Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 2

ChessBase Reader 2017 Printout, Leo , 11/05/2019 1

E04 10.Nd2 Na5 11.Qa4 c6


Davies,N [ On 11...c5 White's simplest would be
Lukacs,P 12.dxc5 Bxc5 13.Nxc4 Nxc4
Budapest 1993 14.Qxc4 , with an edge because of
[Nigel Davies] the powerful bishop on g2. ]
12.b4 c3 13.bxa5 cxd2 14.Bxd2
1.d4 Already a sign of a different level of White's strong bishop pair and action
preparedness. Against a player with along the b- and c-files give him all the
Lukacs' expertise in the openings I play here, notwithstanding the doubled
would normally have preferred some a-pawns.
kind of flank opening. Nd5 15.Rab1 Qd7 16.Rfc1 Rfc8
d5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.c4 e6 4.g3 dxc4 17.Qb3 Rab8 18.a4 h6 19.h4 Bd6
5.Bg2 Bd7 6.Ne5 Bc6 7.Nxc6 Nxc6 20.e4 Ne7 21.Qb2 Torturing Black with
8.0-0 Be7 Strangely enough I had half the possibility of Bd2-c3 followed by a
expected this move, even though it had later d4-d5. Accordingly he makes the
rarely been played at the time. During following bid for freedom.
my studies I had noticed that Lukacs' b5 22.axb6 Rxb6
compatriot Istvan Farago had played [ 22...axb6 would have kept Black's
this move and guessed that it might crop pawns intact but would have also left
up. him with very little counterplay. ]
The alternatives seem quite good for 23.Qa1 Rxb1 24.Rxb1 f5 This breaks
White. For example: up White's powerful pawn centre and
[ a) 8...Nxd4?! is met by 9.Bxb7 Rb8 gets access to the d5-square. But the
10.Bg2 Bc5 11.Nd2 c3 12.bxc3 Nb5 downside is that it creates weaknesses
13.Qc2 0-0 14.a4 , as in B.Gulko-V. along the e-file.
Korchnoi, Amsterdam 1989. ] [ 24...c5 would have been a better try,
[ b) 8...Qd7 9.e3 Rb8 10.Qe2 b5 after which 25.Bc3 cxd4 26.Bxd4 f6
11.a4 a6 12.axb5 axb5 13.b3 cxb3 would have left Black worse but on the
14.Nd2 Be7 15.Nxb3 0-0 16.Bd2! board. ]
Rfc8 17.Rfc1 Nd5 was K.Georgiev-V. 25.Re1 Rd8 26.Qa2 Kh8 27.h5 fxe4
Anand, Wijk aan Zee 1989, and here 28.Rxe4 Nd5 29.Qc4 Rf8 30.Qe2 Nc7
18.h4! , intending h4-h5-h6, would 31.Bh3 Rf6 32.Kg2 Trying to improve
have kept an edge for White my position in leisurely style.
according to Anand. ] c5 33.Bc3 Rf8?!
9.e3 0-0 [ It would have been more stubborn to
[ In a later game, S.Polgar-A.Maric, play 33...Nd5 , though this is still
Tilburg 1994, Black tried to improve good for White after 34.Bb2 c4
on this with 9...Qd7 but after 10.Qa4 35.Qxc4 Qb7 36.Qc2 . ]
Nb4 11.Qxd7+ Nxd7 12.Nd2 Nb6 34.Bxe6 Qc6 35.Kg1?!
13.Bxb7 Rb8 14.Bf3 White was [ Missing a stronger option in 35.Qg4!
better thanks to the useful pair of threatening 36 d5 or even 36 Qxg7+
bishops. ] followed by 37 d5+. This variation
ChessBase Reader 2017 Printout, Leo , 11/05/2019 2

would have been immediately


decisive. ]
35...c4?!
[ Black could have defended more
stubbornly with 35...Nd5
when I would have had to find the
variation 36.Bxd5 Qxd5 37.dxc5
Bxc5 38.Qg4 Bxf2+ 39.Kh2 Qb7
40.Qg6 Kg8 41.Bb4! threatening
both 42 Bxf8 and 42 Re7. ]
36.Bxc4 Qxa4 37.d5 Unveiling the
dark-squared bishop on c3 sets up a
new target: Black's king.
Qd7 38.Qe3 Kg8 39.Qe2 a6 40.Rg4
Rf7 41.Qe4 Nb5 42.Bb2 Qa7
43.Qe8+ Bf8 44.d6! Qxf2+ 45.Kh1
[ After 45.Kh1 Qf3+ 46.Kh2 Qf2+
47.Kh3 Black's checks have run out. ]
1-0

Вам также может понравиться