Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
ABSTRACT
Bronchiolitis is a common cause of outpatient visits and hospitalization in children younger than age 2 years. Despite the
frequency with which pediatricians manage this di- agnosis, there is significant variability in care in both the inpatient and
outpatient setting. This may be due in part to changing guidelines set forth by leading pediatric organizations such as the
American Academy of Pediatrics, as increasing evidence emerges that tradi- tional therapies are not effective. This article
reviews current evidence-based practices for diagnosis and treatment of bronchiolitis, and provides an overview of inpatient
manage- ment. [Pediatr Ann. 2017;46(7):e252-e256.] I
n are dren the often with winter, chief filled pediatricians’ complaints with offices young chil- of fever, cough, and
wheezing. Frequently, this constellation of symptoms is a result of bronchiolitis—a clinical diagnosis made in
children younger than age 2 years who present with lower respira- tory signs and symptoms (tachypnea, wheezing,
increased work of breathing) in the setting of viral infection. The ini- tial presenting symptoms are often rhi- norrhea
and cough, which later progress to lower respiratory tract illness.1 It will come as no surprise to a general pedia-
trician that bronchiolitis accounts for more office visits than diaper rash, uri- nary tract infections, or gastroenteritis,
and that bronchiolitis visits make up at least 10% of outpatient pediatric visits
is the most common cause of hospital- ization for infants younger than age 12 months,1 and accounts for 18% of all
hospitalizations for these children (ex- cluding routine births).2 Hospitalizations for bronchiolitis in the United
States result in an estimated $1.73 billion an- nually in hospital charges.2 Despite the high prevalence of
bronchiolitis, mortal- ity rates are low and have been decreas- ing over time (4 per 10,000 patients in 2011).6 Most
deaths from bronchiol- and 16% of hospitalizations for chil-
itis are in infants younger than age 12 dren younger than age 2 years.2,3
This
months and in children with complex article reviews current
evidence-based
chronic conditions (most commonly car- practices for diagnosis and
treatment of
diovascular conditions).6 bronchiolitis, with a focus on inpatient
Despite the frequency with which management.
general pediatricians encounter this The 2014 American Academy of Pe-
diagnosis, practice patterns are often diatrics (AAP) clinical practice
guide-
highly variable.7 We present a series of line on the diagnosis,
management, and
important questions that general pedia- prevention of bronchiolitis
defines bron-
tricians can ask to help them guide their chiolitis as “a constellation of
signs and
care for pediatric patients presenting symptoms occurring in children
younger
with suspected bronchiolitis. than 2 years including a viral upper re-
spiratory tract prodrome followed by
WHAT LABORATORY OR IMAGING increased respiratory effort and
wheez-
STUDIES SHOULD BE OBTAINED IF ing.”1 A number of viral
etiologies have
BRONCHIOLITIS IS SUSPECTED? been identified, but the primary
cause is
The 2014 AAP clinical practice respiratory syncytial virus (RSV),
which
guideline recommends against routinely is the causative virus for up to
80% of
obtaining laboratory or radiographic bronchiolitis in infants.4,5
Bronchiolitis
studies for bronchiolitis, as the diagno- sis can be made clinically.1 As always, Elisa Hampton, MD, is an Assistant Professor of
Clinical Pediatrics, Weill Cornell Medicine. Erika
obtaining a careful history is
key, and it Abramson, MD, MS, is an Associate Professor of Pediatrics and Healthcare Policy & Research, Weill
is important to consider
alternative di- Cornell Medicine.
agnoses such as ingestion of a
foreign Address correspondence to Elisa Hampton, MD, Weill Cornell Medicine, 505 E. 70th Street, 5th Floor,
body. Viral testing is not
recommended New York, NY 10021; email: elp9047@med.cornell.edu.
because there are many viruses
that can Disclosure: The authors have no relevant financial relationships to disclose.
cause bronchiolitis, but the
underlying doi: 10.3928/19382359-20170620-02
viral etiology is generally not correlated
e252 Copyright © SLACK Incorporated
SPECIAL ISSUE ARTICLE
with specific clinical findings or respon- siveness to interventions.5
Therefore, identifying the specific vi- ral etiology is unlikely to add significant information that will change
prognosis or management. In addition, polymerase chain reaction testing may uncover pro- longed viral shedding
from an unrelated prior illness and not be representative of the current etiology for symptoms.1
Routine radiographic imaging is also not recommended due to the high preva- lence of abnormalities on chest
X-ray in infants with bronchiolitis and the lack of correlation between these abnormalities and clinical outcomes.1 In
fact, imaging with chest X-ray is correlated with an in- creased use of antibiotics.8 Furthermore, reducing the
number of chest X-rays has been shown to decrease costs without af- fecting clinical outcomes.9
WHAT PREDISPOSING RISK FACTORS MIGHT LEAD TO A WORSE CLINICAL COURSE?
Elements of a patient’s history that are most relevant for an office visit for bronchiolitis are factors that contribute
to an overall risk assessment for the patient. Risk factors for severe disease in bronchiolitis include age younger than
12 weeks and underlying medi- cal conditions such as premature birth, cardiopulmonary disease, and immuno-
deficiency.1 Children who have had re- current wheezing or have other chronic pulmonary disease likely represent a
distinct population, and the management recommendations reviewed here do not apply to these infants.
In addition to assessing for risk fac- tors for severe disease, another important goal of the initial history and
physical examination in the office setting is to as- sess the patient for severe disease at this moment in time. Of
particular impor- tance is assessing hydration, activity lev- el, mental status, and respiratory effort.
In addition, as bronchiolitis is known to be a dynamic and rapidly changing dis- ease process, assessing the ability of
the family to provide supportive care, under- stand concerning signs and symptoms, and return for follow-up is
critical.
HOW CAN PATIENTS AT HIGH RISK FOR SEVERE DISEASE BE BETTER PROTECTED?
One tool available to the outpatient pediatrician for the prevention of RSV infection is palivizumab. The AAP
Committee on Infectious Diseases pub- lished guidelines in 2014 on the use of palivizumab for prophylaxis of RSV
in- fection.10 This policy statement recom- mends restricting use of palivizumab to a specific group of high-risk
infants, including premature infants with a ges- tational age of less than 29 weeks, pre- term infants with a diagnosis
of chronic lung disease of prematurity (defined as gestational age <32 weeks requir- ing supplemental oxygen >21%
for at least 28 days after birth), and infants younger than age 12 months with he- modynamically significant
congenital heart disease. Other subsets of infants, including those with pulmonary ab- normalities, neuromuscular
disease, or severely immunocompromised states, may also be considered for prophylaxis in some situations.
Additionally, preventive care for all patients should include counseling on hand hygiene, breast-feeding
promotion, and avoidance of tobacco smoke.1
ARE THERE TREATMENTS FOR BRONCHIOLITIS IN THE OFFICE?
The mainstay of treatment is rou- tine supportive care including ensur- ing adequate hydration and educating the
family about signs and symptoms that signal worsening disease and need for re-evaluation. Frequent nasal suc-
tioning to remove secretions is help-
ful, although “deep” suctioning of the nasopharynx has been associated with increased length of stay in hospitalized
children, possibly due to edema of the upper airway.11 Chest physiotherapy with vibration or percussion is also not
recommended as it has not been shown to be beneficial.1
A notable change between an earlier version of the AAP bronchiolitis clinical practice guideline and the current
guide- line relates to the use of bronchodilators. Although some studies show an improve- ment in clinical symptom
scores with the use of albuterol,12,13 evidence does not support their use in decreasing need for hospitalization,
shortening length of stay, or improving oxygen saturation. There- fore, there is a strong recommendation in the 2014
AAP guidelines against using albuterol in patients with bronchiolitis.1 This recommendation relies heavily on a
Cochrane review from 2014 that includ- ed 30 studies of both outpatients and in- patients,14 and included the
consideration that albuterol use can cause side effects such as tremor and tachycardia. Despite the strong
recommendation against the use of bronchodilators for patients with bronchiolitis, some clinicians might still
consider a trial of albuterol for a patient who is wheezing for the first time and has a strong family history of asthma.
It is important to note that although a small number of children with viral-induced wheezing may respond to
bronchodila- tors, there is no reliable way to determine which patients will have reversible air- way obstruction, nor
whether the effect of the medication will be sustained with repeat administration.
Nebulized epinephrine is also not recommended.1 In the inpatient setting, epinephrine use has been associated
with increased length of stay.15,16 In the outpatient setting, a Cochrane review suggested a benefit in reducing
admis- sion on the first day after an emergen-
PEDIATRIC ANNALS • Vol. 46, No. 7, 2017 e253
SPECIAL ISSUE ARTICLE
cy department visit but not at 7 days.17 Given that epinephrine is not gener- ally administered at home and that pro-
longed observation after administration in the outpatient setting is problematic, the authors of the 2014 clinical
practice guideline1 strongly recommend against using epinephrine for the treatment of bronchiolitis.
Similarly, corticosteroids are not recommended due to evidence showing no improvements in admission rates or
venous hydration will be used. Several studies have compared nasogastric and intravenous hydration and found that
clinical outcomes (including duration of oxygen requirement, need for escala- tion of respiratory support, and length
of stay) and parental satisfaction are simi- lar.1 Due to the evidence discussed in the previous section, infants are not
routine- ly treated with albuterol, epinephrine, or corticosteroids.12-14 Earlier evidence showed a possible decrease
in length of stay when nebulized hypertonic saline treatments were used in hospitalized infants; however, a
reanalysis of this data in 2016 did not show benefit after accounting for heterogeneity of the in- cluded patient
populations.19 Therefore, infants hospitalized for bronchiolitis are often not treated with any respiratory medications
at all.
Infants will be treated with oxygen for sustained hypoxia, although increas- ing oxygen saturations above 90%
are generally accepted, so those infants are not treated with supplemental oxygen. This is due to an analysis of the
oxy- hemoglobin dissociation curve, which shows that increasing oxygen saturation above 90% requires large
elevations in arterial pressure of oxygen. Further- more, there is no evidence that increas- ing oxygen saturations
above 90% af- fects clinical outcomes.1
Another change in the 2014 clinical practice guidelines is the option not to monitor hospitalized infants with con-
tinuous pulse oximetry. Studies have found that a perceived need for oxygen is a key driver of length of stay in
bron- chiolitis,20 and that transient hypoxemia is common even in healthy infants.21 A 2016 study22 showed that
most infants evaluated in the emergency department for bronchiolitis who were determined to be stable for
discharge home had either transient or sustained oxygen desaturations. There were no differ-