Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 3

Moodle Rubric for 3rd Year Critical Review Assignment

Main body No - Does not comply with course guidelines. Yes - Complies with course guidelines
of text 0points 2points
formatting

Word No (>10%) Yes (1500 +/- 10%)


Count 0points 2points
achieved

Referencin No - All references are not GMIT School of Science Harvard style. Yes - All references are GMIT School of Science Harvard Style and
g correct 0points are formatted correctly without mistakes and inconsistencies.
7points

Citations No - All citations are not GMIT School of Science Harvard style, do Yes - All citations are GMIT School of Science Harvard Style and are
correct not match references, or are inconsistent in formatting. formatted correctly without mistakes and inconsistencies.Click to edit
0points level
3points

Appropriat No - All resources used are not suitable for a third level science essay. Yes - All resources used are suitable for a third level science
e 0points essay.Click to edit level
resources 5points
used.

Plagiarism Yes - There are issues with plagiarism which must be followed up. No - this document is not plagiarised.
0points 1points

Introductio No introduction Poor - Fails to Needs work: Fails to Good: Introduces the V. Good. Introduces Excellent -
n 0points introduce 2 of the introduce 1 of the sport, demands and the sport, demands and Introduces sport,
following: the sport, following: the sport, energy system but energy systems. physiological
lacks detail or finesse. 12points demands and energy
demands and energy demands and energy 9points systems clearly.
systems. systems. Well referenced.
3points 6points 15points
Ketogenic No introduction Poor: Fails to define. Needs work: Attempt Good: V. Good. Robust and Excellent - Robust
diet 0points 1points made, but student 3points accurate definition. and accurate
defines inaccurately. Well written. definition.
2points 4points Extremely relevant
to the topic.
5points
Body of No articles reviewed. Poor: Fails to present Needs work: Fails to Good: Presents a mix V. Good. presenting Excellent - Presents
the essay. 0points sufficient relevant present sufficient of relevant and not- only relevant results only relevant results
information to support relevant information to very-relevant results and information rather and information
the essay. No evidence support the essay. and information. Some than all results and rather than all
of analysis. Little evidence of analysis but information. Good results and
6points analysis. insufficient. analysis. information.
12points 18points 24points Excellently written
with robust analysis.
30points
Conclusion No conclusion. Poor: Fails to Draws Needs work: Fails to Good: Draws together V. Good. Draws Excellent - Draws
0points together the relevant draws together all some relevant together all relevant together all relevant
information. No relevant information. information but misses information, provides information,
evidence of analysis or Insufficient analysis. out on some points. original analysis and provides in-depth
recommendations. 4points Provides analysis and recommendations. and original analysis
2points recommendations. 8points and
6points recommendations.
Writing is to-the-
point.
10points
Writing Extremely poor. Poor - Not written in a Needs work: Good: V. Good. Excellent - Good
style 0points scientific and academic 4points 6points 8points flow to the writing.
style, or to the level Always written in
expected of a 3rd year the third person and
student. in a formal
2points language. No
repetition. Writing
is brief and clearly
expressed.
10points

Вам также может понравиться