Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
ISSN 1690-074X
RESUMEN
ABSTRACT
The present article has been elaborated to show like the dynamic behavior
of the technologies demands the existence of a referential model that allows to
define the possible types of organizations, being based on some excellent
guidelines in the chronological evolution of the technologies and since these
have influenced in the organization changes, product of the variations in its
elements: Structure, Processes, Human Resource and Strategy. For it, it has
taking as revision bases exhaustive of referring theoreticians, which they allow
to make the analysis of some proposals of models that define the existing
relations and interrelations between the mentioned elements and the
technology of information, which allows to differentiate the types from
organization.
DONOVAN, J. (1994):
“Business re-engineering with HENDERSON, J.,
information technology”. Englewood VENKATRAMAN, N. (1993):
Cliffs, NJ, Estados Unidos: “Strategic Alignment: Leveraging
Prentice-Hall. information technology for
transforming organizations”. IBM
DRUCKER, P (2003): “Llega System Journal, Vol. 32, No. 1,
una nueva organización a la 1993, pag. 4 - 15.
empresa”. Harvard Business
Review. Gestión del Conocimiento. HOLSAPPLE, C. (2005). The
Ideas con Impacto. Deusto. inseparability of modern Knowledge
Management and computer-based
EARL, M. (1996):”Integrating Technology. Journal of knowledge
IS and then Organization: A Management, 9,1, 42.
framework of Organizational Fit”.
Oxford University Press HUQ, A., RAJA, J., &
ROSENBERG, D. (2006). Linking
EDWARDS, C.; WARD, J.; Organizational Culture and
BITHEWAY, A. (2000): Commuties of practice. In E.
“Fundamentos de Sistemas de Coakes & S. Clarke (Eds.),
Información”. Prentice Hall. 2da. Encyclopedia of Communities of
Edición. practice in information and
Knowledge Mangement.: IDEA
GROUP REFERENCE.
ELSHAW, B. (2006). Critical
Sucess Factors for the successful
introducction of an intellectual KARAHANNA, E.,
capital management system. In E. EVARISTO, J., & SRITE, M.
Coakes & S. Clarke (Eds.), (2005). Levels of Culture and
Encyclopedia of communities of Individual Behavior: An Integrative
practice in information and Perspective. Journal of Global
knowledge management: IDEA Information Management, 13, 2.
GROUP REFERENCE.
LAUBACHER, R.; MALONE,
GLASER, J. (2004): “The T. (1997): “Two scenarios for 21st
Mystery of IT Strategy”, Health Century Organizations: Shifting
Financial Management, Jan 2004; Networks of Small Firms o All
58, 1; ABI/INFORM Global; pg. 82. Encompassing “Virtual Country” ”.
Sloan School of Management,
Massechusetts institute of
GOTTSCHALK, P. (2004). Technology. Working Paper.
Strategic Knowledge Management
21CWP#001. January 1997.
Technology: IDEA GROUP
PUBLISHING. LAUBACHER, R. (2001):”Working
in the 21st Century: Virtual
HAMMER, M.; CHAMPTY, J. Corporation”. Papel de trabajo
(1993): “A manifiesto for Business
presentado en International
Revolution”. Nicholas Brearly
Employment Futures
Publishing. London.
346 Darwin Artigas, Luis Eduardo Mathison, José A. Vásquez, Carlos A. Leal
/Formación Gerencial Año 8, Nº 2 (2009).