Principal OPCRF

Office Performance Commitment and Review Form (OPCRF)
Name of Employee : ERNILYN E. LIGAN Rater:

Position: Principal-2 Position:
Review Period: June 2019 - March 2020 Date of Review:
Bureau/Division: Deped - Zamboanga del Sur Division
TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING
WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Per
Objective QUALITY EFFICIENCY
5- Outstanding 5- Outstanding
Basic 1.
Education INSTRUCTIONAL
Services Increased (MPS) Performance in all learning
LEADERSHIP/ areas through the following interventions:*
LEARNING Conducted intensive remedial classes for
OUTCOMES __% least learned skills* Provided activity sheets 95-100% of learners achieved 75% and above MPS in
for least learned skills class* Provided all subjects
appropriate IM's for review classes.* Provided
sufficient school supplies.*Constructed test
question parallel with complete TOS
4- Very Satisfactory 4- Very Satisfactory

· Performed instructional supervision of at least 6
teachers a month and complied the ff:check DLL, Pre
1.1 Accounted for learning 85-94% of teachers supervised
observation and post ,STAR Observation Tool and set
outcomes of schools and June, 2019 to agreement
20%
centers viz-a-viz goals and March, 2020
targets 3- Satisfactory 3- Satisfactory
· Performed instructional supervision of
at least 5 teachers a month and
complied the ff: check DLL, Pre 75-84% of teachers supervised
observation and post , STAR
Observation Tool and set agreement
2- Unsatisfactory 2- Unsatisfactory
targets

· Performed instructional supervision of at least 4

teachers a month and complied the ff: check DLL,Pre
70-74% of teachers supervised
observation and post STAR Observation Tool and set
agreement
1- Poor 1- Poor
Performed zero instructional supervision . 69% and below of teachers
1.2 Performed instructional 10% 5- Outstanding 5- Outstanding

supervision to
achieve learning outcomes Exceeds 100% in the implementation of
instructional supervisory plan with
Submitted all required and validated MOVs
comprehensive analysis of the result of
observations
June, 2019 to
March, 2020 4- Very Satisfactory 4- Very Satisfactory
90- 100% implemented instructional
supervisory plan with comprehensive analysis Submitted a combination of at least 4 MOVs
of the result of observations
3- Satisfactory 3- Satisfactory

Submitted a combination of at least 3
supervisory plan with comprehensive analysis MOVs
June, 2019 to 2- Unsatisfactory 2- Unsatisfactory

March, 2020
supervisory plan with comprehensive analysis Submitted a combination of at least 2 MOVs
1- Poor 1- Poor
60-69% implemented instructional supervisory plan

with comprehensive analysis of the result of Submitted a combination of at least 1 MOVs
observations
1.3 Increased Internal 5- Outstanding 5- Outstanding

Efficiency based on Planning
standards. Exceeds the planning standard for internal Submitted all required and validated MOVs
> Drop-out effecciency with comprehensive analysis
> Enrolment
> Completion 4- Very Satisfactory 4- Very Satisfactory
> Graduation
> Literacy and Numeracy Within the planning standard for internal Submitted all required and validated MOVs
Rate effeciency with analysis
Lacking 1 submitted all required and
June, 2019 to
10% validated MOVs for quality that reflects 5- 10% below the planning
March, 2020 the academic performance of the standard for internal effeciency
learners with analysis
Lacking 1 submitted required and validated
10-15% below the planning standard for
MOVs for quality that reflects the academic
internal effeciency
performance of the learners without analysis
1- Poor 1- Poor
Lacking 2 submitted required and validated
15 % below the planning standard for internal
MOVs for quality that reflects the academic
effeciency
performance of the learners without analysis
2. SCHOOL 2.1. Provided safe and child 5- Outstanding 5- Outstanding
ENVIRONMENT __ friendly learning and school
% environment for 100% implemented programs, activities and
students/learners projects based on action plan and AIP and Submitted all required and validated MOVs
achieved very outstanding CFSS
June, 2019 to
March, 2020
6%
June, 2019 to 100% implemented programs, activities and

March, 2020
6%
projects based on action plan and AIP and Submitted a combination of at least 3 MOVs
achieved outstanding CFSS
100% implemented programs, activities
Submitted a combination of at
and projects based on action plan and
AIP and achieved child friendly school least 2 MOVs
80-90% implemented programs, activities and
projects based on action plan and AIP and Submitted a combination of at least 1 MOVs
achieved child friendly school
1- Poor 1- Poor
70-80% implemented programs, activities and
projects based on action plan and AIP and No MOV
achieved child friendly school
2.2 Maintained functional 5- Outstanding 5- Outstanding
school buildings and facilites
90-100% implemented project and actvities to
maintian functional facilities based on AIP and Submitted all required and validated MOVs
utilized facilities according to purpose
80- 89% implemented project and actvities to
maintian functional facilities based on AIP and Submitted a combination of at least 3 MOVs
June, 2019 to 70-89% implemented project and
March, 2020
6% actvities to maintian functional Submitted a combination of at
facilities based on AIP and utilized least 2 MOVs
facilities according to purpose
June, 2019 to TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING
March, 2020
6%
60-69% implemented project and actvities to
maintian functional facilities based on AIP and Submitted a combination of at least 1 MOVs
1- Poor 1- Poor
below 60% implemented project and actvities
to maintian functional facilities based on AIP No MOV
and utilized facilities according to purpose
2.3 Acquired School Site 5- Outstanding 5- Outstanding
ownership (Title of Lot,
Deed of Donation, Tax Acquired land title of school site Submitted all required and validated MOVs
declaration
Acquired approved survey of school site Submitted a combination of at least 3 MOVs
June, 2019 to Acquired Tax Declaration or Deed of Submitted a combination of at
March, 2020
6% Donation least 2 MOVs
70-74% requirements for school site
Acquired Deed of Donation
documents accomplished
1- Poor 1- Poor
69% below requirements for school site
No evidences acquired
documents accomplished
Basic 3. Human 3.1 Provided technical 5- Outstanding 5- Outstanding
Education Resource assistance to eachers on
Services Management and matters pertaining to
Development __ enhancement of classroom
% management, skills and
instructional competence and
to non-teaching personnel
for support services within the
RPMS cycle
Basic 3. Human 3.1 Provided technical Objective QUALITY EFFICIENCY
Education Resource assistance to eachers on
Services Management and matters pertaining to Provided with technical assistance with
Development __ enhancement of classroom corresponding evidences on Teachers
% management, skills and 95 % - 100% of the teachers provided
portfolio containing: *10 observation reports
instructional competence and technical assistance with required reports.
*observation checklist *accomplished
to non-teaching personnel
for support services within the observation form * IPPD
RPMS cycle
85 % - 94% of the teachers provided
three requirements met with complete
technical assistance with required reports.
evidences
June, 2019 to
March, 2020
6% 3- Satisfactory 3- Satisfactory
75 % - 84% of the teachers
two requirements met with complete
provided technical assistance with
evidences
required reports.
one requirements met with complete 70 % - 74% of the teachers provided technical
evidences assistance with required reports.
1- Poor 1- Poor
No requirements met with complete 69 % below of the teachers provided
evidences technical assistance with required reports.
5- Outstanding 5- Outstanding
Improved Teaching & Non-teaching personnel

3.2 Managed capacity building competence through the ff requirements:
programs for INSET addressing learning/performance
teaching and non-teaching
95 % - 100% RPMS processes delivered to
gaps, Action Research, Mentoring and
personnel in all teachers in the school
Coaching, LAC Sessions (K-12, ELLN),
school Improved teaching learning process, giving
special jobs
June, 2019 to
March, 2020
attended a seminar at least 1 Regional

June, 2019 to 85 % - 94% RPMS processes delivered to all
Seminar, 1 Division and 2 School Based
March, 2020 teachers in the school
Seminars
6%
75 % - 84% RPMS processes
attended a seminar at least 1 Division
delivered to all teachers in the
2 School Based Seminars
school
70 % - 74% RPMS processes delivered to all

attended at least 2 School Based Seminar
teachers in the school
1- Poor 1- Poor
69 % belowRPMS processes delivered to all

0 attendance to seminars
*Performed RPMS processes with the

3.3 Established and managed 5- Outstanding
following as evidences: 5- Outstanding
rewards and * Conducted RPMS
recgnition system in Seminar 95 % - 100% RPMS processes delivered to
school.
*Checked & tracked Performance contracts, all teachers in the school
and performance evaluation results in
prescribed
4- Very tools and proposed development
Satisfactory 4- Very Satisfactory
plans
Checked & tracked Performance contracts,
and performance evaluation results in 85 % - 94% RPMS processes delivered to all
prescribed tools and proposed development teachers in the school
June, 2019 to
plans
March, 2020 3- Satisfactory 3- Satisfactory
Check Performance contracts, and 75 % - 84% RPMS processes
6%
performance evaluation results in
prescribed tools and proposed
delivered to all teachers in the
development plans school
June, 2019 to
March, 2020
6%
Tracked Performance contracts, and

70 % - 74% RPMS processes delivered to all
performance evaluation results in prescribed
tools and proposed development plans
1- Poor 1- Poor
No Checking & tracking of the Performance
contracts, and performance evaluation 69 % belowRPMS processes delivered to all
results in prescribed tools and proposed teachers in the school
development plans
Basic 4. Parents’ 4.1 Established school and 5- Outstanding 5- Outstanding
Education Involvement and family and community
Services Community partnership for school
Partnership School performance Prepared stakeholders partnership
Leadership, mobilization plan (Brigada Eskwela, home 95-100% of improved partnership of school,
Management and visitations, homeroom meetings, PTA Board family and community with required evidences
Operations __% Meeting, GPTA) with documentary evidence.
3 out of the 4 mobilization plan prepared with 85-94% of improved partnership of school,
June, 2019 to documentary evidence family and community with required evidences
March, 2020
10%
75-84% of improved partnership
2 out of the 4 mobilization plan
prepared with documentary evidence
of school, family and community
with required evidences
1 out of the 4 mobilization plan prepared with 70-74% of improved partnership of school,
documentary evidence family and community with required evidences
1- Poor 1- Poor
No mobilization plan No mobilization plan conducted

Basic
Education 5. School Leadership, 5.1 Performed school 5- Outstanding 5- Outstanding
Services Management and leadership, management and
operations __% operations function such as Has met the following interventions;
maintaining high absorptive
capacity in terms of utilizing 1.Identified Priority Improvement Areas
maintenance and other (PIA's)
operating expesnses (MOOE). June, 2019 to 12% 2.Set general objectives.
March, 2020 90-100% of school priority needs has been
3.Formulated solutions
identified
and designing project designs.
4.Reviewed SIP/AIP re-analyzing
data revisiting the root cause to ensure that
the projects continue to address existing
needs.
Has met three out of four interventions with 83-89% of school priority needs has been
evidences. identified.
Has met two out of four interventions 76-82 % of the school priority
with evidences. needs has been identified.
Has met one out of four interventions with 69 - 75 % of the school priority needs has
incomplete evidences. been identified.
1- Poor 1- Poor
70% and below of the school priority needs

Has not met all of the four interventions.
has been identified
5.2 Insititued a system for 5- Outstanding 5- Outstanding
transparency in all school
operations. Has complied the following interventions:
1. Displayed transparency
board. 2. Ensured the proceeds of resource
mobilization funds must have academic
95 to 100% compliance
impact to school pupils 3.Tendered
Accomplishment /Liquidation Report to PTA
and Teachers .4.Compiled copies of
June, 2019 to
10%
Liquidation Reports in all school funds.
March, 2020
Has complied three out of four interventions

with complete evidences.
Has complied two out of four
interventions with incomplete 75 to 84% compliance
evidences.
Has complied one out of four interventions

with incomplete evidences.
1- Poor 1- Poor
Has not complied all of the four interventions. None compliance

5. Plus Factor 5.1 Performed various related 5- Outstanding 5- Outstanding
work/activities that contribute
to school goals
5. Plus Factor 5.1 Performed various related Objective QUALITY EFFICIENCY
work/activities that contribute
to school goals Consistently performed special tasks and/or Submitted at least 4 different kinds of
as shown in the MOV submitted acceptable MOV

Frequently performed special tasks and/or as Submitted only 3 different kinds of acceptable
shown in the MOV submitted MOV
June, 2019 to Occasionally performed special tasks
March, 2020
10% Submitted only 2 different kinds
and/or
as shown in the MOV submitted of acceptable MOV
Rarely performed special tasks and/or as
Submitted any 1 of the acceptable MOV
shown in the MOV submitted
1- Poor 1- Poor
No acceptable evidence was shown No acceptable evidence was shown
100%
Ratee: Rater:
ERNILYN E. LIGAN JUDITH V. ROMAGUERA

Principal-2 OIC-Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
Commitment and Review Form (OPCRF)
JUDITH V. ROMAGUERA
OIC, Asst. Schools Division Superintendent
ANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness ACTUAL
RESULTS
Score*
TIMELINESS Q E T Ave
5- Outstanding
submitted accomplishment reports 5 days before the

deadline
4- Very Satisfactory
submitted accomplishment reports 3 days before the

deadline
3- Satisfactory
submitted accomplishment reports

with in the deadline
2- Unsatisfactory
RESULTS
Score*
submitted accomplishment reports 3 days

after the deadline
1- Poor
submitted accomplishment reports 4 days
after the deadline or no reports submitted
5- Outstanding
Submitted before the rating period
Submitted within the rating period
3- Satisfactory
Submitted 2 days after the rating

period
2- Unsatisfactory
Submitted 3 days after the rating period
1- Poor
RESULTS
Score*
Submitted 5 days beyond the rating period
5- Outstanding
3- Satisfactory
2- Unsatisfactory
1- Poor
5- Outstanding
RESULTS
Score*
3- Satisfactory
2- Unsatisfactory
1- Poor
5- Outstanding
3- Satisfactory

RESULTS
Score*
2- Unsatisfactory
1- Poor
5- Outstanding
3- Satisfactory
2- Unsatisfactory
Complied required supporting documents 3 days after
the deadline
1- Poor
Complied required supporting documents 5
days after the deadline
5- Outstanding
RESULTS
Score*
submitted monthly the required evidences 5

days before the due date
3- Satisfactory
submitted monthly the required
evidences on time
2- Unsatisfactory
submitted monthly the required evidences after the
due date
1- Poor
Failed to submit monthly the required
evidence
5- Outstanding

RESULTS
Score*

3- Satisfactory
evidences on time
2- Unsatisfactory

due date
1- Poor

evidence
5- Outstanding


3- Satisfactory

evidences on time
RESULTS
Score*
2- Unsatisfactory

due date
1- Poor

evidence
5- Outstanding
Submitted accomplishment reports 5 days

before the deadline.
Submitted accomplishment reports 3 days

before the deadline.
3- Satisfactory
2 mobilization plan conducted one every
grading pedriod with documentary
evidence
2- Unsatisfactory
1 mobilization plan conducted every grading period

with documentary evidence
RESULTS
Score*
1- Poor
No mobilization plan conducted every grading

period
5- Outstanding
Submitted approved ESIP/AIP to the

division/district office 5 days before the due
date.

division/district office 3 days before due date
3- Satisfactory
division/district office within/on due
date
2- Unsatisfactory
Submitted approved ESIP/AIP to the division/district

office 3 days after the due date
1- Poor
RESULTS
Score*

division/district office 5 days after due date
and beyond
5- Outstanding
Submitted reports and other documents 5

days before due date
Submitted reports and other documents 3

days before due date
3- Satisfactory
Submitted reports and other documents

on or within due date
2- Unsatisfactory
Submitted reports and other documents on or within

due date
1- Poor
No reports submitted
5- Outstanding
RESULTS
Score*
3- Satisfactory
2- Unsatisfactory
1- Poor
OVERALL
RATING FOR
ACCOMPLISH
METS
0.00
Approved:
MA. LIZA R. TABILON, Ed.D., CESO VI

OIC, Schools Division Superintendent
RESULTS
Score*

Principal OPCRF

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Principal OPCRF

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Office Performance Commitment and Review Form (OPCRF)

Name of Employee : ERNILYN E. LIGAN Rater:

4- Very Satisfactory 4- Very Satisfactory

TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING

· Performed instructional supervision of at least 4

Performed zero instructional supervision . 69% and below of teachers

1.2 Performed instructional 10% 5- Outstanding 5- Outstanding

80- 89% implemented instructional

June, 2019 to 2- Unsatisfactory 2- Unsatisfactory

60-69% implemented instructional supervisory plan

1.3 Increased Internal 5- Outstanding 5- Outstanding

June, 2019 to 100% implemented programs, activities and

Acquired approved survey of school site Submitted a combination of at least 3 MOVs

Improved Teaching & Non-teaching personnel

4- Very Satisfactory 4- Very Satisfactory

attended a seminar at least 1 Regional

70 % - 74% RPMS processes delivered to all

69 % belowRPMS processes delivered to all

*Performed RPMS processes with the

Tracked Performance contracts, and

4- Very Satisfactory 4- Very Satisfactory

No mobilization plan No mobilization plan conducted

70% and below of the school priority needs

Has complied three out of four interventions

Has complied one out of four interventions

Has not complied all of the four interventions. None compliance

4- Very Satisfactory 4- Very Satisfactory

No acceptable evidence was shown No acceptable evidence was shown

ERNILYN E. LIGAN JUDITH V. ROMAGUERA

ANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

submitted accomplishment reports 5 days before the

submitted accomplishment reports 3 days before the

submitted accomplishment reports

submitted accomplishment reports 3 days

Submitted before the rating period

Submitted within the rating period

Submitted 2 days after the rating

Submitted 3 days after the rating period

Submitted 5 days beyond the rating period

Submitted before the rating period

Submitted within the rating period

Submitted 2 days after the rating period

Submitted 3 days after the rating period

Submitted 5 days beyond the rating period

Submitted before the rating period

Submitted within the rating period

Submitted 2 days after the rating period

Submitted 3 days after the rating period

Submitted 5 days beyond the rating period

Submitted before the rating period

Submitted within the rating period

Submitted 2 days after the rating period

Submitted 3 days after the rating period

Submitted 5 days beyond the rating period

Submitted within the rating period

Submitted 2 days after the rating period

submitted monthly the required evidences 5

submitted monthly the required evidences 5

submitted monthly the required evidences 3

submitted monthly the required evidences after the

Failed to submit monthly the required

submitted monthly the required evidences 5

submitted monthly the required evidences 3

submitted monthly the required