Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
research-article2016
JOU0010.1177/1464884916648093JournalismSong
Article
Journalism
education
Yang Song
Fudan University, China
Abstract
This article analyzes a journalism student’s multimedia news storytelling project in the
format of audio slideshows as required by an introductory course on online journalism.
Combining classroom ethnography, semi-structured interviews, content and textual
analysis, the study focuses in detail on how the student designs a character-driven,
audio-visual story through the theoretical lens of digital literacies and multimodality. The
findings reveal the complexity of multimodal and generic design made by the journalism
student. It is also found that the design process helps her to assert an authorial stance as
an emergent online journalist who negotiates heterogeneity of journalistic professional
Discourses. This article proposes a genre-aware, semiotic-aware, critical framework
informed by digital literacy studies and embeds a case study in the theoretical framework
in order to understand the ‘literacies’ as required and performed in multimedia news
storytelling. Theoretical and pedagogical implications are also discussed at the end of
the article.
Keywords
Audio slideshows, genre-awareness, multimedia news storytelling, multimodality,
online journalism education, semiotic awareness
Introduction
Technology has brought along constant evolution to journalism (Pavlik, 2001). With the
emergence of online journalism in the 1990s, online news practices challenge the
occupational jurisdiction of journalism with a multiplicity of conflicting and competing
Corresponding author:
Yang Song, Department of English Language and Literature, College of Foreign Languages and Literatures,
Fudan University, 323, Humanities Building, 220 Handan Road, Yangpu District, 200433 Shanghai, China.
Email: songyang@fudan.edu.cn
838 Journalism 19(6)
that are accepted as instantiations of particular identities (or ‘kinds of people’) by spe-
cific groups’. Any literacy practice by an individual simultaneously enacts an identity
affiliated to one or more Discourses, whether in harmony or in tension. Second, NLS
emphasize the critical awareness of the discourse community members toward their own
literacy practice, their beliefs, and values, as well as institutional codes of conduct that
have been internalized and recognized by these members. It requires learners being
socialized in any kind of literacy practice to not only achieve mastery in performance but
to learn meta-knowledge about (1) the Discourse(s) that they subscribe to and (2) how
the Discourses come into being historically and evolve under specific social and cultural
contexts, and to learn a meta-language to articulate and to share their understandings
about the meta-knowledge so as to make possibilities of revising the Discourses together
with the underlying power relations (Gee, 2014). The cultivation of meta-knowledge and
a meta-language makes new literacies inherently akin with critical literacy and critical
pedagogy (Gee, 2014). Third, NLS have led a ‘digital’ turn in literacy research by empha-
sizing how digital technologies drive changes in literacy practice (Mills, 2010).
Ethnographic studies have revealed innovative use of digital technologies among chil-
dren both in school and at home (Gilje, 2010; Vasudevan et al., 2010). Their attention to
the juxtaposition of multiple types of semiotic resources (written and spoken texts,
images, sounds, voices, etc.) overlaps with the tradition of multiliteracies studies (New
London Group, 1996).
New London Group (1996) argues that the textual literacy is increasingly integrated
with other modes of meaning making, including ‘the visual, the audio, the spatial, the
behavioral, and so on’ (Cazden et al., 1996: 64). Apart from linguistic meaning, five
other equally important elements, including ‘visual meaning, audio meaning, gestural
meaning, spatial meaning, and the multimodal patterns of meaning that relates to the first
five modes of meaning to each other’ (Cazden et al., 1996: 65), are incorporated into the
making of meaning (or design). Multiliteracies researchers (Kress, 2003, 2010; Kress
and Van Leeuwen, 1996; Van Leeuwen, 2005) have also contributed substantially to the
development of multimodal discourse analysis (MDA), which provides the meta-lan-
guage for both ethnographic and textual studies in both traditions of literacy studies
reviewed above.
Grounded on the paradigmatic underpinnings of digital literacy studies, online jour-
nalists can be regarded as a discourse community that shares an increasingly diverse
multiplicity of journalistic Discourses and codes of conducts, especially those related to
what is news and what are news values. Online journalism classrooms are in turn ‘sites
where students and teachers undertake matter/energy/symbolic exchanges as part of the
work of producing discourse and cultural capital’ (Luke, 1995: 3). Students are supposed
to be critically socialized into literacy practice required for ‘designing’ multimedia news
storytelling embedded in online journalism culture globally and locally. Design refers to
how students explore the journalistic storytelling potentials of multimedia, when com-
pleting the audio slideshow assignment. The design stance is rooted in traditional MDA
but also in the functional methodology that ‘treats the film [audio slideshow in the case]
as designed to elicit certain sorts of effects’, and that assumes that ‘the text is so made
that it seeks certain intersubjective regularities of response’ (Bordwell, 2004: 211). This
article will describe and analyze a journalism student’s multimodal design experience as
840 Journalism 19(6)
both process and product so as to illustrate digital literacy practice involved in learning
multimedia news storytelling and her identity formation as an online journalist-to-be.
Before delving into the case study, the next section will introduce the theoretical frame-
work informed by digital literacy studies.
Theoretical framework
The present section proposes a unitary, multi-layered framework. Methodologically, the
framework aims to facilitate the description and analysis of digital literacies involved in
online journalism practice. The framework defines digital literacies as both meaning-
making potentials and multi-semiotic instantiation enacted and reflected upon by online
journalism students in specific cultural and social contexts for specific purposes. It
simultaneously encompasses dimensions of professional culture, professional practices,
and abstraction of instantiated meaning making via multimodal semiotic resources (see
Figure 1).
Figure 1 illustrates a genre-aware, semiotic-aware, critical framework that aims at
analyzing digital literacies required and practiced by online journalists. The largest circle
represents the dimension of professional journalistic Discourses. Based on Gee ([1990]
2012), the Discourses are social constructs, which are produced, reproduced, circulated,
and transformed by online journalists as situated within a journalistic institutional culture
and the overall culture of online mass communication. Journalism Discourses are
‘weaved’ together to mark the emergence of new Discourses of online journalism.
Journalistic schools are by no means an insulated space independent from the sociocul-
tural context but rather ‘a modern state institution in which the regulation of activity and
knowledge construction are seen as crucial for the process of sociocultural reproduction’
(Pérez-Milans, 2011: 1007). Instead of imposing a particular kind of journalistic
Discourse on the students, online journalism courses should, from the perspective of
New Literacies, take a critical stance by drawing students’ attention to existing Discourses
and how they construct their authorial stances or discourse identities by subscribing to
Song 841
Case study
The present section presents my findings of the case study in two sub-sections. The first
sub-section focuses on multimodal and generic literacies enacted in Christina’s multi-
modal storytelling experience. The second sub-section analyzes the journalistic
Discourses that Christina has consciously subscribed to and embodied in her authorial
stance as an emergent online journalist.
had been a loyal customer for over a decade. The shoe-shiner’s commentary is self-initi-
ated and simultaneously addressed to the customer and to Christina as an exposition of
their relationship; it reflects not only customer-service but a long-lasting friendship. In
terms of the modes of production, the dual function of the commentary introduced the
mode of participation in addition to the modes of observation and interaction into the
story production.3 The participatory elements included in the final story inherently
engaged the viewers, who were ‘participating’ vicariously as Christina did at the scene
of observation and interview.
The institutional aspect of the story value, on the other hand, is first constructed
through visual presentations of the shoe shining processes. The photo slides (see
Appendix 1) unfolded with a panorama of the shoe-shiner at his working place, and
continued with photos of him at work; the slides showed his working tools and a
shined black shoe. The opening phase was followed by four phases of him interacting
with four different customers, which were intermingled with close-ups of his working
hands, tools, and shined or to-be-shined shoes. The sequential photographic staging of
the shoe-shiner, together with different customers, brought continuous temporal exten-
sions along the story timeline (although compressed in comparison with the physical
time that it took for shoe shining). Even without the auditory tracks, the visual sequence
of one shoe shining event after another established the basic narrative stream of the
audio slideshow story.
The shoe-shiner–customer interactions were presented intermittently with close-ups
of relevant shoe shining tools and other objects in the shoe-shiner’s working environ-
ment. The dynamic editing method not only provided an abundance of visual variety to
the viewers, in terms of shooting distances and angles, but it helped validate the image of
a shoe-shiner with professional expertise.
Apart from the visual track, the institutional story value is further enhanced by the
integration of recount, explanation, and argumentation in the verbal track. As can be seen
in the Subtitle column in Appendix 1, the story started with the shoe-shiner’s narration of
how he has been a self-made man since the very beginning of his career. In between his
narration and self-evaluation commentary about his career and life history, Christina
inserted supportive commentary from the customers to provide side evidence to the
shoe-shiner’s account. The professional expertise of the shoe-shiner became more con-
vincing by the customers’ verbal expression of high satisfaction with the shoe shining
Song 845
Christina: Coz at the beginning, the old man says he wants to satisfy the customers, and the
customer says it’s really good or something. It’s like responding to him. It’s not just from this
old man. We can also see from the customers how hard working the old man is. When I put the
customers’ comments in, I was trying to respond to what is before and how to move to another
customer, something like that.
846 Journalism 19(6)
Figure 3. Interplay between the dual tracks of Shine for Life.
The delicacy of the structuring design resides in the diverse and rhetorical organiza-
tion of the shoe-shiner’s and customers’ verbal discourses of emotion or evaluation in
Martin and White’s (2005) Appraisal Theory. The language of evaluation can be catego-
rized into (1) affect, (2) appreciation, and (3) judgment. Affect is ‘concerned with regis-
tering positive and negative feelings’; judgment with ‘attitudes toward behavior, which
we admire or criticize, praise or condemn’; and appreciation with ‘evaluations of semi-
otic and natural phenomena, according to the ways in which they are valued or not in a
given field’ (Martin and White, 2005: 42–43). For instance, as illustrated in the Subtitle
column in Appendix 1, the shoe-shiner’s judgment toward the shoe shining expertise,
spanning from Slide 2 to Slide 6, is expanded through the attributive propositions of
Customer 1 corresponding to Slide 7 and Slide 8. His appreciation of the shoe shining
expertise is further expanded and strengthened by the second customer’s judgment, span-
ning from Slide 9 to Slide 11.
Given the above visual and auditory devices that the student employed to create emo-
tional authenticity, and as a way to engage and rhetorically persuade the viewers to
accept the story value, it is eventually time to analyze how the student integrated the
above devices together in multimedia storytelling.
As discussed in the present section, the student has maintained a narrative storyline in
the visual track while building up a dialogic structure in the auditory track (see Figure 3
above). The narrative line built upon sequences of shoe-shiner-and-customer interactions,
and imbued the intermittent presentation of verbal sequences from the shoe-shiner and the
customers as ‘alternating lines of dialogue’ (Van Leeuwen, 2005: 249) that ‘are joined
with one another and alternating with one another not according to the laws of grammar
or logic, but according to the laws of evaluative (emotive) correspondence, dialogical
deployment, etc.’ (Van Leeuwen, 2005: 249). In between the logic of dialogue, Christina
utilized multimodal coherence. For instance, she explained her decision about multimodal
coherence while maintaining the flow of interaction as follows below. Please note that the
visual-verbal linking devices and corresponding slide numbers in Appendix 1 are marked
in square brackets after the specific section of the student interview episode below:4
Christina: Because he’s talking about the oil [Slide 3] – ‘the polish you cannot be too stinky’
– so I put the photos there [Illustration]. shiny [Slide 4, Anchorage], yeah, and then, like, it
takes a, because this customer is the first customer who talks. I tried to show how this man tried
to polish shoes for him [Slide 5] and yeah he’s talking [Anchorage].
Table 1. Comparison between participatory and objective Discourses of journalism (summary
based on Hajunen, 2013: 949–950).
recorded conversation between the customer and the shoe-shiner; she had wisely chosen
two moments of the sequence of interaction. Slide 26 was a medium close-up of the cus-
tomer pouring water for the shoe-shiner. The focal length was typical for showing inti-
mate relationship between subjects in the shooting frame. Slide 27 was the shoe-shiner
sitting on a stool and eating bread. The two images were linked via the continuous pres-
entation of the hissing sound of the plastic bag that wrapped the bread in Slide 27. The
two images, together with the natural sound, were adequate enough to activate the visual
schemata of the scene.
In a word, Christina employed a diversity of multimodal and generic means to present
a multi-perspective, multi-character narrative that engaged viewers with strong emo-
tional authenticity. Most of the strategies analyzed above were not taught in the course.
The case, therefore, illustrates the power of the student’s digital literacy practice that
filled the gap left by the instructor-led online journalism meta-knowledge and meta-
language; with digital literacies, the student was not only able to push the boundaries of
the multimedia storytelling potentials of the audio slideshow but asserting her authorial
stance as an emergent online journalist.
While the format of audio slideshows allows her to maintain a detached role of the
observer and witness aligning with the objective ideal of journalism (Lillie, 2011),
Christina asserted explicitly in the student interview that she did not agree that objectiv-
ity could only be realized by subordinating multiple, balanced voices under an authorita-
tive voice of the reporter, which seems a ‘mission impossible’ in the case of
character-driven narrative as was discussed in class by the instructor. Instead, Christina
explained her efforts in constructing the afore-analyzed persuasive narrative as a form of
‘objective’ reporting and treating the audio slideshow as a site of genuine dialogue,
where multiple voices are ‘juxtaposed to one another, mutually supplement one another,
contradict one another and be interrelated dialogically’ (Bakhtin, 1986: 292). Although
she is using the term ‘objectivity’ in explanation of her story design, she has aligned
extensively with the participatory ideal that regards the role of journalists as perceptive
analysts (Pauly, 2008). She has dialogically reconstructed the story scene by scene, con-
textualized audio interviews with photos (and vice versa), and attended to symbolic
details (see Slides 14, 15, and 25), which are all recognized rituals of participatory ideal
of journalism. The visually contextualized presentation of voices in the story also abides
by the ideal of transparency. In terms of identity formation, Christina’s story design can
therefore be understood simultaneously as her assertion of an authorial stance that nego-
tiates among the three journalistic Discourses of online journalism.
Conclusion
Digital literacies are situated, multi-semiotic meaning-making practices that are co-
determined by the lived experiences of (student) journalists, their professional values,
and multimedia storytelling. As a single case study, Christina’s audio slideshow making
constitutes a limited set of data. The case study cannot encompass all digital literacies for
online journalism, and the findings of the study need to be interpreted in view of its
limitation.
While Christina’s case is regarded as successful by the instructor and her classmates,
it reveals a variety of challenges that journalism students may face in the process of cre-
ating audio-visual news stories as well as how those challenges can be addressed with
learnable strategies (Hafner, 2014: 678). The findings show that multimodal news story-
telling that online journalists (or online-journalists-to-be) are practicing in fulfillment of
the course requirements has gone far beyond technological skills of using computer soft-
ware, digital cameras, and audio recorders. In the case study, Christina has demonstrated
a multiplicity of digital literacies. She reflexively asserted her authorial stance as a pro-
fessional online journalist-to-be by negotiating different journalistic Discourses, multi-
plying news gathering strategies, and exploring meaning-making potentials of
multi-semiotic and multi-generic resources. By mobilizing the semiotic and generic
resources in hand, she has constructed the news worthiness of the story at multiple levels,
engaged the audience emotionally and attitudinally, and enhanced the validity and trust-
worthiness by creating dialogues among the subjects/characters’ voices.
In terms of the transferability of the findings, transmodal coherence and multimodal
structuring strategies are also significant digital literacies required for effective design
of themed news webpages, which involve images, texts, and audio clips, and so on.
Song 849
Even in the case of Twitter journalism, it is not uncommon for Twitter news to include
both images (or photo galleries) and texts. In addition, selecting and framing tweet
quotes, video clips, and photos into a coherent news story (as in storify.com) also
requires (student) journalists to mobilize emotional packaging strategies to bring mul-
tiple voices into meaning dialogues with each other as well as balancing different
journalistic ideals (i.e. objectivity, transparency, and participation) as Christina did in
the case.
While the case study is illustrative of how multimedia could be understood and
practiced in audio-visual news storytelling, it does not involve meaning-making
resources such as some spatial representation resources (e.g. hypertexts, grids), and
user-generated contents as those in Twitter journalism. In order to draw a fuller picture
of digital literacies for online journalism, more case studies need to be conducted in
both professional educational contexts with regard to online journalism practices in a
variety of formats, such as cases of collaborative productions of news tweets among
(student) journalists and non-journalist Twitter users. It also needs to be reiterated that
digital literacies analyzed in the case study cannot be abstracted into prescriptive
guidelines for online news storytelling without careful consideration of the situations
of news production.
Given the afore-mentioned limitation, the case study has two implications.
Theoretically, the analysis of Christina’s audio slideshow making demonstrates how the
theoretical framework proposed in the present study can be useful in examining online
journalists’ digital literacies practices and their professional identity formation. By inte-
grating the SFL and NLS traditions of literacy studies, the framework allows online
journalism education researchers and practitioners to analyze, teach, and assess students’
online journalism practices as both product and process and as both multi-semiotic and
multi-generic meaning-making potentials and instantiations. The framework is proposed
with a specific focus on online journalism because of its richness in multimedia elements
and the dynamic negotiations among pluralizing journalistic ideals.
Nevertheless, the boundary between online and offline journalism is blurry, and cross-
platform practices can be commonly found in major news agencies globally. In the sense,
the framework could help journalism educators understand and analyze journalism prac-
tice in general as long as a critical reflection has devoted to the meaning-making poten-
tials enabled by ever-evolving news packaging formats (Jacobson et al., 2015) as well as
professional ideals that are embodied and enacted in news storytelling.
Pedagogically, the multi-dimensional framework of digital literacies for online jour-
nalism could also serve as a profession-specific framework, which can be used by
(online) journalism educators to design related course curricula. First, the framework
provides a contextualized, holistic, and profession-specific account of (online) journal-
ism practices. In connection with the three sets of skills commonly taught in online
journalism courses, including technological skills, conventional journalistic skills, and
online news packaging skills, the framework of digital literacies requires both teachers
and students to prioritize the notion of journalism practice. Those different sets of skills
are embodied in journalism practice and can only be acquired in a situated manner.
Instead of teaching and learning these sets of skills independently, it would be more
effective to design authentic, situated news storytelling tasks in a variety of news formats
850 Journalism 19(6)
with different semiotic meaning-making potentials. In this way, students are empowered
to exert agency as story designers and mobilize their digital literacies acquired both in
and out of the classroom.
Second, informed by NLS and the genre pedagogy of the Sydney School, the educa-
tors could put more emphasis on the co-construction of a set of meta-language with their
students in critical and reflexive analysis of online news storytelling by others and by
themselves. In other words, the digital-literacies-informed approach allows online jour-
nalism educators to recognize the emergent, dynamic, and creative nature of multimodal
news storytelling and to foster the online journalism classroom as ‘sites for learning in
vibrant, engaging ways’ (Vasudevan et al., 2010: 465).
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank the three anonymous reviewers for their constructive and inspiring comments
on an earlier draft of the article. As the article is developed on the basis of my doctoral dissertation,
I would also like to thank Professor Angel M. Y. Lin, my PhD supervisor, for her guidance during
my study at the University of Hong Kong.
Funding
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/
or publication of this article: The research was supported by a research faculty startup grant spon-
sored by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China (JJH3152034, Fudan
University, Shanghai).
Notes
1. A paradigm here refers to an educational model that is generally accepted by the researchers
and educators as an effective way to facilitate teaching and learning with a profession-specific
community.
2. Media logic refers specifically to ‘forms and processes which organise the work done
within a particular medium [and] the competence and frames of perception of audiences/
users, which in turn reinforces how production within the medium takes place’ (Dahlgren,
1996: 63).
3. Nichols (2001: 33) identified six modes of documentary in terms of genre, style, and involve-
ment of the documentary makers. Among them, the observational mode allows ‘the film-
maker to record unobtrusively what people did when they were not explicitly addressing the
camera’, while the participatory mode allowed the filmmaker to engage with the subjects
directly and to ‘recount past events by means of witnesses and experts whom the viewer could
also see’.
4. Anchorage and illustration are two strategies of linking between images and words in Van
Leeuwen’s (2005) multimodal discourse analysis (MDA) framework. In the case of anchor-
age, ‘words make the meanings of an image more specific’ (p. 275). Illustration refers to ‘The
text paraphrases the image (or vice versa)’ (Van Leeuwen, 2005: 230).
Song 851
References
Bakhtin M (1986) Speech Genres and Other Late Essays (trans. VW McGee). Austin, TX:
University of Texas Press.
Baldry A and Thibault J (2006) Multimodal Transcription and Text Analysis: A Multimedia Toolkit
and Coursebook with Associated on-line Course. London; New York: Equinox Publishing.
Barton D and Hamilton M (1998) Local Literacies: Reading and Writing in One Community.
London: Routledge.
Becker LB, Vlad T and Kalpen K (2011) 2011 annual survey of journalism and mass communica-
tion enrollments: Enrollments decline, reversing the increase of a year earlier, and suggesting
slow growth for future. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator 66(4): 299–324.
Blom R and Davenport LD (2012) Searching for the core of journalism education: Program directors
disagree on curriculum priorities. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator 67(1): 70–86.
Bor SE (2014) Teaching social media journalism: Challenges and opportunities for future curricu-
lum design. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator 69(3): 243–255.
Bordwell D (2004) Neo-structuralist narratology and the functions of filmic storytelling. In: Ryan
ML (ed.) Narrative across Media: The Languages of Storytelling. Lincoln, NE; London:
University of Nebraska Press, pp. 203–219.
Bruner J (1990) Acts of Meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Cazden C, Cope B, Fairclough N, et al. (1996) A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social
futures. Harvard Educational Review 66(1): 60–92.
Chen M (2013) Bu yao yin wei zou de tai yuan, er wang ji wei shen me chu fa. Beijing, China:
China Renmin University Press (in Chinese).
Cochrane T, Sissons H and Mulrennan D (2012) Journalism 2.0: Exploring the impact of mobile
and social media on journalism education. In: Sánchez IA and Isaias P (eds) Proceedings of
the IADIS International Conference on Mobile Learning 2012. Berlin: IADIS International
Association for Development of the Information Society, pp. 165–172.
Dahlgren P (1996) Media logic in cyberspace: Repositioning journalism and its publics. Javnost:
The Public 3(3): 59–72.
Deuze M (1999) Journalism and the web: An analysis of skills and standards in an online environ-
ment. International Communication Gazette 61(5): 373–390.
Du YR (2014) What is needed versus what is taught: Students’ perception of online journalism
courses in Hong Kong. Asia Pacific Media Educator 24(2): 225–237.
Du YR and Lo SCE (2014) The gap between online journalism education and practice: A Hong
Kong study. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator 69(4): 415–434.
Fahmy S (2008) How online journalists rank importance of news skills. Newspaper Research
Journal 29(2): 23–39.
Galtung J and Ruge M (1965) The structure of foreign news: The presentation of the Congo, Cuba
and Cyprus crises in four Norwegian newspapers. Journal of International Peace Research
2(1): 64–91.
Gee JP ([1990] 2012) Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideology in Discourses. London:
Routledge.
Gee JP (2014) Unified Discourse Analysis: Language, Reality, Virtual Worlds and Video Games.
London: Routledge.
Gilje Ø (2010) Multimodal redesign in filmmaking practices: An inquiry of young filmmakers’
deployment of semiotic tools in their filmmaking practice. Written Communication 27(4):
494–522.
Gillmor D (2006) We the Media: Grassroots Journalism by the People for the People. Sebastopol,
CA: O’Reilly.
852 Journalism 19(6)
Hafner CA (2014) Embedding digital literacies in English Language Teaching: Students’ digital
video projects as multimodal ensembles. TESOL Quaterly 48(4): 655–685.
Hajunen J (2013) At the crossroads of participation and objectivity: Reinventing citizen engage-
ment in the SBS newsroom. New Media & Society 15(6): 947–962.
Halliday MAK (1978) Language as Social Semiotics. London: Edward Arnold.
Hart J (2011) Story Craft: The Complete Guide to Writing Narrative Nonfiction. Chicago, IL:
University of Chicago Press.
Jacobson S, Marino J and Gutsche RE (2015) The digital animation of literary journalism.
Journalism. Epub ahead of print 5 February. DOI: 10.1177/1464884914568079.
Jones RH and Hafner CA (2012) Understanding Digital Literacies: A Practical Introduction.
London: Routledge.
Karlsson M (2010) Rituals of transparency: Evaluating online news outlets’ uses of transparency
rituals in the United States, United Kingdom and Sweden. Journalism Studies 11(4): 535–545.
Kress GR (2003) Literacy in the New Media Age. New York: Routledge.
Kress GR (2010) Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary communication.
London; New York: Routledge.
Kress GR and Van Leeuwen T (1996) Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London;
New York: Routledge.
Lankshear C and Knobel M (2011) New Literacies, 3rd edn. New York: Open University Press.
Lewis SC (2012) The tension between professional control and open participation: Journalism and
its boundaries. Information, Communication & Society 15(6): 836–867.
Lillie J (2011) How and why journalists create audio slideshows. Journalism Practice 5(3):
350–365.
Lipschultz JH (2012) Media storytelling, curriculum, and the next 100 years. Journalism & Mass
Communication Educator 67(4): 408–412.
Luke A (1995) Text and discourse in education: An introduction to critical discourse analysis.
Review of Research in Education 21(1): 3–48.
Martin JR and Rose D (2008) Genre Relations: Mapping Culture. London; Oakville, CT: Equinox
Publishing.
Martin JR and White R (2005) The Language of Evaluation. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Matheson D (2004) Weblogs and the epistemology of the ‘news’: Some trends in online journal-
ism. New Media & Society 6(4): 443–468.
Mills KA (2010) A review of the ‘digital turn’ in the new literacy studies. Review of Educational
Research 80(2): 246–271.
New London Group (1996) A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard
Educational Review 66: 60–92.
Nichols B (2001) Introduction to Documentary. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Pauly J (2008) New journalism. In: Donsbach W (ed.) The International Encyclopedia of
Communication. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 3209–3211.
Pavlik JV (2001) Journalism and New Media. New York: Columbia University Press.
Pérez-Milans M (2011) Being a Chinese newcomer in Madrid compulsory education: Ideological
constructions in language education practice. Journal of Pragmatics 43(4): 1005–1022.
Peters C (2011) Emotion aside or emotional side? Crafting an ‘experience of involvement’ in the
news. Journalism 12(3): 297–316.
Schudson M (2003) The Sociology of News. New York; London: W. W. Norton & Company.
Schudson M and Anderson C (2009) Objectivity, professionalism, and truth seeking in journal-
ism. In: Wahl-Jorgensen K and Hanitzsch T (eds) The Handbook of Journalism Studies. New
York: Routledge, pp. 88–101.
Song 853
Soffer O (2009) The competing ideals of objectivity and dialogue in American journalism.
Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism 10(4): 473–491.
Tuchman G (1978) Making News: A Study in the Social Construction of Reality. London: The
Free Press.
Van Leeuwen T (2005) Introducing Social Semiotics. New York: Psychology Press.
Vasudevan L, Schultz J and Bateman J (2010) Rethinking composing in a digital age: Authoring
literate identities through multimodal storytelling. Written Communication 27(4): 442–468.
Wenger DL, Owens L and Thompson P (2014) Help wanted: Mobile journalism skills required by
top U.S. news companies. Electronic News 8(2): 138–149.
Woolley B (2014) WIL-power: Developing journalism students’ intercultural communications
and international reporting skills on field trips to Vietnam. Asia Pacific Media Educator
24(2): 157–173.
Yuan EJ (2013) Online journalism in social transformations. Journalism Studies 14(1): 78–93.
Author biography
Yang Song is currently an assistant professor at the Department of English Language and Literature,
Fudan University. Her research interests include digital literacies, online journalism education,
discourse analysis, and computer-assisted teaching and learning.
854
Appendix 1. Multimodal analysis of Shine for Life.
4 0:00:16 A shoe under shining Or the shoes would not look Clinging sound of
shiny. shoe shining tools
(Continued)
855
Appendix 1. (Continued)
856
20 0:01:39 Iron bars next to the There are less and less shoe-
shoe-shiner shiners in Hong Kong.
(Continued)
857
858
Appendix 1. (Continued)
22 0:01:47 Shoe polishing with a No one wants to enter the Sound of wrapping a
focus on the shoe industry. newspaper
25 0:02:01 A box of polishing oil I will send them back to him after
polishing.
Journalism 19(6)
Song
Appendix 1. (Continued)
26 0:02:07 A customer filling Customers here are very nice. Hissing sound of a
water into the shoe- They help me a lot. plastic bag
shiner’s cup