Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Abstract
Rhenium, in the form of ammonium perrhenate was recovered from Sarcheshmeh molybdenite concentrates by roasting the
concentrates with slaked lime. The effect of the roasting parameters, such as roasting temperature, roasting materials and gas
composition was investigated. The roasted materials were leached with water in order to separate the water-soluble calcium
perrhenate and the water-insoluble compounds, calcium molybdate and calcium sulfate, that were formed during roasting. Impure
rhenium-bearing solution was passed through a column of strong anionic quaternary resin (Dow IRA 410) for selective absorption
of rhenium ions from the solution. Stripping of the column was carried out with hypochloric acid. The resultant perrhenic acid
solution was exposed to hydrogen sulfide gas in order to precipitate rhenium heptasulfide. To produce ammonium perrhenate, the
sulfide was decomposed by ammonia in the presence of hydrogen peroxide. The solution was evaporated and ammonium
perrhenate crystals were formed. © 1998 Elsevier Science S.A.
2.2. Roasting
2.3. Leaching
Fig. 5. Effect of roast composition and reactor temperature on the Fig. 7. Effect of the incoming gas composition on the rhenium
rhenium recovery. recovery for SR 2060.
248 M.H. Shariat, M. Hassani / Journal of Materials Processing Technology 74 (1998) 243–250
Fig. 8. Effect of the incoming gas composition on the reaction time Fig. 9. Effect of the solution flow rate in the absorbing column on the
for SR 2060. rhenium recovery.
3.2. Leaching and aqueous chemical reactions tion is at only trace level, it increased gradually during
the time of operation, resin saturation being reached
The solution after leaching was evaporated and ana- when the rhenium content of the effluent solution be-
lyzed, a typical analysis is shown in Table 2. The basic came considerable. After loading the resin column, it
rhenium-bearing solution contained about 1 – 2 g l − 1 was washed with sodium hydroxide solution (10% by
rhenium was passed through the column of Dow IRA wt.) to remove any molybdenum ions, and was then
410 resin at the rate of 4 cm3 cm − 3 resin per h, losing washed with distilled water. The amount of rhenium
all of the rhenium and becoming almost free of rhe- lost in this step was negligible. For stripping, (elution)
nium ions. 800 cm3 of 0.5 N hypochloric acid solution was chosen.
The flow rate of the solution through the column has As the experiment showed the rate of stripping was less
an effective role on the amount of rhenium absorbed, than the rate of loading. A flow rate of 2 cm3 cm − 3 of
and hence on the rhenium content of the effluent resin per h was chosen for the eluent solutions. After
solution. The effect of the solution flow rate on the
rhenium content of the effluent solution was examined,
the results being presented in Fig. 9. It can be seen that
the lowest effluent concentration of rhenium is achieved
at a flow rate of 4 cm3 cm − 3 of resin per h. In order to
find the efficiency of Dow-IRA 410 in rhenium adsorp-
tion, 800 cm3 of rhenium-bearing solution was poured
over the resin column (30 cm high and 2.6 cm diame-
ter). Samples of 100 cm3 volume were collected from
the bottom of the column and analyzed. Fig. 10 illus-
trates the variation of the rhenium content in the
effluent solution with respect to the volume of the
solution passed. It can be seen that the first 300 cm3 of
the solution do not show any rhenium whilst the rest
did. Although the rhenium content of the effluent solu-
Table 2
Analysis of the rhenium-bearing solution for the SR 2060 sample
Element Re Mo Ca Fe Cu As
g l−1 1.63 0.2 8.1 0.05 0.06 0.00 Fig. 10. Rhenium content of the effluent solution during the rhenium-
absorbtion step.
M.H. Shariat, M. Hassani / Journal of Materials Processing Technology 74 (1998) 243–250 249
the column stripping was completed, the resulting solu- ate and ammonium sulfate according to the following
tion was analyzed, and the total rhenium content of the reactions, which can be separated easily:
solution was found. Under these conditions the maxi- Re2S7 + 16NH4OH+ 14O2
mum rhenium recovery from the rhenium bearing solu-
tion was about 90%. As hydrogen sulfide gas was = 2NH4ReO4 + 7(NH4)2SO4 + 8H2O (19)
introduced into the produced perrhenic acid solution, Re2S7 + 16NH4OH+ 28H2O2
which latter was acidified with hydrochloric acid, rhe-
nium heptasulfide precipitates were formed rapidly. Af- = 2NH4ReO4 + 7(NH4)2SO4 + 36H2O (20)
ter washing, filtering and drying the precipitates, they As using oxygen as the oxidizing agent usually re-
were weighted and recovery of 92% was recorded. To quires a high temperature and pressure, its use is lim-
produce ammonium perrhenate, rhenium heptasulfide ited, so that hydrogen peroxide is used for the
was oxidized and decomposed by a suitable amount of oxidation of the rhenium heptasulfide.
hydrogen peroxide and ammonium hydroxide solution,
after which the solution was evaporated to produce a
saturated solution of rhenium. The rhenium concentra- 5. Conclusion
tion of the solution was about 20 g l − 1, i.e. the solution
volume decreased to about 60 cm3. The saturated am- This study has shown that the roasting of molybden-
monium perrhenate solution was cooled, which resulted ite concentrates in the presence of slaked lime in excess
in the formation of the ammonium perrhenate crystals. of the stoichiometric amount (about twice the weight of
After the crystals had been collected, they were dried the concentrates) enables the recovery of the rhenium
and weighed. The weight of ammonium perrhenate content of the concentrates with the efficiency of 85–
crystals was about 1.42 g, which shows that some of the 90%, and has also shown that the best roasting temper-
rhenium compounds remained in the solution. These ature is about 600°C. Excess oxygen has a negative
solutions are usually returned to the previous steps. The effect on the rhenium recovery in this process. In the
total efficiency of rhenium recovery based on 900 ppm ion-exchange step, a resin other than the usually-used
rhenium content of concentrate and 1.42 g NH4ReO4 resin, Dow IRA 400, was used successfully, i.e. Dow
produced from 1600 g molybdenite concentrate is about IRA 410. The best flow rate of the influent was found
70%. to be 4 cm3 cm − 3 of resin per h. Also, in converting the
rhenium heptasulfide to ammonium perrhenate, hydro-
gen peroxide was used instead of nitric acid as a
4. Discussion reagent, hence preventing the formation of ammonium
nitrate. Finally, the total rhenium recovery was evalu-
As shown in Fig. 6 the rhenium recovery is reduced ated to be about 70%. However, at pilot or industrial
when lime is used instead of slaked lime. Also, during scale, the total recovery will be greater, as most of the
the conversion of calcium hydroxide to calcium oxide discard solutions after the ion-exchange step can be
at a roasting temperature of 600°C, the agitation result- recycled.
ing from water vapor may possibly enhance the kinetics
of the reactions. For this reason, if lime is used as the
reagent, owing to the lower rate of conversion of Acknowledgements
rhenium sulfides to calcium perrhenate, other possible
reactions such as the formation of rhenium heptaoxide The authors wish to express their gratitude to the
formation can take place simultaneously and, hence, management of the Sarcheshmeh Copper Complex for
the rhenium recovery will be reduced. If nitric acid is their generosity in providing all of the materials, equip-
used as the oxidizing agent, in the oxidization of the ment and financial support required for this research.
rhenium heptasulfide, the products are ammonium per-
rhenate, ammonium sulfate and ammonium nitrate,
according to the following reaction: References
Re2S7 +18NH4OH + 16HNO3 [1] A. Sutulov, Molybdenum and rhenium recovery from porphyry
coppers, University of Concepcion, Chile, 1970.
= 2NH4ReO4 +7(NH4)2SO4 +2NH4NO3 +17H2O [2] L. Coudurier, I. Wilkomirsky, G. Morizot, Molybdenite roasting
and rhenium volatilization in a multiple-hearth furnace, Trans.
+ 7N2O (18) Inst. Min. Metall. 79 (Bull. No. 760) (1970) C34 – C40.
[3] P.R. Ammann, T.A. Loose, Rhenium volatilization during
Since ammonium perrhenate and ammonium nitrate
molybdenite roasting, Metall. Trans. 3 (April) (1972) 1020–1021.
have the same properties, separating them from each [4] M.E. Messner, S.R. Zimmerley, Treating molybdenite concen-
other would be difficult. If oxygen or hydrogen perox- trates for separation of small amounts of rhenium, US Patent
ide is used, the products are only ammonium perrhen- No. 3 376 104, April 2, 1968.
250 M.H. Shariat, M. Hassani / Journal of Materials Processing Technology 74 (1998) 243–250
[5] S.R. Zimmerly, J.D. Prater, Process for purifying impure rhe- ite Concentrates, Internal Report.
nium bearing solutions by ion exchange, US Patent 2 945 743, [9] S.R. Zimmerly, J.D. Prater, Process for producing pure ammo-
July 19, 1960. nium perrhenate and other rhenium compounds, US Patent No.
[6] A.D. Melaven, Rare Metals Handbook, Reinhold, New York, 2 876 065, March 3, 1959.
1961. [10] J.C. Carlen, B.D. Bryskin, Rhenium — a unique rare metal,
[7] B.D. Bryskin, F.C. Danek, Powder processing and fabrication of Mater. Manuf. Process. 9 (6) (1994) 1087 – 1104.
rhenium, J. Metals July (1991) 24–26. [11] M. Hassani, Rhenium Recovery from Sarcheshmeh Molybdenite
[8] Sarcheshmeh Copper Complex Reports, Analysis for Molybden- Concentrates, M.Sc Thesis, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran, 1994.