parameters of the X-ray source will be defined by selecting the source in the Birsh and
Marshall catalogue available in the CIVA source database.
Selection of the spectrum in the data base in the “Parameters” tab in the “Source” panel
The corresponding parameters of the source are visible below and correspond to a 140 kV X-ray
source with a tungsten anode and a filter of aluminum of 4 mm.
The corresponding spectrum of energy for the radiated photons is visible at the bottom of the panel.
A silver-bromide film Agfa D7 will be defined, selected from the film library of “NF EN ISO 11699-1
models”.
It has a curved geometry in order to fit with the pipe dimensions and curvature radius defined below.
This panel allows defining the positions of the source and the detector in the test piece coordinate
systems.
These positions are given below. It corresponds to a source to film distance of 186 mm.
The “R” values represent the radial coordinates in the elbow system with an origin at the center of
the pipe.
Geometry of the flaw defined in the “Geometry” tab in the “Flaw” panel
A ligament of 2 mm is mentioned, that is to say that the distance between the flaw edge and the
outer side of the pipe is 2 mm:
Positioning of the flaw defined in the “Positioning” tab in the “Flaw” panel
As shown below, keep the default settings for the “source” and “detector” options of the computation
parameters panel (meaning that this calculation will ignore geometric unsharpness due to the source
and will ignore as well the granularity of the film).
In the analysis window, display the optical density and the curves showing optical density evolutions
versus X and Y cross section.
It can be noticed that the flaw is visible with quite a good contrast (level of OD about 3 for the flaw
and about 2 for the surrounding zone).
The detector granularity results as a noise superimposed to the previous results between the different
pixels of the film.
The flaw detection remains good as the contrast level is far larger than the noise level.
Result of the computation of the direct radiation in an elbow accounting for the film granularity
First calculation
In this case, a radius of 3 mm has been defined (in the source panel) in order to represent the effective
size of the anode target of the X-ray tube.
In order to take into account this, you have to enable the relevant option in the source tab of the
computation parameters panel:
Note:
› Single point: The source focus is assumed to be a perfect point: no geometrical blurring.
› Analytic (selected here): The size of the source is accounted for by an image processing method
convoluting the initial one with a Gaussian curve defining a kind of filter in order to estimate mag-
nification of the scene.
› Geometric: The source is divided into different source points spread in the volume representing
the source. This model is generally more precise but longer to compute.
In the analysis window, display the optical density image and curves.
As it can be seen on the image below, the contrast is not as good as before if the geometrical
unsharpness is taken into account.
The source of photonic emission is less focused, therefore the maximum optical density level ob-
tained on the flaw decreases to lower values (around 2.2 instead of 3 before).
In this case, the flaw becomes hardly visible due to geometrical blurring.
Then several parameters of the control will be changed in order to try to optimize the detection and
the sizing of the researched flaw:
In the geometry tab of the specimen panel, select a 3D CAD type geometry then import the CAD file
“RT_Tutorial_Ex3_Stiffener_3DCAD.stp”, from the files available with this tutorial.
In the mesh tab; refine a little bit the mesh parameters in order to increase the accuracy with which
CIVA will account for this geometry.
Note: By clicking with the right button of the mouse on the specimen in the 3D view and choosing
"Component - Mesh - Visible", you can visualize the meshing of the specimen.
Regarding the other parameters of the source, it is proposed in this case to compute the spectrum
of the source based on its physical parameters, instead of selecting it from a predefined but limited
catalogue.
In order to do that, a spectrum generator integrated into CIVA will be used. You can open it by
“modeling” in the bottom of the window.
As displayed below, a 200 kV source is defined, with a tungsten anode having an orientation of 15
degrees. The spectrum is defined by an energy range going from 10 to 200 keV with 1 keV step.
Click on apply to validate the spectrum. You should see the following spectrum.
A silver-bromide film Kodak DR50 will be defined, selected from the film library of “NF EN ISO 11699-1
models”.
Geometry and parameters of the detector in the “Characteristics” tab in the “Detector” panel.
No filter is defined.
Inspection panel
The detector will be placed under the lower part of the stiffener and orientated with a -45° angle to fit
with the shape of this part, while the source is placed above the flat plate on the top of the stiffener.
The flaw is defined with a “straight trapezoid” geometry with the following dimensions.
Geometry of the flaw defined in the “Geometry” tab in the “Flaw” panel.
The position is defined at X = 150 mm and Y = 50 mm with an orientation “perpendicular to the profile
plane” and a tilt angle of -30 degrees.
Finally, a ligament of 6 mm is defined. This ligament is the distance between the extremity of the
notch and the impact point N°4. That corresponds to a distance of 6 mm between the lower edge of
the crack and the bottom edge of the stiffener.
All these parameters are visible in the panel below and visualization representing the flaw in the test
piece is also proposed:
Positioning of the flaw defined in the “Positioning” tab in the “Flaw” panel.
As shown below, keep the default settings for the “source” and “detector” options of the computation
parameters panel.
In the analysis window, display the optical density and the curves showing optical density evolutions
versus X and Y cross section.
The settings have to be optimized in order to improve the detectability of such a flaw at such a position.
The goal is that photons cross less matter to reach the targeted zone. The other objective is to have
a more similar orientation for the source and for the detector.
Inspection panel
Since CIVA 11 there is a “post-processing parameter optimization” which allows the user to optimize
the results of a configuration without re-computing all the calculation.
Analyze page
Select the detector response’s image and click on the icon from the toolbar.
Choose “Optical density” in the “Search value” drop-down list. This parameter will be fixed.
Key-in an intensity of 5 mA instead of 1 mA then click on the “Apply” button (on the bottom of the
window). CIVA will generate a new image without doing the full calculation.
In the detector panel, replace the existing one by a “Kodak CX” film.
It means that we may obtain a better result with a shorter exposure time.
Select the parametric study tile from the desk and select “current configuration”.
Creation of a variation project by selecting the parametric study tile from the desk.
When done, the Civa manager window should give you a new file with a “.var” extension, describing
the parametric study.
It should also add a “Variation” panel in the “Model - Civa Xray” window.
Open the “Options” panel, and locate the mouse on the exposure time parameter as illustrated here-
after. You should see a blue rectangle surrounding this parameter.
Blue rectangle surrounding the “Exposure time” parameter in “computing” tab in “Options” panel.
Right click on this parameter and then click on the “VAR: Add to variation” button.
Define a “Linear spacing”, key-in a ”Number of values” of 10, a “Start” value of 10 s and a “Stop”
value of 100 s.
In the “Extraction” tab, enter the following information in order to extract, for each calculation, the
mean optical density value in the “flaw zone” on the film.
After computation, the CIVA manager window gives you access to several results.
Analysis curve plotting the variation of mean optical density with respect to exposure time.
Actually, to obtain an optical density around 3, exposure times between 30 seconds and 40 seconds
seem the better choice.
You can load any of the configuration files computed in the scenario study with its associated result.
For instance if you load the case with the exposure time of 30 s the following image of optical density
can be displayed:
You may use the different capabilities of the CIVA simulation software to change other influential pa-
rameters (type of source, position of the source, exposure time, detector type, etc.) to further improve
the results or to study potential disturbing parameters (scattering, unsharpness, film granularity, etc.).