Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 1

Investigation of beta-adrenergic receptors

binding pocket based on selected beta-blockers


Paweł Książek, Karol Kaszuba, Krzysztof Bryl
University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Chair of Physics and Biophysics

tion the complexes were visualized and analyzed with Results from automated docking differed from results
Introduction molecular visualization program VMD [8]. During anal- from energy minimization. Thus we decided to verify
ysis we searched for typical non-bonded interactions, our results with experimental data from induced muta-
that can be found in protein-ligand complexes: hydro- genesis researches. Our results were successfully ver-
β-adrenergic receptors are a member of G protein
gen bonds, ionic interactions and hydrophobic interac- ified [9].
coupled receptors family. At present, three β-adrener-
tions.
gic receptor subtypes have been identified in mam-
mals: β1, β2 and β3. Human cardiomiocytes express
all three β-adrenergic receptor subtypes. Importance
of β-adrenergic signaling in heart failure and cardiac
arrhythmia was reported. β-adrenergic antagonists (al-
so referred to as β-blockers) are important form of
management of heart diseases. New findings about β-
adrenergic signaling paths become basis for more effi-
cient therapies [1]. Detailed knowledge about β-adren-
ergic receptors binding pocket may help to construct
highly selective agents necessary to design new β-
adrenergic blocking strategies.

Structure of β1 (left) and β2-adrenergic receptor (right) shown with new Residues of β1 and β2-adrenergic receptor involved in esmolol (se-
cartoon drawing method. Roman numerals indicate successive trans- lective antagonist) and sotalol (non-selective antagonist) binding
membrane regions. marked in red. Residues shown with their homologues and region af-
filiation.

Conclusions

● Residues involved in ligand binding by both β-


adrenergic receptor subtypes are found in trans-
Binding pocket of β-adrenergic receptors (β2 as an example). Impor- membrane regions III, V, VI, VII and extracellular
tant agonist binding residues shown with CPK drawing method. Dis- loop IV-V.
tances between their α carbons indicated in angstroms (Å).
● Hydrophobic interactions play predominant role in
ligand binding by both β-adrenergic receptor sub-
types.
● Application of antagonists with different affinity re-
Objectives vealed differences in binding pattern.
● Selectivity of β1-adrenergic receptor is deter-
mined by hydrogen bonds.
The purpose of our work was to explore binding pocket
Esmolol (top) and sotalol (bottom) structures shown with licorice
of β1 and β2-adrenergic receptor. With computational drawing method. Hydrogen atoms are omitted. Important atoms are
techniques consisting of automated docking and ener- numerated. Lines indicate bounds: cyan — carbon, blue — nitrogen,
red — oxygen, yellow — sulphur.
gy minimization we expected to identify residues im-
portant to antagonists binding by both subtypes. We
References
also expected to identify binding pattern specific only
for β1-adrenergic receptor antagonists. Gained knowl- 1. Urszula Mackiewicz, Emilia Klemenska, and Andrzej Beręsewicz. Recep-
tory beta-adrenergiczne w zdrowym i niewydolnym sercu. Kardiologia Pol-
edge should be helpful in constructing new highly spe- ska, 65:294–302, 2007.
cific β-blockers. 2. Janusz M. Bujnicki. Przewidywanie struktur białek: Boltzmann i Darwin.
Kosmos, 54, 2005.
3. Vadim Cherezov and et al. High-resolution crystal structure of an en-
gineered human b2-adrenergic g protein–coupled receptor. Science,

Materials & Methods


318:1258– 1295, 2007.
4. G.H. Barbier, U.R. Shettigar, and D.O. Appunn. Clinical rationale for the
Scheme of our research procedure. Protein-ligand complexes were use of an ultra-short acting beta-blocker: esmolol. International journal of
analyzed twice: after docking and after energy minimization. clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 33(4):212–218, 1995.
5. J.L. Anderson and E.N. Prystowsky. Sotalol: An important new antiarrhyth-
In our research we used structures of β1 and β2-
mic. American heart journal, 137(3):388–409, 1999.
adrenergic receptor. Structure of β1-adrenergic recep- 6. G.M. Morris, D.S. Goodsell, R.S. Halliday, R. Huey, W.E. Hart, R.K. Belew,
and A.J. Olson. Automated docking using a lamarckian genetic algorithm
tor was obtained with homology modeling technique
and an empirical binding free energy function. Journal of Computational
[2]. High-resolution crystal structure of β2-adrenergic Results Chemistry, 19:1639–1662, 1998.
receptor was downloaded from Protein Data Bank 7. James C. Phillips, Rosemary Braun, Wei Wang, James Gumbart,
Emad Tajkhorshid, Elizabeth Villa, Christophe Chipot, Robert D. Skeel,
(PDBID: 2RH1) [3]. Two antagonists with different affin- Laxmikant Kale, and Klaus Schulten. Scalable molecular dynamics with
ity were used to determine β-adrenergic receptors Research based on selected drugs (esmolol and so- namd. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 26:1781–1802, 2005.

binding residues. Both, selective antagonist, esmolol talol) shown that between receptor subtypes occur dif- 8. William Humphrey, Andrew Dalke, and Klaus Schulten. VMD – Visual
Molecular Dynamics. Journal of Molecular Graphics, 14:33–38, 1996.
(binds only to β1-adrenergic receptor) [4], and non-se- ferences in ligand binding pattern. Results obtained 9. Catherine D. Strader, Irving S. Sigal, R. Bruce Register, Mari Rios Cande-

lective, sotalol (binds to both β1 and β2-adrenergic re- from protein-ligand complexes analysis after automat- lore, Elaine Rands, and Richard A.F. Dixon. Identification of residues re-
quired for ligand binding to the β-adrenergic receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad.
ceptor) [5], are typical antyarrhythmia β-blockers. ed docking revealed residues determining β1-selectivi- Sci., 84:4384–4388, 1987.
ty: TYR367 (hydrogen bond), VAL142 (hydrophobic in-
We employed automated docking method implement- teraction) and SER232 (hydrogen bond). Results ob-
ed in AutoDock 4.0 [6]. Energy of protein-ligand com- tained from complexes analysis after energy minimiza-
plexes, that was obtained after docking, was minimized tion revealed that THR220 residue (hydrogen bond) is
with molecular dynamics simulation package NAMD involved in β1-selectivity.
2.6 [7].First after docking, then after energy minimiza-

Вам также может понравиться