Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
83
IRC:SP:73-2015
Alternatively, Solar Powered Road Markers are more effective and draw attention of drivers and
shall be provided at locations like at Sl. 6 & 8 and also other locations where performance of
normal road studs are not that effective due to street lightings and other roadside activities.
84
IRC:SP:73-2015
e) The obstruction with high value and if damaged by vehicle impact will have
serious consequences
f) The gorge areas of all diverging which are one level above ground
The specific location shall be identified following the criteria given above and the type of crash
attenuators will be based on severity of the situation and shall be indicated in Schedule “B”.
85
IRC:SP:73-2015
86
IRC:SP:73-2015
b) End treatment for steel barrier: If hit, an untreated end of the roadside
barrier can be hazardous, because the barrier beam can penetrate the
passenger compartment and cause the impact vehicle to stop abruptly. End
treatments should, therefore, form an integral part of safety barriers and
the end treatment should not spear vault or roll a vehicle for head on or
angled impacts. The end treatment on approach shall be Modified Eccentric
Loader Terminal (MELT) arrangement as shown in Fig 9.13 and departure
sides it shall be Trailing Terminal (TT) arrangement as shown in Fig 9.14.
The international practices shall be adopted for those details which are not
available in this Manual for MELT and TT arrangements for the end treatment
of 'W' beam.
The 'W' Beam to concrete transition shall be carried out by decreasing the
post spacing, nesting one rail behind another and using steel section behind
the 'W' Beam. The transition between 'W' beam and concrete barrier is
detailed in Fig. 9.15.
c) Placement: Placement recommendations determine the exact layout of the
barrier and shall be made by the design engineer keeping in view the lateral
offset of the barrier and flare rate. The final layout shall be as site-specific
combination of these factors. The barriers shall be as far away from the traffic
as possible and shall preferably have uniform clearance between the traffic
and the hazard. As far as possible, the safety barrier shall be placed beyond
2.5 m of the travelled way. For long and continuous stretches, this offset is
not critical. The distance between the barrier and the hazard shall not be
less than the deflection of the barrier by an impact of a full sized vehicle. In
case of embankments, a minimum distance of 600 mm shall be maintained
between the barrier and the start of embankment slope of a hazard to prevent
the wheels from dropping over the edge.
The 'W' beam and thrie beam perform well on the outside of curves and even
those of relatively small radius. When a kerb exists on the edge of road and
on to close proximity traffic way whether on shoulder or median edge lines,
a distance of 100 mm shall be maintained between vertical face of kerb and
'W' beam or thrie beam face to ensure that impacting vehicle do not vault
over safety barrier and at the same time reduces the nuisance hit. The steel
barrier shall be placed in such a way so as to be collided by vehicle directly.
9.7.3 Road Side Concrete Barriers
a) Design aspects: Roadside concrete safety barriers are rigid barriers having
a sloped front face and a vertical back face. For uniformity New Jersey type
concrete barriers should be used where necessary. Rigid crash barriers
may however be required only in constrained urban location between main
carriageway and service road. The concrete barrier may be pre-cast in
87
IRC:SP:73-2015
88
IRC:SP:73-2015
b) End treatment: The end treatment shall be as per the manufactures details
conforming to EN 1317 Part 2. The wire rope to 'W' beam transition shall
be done Modified Eccentric Loader Terminal (MELT) arrangement as shown
in Fig. 9.18.The termination of wire rope to a rigid or concrete barrier or a
parapet shall be avoided and there shall be a transition from wire rope to
W-beam in-turn to concrete barrier as shown in Fig. 9.19.
c) Placement: The placement of the Wire Rope Safety Barrier shall be
determined by the design engineer and shall be a combination of the
deflection ratios of the barrier and the site-specific conditions. The barrier
shall be placed as far away from the traffic as possible and shall preferably
have uniform clearance. The lateral slope of surface between traffic way
and wire rope safety shall always be flatter than 10:1 so that vehicle bumper
trajectory will not change before an errant vehicle hit the wire rope.
When Wire Rope Safety Barrier is provided in front of a hazard, it shall be so located caters
to the deflection specified by the manufacture. The barrier shall be extended at full height
not less than 30 m in advance of the hazard on the approach side, and shall continue at
full height for 7.5 m beyond the hazard on the departure side. The minimum length of fence
shall be no less than 50 m. If there is a hazard present in the deflection area of the barrier,
then the distance between fence and the hazard shall not be less than that deflection values
described by the manufacture and will depend upon the post spacing.
There shall be at least 1 m setback distance between wire rope safety barrier and the start
of drop or embankment slope. While installing wire rope on a highway carrying two/three-
wheelers and other small vehicles, the deflection as specified by the manufacturer shall be
maintained as set back distance from the start of drop or embankment. The deflection can be
reduced by closer post spacing, however the minimum setback distance shall be ensured.
Wire rope can be installed for curves radii more than 450 m only.
The Wire Rope Safety Barrier shall not be permitted in following situations:
● Where a hazard is present within the deflection area of the fence.
● Where total fence length is less than 50 m
● On a horizontal curves of radius 450 m or less.
● On vertical sag curves of radius less than 3 km.
● Where rate of change in setback is steeper than 1 in 10.
9.7.5 Barriers on Median/Raised Footpath
9.7.5.1 At locations where project is passing through 4-lane or 6 lane configurations
having a narrow median and at locations where barriers have to be install on footpath or
raised platform, the provisions and warrants given in IRC:84 shall govern.
9.7.5.2 The lateral placement of 'W' beam or wire rope barrier on raised platform
of footpath having raised kerb and on embankment sides are pictorially presented in
Fig. 9.20.
89
IRC:SP:73-2015
90
Fig. 9.10 Space Required to Place Crash Attenuators