0 оценок0% нашли этот документ полезным (0 голосов)
44 просмотров6 страниц
The document discusses the concept of the "collage city" put forth by authors Colin Rowe and Fred Koetter in their 1978 work. They envisioned the city as an aggregate of discontinuous architectural fragments. The authors suggest that buildings should act both as occupiers and definers of space, maintaining individual presence while providing urban continuity. They hope for a situation where buildings and spaces coexist in an "equality of sustained debate" without a clear victor, resembling a solid-void dialectic that allows joint existence. The city is conceived as a two-dimensional collage assembled from diverse historical fragments left behind.
The document discusses the concept of the "collage city" put forth by authors Colin Rowe and Fred Koetter in their 1978 work. They envisioned the city as an aggregate of discontinuous architectural fragments. The authors suggest that buildings should act both as occupiers and definers of space, maintaining individual presence while providing urban continuity. They hope for a situation where buildings and spaces coexist in an "equality of sustained debate" without a clear victor, resembling a solid-void dialectic that allows joint existence. The city is conceived as a two-dimensional collage assembled from diverse historical fragments left behind.
The document discusses the concept of the "collage city" put forth by authors Colin Rowe and Fred Koetter in their 1978 work. They envisioned the city as an aggregate of discontinuous architectural fragments. The authors suggest that buildings should act both as occupiers and definers of space, maintaining individual presence while providing urban continuity. They hope for a situation where buildings and spaces coexist in an "equality of sustained debate" without a clear victor, resembling a solid-void dialectic that allows joint existence. The city is conceived as a two-dimensional collage assembled from diverse historical fragments left behind.
aggregate of discontinuous fragments” “Simply these avenues are disposable. In no way do their facades designate any effective frontier between public and private.They are evasive.” The dilemma of the Free Standing Building >> Buildings as objects is not disregarded in its totality: suggests that buildings should act both as space occupier and space definer – maintaining an individual presence while providing continuity to the urban texture. “The situation hoped for should be recognized as one in which both buildings and spaces exist in an equality of sustained debate. A debate in which victory consists in each component emerging undefeated, the imagined condition is a type of solid- void dialectic, which might allow for the joint existence...” “The city is conceived of as a two-dimensional collage and the urban designer as the bricoleur who assembles this collage from a diverse kit of fragmentary objects that architectural and urban history have left behind.” (Harvard Architecture Review 10)
The City As The Object of Architecture Author(s) : Mario Gandelsonas Source: Assemblage, Dec., 1998, No. 37 (Dec., 1998), Pp. 128-144 Published By: The MIT Press