Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
SOCIAL SCIENCE II
Social, Economic and Political Thought
Second Semester 2010-2011
THE COURSE
A survey of social, economic, and political thought from classical to contemporary periods.
THIS COURSE has two general learning objectives: (1) to carefully describe the main themes of selected social, economic, and
political thinkers of various periods of western civilization, and (2) to clearly demonstrate the continuity and discontinuity
in their “great conversation”.
Ancient Greek political theory is the fountainhead of social, economic, and political thought of the West. The
issues it raised, and the concepts it developed in addressing those issues, have largely determined the main directions of
Western economic, social, and political thought.
This is more evident in social and political thought than in economic thought. Joseph A. Schumpeter says that
economic analysis was “a very minor element” of classical and medieval thought. Systematic theorizing on economic
problems started towards the end of the 17th century. Hence, this survey will initially concentrate in social and political
thought. The economic ideas of classical and medieval thinkers, however, will also be noted.
In order to clearly identify the emphasis of the course, five themes will be pursued for all of the selected thinkers.
These are: (1) the blending of politics and ethics, (2) human nature and the purpose of political associations, (3) organizing
or constituting political associations, (4) why and how political associations change, and (5) issues in economic thought –
value, price, production, distribution, nature of market, and relationship between the state and market. Pursuing these
themes through the selected thinkers would reveal the “great conversation” among the different traditions of political,
economic and social thought.
COURSE REQUIREMENTS
Student performance will be evaluated on the basis of three examinations, participation in-group and plenary
discussions, and class attendance.
The examinations will focus on the concepts and conceptual systems of selected thinkers, and the similarities and
differences among these concepts and conceptual systems. Each of the three examinations has a weight of 25% of the final
grade.
Active participation in the class activities, such as oral report or group discussion, has a weight of 20% of the final
grade.
Class attendance has a weight of 5% of the final grade.
READING LIST
REQUIRED READINGS
Curtis, Michael. 1981. The Great Political Theories, Volume I and II. New York: Avon Books.
Social Science II Committee. 1992. Readings in Social Science II. Quezon City: University of the Philippines Press.
OPTIONAL READINGS
Ebenstein, W. and Ebenstein, A. 2000. Great Political Thinkers: Plato to the Present. Singapore: Thomson.
Gaarder, Jostein. 2001. Sophie’s World. London: Phoenix House.
Ronas, Malaya C. 1998. Angkan ni Socrates: Gabay sa Panimulang Talakayan sa Kaisipang Kanluran Hinggil sa Lipunan.
Ekonomiya, at Politika. Lungsod Quezon: UP Sentro ng Wikang Filipino.
rules”
3. Economic ideas of early Christian leaders
a. Teachings of the Apostles
b. Discourses on wealth and property
Day 9 (Dec.07.10) ST THOMAS AQUINAS (1225-1274) Lecture-discussion Curtis, pp. 177-78.
To explain the Scholastic view 1. Life and times of St. Thomas Aquinas 196-210.
on the nature of human beings a. Early education
and the state (polis). b. Theological studies, rediscovery of Readings in Social
Aristotle Science II, pp. 86-95.
To discuss the relationship c. Teaching career in the University of Paris
between the church and the d. Scholasticism: blending of faith and
state. reason
2. Political thought of St. Thomas Aquinas
To discuss the different kinds a. The inadequacy of the state
of law. b. The state is natural
c. The state has divine nature
d. Two spheres theory: the church over the
state
• Individual and the state
• Four kinds of law
• Limited sovereignty
3. Economic ideas of St. Thomas Aquinas
a. Private property is not against natural law
b. Trading is legitimate
c. Just price
d. Usury is a sin
Day 10 (Dec.09.10) Integration Group-discussion
To compare the classical and
medieval views on the nature
of human beings and the state.
Day 11 (Dec.14.10) FIRST EXAMINATION
Day 12 (Dec.16.10) POST-EXAMINATION FREE DAY (LAST SESSION DAY OF THE YEAR)
Day 13 (Jan.04.11) Lecture of Professor
To discuss the political Francisco Nemenzo
thought of Machiavelli in The (DVD)
Prince and Discourses.
Day 14 (Jan.06.11) NICCOLO MACHIAVELLI (1469-1527) Lecture-discussion Curtis, pp. 215-17,
Continuation of the discussion 1. Brief biography 219-29.
of Machiavelli a. What was reborn in the Renaissance? Readings in Social
b. Domestic and foreign rivalries Science II, pp. 86-95.
c. Second secretary of the chancery
d. Foreign missions to France and Vatican
Day 15 (Jan.11.11) 2. Political thought of Machiavelli Group-discussion
a. Break between politics and ethics
b. Establishment of a “new order” and its
preservation
c. The ecclesiastical principality
d. Nationalism and liberation
3. Machiavelli’s place in the history of political
thought
Day 16 (Jan.13.11) Galileo’s Dialogo
To describe the Scientific (DVD) Discovery
Revolution Channel
Day 17 (Jan.18.11) Lecture of Professor
To present an overview of the Carolina G. Herandez
social contract theories (DVD)
Day 18 (Jan.20.11) THOMAS HOBBES (1588-1679) Lecture-discussion Curtis, pp. 354-370.
To describe the nature of 1. Brief biography
human beings in the “state of a. Educational background Readings in Social
nature”. b. Tutor in the household of the Earl of Science II, pp. 96-109.
Devonshire
To discuss the social contract c. Civil war: Crown versus Parliament
between the ruler(s) and the d. Political sanctuary in France
ruled. 2. Social contract theory of Thomas Hobbes
a. Human passions determine good and evil
To discuss how social contract b. Human passions lead to enmity and
had shaped the nature of civil distrust
Social Science II | 4
1. Since attendance is part of the final grade, everyone is encouraged to complete all sessions. The maximum number of
absences allowed, per University rule, is six (6). Exceeding the limit means a final grade of 5.00, irrespective of the
nature of the absences (excused or unexcused).
2. No student would be allowed to enter the classroom if he/she is late for more than 20 minutes. At the same time, no
student must leave the classroom more than 15 minutes before the end of the class period.
3. Proper decorum is a must to ensure a harmonious and lively environment for discussion. Avoid unnecessary
interruption. Attitude fitting for a college student is expected in class.
4. Related to proper decorum, use of mobile phones is strictly prohibited. All phones should be turned off or put in
silent mode. Should the use of phone be inevitable, the student may silently exit the room without disrupting any on-
going discussion. Failure to comply with this rule will cause the class to take a quiz.
5. Absolutely no make-up exams will be given to those who miss any of the three exams unless the student has a valid
excuse (i.e., illness) and an official excuse slip or medical certification noted by the University Health Service.
6. No additional or special course work will be given to any student.
7. Eating is allowed inside the room except for any kind of food that may cause disturbance during class sessions.
8. Smiling is not prohibited.
DATES TO REMEMBER