Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Medicare, the nation's largest health insurance program, was created in 1965 as an amendment to the
Social Security program. It provides health insurance to persons age 65 and older, to qualifying persons
under age 65 with permanent disabilities, and to persons of any age suffering from permanent kidney
failure.
When Medicare was created, older Americans were facing a health care crisis. The Social Security
system was failing to protect them against the greatest single cause of economic dependency in old age:
the high cost of medical care. In 1950 only 1 in 8 older Americans had health insurance and it was difficult
to obtain private health insurance because insurers had long considered this population a "bad risk”.
Since its implementation, Medicare has been successful in providing health insurance coverage to
generations of Americans who could not obtain it elsewhere, guaranteeing reliable access to most
medically reasonable and necessary health care services. Medicare has proven that good government
can create a successful single-payer health plan for older and disabled Americans.
Today, the Medicare program has become a target for ideologues who ignore Medicare’s successes and
who refuse to acknowledge the failure of private commercial and non-commercial health insurance
companies to offer secure, easy to access health insurance for older Americans and those with
permanent disabilities.
Today, rising health care costs affecting all Americans have prompted debate about how to guarantee that
Medicare will be available to future generations of Americans. NEA and its affiliates must lead in this
debate.
Many have attacked the fundamental structure of the Medicare program and have sought to undermine
the guarantee of health coverage that the Medicare program provides. The Medicare Modernization Act
(MMA), passed in 2003, brought some outpatient prescription drug coverage to Medicare beneficiaries,
but it also brought for profit and non-profit private health insurers back into the “solution”.
“A war against Medicare had been developing for years, with the goals of replacing it totally with
private insurance and discrediting the social insurance concept. Enactment of the Medicare
Modernization Act of 2003 (MMA) was a victory for privatizers in the first major battle of that war.
It virtually embodies a master plan for the war. The MMA undermines the health insurance
program that senior citizens and people with long-term disabilities have relied on for many years.
It strips away protections that people with Medicare continue to need. Moreover, if [certain] MMA’s
provisions are allowed to remain in force, they will continue to erode traditional Medicare”
Reclaim and Strengthen Medicare: Undo the Damage to Health Care for All, Rekindling Reform,
May 30, 2007.
WHY SHOULD NEA MEMBERS CARE?
Medicare is a benefit that helps to improve and maintain the quality of health for members and their
families. Several hundred thousand NEA members currently receive Medicare benefits. Eventually all
NEA members will need Medicare benefits. Without Medicare benefits, our members will not be able to
obtain high quality, affordable and comprehensive health care. Rising medical costs and efforts to
privatize Medicare directly threaten the future of Medicare.
Traditional Medicare is a highly successful and efficient single-payer federal health insurance program for
America’s elderly and disabled. There are over 44 million Medicare beneficiaries as of January 2008 with
37 million age 65 and older and 7 million under age 65 with permanent disabilities.
Medicare is financed through payroll tax revenues, general revenue and premiums paid. Medicare
beneficiaries may purchase supplemental health insurance policies, commonly called Medigap policies,
from private health insurance companies. These Medigap policies cover many medical co-payment costs.
Non-traditional Medicare plans sponsored by private insurers are known as Medicare Advantage (MA)
plans. MA plans fall into several different types, however all exist outside traditional Medicare and are
subsidized by the federal government over and above traditional Medicare payments. These subsidies
favor private health insurance plans and their shareholders at the expense of traditional Medicare and as
a result threaten the long-term viability of the Medicare trust fund.
NEA supports federal legislation that would 1) Require Medicare Part D drug price negotiation by the
federal government and, 2) Reduce and eventually eliminate the excessive subsidy payments being
made to Medicare Advantage plans. NEA is also reviewing proposals that would further means test
certain parts of Medicare
Between 2007 and 2009, the federal government is phasing in a means-testing formula for Part B
premiums. This is an important issue for many NEA members.
When fully phased-in by 2009, the means-testing formula will significantly increase the
percentage of Part B premiums for higher income recipients. Medicare beneficiaries with higher
incomes will pay higher premiums on a graduated scale based on their annual income.
• Income brackets for most unmarried beneficiaries filing individual returns. Amounts are doubled
for married couples filing joint return. The definition of income for means testing is the Modified
Adjusted Gross Income including wages, interest, and income from qualified retirement accounts,
capital gains, and alimony received.
Additional Resources.
1. Social Security and Medicare Fact Sheet, 2008, Bureau of National Affairs.
http://insidenea.nea.org/Departments/CBMA/CBC/HealthcareandRetirementBenefits/Documents/
Fact%20Sheets-Briefs-
Talking%20Points/Fact%20Sheet%202008%20Medicare%20Social%20Security.pdf
2. Explanation of original Medicare and other Medicare benefits. Medicare and You 2008. Centers
for Medicare and Medicaid Services and at
http://www.medicare.gov/Publications/Pubs/pdf/10050.pdf.
3. Medicare Part D. Medicare and You, 2008 and “Overview of Medicare Part D Organizations,
Plans and Benefits By Enrollment in 2006 and 2007.” Kaiser Family Foundation at
http://www.kff.org/medicare/7710.cfm
4. Medicare Part C (Medicare Advantage). Medicare and You, 2008 and “Medicare Advantage Fact
Sheet.” Kaiser Family Foundation at http://www.kff.org/medicare/upload/2052-10.pdf
5. Financing Medicare: An Issue Brief”. Kaiser Family Foundation. January 2008 Kaiser Family
Foundation at http://www.kff.org/medicare/upload/7731.pdf
6. Medicare: A National Treasure for Forty Years, July 2005, Medicare Rights Center at
http://www.medicarerights.org/medicare_works.pdf
7. The Case for Standardizing and Simplifying Medicare Private Health Plans, Medicare Rights
Center, from Informed Choice – Sept. 2007, California Health Advocates at
http://www.medicarerights.org/MRC-CHA_MAstandardization.pdf
8. Too Good to Be True: The Fine Print in the Medicare Private Health Plan Benefits, April, 2007,
Medicare Rights Center at http://www.www.medicarerights.org/MA_care_problems.pdf
9. After the Goldrush: The Marketing of Medicare Advantage and Part D Plans, Regulatory
Oversight of Insurance Companies and Agents Inadequate to Protect People with Medicare, from
Informed Choice – Jan. 2007, California Health Advocates at
http://www.www.medicarerights.org/CHA-MRC-brief_goldrush.pdf