Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 6

University of the Philippines

College of Social Sciences and Philosophy


DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE

SOCIAL SCIENCE II
Social, Economic and Political Thought
Second Semester 2010-2011

Jan Robert R. Go THR-3 (0830-1000HRS) PH 434


Teaching Associate THV (1130-1300HRS) PH 406

THE COURSE

A survey of social, economic, and political thought from classical to contemporary periods.

THIS COURSE has two general learning objectives: (1) to carefully describe the main themes of selected social, economic, and
political thinkers of various periods of western civilization, and (2) to clearly demonstrate the continuity and discontinuity
in their “great conversation”.
Ancient Greek political theory is the fountainhead of social, economic, and political thought of the West. The
issues it raised, and the concepts it developed in addressing those issues, have largely determined the main directions of
Western economic, social, and political thought.
This is more evident in social and political thought than in economic thought. Joseph A. Schumpeter says that
economic analysis was “a very minor element” of classical and medieval thought. Systematic theorizing on economic
problems started towards the end of the 17th century. Hence, this survey will initially concentrate in social and political
thought. The economic ideas of classical and medieval thinkers, however, will also be noted.
In order to clearly identify the emphasis of the course, five themes will be pursued for all of the selected thinkers.
These are: (1) the blending of politics and ethics, (2) human nature and the purpose of political associations, (3) organizing
or constituting political associations, (4) why and how political associations change, and (5) issues in economic thought –
value, price, production, distribution, nature of market, and relationship between the state and market. Pursuing these
themes through the selected thinkers would reveal the “great conversation” among the different traditions of political,
economic and social thought.

COURSE REQUIREMENTS

Student performance will be evaluated on the basis of three examinations, participation in-group and plenary
discussions, and class attendance.
The examinations will focus on the concepts and conceptual systems of selected thinkers, and the similarities and
differences among these concepts and conceptual systems. Each of the three examinations has a weight of 25% of the final
grade.
Active participation in the class activities, such as oral report or group discussion, has a weight of 20% of the final
grade.
Class attendance has a weight of 5% of the final grade.

READING LIST

REQUIRED READINGS
Curtis, Michael. 1981. The Great Political Theories, Volume I and II. New York: Avon Books.
Social Science II Committee. 1992. Readings in Social Science II. Quezon City: University of the Philippines Press.

OPTIONAL READINGS
Ebenstein, W. and Ebenstein, A. 2000. Great Political Thinkers: Plato to the Present. Singapore: Thomson.
Gaarder, Jostein. 2001. Sophie’s World. London: Phoenix House.
Ronas, Malaya C. 1998. Angkan ni Socrates: Gabay sa Panimulang Talakayan sa Kaisipang Kanluran Hinggil sa Lipunan.
Ekonomiya, at Politika. Lungsod Quezon: UP Sentro ng Wikang Filipino.

SCHEDULE, TOPICS AND CLASS ACTIVITIES

SCHEDULE & OBJECTIVES TOPIC CLASS ACTIVITY READINGS


Day 1 (Nov.09.10) General Education and Specialist Education Lecture-discussion
Overview of Social Science II
Day 2 (Nov.11.10) Greek Legacy to Critical Thinking Lecture of Professor
To define critical thinking. Felipe B. Miranda
(DVD)
To discuss the contributions of
classical Greek civilization to
critical thinking.
Social Science II | 2

Day 3 (Nov.16.10) Continuation Group-discussion


Day 4 (Nov.18.10) PLATO (c. 428-348 B.C.) The Republic (DVD), Michael Curtis (ed.),
To explain how the nature of 1. Family and educational background Discovery Channel Great Political
human beings affects the 2. Pre-Socratic and Socratic influences Theories Volume I
nature of the polis. 3. Plato’s political thought (New York: Avon
a. Conventional view of justice questioned Books, 1981) pp. 26-
To discuss the Plato’s ideal b. Theory of justice 28, 34-64.
polis. c. Origin of the polis
d. Justice in the individual and the polis Readings in Social
e. The just polis Science II (Quezon
f. Existing polis compared with the just City: University of
polis the Philippines, 1995),
• The purpose of existing polis pp. 1-27.
• The purpose of the just polis
4. Economic ideas of Plato
a. Division of labor
b. Common ownership of property among
guardians
Day 5 (Nov.23.10) Continuation Group-discussion
Day 6 (Nov.25.10) ARISTOTLE (384-322 B.C.) Lecture-discussion Curtis, pp. 28-30, 64-
To explain how the nature of 1. Brief biography 101.
human beings affects the a. Family background
nature of the polis. b. Education in Plato’s Academy Readings in Social
c. Academic work in the Lyceum Science II, pp. 28-53.
To discuss Aristotle’s ideal 2. Political thought of Aristotle
and practicable polis. 1. Natural kinds of rule in the polis
a. Rule of the father over his family
b. Rule of parents over children
c. Rule of master over slave
2. Criticism of ideal polis and existing polis
a. Criticism of Plato, Phaleas, and
Hippodamus
b. Criticism of Sparta, Crete, and
Carthage
3. On citizenship, kinds of constitutions, and
distributive justice
a. Concept of citizenship and
comparison between good citizen
and good person
b. Kinds of constitution
c. Who should rule?
4. The best practicable way of governing the
polis and a guide to law-making
a. Doctrine of the mean applied to
practical governance
b. Principles for law-making
c. The best polis
3. Economic ideas of Aristotle
a. Management of the family
b. Natural and unnatural exchange
c. Private property and commonly owned
property
Day 7 (Nov.30.10) Medieval Political Thought Lecture of Professor
To give an overview of the Lydia Casambre
main themes of Medieval (DVD)
Political Thought
Day 8 (Dec.02.10) ST AUGUSTINE (354-430 A.D.) Lecture-discussion Curtis, pp. 141-43,
To explain how sin affects the 1. Brief biography 146-156.
nature of the state (polis). a. Family background
b. Conversion to Christianity Readings in Social
To discuss love of God and c. The fall of Rome and theological Science II, pp. 58-68.
love of self: Heavenly city and discourses
Earthly city. 2. Political thought of St. Augustine
a. Origin of the state
b. Two visible cities
c. Two invisible cities
d. “Justice reigns in the city where Christ
Social Science II | 3

rules”
3. Economic ideas of early Christian leaders
a. Teachings of the Apostles
b. Discourses on wealth and property
Day 9 (Dec.07.10) ST THOMAS AQUINAS (1225-1274) Lecture-discussion Curtis, pp. 177-78.
To explain the Scholastic view 1. Life and times of St. Thomas Aquinas 196-210.
on the nature of human beings a. Early education
and the state (polis). b. Theological studies, rediscovery of Readings in Social
Aristotle Science II, pp. 86-95.
To discuss the relationship c. Teaching career in the University of Paris
between the church and the d. Scholasticism: blending of faith and
state. reason
2. Political thought of St. Thomas Aquinas
To discuss the different kinds a. The inadequacy of the state
of law. b. The state is natural
c. The state has divine nature
d. Two spheres theory: the church over the
state
• Individual and the state
• Four kinds of law
• Limited sovereignty
3. Economic ideas of St. Thomas Aquinas
a. Private property is not against natural law
b. Trading is legitimate
c. Just price
d. Usury is a sin
Day 10 (Dec.09.10) Integration Group-discussion
To compare the classical and
medieval views on the nature
of human beings and the state.
Day 11 (Dec.14.10) FIRST EXAMINATION
Day 12 (Dec.16.10) POST-EXAMINATION FREE DAY (LAST SESSION DAY OF THE YEAR)
Day 13 (Jan.04.11) Lecture of Professor
To discuss the political Francisco Nemenzo
thought of Machiavelli in The (DVD)
Prince and Discourses.
Day 14 (Jan.06.11) NICCOLO MACHIAVELLI (1469-1527) Lecture-discussion Curtis, pp. 215-17,
Continuation of the discussion 1. Brief biography 219-29.
of Machiavelli a. What was reborn in the Renaissance? Readings in Social
b. Domestic and foreign rivalries Science II, pp. 86-95.
c. Second secretary of the chancery
d. Foreign missions to France and Vatican
Day 15 (Jan.11.11) 2. Political thought of Machiavelli Group-discussion
a. Break between politics and ethics
b. Establishment of a “new order” and its
preservation
c. The ecclesiastical principality
d. Nationalism and liberation
3. Machiavelli’s place in the history of political
thought
Day 16 (Jan.13.11) Galileo’s Dialogo
To describe the Scientific (DVD) Discovery
Revolution Channel
Day 17 (Jan.18.11) Lecture of Professor
To present an overview of the Carolina G. Herandez
social contract theories (DVD)
Day 18 (Jan.20.11) THOMAS HOBBES (1588-1679) Lecture-discussion Curtis, pp. 354-370.
To describe the nature of 1. Brief biography
human beings in the “state of a. Educational background Readings in Social
nature”. b. Tutor in the household of the Earl of Science II, pp. 96-109.
Devonshire
To discuss the social contract c. Civil war: Crown versus Parliament
between the ruler(s) and the d. Political sanctuary in France
ruled. 2. Social contract theory of Thomas Hobbes
a. Human passions determine good and evil
To discuss how social contract b. Human passions lead to enmity and
had shaped the nature of civil distrust
Social Science II | 4

society. c. The extreme insecurity in the state of


nature prevented a socially ordered life
d. The “mutuality of protection and
obligation” in civil society
e. The state is superior to the church
Day 19 (Jan.25.11) JOHN LOCKE (1632-1704) Lecture-discussion Curtis, pp. 359-60,
To describe the nature of 1. Brief biography 372-89.
human beings in the state of a. Family background
nature. b. Education and academic career in Oxford Readings in Social
University Science II, pp. 109-26.
To explain how the social c. Career in politics
contract had shaped the nature d. Glorious revolution of 1688
of civil society 2. Social contract theory of John Locke
a. Divine rights of king questioned
b. “True original extent, and end of civil
government”
c. State of nature
• Origin of property
• Origin and end of civil society
• Limited government
• Right to resist
3. Locke’s economic thought
a. Theory of property
b. Labor theory of value
c. Money
Day 20 (Jan.27.11) JEAN-JACQUES ROUSSEAU (1712-1778) Lecture-discussion Curtis, Volume 2, pp.
To describe the nature of 1. Brief biography 15-17, 18-34
human beings in the state of a. Family background
nature. b. Adventurous life: from Geneva to Savoy Readings in Social
to Paris Science II, pp. 127-45.
To discuss the injustice of the c. A niche in the literary and philosophical
social contract that aims to circles of Paris and the world
protect property. 2. Social contract theory of Rousseau
a. Passions of self-preservation and fellow
To discuss the concept of a just feeling of the primitive person
social contract. b. Origin of civil society
c. Social contract for a just civil society
d. The legislator and establishment of a just
civil society
e. Sovereign and government
f. How the government should be
constituted
Day 21 (Feb.01.11) Integration Group-discussion
To synthesize the realist views
of human nature and their
effect on politics

To compare the social contract


theories of Hobbes, Locke and
Rousseau.
Day 22 (Feb.03.11) SECOND EXAMINATION
Day 23 (Feb.08.11) POST-EXAMINATION FREE DAY
Day 24 (Feb.10.11) Liberal Political Economy Lecture of Professor
Emmanuel de Dios
(DVD)

Day 25 (Feb.15.11) ADAM SMITH (1723-1790) Lecture-discussion Curtis, Volume 2, pp.


To explain how the nature of 1. Brief biography 105-17.
human beings shape society’s a. Family background
economic structure (laissez b. Education and academic career Readings in Social
faire) c. Tutor in the household of the Duke of Science II, pp. 145-50.
Buccleuch
To discuss Smith’s views on 2. Smith’s theory of morality
value, production, a. The question of virtue is intimately linked
distribution, and economic with sentiment.
growth. b. Sympathy and imagination make a person
a social being.
Social Science II | 5

c. Private interest for common benefit


3. Laissez faire: “The obvious and simple system
of natural liberty”
a. Aim of society – “to better the condition
of man” – best served through its
opulence
b. Division of labor and productivity
c. Theory of value
d. Analysis of distribution
e. Theory of capital accumulation
Day 26 (Feb.17.11) David Ricardo (1772-1823) Lecture-discussion Readings in Social
To discuss Ricardo’s 1. Brief biography Science II, pp. 151-55.
contributions to the theory of a. Family background
value and theory of b. Public debates over the currency issue
comparative advantage. and corn law
c. Influence of Adam Smith and James Mill
2. Contributions to classical political economy
a. Theory of rent
b. Reformulation of theory of value
c. “Laws of distribution”
d. Law of comparative advantage
Day 27 (Feb.22.11) JOHN STUART MILL (1806-1873) Lecture-discussion Curtis, Volume II, pp.
To discuss his theory of liberty 1. Brief biography 105-8, 125-29.
a. Unorthodox education
To discuss his revision of b. Intellectual influences Readings in Social
utilitarianism 2. Social and political thought Science II, pp. 155-59,
a. Revision of utilitarianism 160-77.
To discuss his revisions of b. Education is the responsibility of the
classical political economy. government
c. Progress: from barbarism to civilization
d. Modern representative government
e. Liberty: precondition for modern society
f. Revision of classical political economy
• Revision of theory of value
• Modification of law of distribution
• Acceptance of stationary state
• State intervention
Day 28 (Feb.24.11) Marxism Through Time Lecture of Professor Curtis, Volume 2, pp
To explain social change from Francisco Nemenzo 155-80.
the perspective of dialectical- (DVD)
historical materialism.
KARL MARX (1818-1883)
1. Brief biography
a. Family background
b. Education
c. Expulsion from Prussia and exile
2. Dialectical historical materialism
a. Class struggle and social change
b. Critique of liberal political economy
c. Vision of perfect society
Day 29 (Mar.01.11) Continuation Group-discussion
Day 30 (Mar.03.11) The Rise of Positivism and the Seeds of Social Lecture of Professor
To discuss Positivism and Constructivism Cynthia Rose
Social Constructivism as Banzon-Bautista
philosophy of social science (DVD)

Day 31 (Mar.08.11) EMILE DURKHEIM (1858-1917) Lecture-discussion Readings in Social


To explain the implication of 1. Brief biography Science II, pp. 219-31.
social solidarity on the nature 2. Division of labor in society
of society. a. Two kinds of solidarity
b. Two kinds of societies
c. Collective consciousness and society
d. Social differentiation and division of labor
e. Origin of social differentiation
Social Science II | 6

To discuss Weber’s views on MAX WEBER (1864-1920) Readings in Social


economics and politics. 1. Brief biography Science II, pp. 207-19.
To explain his theory of social 2. Sociology of religion
science. 3. Political sociology
4. Theory of social science
Day 31 (Mar.10.11) Current Debates in the Social Sciences Lecture of Professor
To compare modern and Randolph S. David
postmodern views on human (DVD)
nature and nature of society.
Day 32 (Mar.15.11) Integration Group-discussion
To synthesize the recent views
regarding the relationship
between the state and market.

To compare recent views


about society and politics.
Day 33 (Mar.17.11) THIRD EXAMINATION
END OF SOCIAL SCIENCE II

COURSE GRADE CONVERSION

RAW SCORE GRADE EQUIVALENT


95-100 1.00
90-94 1.25
85-89 1.50
80-84 1.75
76-79 2.00
72-75 2.25
68-71 2.50
64-67 2.75
60-63 3.00
50-59 4.00
00-50 5.00

OTHER CLASS POLICIES

1. Since attendance is part of the final grade, everyone is encouraged to complete all sessions. The maximum number of
absences allowed, per University rule, is six (6). Exceeding the limit means a final grade of 5.00, irrespective of the
nature of the absences (excused or unexcused).
2. No student would be allowed to enter the classroom if he/she is late for more than 20 minutes. At the same time, no
student must leave the classroom more than 15 minutes before the end of the class period.
3. Proper decorum is a must to ensure a harmonious and lively environment for discussion. Avoid unnecessary
interruption. Attitude fitting for a college student is expected in class.
4. Related to proper decorum, use of mobile phones is strictly prohibited. All phones should be turned off or put in
silent mode. Should the use of phone be inevitable, the student may silently exit the room without disrupting any on-
going discussion. Failure to comply with this rule will cause the class to take a quiz.
5. Absolutely no make-up exams will be given to those who miss any of the three exams unless the student has a valid
excuse (i.e., illness) and an official excuse slip or medical certification noted by the University Health Service.
6. No additional or special course work will be given to any student.
7. Eating is allowed inside the room except for any kind of food that may cause disturbance during class sessions.
8. Smiling is not prohibited.

CONSULTATION Office : Rm 3001, Faculty Centre, Bulwagang Rizal


Hours : 1300-1600HRS, Tuesdays and Thursdays
Email : janrobert.go@gmail.com, jrgo1@up.edu.ph

DATES TO REMEMBER

First Examination 14 December 2010, Tuesday


Second Examination 03 February 2011, Thursday
Third Examination 17 March 2011, Thursday
Last Day of Dropping 21 February 2011, Monday
End of Classes 22 March 2011, Tuesday

Вам также может понравиться