Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Dr. Rosenberg
3 May 2019
is an alternative gene editing software.CRISPR can now be found worldwide and can even be
bought off of the internet. This technique has been applied to food, babies and other living
organisms. This tool has benefited our society by resurrecting extinct species, correcting genetic
diseases, creating new healthier and sustainable foods, and the possibility to cure cancer. This
technique is overused and is not always necessary. CAS9 may help bring a sustainable future but
it needs to be more regulated.
Crispr has allowed our society to advance, enabling us to change the identity of human
embryos which limit human diversity. The engineering of
certain organisms limits diversity in its population and
prevents evolution. “The attributes that we now consider part
of the vast spectrum of human diversity might, in time,
become medicalized.”(Genetics and Education) In nature we
have been able to adapt and survive in certain environments
which help determine our genetic characteristics. Parents now
hold the power to alter and to control their child's identity
using genetic engineering. When genetic engineering is
present the parents must think of the best interest of the child.
Individuals can leave a certain culture using genetically
engineering. The offspring should have the right to shape its
own identity, and have its own characteristics. “Its identity does not develop in
a vacuum. It is rather the
result, among other things, of a process of
socialization which occurs within a specific
cultural context." (Genetics and Education)
People have the right to belong to a culture.
Also, when genetic engineering is present all
offsprings will begin to look alike, causing less
diversity. “The engineering of embryos create
"designer babies" whose appearance, IQ,
creative talents and athletic ability will have
been customized by using DNA from alternative
sources.”(Trusting the future). When parents mess with a child's genetics it changes the natural
identity of the child and prevents equality.
3
Genetic engineering is unethical due to the pressing concerns of genetic diversity, and
child identity concerns using tools such as Crispr. Once genetic engineering is present in our
ecosystem it becomes impossible to erase. The adapted genes will affect the plants in the
surrounding area and cause a catastrophic ripple effect on our planet. GMO’s reduce genetic
diversity and can cause health damages. Also, when parents have the ability to control every
aspect of a child’s characteristics, it prevents the child from understanding their identity. GMO’s
need to be more regulated until more information about its impacts are understood. Humans
should not have the right to play God with our evolution in the balance.
5
Works Cited
Chan, David K. “The Concept of Human Dignity in the Ethics of Genetic Research.” Bioethics,
vol. 29, no. 4, May 2015, pp. 274–282. EBSCOhost, doi:10.1111/bioe.12102.
“10 Reasons to Avoid GMOs.” Institute for Responsible Technology,
responsibletechnology.org/gmo-education/10-reasons-to-avoid-gmos/.
Saey, Tina Hesman. “Explainer: How CRISPR Works.” Science News for Students, 4 Dec. 2017,
www.sciencenewsforstudents.org/article/explainer-how-crispr-works.
Sternberg, Samuel. Crack in Creation - the New Power to Control Evolution. Vintage Publishing,
2017.
Saulter, Stephanie. “Trusting the Future? Ethics of Human Genetic Modification (Op-Ed).”
www.livescience.com/45392-ethics-of-altering-human-genetics.html.
SIGMA, 2020.
Ravitsky, Vardit. “Genetics and Education: The Ethics of Shaping Human Identity.” Mount
Sinai
Journal of Medicine, vol. 69, no. 5, Oct. 2002, p. 312. EBSCOhost,
search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=8796833&site=ehost-live.