Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Rev. 1
Score Item Weight Description Data Owner Score Red (0) Amber (1) Green (2) Comments
1. Questionnaires properly
filled, 2. Bid format used.
Meets Meets all
Compliance to RFI/ 3. Proposal confirms BIG Engineering/ Meets two(2)
20% 0 three(3) four (4)
RFP documents specifications and scope Procurement or less items
items items
of work, 4. Meets
submission deadline
100% 33%
Supplier performance below B.I.G. expectations. Robust Corrective action plans must be agreed and in place with
60% - 79% Yellow
B.I.G..
1%-59% Red Supplier performance unacceptable to B.I.G.. Robust corrective actions plans must be agreed and inplace with B.I.G.
Supplier Name:
Supplier's
Make sure to have comments for each
Representative criteria both positive and negative.,
Customer's Type in the Scores
Representative
Score Item Weight Description Data Owner Score Red (0) Amber (1) Green (2) Comments
1. Questionnaires properly
filled, 2. Bid format used.
Meets Meets all
Compliance to RFI/ 3. Proposal confirms BIG Engineering/ Meets two(2)
20% 0 three(3) four (4)
RFP documents specifications and scope Procurement or less items
items items
of work, 4. Meets
submission deadline
100% 33%
Supplier performance below B.I.G. expectations. Robust Corrective action plans must be agreed and in place with
60% - 79% Yellow
B.I.G..
Supplier performance unacceptable to B.I.G.. Robust corrective actions plans must be agreed and inplace with
1%-59% Red
B.I.G.
AFTER S
Number of escalated
10% Actual count of escalations
requests for help
100%
Manufacturing/
1 4 per quarter 1 per quarter 0 per quarter
Engineering
More than 1
Engineering/ More than 3 day, Less less than 1
1
Procurement days late than 3 days day late
late
Parts
Engineering/
1 Meets none available at Meets both
Procurement
time of order
Within agreed
timeline, Ahead, correct
Engineering/
1 Meets none correct and and quality
Manufacturing
quality materials
materials
50%
Comments