RPMS Tool for Teacher I-III

(Proficient Teachers)

Revision Code:
POSITION AND COMPETENCY PROFILE PCP No. ___
00

Department of Education
Name MARK ANTHONY F FAMILARAN Salary Grade SG 11, Step 1
Position Title Teacher I
Parenthetical Title Effectivity Date JUNE 21, 2015
Office Unit Page/s
Reports to Principal/School Heads
Position Supervised
JOB SUMMARY

QUALIFICATION STANDARDS
A. CSC Prescribed Qualifications

Education Education Bachelor of Elementary/Secondary/Early Childhood Education or Bachelor’s degree

plus 18 units in Education
Experience None Required
Eligibility RA 1080
Trainings None Required
B. Preferred Qualifications
Education BSE/BSEEd/College Graduate with Education units (18-21), at least 18 MA units
Experience
Eligibility PBET/LET Passer
Trainings In-service Training

DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

1. Applies mastery of content knowledge and its application across learning areas

2. Facilitates learning using appropriate and innovative teaching strategies and classroom
management practices

3. Manages an environment conducive to learning

4. Addresses learner diversity
5. Implements and supervises curricular and co-curricular programs to support learning

6. Monitors and evaluates learner progress and undertakes activities to improve learner
performance

7. Maintains updated records of learners’ progress

8. Counsels and guides learners

9. Works with relevant stakeholders, both internal and external, to promote learning and improve
school performance

10. Undertakes activities towards personal and professional growth

11. Does related work
 RPMS Tool for Master Teacher I-IV
(Highly Proficient Teachers)

POSITION AND COMPETENCY PROFILE PCP No. ___ Revision Code: 00

Department of Education
Name MARK ANTHONY F FAMILARAN Salary Grade SG 18, Step 1
Position Title Master Teacher II
Parenthetical Title Effectivity Date November 3, 2018
Office Unit Page/s
Reports to Principal/School Heads
Position Supervised
JOB SUMMARY

QUALIFICATION STANDARDS
A. CSC Prescribed Qualifications
Bachelor of Elementary/Secondary Education or Bachelor’s degree plus 18 units in Education and 18 units for
a Master’s degree in
Education Education or its equivalent (MT-I), Bachelor of Elementary/Secondary Education or Bachelor’s degree plus 18
professional units in
Education and 24 units for a Master’s degree in Education or its equivalent (MT-II)

Experience
Eligibility RA 1080
Trainings
B. Preferred Qualifications
Education Master’s Degree Graduate
Experience 3 years in service as Teacher III
Eligibility PBET/LET Passer
Trainings Relevant trainings

DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

1. Models exemplary practice in the application of content knowledge and pedagogy showing its integration
within and across learning areas

2. Conducts in-depth studies or action researches on teaching-learning innovations

3. Works with colleagues to create learning-focused environments that promote learner responsibility and
achievement

4. Assists colleagues to implement differentiated teaching strategies that are responsive to learner diversity

5. Leads in the preparation and enrichment of curriculum

6. Initiates programs and projects that can enhance the curriculum and its implementation
7. Leads colleagues in the design, evaluation, interpretation and utilization of different types of assessment
tools for the improvement of the teaching and learning process
8. Updates parents/guardians on learner needs, progress and achievement
9. Strengthens school-community partnerships to enrich engagement of internal and external stakeholders
in the educative process
10. Establishes links with colleagues through attendance and membership in professional organizations for
self-growth and advancement
11. Provides technical assistance through demonstration teaching, mentoring, coaching, class monitoring
and observation, organizing/leading/serving as trainers/facilitators in teacher quality circles/learning action
cells
12. Does related work
 INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE AND COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM FOR TEACHERS I-III
Name of Employee: MARK ANTHONY F FAMILARAN Name of Rater: FERNANDA G. JAMADIN
Position: Teacher I Position: Head Teacher III
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Division of Pasay Date of Review: Nov. 2018 / April 2019
Rating Period: JUNE 2018-April 2019
TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight
Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Score
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Poor (1) Results Q E T Ave
(4) (2)

Basic 1. Content 1. Applied Quality Showed Showed Showed Showed No

Education Knowledge knowledgeof knowledge of knowledge of knowledge of knowledge of acceptable
Services and content within content and its content and its content and its content and its evidence
Pedagogy and across integration integration integration integration was shown
within and within and within and within and
curriculum
across subject across subject across subject across subject
teaching areas. areas as shown areas as shown areas as shown areas as shown
in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a
rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4
###
Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted No
least 4 lessons lessons lessons any 1 acceptable
using MOV 1 and using MOV 1 using MOV 1 of the evidence
supported and supported and supported given was shown
by any 1 of the by any 1 of the by any 1 of the MOV
other given other given other given
MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness
Basic 2. Used a Quality Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using No
Education range of different teaching different teaching different teaching different teaching acceptable
Services teaching strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that evidence
strategies that promote reading promote reading promote reading promote reading was shown
writing and or writing and or writing and or writing and or
enhance learner
numeracy skills numeracy skills numeracy skills numeracy skills as
achievement in as shown in as shown in as shown in shown in MOV 1
literacy and MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a with a rating of 4
numeracy skills rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5

###
 range of
Services teaching
strategies that
enhance learner
achievement in Performance Indicators Rating
literacy and Weight
Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives
numeracy skills Timeline per Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Score
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Poor (1) Results Q E T Ave
(4) (2)

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No

### least 4 learner- learner-centered learner-centered learner-centered acceptable
centered lessons lessons lessons evidence
lessons as evidently as evidently as evidently was shown
as evidently shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in any of
shown in MOV 1 and supported and supported the given MOV
and supported by any 1 of the by any 1 of the
by any 1 of the other given other given
other given MOV given MOV given
MOV given

Timeliness
Basic 3. Applied a Quality Used different Used different Used different Used different No
Education range of teaching teaching teaching teaching acceptable
Services teaching strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that evidence
strategies to develop critical develop critical develop critical develop critical was shown
and creative and creative and creative and creative
develop critical
thinking and/or thinking and/or thinking and/or thinking and/or
and other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as
creative shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV
thinking, as 1 with a rating of 1 with a rating of 1 with a rating of 1 with a rating of 4
well as other 7 6 5
higher order
###
thinking skills.
Efficiency Used different Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted No
teaching lessons lessons as 1 lesson as acceptable
strategies that as evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by any evidence
develop critical MOV 1 MOV 1 1 of the was shown
and creative and supported and supported given
thinking and/or by any 1 of the by any 1 of the MOV
other HOTS as other given other given
shown in MOV MOV MOV
1 with a rating of
Timeliness 7
 Performance Indicators Rating
Weight
Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Score
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Poor (1) Results Q E T Ave
(4) (2)

Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed Quality Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom No
Education Environme classroom management management management management acceptable
Services nt & structure to strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that evidence
Diversity of engage engage learners engage learners engage learners engage learners was shown
in in in in
Learners learners,
activities/tasks activities/tasks activities/tasks activities/tasks
individually or in as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in
groups, in MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a
meaningful rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4
exploration,
discovery ###
and hands-on Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No
activities within least 4 lessons lessons lessons lesson acceptable
a supported by supported by supported by supported by evidence
range of MOV 1 and any MOV 1 and any MOV 1 and any any of the was shown
1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other acceptable
physical
acceptable MOV acceptable acceptable MOV
learning MOV MOV
environments.
Timeliness
Basic 5. Managed Quality Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher No
Education learner management management management management acceptable
Services behavior strategies of strategies of strategies of strategies of evidence
constructively learner behavior learner behavior learner behavior learner behavior was shown
that promote that promote that promote that promote
by
positive and positive and positive and positive and
applying non-violent non-violent non-violent non-violent
positive and discipline as discipline as discipline as discipline as
non-violent shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV
discipline submitted with a submitted with a submitted with a submitted with a
to ensure ### rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4
learning
focused
environments.
 by
applying
positive and
non-violent Performance Indicators Rating
discipline Weight
Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives
to ensure Timeline per Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Score
###
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Poor (1) Results Q E T Ave
learning (4) (2)
focused
environments. Efficiency Submitted at Submitted at submitted at Submitted any 1 No
least 4 of the least 4 of the least 4 of the of the given acceptable
given strategies given strategies given strategies strategies as evidence
as observed in at as observed in as observed in observed in only was shown
least 4 3 lessons 2 lessons 1 lesson
lessons

Timeliness
Basic 6. Used Quality Applied Applied Applied Applied No
Education differentiated, differentiated differentiated differentiated differentiated acceptable
Services developmentally teaching teaching teaching teaching evidence
appropriate strategies to strategies to strategies to strategies to was shown
learning address learner address learner address learner address learner
experiences to diversity as diversity as diversity as diversity as
address shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV
learners’ 1 with a rating of 1 with a rating of 1 with a rating of 1 with a rating of 4
gender, needs, 7 6 5
strengths,
interests Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 No
and least 4 differentiated differentiated differentiated acceptable
experiences. ### differentiated teaching teaching teaching evidence
teaching strategies in at strategies in 2 strategy in only shown
strategies in at least 2 lessons lessons as 1 lesson as
least 2 lessons as evidenced by evidenced by evidently shown
as evidenced by MOV 1 and MOV 1 and in any 1 of the
MOV 1 and supported by supported by acceptable
supported by any 1 of the any 1 of the MOV
any 1 of the other other
other acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
acceptable
MOV

Timeliness
 Performance Indicators Rating
Weight
Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Score
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Poor (1) Results Q E T Ave
(4) (2)

Basic 3. 7. Planned, Quality Planned and Planned and Planned and Planned and No
Education Curriculum managed implemented implemented implemented implemented acceptable
Services and and developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally evidence
Planning implemented sequenced sequenced sequenced sequenced shown
teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and
developmentally
learning learning learning learning
sequenced process as process as process as process as shown
teaching shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV in MOV
and learning 1 with a rating of 1 with a rating of 1 with a rating of 1 with a rating of 4
processes to 7 6 5
meet curriculum
requirements
and Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No
varied teaching least 4 developmentally developmentally developmentally acceptable
###
contexts. developmentally sequenced sequenced sequenced evidence
sequenced teaching and teaching and teaching and was shown
teaching and learning learning learning
learning process as process as process as
process as evidently shown evidently shown evidently shown
evidently shown in MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and in any 1 of the
in MOV 1 and supported by supported by given MOV
supported by any 1 of the any 1 of the
any 1 of the other given MOV other given MOV
other given MOV

Timeliness
 Performance Indicators Rating
Weight
Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Score
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Poor (1) Results Q E T Ave
(4) (2)

Basic 8. Participated in Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No

Education collegial participated in participated in participated in participated in acceptable
Services discussions LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LAC/FGD/ evidence
that use teacher meetings to meetings to meetings to meeting to was shown
and discuss discuss discuss discuss
learner feedback teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner
to feedback to feedback to feedback to feedback to
enrich teaching enrich enrich enrich enrich
practice instruction as instruction as instruction as instruction as
shown in the shown in the shown in the shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submit
###

Efficiency Participated in Participated in 3 Participated in 2 Participated in 1 No

at least 4 LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LAC/FGD/ acceptable
LACs/FGDs/ meetings as meetings as meeting as evidence
meetings as evidently shown evidently shown evidently shown was shown
evidently shown in any 1 of the in any 1 of the in any 1 of the
in any 1 of the given MOV given MOV given MOV
given MOV

Timeliness
Basic 9. Selected, Quality Developed and Developed and Developed and Developed and No
Education developed, used varied used varied used varied used varied acceptable
Services organized teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and evidence
and used learning learning learning learning was shown
resources, resources, resources, resources,
appropriate
including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to
teaching and address address address address
learning learning goals learning goals learning goals learning goals
resources, as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in
including ICT, MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a
to address rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4
learning goals.
###
 and used
appropriate
teaching and
learning
Performance Indicators Rating
resources,
Weight
including ICT, Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Score
to address KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Poor (1) Results Q E T Ave
(4) (2)
learning goals.
### Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any No
least 4 varied varied teaching varied teaching teaching and acceptable
teaching and and learning and learning learning evidence
learning resources, resources, resource, was shown
resources, including ICT, including ICT, including ICT,
including ICT, as evidently as evidently as evidently
as evidently shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in any of
shown in MOV 1 and supported 1 and supported the acceptable
1 and supported by any 1 of the by any 1 of the MOV
by any 1 of the acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
acceptable MOV

Timeliness
Basic 4. 10. Designed, Quality Designed, Designed, Designed, Designed, No
Education Assessment selected, selected, selected, selected, selected, acceptable
Services and organized organized and organized and organized and organized and evidence
Reporting and used used diagnostic, used diagnostic, used diagnostic, used diagnostic, was shown
formative and formative and formative and formative and
diagnostic,
summative summative summative summative
formative and assessment assessment assessment assessment
summative strategies strategies strategies strategies
assessment consistent with consistent with consistent with consistent with
strategies curriculum curriculum curriculum curriculum
consistent requirements as requirements as requirements as requirements as
with curriculum shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV
requirements. 1 with a rating of 1 with a rating of 1 with a rating of 1 with a rating of 4
### 7 6 5

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No

least 4 varied varied varied assessment tool acceptable
assessment assessment assessment as evidently evidence
tools as tools as tools as shown in any of was shown
evidently shown evidently shown evidently shown the acceptable
in any 1 of the in any 1 of the in any 1 of the MOV
acceptable MOV acceptable acceptable
MOV MOV
 Performance Indicators Rating
Weight
Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Score
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Poor (1) Results Q E T Ave
(4) (2)

Timeliness
Basic 11. Monitored Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No
Education and evaluated monitored and monitored and monitored and monitored and acceptable
Services learner progress evaluated evaluated evaluated evaluated evidence
and achievement learner progress learner progress learner progress learner progress was shown
using learning and and and & achievement
attainment data. achievement achievement achievement using learner
using learner using learner using learner attainment data
attainment data attainment data attainment data as shown in the
as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the MOV submitted
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted

### Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted 1 No

combination of combination of combination of acceptable acceptable
at least 4 of the 3 of the 2 of the MOV evidence
acceptable acceptable acceptable was shown
MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV No

were distributed were distributed were distributed was completed acceptable
across 4 quarters across 3 quarters across 2 quarters in only 1 quarter evidence
was shown
 Performance Indicators Rating
Weight
Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Score
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Poor (1) Results Q E T Ave
(4) (2)

Basic 12. Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely showed No

Education Communicated showed prompt showed prompt showed prompt prompt and acceptable
Services promptly and and clear and clear and clear clear evidence
clearly communication communication communication communication was shown
the learners’ of the learners’ of the learners’ of the learners’ of the learners’
needs, needs, progress needs, progress needs, progress needs, progress
progress and and and and and
achievement to achievement to achievement to achievement to achievement to
key key key key key
stakeholders, stakeholders, stakeholders, stakeholders, stakeholders,
including including including including including
parents/guardian parents/ parents/ parents/ parents/
s. guardians as guardians as guardians as guardians as
shown in the shown in the shown in the shown in the
### MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted

Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted any 1 No

combination of combination of combination of of the given MOV acceptable
at least 4 of the 3 of the 2 of the evidence
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV was shown
 ###

Performance Indicators Rating

Weight
Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Score
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Poor (1) Results Q E T Ave
(4) (2)

Timeliness Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV No

were distributed were distributed were distributed was completed acceptable
across 4 across 3 across 2 quarters in only 1 quarter evidence
quarters quarters was shown

Basic 5. Plus 13. Performed Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No

Education Factor various performed performed performed performed acceptable
Services related various related various related various related various related evidence
works/activities work/activities work/activities work/activities work/activities was shown
that that contribute that contribute that contribute that contribute
contribute to the to the teaching to the teaching to the teaching to the teaching
teaching-learning learning learning learning learning
process. process as process as process as process as
shown in the shown in the shown in the shown in the
### MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 No

least 4 different different kinds different kinds of the acceptable
kinds of of acceptable of acceptable acceptable evidence
acceptable MOV MOV MOV was shown
MOV

Timeliness

RATING FOR OVERALL

ACCOMPLISHMENTS

FERNANDA G. JAMADIN MARK ANTHONY F FAMILARAN EMILIA L. TOLENTINO

Head Teacher III Teacher I Principal IV
Rater Ratee Approving Authority
 INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE AND COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM FOR MASTER TEACHER
Name of Employee: MARK ANTHONY F FAMILARAN Name of Rater: EMILIA L. TOLENTINO
Position: MASTER TEACHER I Position: Principal IV
Burue/Center/Service/Division: DIVISIOMN OF PASAY Date of Review: April 2019
Rating Period: June 2018-April 2019
TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION
Weig Performance Indicators Rating
MFOs Very Actual
KRAs ObjectivesTimelineht per Oustanding Satisfactor Unsatisfac Score
QET Sastisfacto Poor (1) Results Q E T Ave
KRA (5) y (3) tory (2)
ry (4)
Basic 1. Content 1. Modeled Quality Modeled Modeled Modeled Modeled No
Education Knowledge effective effective effective effective effective acceptable
Services and applications of applications of applications of applications of applications of evidence
Pedagogy content content content content content was shown
knowledge knowledge knowledge knowledge knowledge
within and within and within and within and within and
across across across across across
curriculum curriculum curriculum curriculum curriculum
teaching teaching areas teaching areas teaching areas teaching areas
areas. as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in
MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a
rating of 8 rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5
7.5%

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No

least 4 lessons lessons as lessons as lesson as acceptable
as evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by evidence
MOV 1 and MOV 1 from MOV 1 from MOV 1 from was shown
supported by colleagues and colleagues and colleagues &
any 1 of the supported by supported by supported by
other MOV any 1 of the any 1 of the any 1 of the
given other MOV other MOV other MOV
given given given

Timeliness

13
 Weig Performance Indicators Rating
MFOs Very Actual
KRAs ObjectivesTimelineht per Oustanding Satisfactor Unsatisfac Score
QET Sastisfacto Poor (1) Results Q E T Ave
KRA (5) y (3) tory (2)
ry (4)
2. Collaborated Quality Conducted, Conducted and Conducted Proposed No
with completed and completed action research action acceptable
colleagues in disseminated action research with colleagues research with evidence
the action research with colleagues colleagues was shown
conduct with colleagues
andapplication
of Efficiency Submitted at Submitted any Submitted any Submitted any No
research to least 4 of the 3 2 1 acceptable
Basic enrich given MOV of the MOV MOV evidence
Education knowledge of 7.5%
acceptable was shown
Services content MOV
and pedagogy.
Timeliness Presented the Completed the Conducted the Proposed the No
research report research report research report research acceptable
within the rating within the rating within the report evidence
period period rating within the was shown
period rating
period
Basic 3. Developed Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated No
Education and effective effective effective effective acceptable
Services applied effective teaching teaching teaching teaching evidence
teaching strategies to strategies to strategies to strategies to was shown
strategies to promote critical promote critical promote critical promote
promote critical and creative and creative and creative critical
and thinking, as well thinking, as thinking, as and creative
creative as other well well thinking, as
thinking, as higherorder as other as other well
well as other thinking higherorder higherorder as other
higherorder skills as shown thinking thinking higherorder
thinking skills. in MOV 1 with a skills as shown skills as shown thinking
rating of 8 in MOV 1 with in MOV 1 with skills as
a rating of 7 a rating of 6 shown
in MOV 1 with
7.5% a rating of 5

14
 well as other
higherorder
thinking skills.

Weig Performance Indicators Rating

MFOs
7.5% Very Actual
KRAs ObjectivesTimelineht per Oustanding Satisfactor Unsatisfac Score
QET Sastisfacto Poor (1) Results Q E T Ave
KRA (5) y (3) tory (2)
ry (4)
Efficiency Submitted 4 or Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No
more lessons as lessons as lessons as lesson as acceptable
evidently shown evidently evidently evidently evidence
in MOV 1 and shown shown shown was shown
supported by in MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and
any 1 of the supported by supported by supported by
other MOV given any 1 of the any 1 of the any of the
other MOV other MOV other
given given MOV given

Timeliness
Basic 2. Learning 4. Worked with Quality Used classroom Used Used Used No
Education Environmen colleagues to management classroom classroom classroom acceptable
Services t and model strategies that management management management evidence
Diversity of and share engage learners strategies that strategies that strategies that was shown
learners effective in engage engage engage
techniques in activities/tasks learners learners learners
the as shown in in in in
management of MOV 1 with a activities/tasks activities/tasks activities/tasks
classroom rating of 7 as shown in as shown in as shown in
structure to MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a
engage rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4
learners,
individually or in
groups, in 7.5%
meaningful
exploration,
discovery
and hands-on
activities within
a
range of
physical
learning
environments.

15
 learners effective
techniques in
the
management of
classroom
structure to Weig Performance Indicators Rating
MFOs engage Very Actual
KRAs ObjectivesTimelineht per Oustanding Satisfactor Unsatisfac Score
learners, QET Sastisfacto Poor (1) Results Q E T Ave
KRA (5) y (3) tory (2)
individually or in ry (4)
groups, in 7.5% Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No
meaningful least 4 lessons lessons lessons lesson acceptable
exploration, supported by supported by supported by supported by evidence
discovery MOV 1 and any MOV 1 and any MOV 1 and any of the was shown
and hands-on 1 of the other 1 of the other any acceptable
activities within acceptable MOV acceptable 1 of the other MOV
a MOV acceptable
range of MOV
physical
learning
environments.

Timeliness
Basic 5. Exhibited Exhibited Exhibited Exhibited Exhibited No
Education effective effective and effective and effective and effective and acceptable
Services and constructive constructive constructive constructive constructive evidence
behavior behavior behavior behavior behavior was shown
management management management management management
skills by skills by skills by skills by skills by
applying positive applying applying applying applying
and positive and positive and positive and positive and
non-violent non-violent non-violent non-violent non-violent
discipline discipline to discipline to discipline to discipline to
to ensure Quality ensure ensure ensure ensure
learning focused learningfocused learningfocuse learningfocuse learningfocuse
environments. environments d d d
shown in MOV environments environments environments
7.5% 1 with a rating of shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV
8 1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating
of 7 of 6 of 5

16
 learning focused
environments.

7.5%

Weig Performance Indicators Rating

MFOs Very Actual
KRAs ObjectivesTimelineht per Oustanding Satisfactor Unsatisfac Score
QET Sastisfacto Poor (1) Results Q E T Ave
KRA (5) y (3) tory (2)
ry (4)
Applied at least Applied at least Applied at least Applied any of No
7 of the given 7 of the given 7 of the given the given acceptable
strategies as strategies as strategies as strategies as evidence
Efficiency observed in at observed in 3 observed in 2 observed in was shown
least 4 lessons lessons lessons only
1 lesson

Timeliness
Basic 6. Worked with Worked with Worked with Worked with Worked with No
Education colleagues to colleagues at colleagues in colleagues in colleagues but acceptable
Services share least in the the school level the department no evidence of evidence
differentiated, Quality district/cluster to share lesson or grade level sharing with was shown
developmentally level to share to others
appropriate lesson share lesson
opportunities to
address
learners’ Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at No
differences in least 1 lesson least 1 lesson least 1 lesson least 1 lesson, acceptable
gender, 7.5% as evidently as evidently as evidently as evidenced evidence
needs, shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV by was shown
strengths, 1 and supported 1 and 1 and either MOV 2
interests and by any supported supported or
Efficiency acceptable MOV by any by any 3 but no
experiences.
acceptable acceptable evidence of
MOV MOV sharing with
others

Timeliness

17
 Weig Performance Indicators Rating
MFOs Very Actual
KRAs ObjectivesTimelineht per Oustanding Satisfactor Unsatisfac Score
QET Sastisfacto Poor (1) Results Q E T Ave
KRA (5) y (3) tory (2)
ry (4)
Basic 3. 7. Developed & Developed and Developed & Developed & Developed & No
Education Curriculum applied effective applied effective applied applied applied acceptable
Services and strategies in the strategies effective effective effective evidence
Planning planning and showing strategies strategies strategies was shown
management of developmentally showing showing showing
developmentally - sequenced developmentall developmentall developmental
sequenced teaching and y y ly
teaching learning - sequenced - sequenced - sequenced
and learning Quality process as teaching and teaching and teaching and
processes to shown in MOV learning learning learning
meet 1 with a rating process as process as process as
curriculum of 8 shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV
requirements 1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating
and of 7 of 6 of 5
varied teaching 7.5%
contexts

Submitted at Submitted 2-3 Submitted 1 Submitted 1 No

least 4 lessons lessons as lesson as lesson as acceptable
as evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by evidence
MOV 1 and 2 MOV 1 and 2 shown in MOV any 1 of the was shown
and supported and supported 1 and/or 2 and acceptable
Efficiency by any 1 of the by any 1 of the supported by MOV
other other any 1 of the
acceptable MOV acceptable other
MOV acceptable
MOV

Timeliness

18
 Weig Performance Indicators Rating
MFOs Very Actual
KRAs ObjectivesTimelineht per Oustanding Satisfactor Unsatisfac Score
QET Sastisfacto Poor (1) Results Q E T Ave
KRA (5) y (3) tory (2)
ry (4)
Basic 8. Reviewed Quality Consistently led Frequently led Occasionally Rarely led No
Education with collaborative collaborative led collaborative acceptable
Services colleagues, reviews of reviews of collaborative reviews of evidence
teacher teacher and teacher and reviews of teacher and was shown
and learner learner learner teacher and learner
feedback feedback as feedback as learner feedback as
to plan, facilitate evidenced by evidenced by feedback as evidenced by
and the MOV the MOV evidenced by the MOV
enrich teaching submitted submitted the MOV submitted
submitted

Efficiency Submitted 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No

collaborative collaborative collaborative collaborative acceptable
reviews of reviews of reviews of reviews of evidence
teacher and teacher and teacher and teacher and was shown
learner learner learner learner
feedback as feedback as feedback as feedback as
evidently shown evidently evidently evidently
in MOV 1 and shown shown shown
supported by in MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and in any of the
any 1 of the supported by supported by acceptable
acceptable MOV any 1 of the any 1 of the MOV
acceptable acceptable
MOV MOV

Timeliness

19
 Weig Performance Indicators Rating
MFOs Very Actual
KRAs ObjectivesTimelineht per Oustanding Satisfactor Unsatisfac Score
QET Sastisfacto Poor (1) Results Q E T Ave
KRA (5) y (3) tory (2)
ry (4)
Basic 9. Advised and Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No
Education guided advised advised advised advised acceptable
Services colleagues in colleagues in colleagues in colleagues in colleagues in evidence
the the selection, the selection, the selection, the selection, was shown
selection, organization, organization, organization, organization,
organization, development development development development
development and appropriate and appropriate and and
and use use of teaching use of teaching appropriate appropriate
of appropriate and learning and learning use of teaching use of
teaching and resources as resources as and learning teaching
learning shown in the shown in the resources as and learning
resources, MOV submitted MOV submitted shown in the resources as
including MOV submitted shown in the
ICT, to address MOV
specific learning 7.5% submitted
goals

Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No

least 4 teaching teaching and teaching and teaching and acceptable
and learning learning learning learning evidence
resources as resources as resources as resource as was shown
evidenced by at evidenced by at evidenced by evidenced by
Efficiency least 1 of the least 1 of the at any of the
acceptable MOV acceptable least 1 of the acceptable
MOV acceptable MOV
MOV

Timeliness

20
 Weig Performance Indicators Rating
MFOs Very Actual
KRAs ObjectivesTimelineht per Oustanding Satisfactor Unsatisfac Score
QET Sastisfacto Poor (1) Results Q E T Ave
KRA (5) y (3) tory (2)
ry (4)
Basic 4. 10. Worked Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No
Education Assessment collaboratively reviewed reviewed reviewed reviewed acceptable
Services & Reporting with collaboratively collaboratively collaboratively collaboratively evidence
colleagues to assessment assessment assessment assessment was shown
review tools with tools with tools with tools with
the design, colleagues as colleagues as colleagues as colleagues as
selection, shown in the shown in the shown in the shown in the
organization MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV
and use submitted
of a range of
effective 7.5%
Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No
diagnostic,
least 4 assessment assessment assessment acceptable
formative
assessment tools as tools as tool evidence
and summative
tools as evidently evidently as evidently was shown
assessment
evidently shown shown shown shown in any
strategies
in any of the in any of the in any of the of
consistent
acceptable acceptable acceptable the acceptable
with curriculum
MOV MOV MOV MOV
requirements.

Timeliness
Basic 11. Interpreted Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No
Education collaboratively collaborated collaborated collaborated collaborated acceptable
Services monitoring and with colleagues with colleagues with colleagues with evidence
evaluation in the in the in the colleagues was shown
strategies interpretation of interpretation of interpretation in the
of attainment assessment assessment of interpretation
data to Quality data as shown data as shown assessment of
support learner in the MOV in the MOV data as shown assessment
progress and submitted submitted in the MOV data as shown
achievement. 7.5% submitted in the MOV
submitted

21
 strategies
of attainment
data to
support learner
progress and
achievement. 7.5%
Weig Performance Indicators Rating
MFOs Very Actual
KRAs ObjectivesTimelineht per Oustanding Satisfactor Unsatisfac Score
QET Sastisfacto Poor (1) Results Q E T Ave
KRA (5) y (3) tory (2)
ry (4)
Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted any No
least 2 different least 3 of the least 2 of the 1 acceptable
Efficiency types of MOV same kind of same kind of of the MOV evidence
MOV MOV was shown
Timeliness
Basic 12. Applied skills Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely applied No
Education in applied skills in applied skills in applied skills in skills in the acceptable
Services the effective the effective the effective the effective effective evidence
communication communication communication communication communicatio was shown
of of learner needs of learner of learner n
learner needs, and progress to needs needs of learner
progress and parents/ and progress to and progress needs
achievement to guardians as parents/ to and progress
key Quality shown in the guardians as parents/ to
stakeholders, MOV submitted shown in the guardians as parents/
including MOV submitted shown in the guardians as
parents/ 7.5% MOV submitted shown in the
guardians. MOV
submitted

Submitted at Submitted any Submitted any Submitted any No

least 3 of the 3 MOV 2 MOV 1 MOV acceptable
Efficiency acceptable MOV evidence
was shown
Timeliness

22
 Weig Performance Indicators Rating
MFOs Very Actual
KRAs ObjectivesTimelineht per Oustanding Satisfactor Unsatisfac Score
QET Sastisfacto Poor (1) Results Q E T Ave
KRA (5) y (3) tory (2)
ry (4)
Basic 5. Plus 13. Performed Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No
Education Factor various performed performed performed performed acceptable
Services related special tasks special tasks special tasks special tasks evidence
works/activities and/or and/or and/or and/or was shown
that Quality assignments as assignments as assignments as assignments
contribute to the shown in the shown in the shown in the as
teaching- MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted shown in the
learning MOV
process. 7.5% submitted

Submitted at Submitted only Submitted only Submitted any No

least 4 different 3 different 2 different 1 acceptable
kinds of kinds kinds of the evidence
Efficiency acceptable of acceptable of acceptable acceptable was shown
MOV MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness
RATING FOR
OVERALL
ACCOMPLISHMENTS

EMILIA L. TOLENTINO MARK ANTHONY F FAMILARAN EVANGELINE P. LADINES, CESO V

Principal IV Master Teacher I Schools Division Superintendent
Rater Ratee Approving Authority

23
 Part II. COMPETENCIES
CORE BEHAVIORAL COMPETENCIES
Self- Management
1. Sets personal goals and direction, needs and development.
2. Understands personal actions behavior that are clear and purposive and takes into
account personal goals and values congruent to that of the organization
3. Display emotional maturity and enthusiam for and is challenged by higher goals
4. Prioritize work tasks & schedules (Gantt charts, checklists.Etc.) to achieve goals
5. Sets high quality, challenging, realistic goals for self and others.
Professionalism and Ethics
1. Demonstrate the values and behavior enshrined in the Norms and Conduct and Ethical
Standards for Public Officials and Employees (RA 6713)
2. Practice ethical and professional behavior and conduct taking into account the impact of
his/her actions and decisions
3. Maintains a professional image: being trustworthy, regularity of attendance and
punctuality, good grooming and communication
4. Makes personal sacrifices to meet organizational needs.
5. Act with a sense of urgency and responsibility to meet the organization's needs, improve
system and help others improve their effectiveness.
Results Focus
1. Achieves results with optimal use of time and resources mist of the time.
2. Avoids rework, mistakes and wastage through effective work methods by placing
organizational needs before personal needs.
3. Delivers error-free outputs most of the time by conforming to standard operating
procedures correctly and consistently. Able to produce very satisfactory quality of work
in terms of usefulness/acceptability and completeness with no supervision required
4. Expresses a desire to do better and may express frustration of waste or inefficiency.
May focus on new or more precise ways of meeting goals set.
5. Makes specific changes in the system or in own work methods to improve performance.
Examples may include doing something better, faster at a lower cost, more efficiently, or
improving quality, customer satisfaction, morale, without setting any specific goal.
5 - Role model; 4- Consistently demonstrate; 3 - Most of the time demosntrates; 2- Sometimes demonstrate; 1- Rarely demonstrate
Teamwork
1. Willingly does his/her share of responsibility RATE
2. Promotes collaboration and removes barries to teamwork and goal accomplishment across
the organization.
3. Applies negotiation principles in arrivign at win-win agreements
4. Drives consensus and team ownership of decisions
5. Works constructively and collaboratively with others and across organizations to accomplish
organizational goals and objectives.
Service Orientation
1. Can explain and articulate organizational directions, issues and problems.
2. Takes personal responsibility for dealing with and/or correcting customer service issues and
concerns.
3. Initiatives activities that promotes advocacy for men and women empowerment.
4. Participates in updating office vision, mission, mandates and strategies based on DepED
strategies and directions.
5. Developes and adopts service improvement program through simplified procedures that will
further enhance service delivery.
Innovations
1. Examines the root cause of problems and suggests effective solutions. Foster new ideas,
processes, and suggests better ways to do things (cost and/or operational efficiency)
2. Demonstrate an ability to think "beyond the box". Continuously focuses on improving
personal productivity to create higher value and results.
3. Promotes a creative climate and inspires co-workers to develop original ideas or solutions.
4. Translates creative thinking into tangible changes and solutions that improve the work init
and organization
5. Uses ingenioys methods to accomplish responsibilities. Demonstrates resourcefulness and
the ability to succeed with minimal resources.
 PART II. COMPETENCIES

CORE SKILLS
Achievement
1 Enjoy working hard
2 Is action-oriented and full of energy for the things he/she sees as challenging
3 Forwards personal, professional and work unit needs and interests in an issue.
4 Seize more opportunities than others
5 Strategic thinker

Managing Diversity
1 Respect all kinds of classes of people
2 Deals effectively with all races, nationalities, cultures, disabilities, ages and both sexes
3 Support equal and fair treatment and opportunity for all
4 Applies equal standards and criteria to all classes
5 Manifest cultural and gender sensitivity when dealing with people.

Acountability
1 Can be counted on to exceed goals successfully
2 Steadfastly pushes self and others towards results
3 Gets things done on time and optimum use of resources
4 Builds team spirit
5 Transacts with transparency

5 - Role model; 4- Consistently demonstrate; 3 - Most of the time demosntrates; 2- Sometimes demonstrate; 1- Rarely demonstrate
 PART II. COMPETENCIES
CORE SKILLS
LEADING PEOPLE
Uses basic persuasion techniques in a discussion or presentation e.g., staff mobilization, appeals to reason and/or emotions,
1
uses data and examples, visual aids
2 Persuades, convinces or influences others, in order to have a specific impact or effect.
3 “Sets a good example”, is a credible and respected leader; and demonstrates desired behavior.
4 Forwards personal, professional and work unit needs and interests in an issue.
Assumes a pivotal role in promoting the development of an inspiring, relevant vision for the organization and influences others
5
to share ownership of DepEd goals, in order to create an effective work environment.

PEOPLE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT

1 Makes specific changes in the performance management system or in own work methods to improve performance (e.g. does
something better, faster, at lower cost, more efficiently; improves quality, customer satisfaction, morale, revenues).
2 Sets performance standards and measures progress of employees based on office and department targets.
3 Provides feedback and technical assistance such as coaching for performance improvement and action planning.
4 States performance expectations clearly and checks understanding and commitment.

5 Performs all the stages of result-based performance management system supported by evidence and required
documents/forms.

PEOPLE DEVELOPMENT
1 Improves the skills and effectiveness of individuals through employing a range of development strategies.
Facilitates workforce effectiveness through coaching and motivating/developing people within a work environment that
2
promotes mutual trust and respect.
3 Conceptualizes and implements learning interventions to meet identified training needs.
Does long-term coaching or training by arranging appropriate and helpful assignments, formal training, or other experiences
4
for the purpose of supporting a person’s learning and development.

Cultivates a learning environment by structuring interactive experiences such as looking for future opportunities that are in
5
support of achieving individual career goals.

5 - Role model; 4- Consistently demonstrate; 3 - Most of the time demosntrates; 2- Sometimes demonstrate; 1- Rarely demonstrate
 PART III: SUMMARY OF RATINGS FOR DISCUSSION

Final Performance Results Rating Adjectival Rating

Accomplishment of KRAs and Objectives

Employee- Superior Agreement

The signatures below confirm that the employee had his/her superior have agreed to the contents of the performance as
captured in this form

Name of Employee: Name of Superior:

MARK ANTHONY F FAMILARAN

Signature: Signature:

Date: Date:
 PART IV: DEVELOPMENT PLANS

Strengths Developmental Needs Action Plan (Recommended Timeline Resources

Developmental Intervention) Needed

A. Functional Competencies

B. Core Behavioral Competencies

Feedback:

MARK ANTHONY F FAMILARAN FERNANDA G. JAMADIN EMILIA L. TOLENTINO

Teacher I Head Teacher III Principal IV
Ratee Rater Approving Authority
Conforme:
PHASE I. Performance Planning and Commitment

FERNANDA G. JAMADIN MARK ANTHONY F FAMILARAN EMILIA L. TOLENTINO

Head Teacher III Teacher I Principal IV
Rater Ratee Date Approving Authority Date

PHASE III. Performance Review and Evaluation Mid-Year Review

Mid-Year Review:

FERNANDA G. JAMADIN MARK ANTHONY F FAMILARAN EMILIA L. TOLENTINO

Head Teacher III Teacher I Principal IV
Rater Ratee Date Approving Authority Date

Year End Review and Evaluation:

FERNANDA G. JAMADIN MARK ANTHONY F FAMILARAN EMILIA L. TOLENTINO

Head Teacher III Teacher I Principal IV
Rater Ratee Date Approving Authority Date