FACTOR
Volume of
Size
Exp I:
2 g of Zinc chip + 50 cm3 1.0
mol dm-3 HCl
Exp II :
2 g of Zinc powder + 50 cm3 1.0
mol dm-3 HCl
Concentration
Exp I: 2 g of Zinc powder + 50
cm3 0.5 mol dm-3 HCl
Exp II : 2 g of Zinc powder + 50
cm3 1.0 mol dm-3 HCl
Concentration
Exp I: 2 g of Zinc powder + 50
cm3 1.0 mol dm-3 CH3COOH
Exp II : 2 g of Zinc powder + 50
cm3 1.0 mol dm-3 HCl
Exp III : 2 g of Zinc powder + 50
cm3 1.0 mol dm-3 H2SO4
EXPLANATION DIAGRAM
H2/ cm3
Size of zinc in exp. II is smaller than exp I.
Total surface area exposed to collision in exp.
II is larger than exp. I
The frequency of collision between zinc and
hydrogen ion in exp II is higher Exp II
Frequency of effective collision between zinc
and hydrogen ion in exp II is higher
Rate of reaction in exp. II is higher Exp I
Time/s
Volume of H2
Concentration of hydrochloric acid in exp. II is / cm3
higher than exp I
The number particles per unit volume in exp. Exp II
II is higher than exp. I
The frequency of collision between zinc and
hydrogen ion in exp II is higher
Exp II
Frequency of effective collision between zinc
and hydrogen ion in exp II is higher
Rate of reaction in exp. II is higher
Time /s
Experiment I and II
Exp I use ethanoic acid (weak acid) and exp II use
hydrochloric acid (strong acid)
The number of hydrogen ions per unit volume Volume of H2
in exp. II is higher than exp. I / cm3
The frequency of collision between zinc and
hydrogen ion in exp II is higher
Frequency of effective collision between zinc Exp III
and hydrogen ion in exp II is higher
Rate of reaction in exp. II is higher Exp II
Experiment II and III Exp I
Exp III use sulphuric acid (diprotic acid) and exp
II use hydrochloric acid (monoprotic acid)
The number of hydrogen ions per unit volume Time /s
in exp. III is higher than exp. II
The frequency of collision between zinc and
hydrogen ion in exp II is higher
Frequency of effective collision between zinc
and hydrogen ion in exp II is higher
Rate of reaction in exp. II is higher
 Volume
me of
Temperature carbon dioxid cm3
on dioxide/
Temperature
perature of exp. II is higher than exp I.
Exp I: The kinetic en
energy of reactant in exp II is higher
2 g of Zinc chip + 50 cm3 1.0 than I
mol dm-3 HCl at 25 oC The freque
quency of collision between zinc and
Exp II
hydrogen
rogen ion in exp II is higher
Exp II : Frequencyncy of effective collision between zinc
2 g of Zinc powder + 50 cm3 1.0 and hydrogen ion in exp II is higher
mol dm-3 HCl at 40 oC Ratee of reacti
reaction in exp. II is higher Exp I
Time/s
Catalyst Volume
lume of H2
Exp II use cop
copper (II) sulphate act as catalyst / cm3
Exp I: Catalyst
alyst prov
provides an alternative path of reaction Exp II
2 g of Zinc powder + 50 cm3 0.5 which
ich needs llower activation energy (Ea’) (with
(wit catalyst)
mol dm-3 HCl The freque
quency of collision between zinc and
hydrogen
rogen ion in exp II is higher
Exp II : Frequencyncy of effective collision between zinc Exp I
2 g of Zinc powder + 50 cm3 1.0 and hydrogen ion in exp II is higher
mol dm-3 HCl and 2cm3 of Ratee of reacti
reaction in exp. II is higher
copper (II) sulphate
Time /s
HAK MILIK SLM 2011