Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
00
Institution of Chemical Engineers
Trans IChemE, Vol 77, Part A, June 1999
T
he mixing hydrodynamics in a double planetary mixer is investigated numerically and
experimentally over the course of a cross-linking reaction. Using various visualization
techniques, it is shown that this mixer provides good radial dispersion capabilities but
poor axial (top-to-bottom) pumping, irrespective of the viscosity level. The power drawn by
the mixer evolves dramatically from about 180 W m ± 3 at 40% conversion up to approximately
4 kW m ± 3 at 85% conversion. Overall, the numerical predictions and the experimental results
exhibit good agreement although at 85% conversion, the numerical model is not accurate
enough to predict adequately the power consumption due to physical phenomena not
considered in the computations.
Keywords: planetary; mixing; kneading; dispersion; ¯ ow simulation; viscous ¯ uid; solid
propellant; cross-linking
EXPERIMENTAL WORK
During the reactive mixing experiments, the time
evolution of the torque was monitored against the carousel
speed. The power consumption in the mixer bulk was then
determined using the basic relation:
P 2pNT 1
where N is the carousel rotating speed (revolution per
second) and T the torque (N m). For this study, the carousel
speed was set at 10 rpm and the mixer was operated near
its maximum volumetric capacity.
In order to estimate the dispersing capability of the
kneader as well as its radial and axial pumping ef® ciency,
particle counting experiments were performed at 40%, 70%
Figure 1. Double Planetary Mixer with blade details.
and 85% conversion. In this experiment, the vessel volume
was divided in 6 compartments. Each compartment was a
wedge formed by an angular sector of 120 degrees (1/3 of
The industrial unit used for this study was modi® ed so a cross-section) and a height corresponding to half that
that it was possible to measure the torque acting on the of the vessel. The experiment consisted of counting the
carousel and monitor the exact revolution speed, making number of particles in each compartment with time. At
it possible to establish the power curve of the mixing initial time, 100 clustered particles were injected close to
system. For this purpose, the drive unit was raised by the center at the free surface. As for the particles, red pellets
approximately 0.75 m. The space thus created was used of polyphenylene oxide/polyphenylene ether blend were
to install a Himmelstein non-contact torquemeter model used. These particles are neutrally buoyant in PPG.
MCRT 3904X. The measurement capabilities of this In addition, mixing ¯ ow visualization was carried out
torquemeter range from 0 to 2000 lbf.in (0±225 Nm) with using video equipment and image analysis. This allowed
a full scale linearity of 0.1%. Although the manufacturer the observation of the cluster dispersing mechanism
provides a calibration chart for the torquemeter, it was imparted by the complex arms motion.
considered relevant to check this calibration in dynamic
mode at regular intervals during the experiments. For this NUMERICAL MODELLING
purpose, a close-clearance cylinder was carefully mounted
Consider the ¯ ow of an incompressible viscous ¯ uid
on the carousel instead of the double arms so that a
in the vessel. If t, cÇ , v and p represent the stress tensor,
Couette ¯ ow could be reproduced. Torque vs speed relations
the rate-of-strain tensor, the velocity and the pressure
were determined with viscous ¯ uids of known viscosity
respectively, the ¯ ow can be described using the classical
(based on corn syrup), which then allowed veri® cation of
Navier-Stokes equations, namely:
the calibration using elementary ¯ uid mechanics principles.
¶v
r v grad v grad p div 2g Çc 2
MODEL FLUIDS ¶t
div v 0 3
Solid rocket propellants are thermoset composite
materials consisting of a ground oxidizer dispersed into where r is the ¯ uid density, g the viscosity and Çc 1/2.
a rubbery matrix. Polypropylene glycol (PGG) and [grad v (grad v)T ].
Care must be taken in the computation of the integral due Figure 3. Radial dispersion. (a) Initial position of clustered particles;
to the exponential nature of the numerical integration (b) 45% conversion; (c) 70% conversion; (d) 85% conversion.
Figure 5. Axial dispersion at the bottom. (a) Initial position of clustered Figure 6. Numerical (top) and experimental (bottom)Ð stretching-folding
particles; (b) 45% conversion; (c) 70% conversion; (d) 85% conversion. mechanism.
Figure 7. Particle counting experiment (40% conversion). Experimental Figure 9. Particle counting experiment (85% conversion). Experimental
results (top); numerical results (bottom). results (top); numerical results (bottom).
arm. These observations are valid irrespective of the for an anchor. Following Tanguy et al.4 , the power constant
conversion level. It is important to note that, in the case of of an anchor impeller is around 200. The present results
the 85% conversion, the assumption of a ¯ at free surface are then fairly consistent, the power consumption being
is not very realistic. The chaotic nature of the surface between 2.5 and 4 times higher than that of a single
contributes more signi® cantly to the axial dispersion impeller.
mechanism. According to Ottino1 0 , the laminar mixing mechanism
In order to assess the simulation accuracy in this problem obeys a `stretching-folding-breaking’ sequence. Figure 6
and at the same time determine the power dissipated in illustrates the folding phase of a stretched ® lament of tracers
the vessel, the power consumption has been computed by located at one arm tip close to the wall. This `Vee’ shape
performing a macroscopic energy balance and the results can be observed numerically and experimentally in a
compared with the experimental data. Results are summar- remarkably similar fashion. This proves, if necessary, the
ized in Table 1. reliability of the computation of the mixing pattern in
Considering the experimental uncertainty and the the kneader that can pick up details as ® ne as this
numerical precision both estimated at 20%, the agreement orientation phenomenon which occurs during the break-up
between the predictions and the experiments is fairly good of agglomerates.
up to a conversion level of 70%. Beyond this value, the Figures 7 to 9 present the results of particle counting
signi® cant difference observed is explained by the inaccu- experiments. The particles were all injected at the surface.
racy of the computer model. Three reasons may be invoked: Overall, the numerical and experimental sets of results
(a) the shear-thinning character of the cross-linked polymer give fairly similar trends. In terms of top-to-bottom
matrix not taken into account in the model; pumping, it can be seen that a signi® cant time is needed
(b) the chaotic nature of the free surface whose numerical for the ® rst particles to cross the upper half of the volume
description is presently out-of-reach; and vessel. The radial dispersion appears ef® cient and rapid.
(c) the viscous dissipation that would make the ¯ uid less After 60 s, there is already a good amount of particles
viscous. Overall, the power per unit volume varies from in each compartment (in the upper part of the vessel).
180 W m ± 3 to 4 kW m ± 3 over the course of the reaction, Finally, Figures 10 to 12 show the instantaneous density
which is fairly typical with polymerization reactions. of energy dissipation (in W m ± 3 ) at three time steps,
corresponding to three different positions of the kneading
From the above results, it is possible to estimate the blades. Three different views are given in each ® gure. It
value of the power constant Kp using equation (6). As for can be observed that most of the energy is dissipated in
the characteristic parameters, two options can be envisaged: the clearance areas between the arms, and the arms and
the carousel speed along with the vessel diameter, or the walls. These regions correspond to the zones with the
alternatively, the arm rotating speed and the diameter. maximum rate of deformation and therefore the most
Based on the former set of characteristic dimensions and ef® cient mixing. In the bulk itself, there is almost no energy
the power consumption results, the Kp value ranges from dissipation.
500 to 830. As the kneading arm of the Double Planetary
Mixer is fairly similar to an anchor impeller, it is interesting
to compare this range of Kp values with the typical values CONCLUDING REMARKS
The mixing hydrodynamics in a double planetary mixer
has been investigated over the course of a cross-linking
reaction. At 10 rpm (speed of the carousel), it is shown
numerically and experimentally that this mixer provides
good radial dispersion capabilities but poor axial (top-to-
bottom) pumping, irrespective of the viscosity level. The
power drawn by the mixer evolves dramatically from
about 180 W m 3 at 40% conversion up to approximately
4 kW m ± 3 at 85% conversion.
The numerical predictions and the experimental results
exhibit good agreement although at 85% conversion, the
Figure 8. Particle counting experiment (70% conversion). Experimental numerical model is not accurate enough to predict ade-
results (top); numerical results (bottom). quately the power consumption. It is believed that this is
Figure 10. Instantaneous density of energy dissipation after 3rd time step in three different planes. Scale: low (light grey); high (dark grey).
Figure 11. Instantaneous density of energy dissipation after 9th time step in three different planes. Scale: low (lightgrey); high (dark grey).
Figure 12. Instantaneous density of energy dissipation after 13th time step in three different planes. Scale: low (light grey); high (dark grey).
due to the shear-thinning character of the ¯ uid that has not 5. Jenson, W. P. and Talton, R. T., 1965, AIChE Symp Series, 10: 82.
been considered in the computations and possibly to the 6. Hall, K. R. and Godfrey, J. C., 1968, Trans IChemE, 46: T205.
7. Kappel, M., 1979, Int Chem Eng, 19: 571.
very irregular shape of the free surface in the vessel that was 8. Bertrand, F., Tanguy, P. A. and Thibault, F., 1997, Int J Num Meth
ignored in the model. Fluids, 25: 719.
This mixer is an interesting device for tough mixing 9. Bertrand, F., 1995, TheÁse de doctorat, (Institut National Polytechnique
applications and has a good potential for improvements, de Lorraine, France).
10. Ottino, J., 1989, The Kinematics of Mixing, (Cambridge University
especially the shape of the mixing arms. Press).
REFERENCES
1. Fluke, M., 1968, ACS Chemistry Series No. 88: 176. ADDRESS
2. Bertrand, F., Thibault, F., Tanguy, P. A. and Choplin, L., 1994, Process Correspondence concerning this paper should be addressed to Professor
MixingÐ Chemical and Biochemical Applications, G. Tatterson and P. A. Tanguy, URPEI, Department of Chemical Engineering, Ecole
R. Calabrese (Eds) AIChE Symp Series No. 299: 106. Polytechnique, PO Box 6079, Station Centre-Ville, Montreal H3C 3A7,
3. Tanguy, P. A., Bertrand, F., Labrie, R., Brito-De La Fuente, E. and Canada. E-mail: tanguy@urpei.polymtl.ca
Fages, M. H., 1995, Recents Progres en Genie des Procedes, (Lavoisier
TecDoc) 38, 87.
4. Tanguy, P. A., Bertrand, F., Labrie, R. and Brito-De La Fuente, E., The manuscript was received 16 November 1998 and accepted for
1996, Chem Eng Res Des, 74: 499. publication 18 January 1999.