Introduction

This material will only assess the possibility and

probability of achieving a state of mind that
transcends your default state. The default state of
mind is the average or “normal” state, which is only
affected and shaped by the passage of time and through
our experiences. We can incrementally improve our
thinking and ideologies, but achieving an exponential
growth to higher consciousness requires an
understanding of a specific approach and a model to
confirm the method. I will address the issue of how to
achieve perfect consciousness in separate material,
which I will publish in the near future to compliment
this material.
 Table of Contents:

Chapter 1: Bilateral Evaluation Method

Section A: Terminology
Section B: How does this method work?
Section C: Examples
Chapter 2: Mental Influence Model
Section A: Is ₼=1 possible?
Section B: Examples
 This content is free!
But your support helps me
publish more material & conduct
more research.
Consider supporting me using the
information below.
 Chapter 1:
Bilateral Evaluation Method

The Bilateral Evaluation Method is a method to survey

test subjects or a group of individuals and use the
data to determine mental stability.

Section A: Terminology

₼ - Mental Stability
This symbol represents mental stability as a value with
minimum (-4) and maximum (5) parameters. You will
understand why this is the case when we arrive at
Section B. Anyone who wants to attain perfect
consciousness, has to have a mental stability of ₼=1
for reasons we will fully cover by the end of this
chapter.

-₻ - Subconscious Mind
This symbol will be used to refer to the subconscious
mind.

ȶ- Conscious Mind
This symbol will be used to refer to the conscious
mind.
Section B: How does the method work?

This method requires you to evaluate different aspects

of your/test subject’s psyche as well as knowing the
status of physical mental health issues, such as
genetic illnesses, other diseases or damage due to
injury.

This method requires you to score each aspect of the

psyche from -1 to 1 depending on the type of
consciousness and relevant criteria in order to
calculate mental stability.

₼=-₻+ȶ

As you can see above, first we need the values for the
subconscious and conscious mind to calculate the mental
stability. First let’s take a look at the Subconscious
solution below.

-₻=SD+P+BF+E

Typically the values for one aspect of the subconscious

is the same for all the other aspects SD, P, BF and E.
However, you can only assign 3 different values for
each aspect of the subconscious mind that correspond to
3 choices as shown below:
0=Damaged brain, Physical illness, genetic illness.

-0.5=Intoxicated state of mind (Alcohol, Narcotics,

some Medication).

-1=Healthy brain

SD – Self Deception
Our subconscious mind has a way of tricking us, either
in the form of denial or forcing us to accept double
standards to protect our flawed reasoning and beliefs.
It also manifests to prevent us from achieving our
goals and desires in an attempt to mitigate the risk of
failure and disappointment by making us give up,
instead of trying. After all, you cannot fail if you
never try.

P – Policy
Policy is the part of the subconscious mind responsible
for forming habits and routines. This part of the
subconscious mind is often responsible for the feeling
of discomfort when a routine or habit is broken. It is
possible to enforce new routines by repeating the
behavior. Your subconscious will automate the behavior
if you actively reinforce it every day.

BF – Bodily Functions
This is perhaps the easiest of the subconscious
parameters to understand. Your heart rate and breathing
cycles are mostly governed by the subconscious mind,
alongside a myriad of other bodily processes.
E – Emotions
This parameter is debated somewhat, however the truth
of the matter is, our emotions are subconscious, we
only act upon them consciously after the fact. This
isn’t such a huge setback, since we can however control
how we react to these emotions. With enough practice we
can control the persistence of these various emotions.

Now let’s move on to the conscious side of the mind.

This time we rely on more than just three values per
parameter across the board. These values must be chosen
by evaluating each conscious parameter individually,
let’s go through it below.

ȶ=U+C+A+SR+I

This time it’s up to you to evaluate and judge the

score of each conscious parameter. You can assign a
score from 0-1 using any amount of decimal places for
accuracy.

Example:
Bad score: 0.21
Average score: 0.5
Good score: 0.8745
U – Understanding
Understanding is identical to comprehension. This
parameter measures the knowledge, gullibility and
logical reasoning of the test subject. To evaluate this
parameter you must take the following into
consideration:

 Intelligence
 Logic & Reasoning
 Gullibility
 Knowledge and diversity of knowledge

C – Creativity
We are all familiar with creativity, however I still
feel I should add this: Creativity in its purest form
is a direct measure of originality and out of the box
thinking, however, taking an old concept and reviving
it in your own unique manner, shows a level of
creativity as well. The point to take away is that we
should always take a balanced perspective when scoring
creativity. The following should be taken into
consideration when scoring this parameter:

 Imagination
 Ability to customize existing ideas and concepts
 Ability to derive original ideas and concepts
 Eccentric & unfathomable behavior
 Social creativity (individuality)
A – Awareness
Awareness is a critical part of our conscious mind,
however, modern life offers a huge amount of
distractions. This draws us away from the present
moment and causes our awareness to fade away. This can
lead to a sort of trance state where perception falls
away, when this happens we are usually highly
susceptible to subliminal influence. To evaluate the
following parameter, take the following into
consideration:

 Evaluate their focus during the scoring session

 Test their susceptibility to indoctrination
 Test if the subject is easily startled

SR – Self-Reflection
This parameter measures the subject’s introspection.
Typically you can evaluate this parameter by asking
about the subject’s philosophy and try to steer the
conversation to an existential topic. Some test
subjects I have evaluated has shown to block out self-
reflective tendencies. They show a real fear when
confronted with this question. When scoring this
parameter take the following into consideration:

 Ask about their personal philosophy

 Ask about their thoughts on their place in the
universe
 Discuss the nature of reality and asses the
responses.
I – Instinct
Some people debate the conscious classification of this
parameter, but let me assure you, we do indeed act on
our instincts consciously. This is a result of bodily
functions which is a subconscious parameter, but this
results in our instinctive drive being triggered, which
consciously drives the human race to act on their
instincts. Therefore we can conclude that instinct does
indeed belong in the conscious category. To evaluate
this parameter, take the following into consideration:

 Self-preservation/self-neglect
 Dominant or submissive character traits
 Motivation and drive
 Does the subject engage in Social Bonding or
Isolation

We have covered the Bilateral Evaluation Method, now

let’s move on to some examples.

Section C: Examples

We will now focus on two hypothetical human subjects,

let’s suppose we already evaluated these test subjects
and determined their mental stability. Let’s have a
look below

Average mental stability

₼=-₻+ȶ
₼=(-1)+(-1)+(-1)+(-1)+(0.5)+(0.5)+(0.5)+(0.5)+(0.5)
₼=-1.5

Human A - Timothy

₼=-₻+ȶ
₼=(-1)+(-1)+(-1)+(-1)+(0.5)+(0.65)+(0.3)+(0.4)+(0.3)
₼=-1.85

Human B - Monica

₼=-₻+ȶ
₼=(-1)+(-1)+(-1)+(-1)+(1)+(1)+(1)+(1)+(1)
₼=1

Human A – Timothy
Timothy has a below average mental stability, yet not
deviating too far from the average. Result: -1.85

Human B – Monica
Monica has achieved a perfect score, she shows real
potential. She may have the gift of perfect
consciousness. We cannot jump so quickly to that
conclusion though. Next we need to find out if ₼=1 is
really possible to achieve. We need a model to
determine mental influence. If the model and the data
can show that Monica can influence both her
subconscious and conscious mind at will, then we can
conclude that Monica can indeed possess perfect
consciousness.

Let’s move on to the Mental Influence Model. You will

need to get familiar with it, the model is an excellent
tool. This model can also make predictions about mental
states and influence that was previously thought to be
impossible to calculate.
 Chapter 2:
Mental Influence Model

Section A: Is ₼=1 possible?

The short answer is yes, but to see why this is the

case, we’ll have to go through some material and
educate ourselves on the Mental Influence Model.

Terms
i – Influence
Ti – Total influence
r{} - Reflectivity

Diagrams and Formulas

In order for us to ascertain whether ₼=1 is possible

we will have to use the data of our evaluation results
and input the data into the MIM formula to get the
mental influence i[₼].
If: i[₼] = more than zero
Then: The test subject only has influence over their
conscious mind. (This is the expected result for
average humans).

If: i[₼] = Less than zero

Then: The test subject only has influence over their
subconscious mind (Exceptionally rare occurrence).

If: i[₼] = Exactly zero

Then: The test subject can influence their conscious
and subconscious mind at will. (If Monica’s result
equals zero, then perfect consciousness is possible).

i[₼]=Ti[(ȶ.r{ȶ})-(-₻.r{-₻})]

Mental influence=Total influence of (Conscious score X

reflective score)-(Subconscious score X reflective
score)

To get the total influence of both types of

consciousness, you have to plot each individual
parameter of consciousness against each parameter of
the subconscious.

U vs. -SD
U vs. -P
U vs. -BF
U vs. -E
C vs. -SD
C vs. -P
C vs. -BF
C vs. –E
A vs. -SD
A vs. -P
A vs. -BF
A vs. –E
SR vs. -SD
SR vs. -P
SR vs. -BF
SR vs. –E
I vs. -SD
I vs. -P
I vs. -BF
I vs. -E

Ti[(ȶ.r{ȶ})-(-₻.r{-₻})]= Ti[(C.r{C})-(-BF.r{-BF})]+all
the other influence results using the same method

Above in the highlighted section, we can see the

formula to get the influence of Creativity against
Bodily Functions (For example: Completing a piece of
art can cause excitement and cause an increase in heart
rate.)
In order to get the reflectivity values we need to plot
out the formula above on the MI Diagram. Let’s get
familiar with the diagram below.

F
D

B
A
A – Consciousness mirror
This is the interaction line, this line is considered
to be the line of interaction between the conscious and
subconscious mind

B – Probability wave
This indicates the fact that every interaction has a
50% chance to reflect and never occur due to
uncertainty or anomalies.

C – Consciousness influence line

Blue line.
Blue always = conscious mind.
Red always = subconscious mind.

To plot this blue line, start the line using your

evaluation data. Use the value for creativity to get
your starting position, in this case C=0.65
Conscious/Subconscious lines always Move from the
starting position to the exact middle of the diagram,
called the point of interaction.

On the opposite side of the consciousness mirror is the

red line, the same rules apply, BF=-1
D – Reflection line
All Consciousness influence lines has a reflectivity
probability of 50% due to Uncertainty and unforeseen
anomalies.

The reflection is always a perfectly mirrored line,

once you have the consciousness line, you can easily
see where the reflection line must be drawn.

After you draw the lines, use the starting points of

the reflections to get the reflective values.
r{C} and r{-BF}
r{0.35} and r{0}

E – Total Influence Line

After you calculated the Formula you have to plot the
result onto the diagram.

=Ti[(C.r{C})-(-BF.r{-BF})]
=Ti[(0.65.r{0.35})-(-1.r{0})]
=Ti[(0.65 x 0.35)-(-1 x 0)]
=Ti[(0.2275)-(0)]
=0.2275
The way to do this is to ensure the First point on the
diagram (Left side) minus the last point (Right Side)
of the line equals the result of your answer.

Example:
If you look at the solid black line you will see the
line starts at 0.2275 and ends on the right side on 0
to accurately depict the result of 0.2275

F – Total Influence Reflection Line

This is the reflection of the Total influence line and
has to follow the same rules as the other reflection
lines. It has to perfectly mirror the Total Influence
Line.

Last Step: Calculating the total influence

Use the same calculations to get the influence for all
the other aspects of consciousness. Once you have your
values you can do the final calculation.

i[₼]=Ti[(ȶ.r{ȶ})-(-₻.r{-₻})]

Section B: Examples

Timothy
Assume we have done the calculations for all of the
aspects of consciousness and get the following result
based on the evaluation data.
i[₼]=1.05

As we can see, the value is positive, therefore Timothy

only has influence over his conscious mind, which is
the average expected result

Now we can plot all the consciousness influence lines

on the diagram together and lastly we draw our total
influence line for Timothy as shown below
Monica
Let’s assume we have calculated the mental influence
for Monica as well, using the evaluation data. When we
do that using the data from our evaluation, we get the
following result.

i[₼]=0

Success! Monica has a mental influence value of 0. She

has the ability to influence both her subconscious and
conscious mind, therefore we can conclude that she has
achieved a state of perfect consciousness if her
evaluation results are unbiased and accurate.
Let’s have a look at Monica’s MI diagram now.

As we can see, the diagram is symmetrical and reflects

the balance between Monica’s conscious and subconscious
mind. These diagrams are helpful for analysis and
predicting certain behaviors.
 This content is free!
But your support helps me
publish more material & conduct
more research.
Consider supporting me using the
information below.