Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 33

FIMDP 2013

DEPT OF COMMUNITY MEDICINE


SRM MEDICAL COLLEGE ,SRM UNIVERSITY
&
UNSW AUSTRALIA

9TH & 10TH JAN 2013


Public private partnership in the
healthcare sector

Padmanesan Narasimhan MBBS MPH PhD


School of Public Health and Community
Medicine
Outline

 Overview of the Indian healthcare system

 PPP model and structure

 Case studies from India


Indian health care system
 1.26 billion population spread across 30 states
 70-80% of the health care is provided by the private
sector (70% in urban and 63% in rural)
 Only 20-30% of the health care is public funded
 Only 20% of outpatient and 45% of inpatient services
were availed from government sector
 Health is a state affair, with central government
contributing to policy, medical education, immunization
etc.
 Health status differs by states, socio economic status
 Spending on healthcare- only 5% of GDP (total value- 40
billion USD)
Indian health care spending
Cont.…

 Public health system


 Inadequate infrastructure
 Non availability of staff, poor access
 Weak referral system
 Recurring funding shortfalls
 Lack of accountability for quality of care

 Private health system


 Most preferred (Est. 70% of all hospitals are in the
private sector)
 Emphasis more on secondary and tertiary care
 Unregulated
 Mandatory registration not practiced
Health spending in select countries
Country Population Infant Health Public
with income mortality expenditure expenditure
of less than rate/1000 to GDP (%) on health to
1$/day (%) total health
expenditure
(%)

India 44.2 57 4.8 17.3

China 18.5 31 2.7 24.9

Sri Lanka 6.6 16 3 45.4

UK - 6 5.8 96.9

USA - 7 13.7 44.1


Out of pocket expenditure as percentage of
private expenditures on health
Major challenges

 Growing population- more aged population

 Increasing middle class- disposable income to


spend on healthcare

 Resurgence of communicable diseases and


increase in non-communicable diseases

 Healthcare divide- the two Indias


Health Infrastructure
State records most dengue cases and deaths this year
Dated 16 October 2012
Major challenges cont…
 Absence of regulation and control, and quality standards
in private health care

 Inadequate and ineffective management of existing


infrastructure

 Inadequate number and quality of health care


professionals

 Declining public investments and expenditure in health


89 dead in Kolkata hospital fire
Dated 09 December 2011
The need for Public Private Partnership (PPP)

 Improve access and reach

 Improve equity

 Better efficiency

 Opportunity to regulate and system accountability

 Improve quality and rationale practice

 Augment resources
PPP models
 Hard infrastructure PPPs (eg. Power, ports, roads etc.)
well developed framework and operate under more
developed markets

 Social structure (education and health) unique


challenges
 Cross subsidy and bankability
 Incentives for the private sector
 Complex governance structures
 Political sensitivity
 Human resource intense
 Operations and maintenance
Framework for PPP
Value chain

 Inputs to outcomes is the value chain


 Key inputs- physical, human resources and financial
 In health care certain inputs are complex eg.
Pharmaceuticals
 Assessment of interdependent nature of the value chain
is important
 Need to unlock hidden values in value chain eg. Utilise
real estate potential of health facilities located in prime
locations
Sector constraints, risks and opportunities
 Disparities in health system eg. States like Uttarakhand
and Odisha have a weak primary care system, ICT
awareness varies by state
 Limited scope for certain models- eg. Cross subsidy in
PPP in India as private sector has developed a
financially viable model
 Unique problems with public health sector- Unionism,
lack of appropriate skills, shortage of personnel and poor
supervision- makes PPP a less attractive proposal
 Combining preventive and curative care in revenue
generation models
Evaluation framework

 Effectiveness

 Efficiency

 Equity

 Financial sustainability
Evaluation- Effectiveness

 Level of success in meeting the objectives

 Effectiveness in monitoring the delivery of the program

 Scalability

 Local stakeholder buy-in


Evaluation- Equity and political considerations

 Ability to benefit the poor and not subsidize the rich

 Political resistance

 Need for wider public sector reforms


Evaluation- Financial sustainability

 Economic return to private sector

 Financing risk

 Private sector appetite and capability


Summary- core principles

 Mutual commitment to health objectives

 Shared decision making and accountability

 Equitable returns and outcomes

 Benefits to the stakeholders

 Limitations- poor quality baseline data


Potential public private partnership models in
Healthcare industry
 Adoption and management contracts- Primary
healthcare centres

 Build, Own and Operate- Diagnostics centres

 Private Finance Initiative scheme- Improving and


developing hospital infrastructure

 Mobile health units

 Telemedicine units

 Insurance schemes
Adoption and management contracts in Primary
healthcare centre
 Addresses the access gap in rural areas

 Two possible ways – Taking over existing PHCs by private sector


and/or mobile clinics

 Limitation- Overall scarcity of skilled healthcare professionals


Built Own and Operate (BOO) - Diagnostics
services
 Addresses the need for creating additional diagnostics

 Private sector will install, maintain and operate diagnostic services

 User charging based

 Limited by the lack of referral network between doctors and health


centres
Private Finance Initiative (PFI) scheme- Hospitals
 Popular in the UK

 Public sector purchase services from private companies


on a long term basis

 Private sector companies construct and maintain


infrastructure to deliver required services

 Collect fee- unitary charge covering the principle and


interest payments

 Payments depend on the performance of the private


contractor
Private Finance Initiative (PFI) scheme- Hospitals
 Addresses the need for developing and improving
infrastructure

 Hard infrastructure and facilities management

 No direct health benefits therefore limited in stakeholder


acceptability
Disease control- Tuberculosis management
 PPM in nearly 270 medical colleges

 Infrastructure, personnel training and monitoring

 Patients benefited with additional services- counselling,


diagnosis and follow up
Insurance schemes

 Yashaswini scheme
 Launched in 2002, in the state of Karnataka

 Premium- Rs 60 annually, provides coverage for


major surgical operations

 No direct health benefits therefore limited in


stakeholder acceptability

 Tamilnadu CM scheme
Summary

 PPPs in health are still at initial stages of development

 Inevitable

 Critical to improve capacity and address the gaps

 Needed to strengthen/deliver quality services

 State/region specific study of the models are required

 A well planned model may deliver a high impact/quality


health care
Challenges for PPP

 No organisational structure/institutional capacity


to manage PPP

 Bureaucracy- distrust private sector

 Long term sustainability

 Legal/regulatory framework
References
Improving health and education service delivery in India through public private partnerships, PPP knowledge series, Asian Development Bank,
2010
Healthcare in India, Emerging market report 2007, Pricewaterhouse Coopers
The Hindu Newspaper, Kasturi and Sons
Hindustan times
Abrantes, A. 2003. Contracting Public Health Care Services in Latin America. In Innovations in Health Service Delivery: The Corporatization of
Public Hospital edited by AS Preker and A Harding. Washington DC: The World Bank. Pages 239-262
ADBI. 2000. Public Private Partnerships in Health. Executive Summary Series No. S34/01. Executive Summary of Proceedings (30 October-3
November),
Ayutthaya, Thailand. Tokyo: Asian Development Bank Institute
Agha S, AM Karim, A Balal and S Sossler. 2003. A Quasi Experimental Study to Assess the Performance of a Reproductive Health Franchise in
Nepal. Commercial
Market Strategies (CMS). Country Research Series Paper No.14. Washington DC
Ahmed, M. 2000. Promoting Public-Private Partnership in Health and Education: The
Case of Bangladesh. In Wang:219-291
Axelsson H, F Bustreo and A Harding. 2003. Private Sector Participation in Child
Health: A Review of World Bank Projects, 1993-2002. Washington, DC: The World Bank
Ashton T., J. Cumming and J. McLean. 2004. Contracting for Health Services in a Public Health System: The New Zealand Experience, Health
Policy69:21-31
Baru, R. 1999. Private Health Care in India: Social Characteristics and Trends. New Delhi: Sage Publications
Bazzoli G, R Stein, J A Alexander, D A Conrad, S Sofaer and S M Shortell. 1997. Public-Private Collaboration in Health and Human Service
Delivery: Evidence from
Community Partnerships. The Milbank Quarterly75(4):533-561
Bennett, S. 1991. The Mystique of Markets: Public and Private Health Care in Developing Countries. PHP Departmental Publication No.4.
London: London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.
Bennett, S and A Mills. 1998. Government Capacity to Contract: Health Sector Experiences and Lessons. Public Administration and
Development18:307-326
Berman, P. 1995. Health Sector Reform: Making Health Development Sustainable. In Health Sector Reform in Developing Countries: Making
Health Development Sustainable edited by Peter Berman. Boston: Harvard University Press

Вам также может понравиться