Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
E-diesel is a new fuel technology using a solubilizer additive in ethanol-diesel blended fuel.
The first demonstration test project in Europe was made from October 2001 to May 2002.
The project was run by a project group. The member was Akzo Nobel Surface Chemistry
AB, Scania Danmark A/S, Statoil A/S and Johs. Rasmussen Svebølle A/S.
The tested e-diesel fuel consisted of 10% anhydrous bioethanol, 88% Danish diesel ULSD
(Miljødiesel 50) and 2% Beraid® ED10, which was easily splash blended and kept stable in
the fuel tank. A Scania heavy duty tank truck was running about 124,200 kilometres on e-
diesel. The result from the emission measurements shows that the emissions of particulate
matters (PM), carbon monoxide (CO), and nitrogen oxides (NOx), were reduced by 31, 29
and 5% respectively. The emission test did also measure the total CO2 emission, which
was reduced with about 3% compared to standard diesel. The specific fuel consumption
measured at DTI, increased by 2,2%. The maximum engine power on the e-diesel truck
was reduced by about 7% for maximum load and speed but retained at lower loads and
speeds. After about 100,000 kilometres Scania made an inspection of the e-diesel engine.
It was shown that the engine and its parts were not affected by the e-diesel. The engine oil
did not show any changes in the oil analysis. The test also confirmed that no modification
has to be made to the engine.
Introduction
Purpose
The purpose with this project was to demonstrate a full-scale demo test on ethanol blended
diesel fuel, so called e-diesel, and to show the environmental advantages that could be
achieved by running on e-diesel.
Objectives
The objective of the test was to prove:
that lower exhaust emissions could be achieved
that standard heavy-duty diesel engines could run on ethanol-blended diesel without
being modified
that e-diesel consisting of 10% ethanol, 88% diesel and 2% additive (Beraid® ED10)
work well as a diesel fuel
that an acceptable operating economy could be achieved, with regard to both
engineering and the environment.
Scope
The demo test was carried through by a project group consisted of Akzo Nobel Surface
Chemistry AB, Statoil A/S, Scania Danmark A/S and Johs. Rasmussen Svebølle A/S. The
test started in October 2001 and was ended in May 2002. Two Scania tank trucks were
participating. One truck was running on e-diesel, the other truck was running on standard
diesel as a reference vehicle.
Preparation of e-diesel
The preparation of the fuel was made at the ethanol supplier Haltermann in Denmark. The
splash blending procedure could be described in four steps.
1. Ethanol was pumped into a stainless steel tank with a propeller agitator.
2. Beraid® ED10 was added.
3. Diesel oil from Statoil arrived in a tank truck where the pre-mix of ethanol and
solubilizer was pumped in.
4. The fuel mix was circulated.
In percentage by volume
Ethanol (>99.5%) 10%
Solubilizer (Beraid® ED10) 2%
Danish Diesel ULSD 88%
Table 1: The composition of the Danish e-diesel fuel.
The vehicles
Two Scania tank trucks participated in the demo test. They are owned and operated by
Johs. Rasmussen Svebølle A/S in Denmark. The identical trucks are running the same
route, back and forth between Odense, Denmark and Düsseldorf, Germany. The distance
between the two cities is 1,428 kilometres. Key data for each vehicle can be found in Table
3. Normally the drivers drove their “own” vehicle but during the test the drivers changed
vehicle to obtain an objective test evaluation, as much as possible.
A diesel engine can run on e-diesel without being modified but to evaluate if any wear
should occur during the test on any parts, new unit-injectors were fitted into both vehicles
and the engine oil was changed.
By experience it is known that ethanol easily dissolves coatings in standard fuel tanks,
which could cause clogging in fuel filter and nuzzles. To avoid this to happen in the fuel
tank it was emptied and washed with ethanol before filling up with e-diesel.
Emission results
The main reductions using e-diesel were 31% on particulate emissions (PM), 29% on
carbon monoxide (CO) and 5% on nitrogen oxides (NOx). Those results are the average
values from the measurements on e-diesel and standard diesel from the 5-mode test .The
specific fuel consumption increased by 2,2% according to DTI. The emission test did also
measure the total carbon dioxide (CO2) emission, which was reduced with about 3%
compared to standard diesel.
7 6 ,5 3
6 ,1 9 e -d ie s e l
6
5 D a n is h d ie s e l U L S D
4
(g/kwh)
1 0 ,4 7 0 ,6 5
0 ,3 9 0 ,3 5
0 ,0 9 0 ,1 3
0
NOx CO HC PM
Diesel has a heating value of 42.9 MJ/kg and ethanol has a heating value of 26.8 MJ/kg –
this give the E-diesel a heating value of 41.3 MJ/kg or 3.8 % lower than diesel. An increase
in fuel consumption is therefore to be expected.
Technical evaluation
Oil analysis
There was a concern that rubber sealings, especially in the unit-injectors, should be
weakened and fuel should mix with the engine oil. On all the oil analysis taken from the
vehicle driving on e-diesel there was no sign of fuel in the engine-oil.
Scania was concerned about oxidation and precipitation of aluminium, but from the oil
analysis the level was low for both vehicles. Cu, Fe and Pb representing the three metals
used in bearings were also under strict supervision. The oil analysis from the e-diesel truck
was very stable on a low level for the three metals.
Inspection of engine
On this engine type the piston top is made of aluminium, and there was a risk for ethanol
should destroy the piston top to some degree. The inspection showed no sign of unusual
wear on the piston top or on other engine parts. See Appendix 1.
All rubber sealings that had been in contact with e-diesel were inspected. There was no
sign of change in the elasticity, and there was no change of colour. One unit-injector was
completely dismantled to show if there was any unusual wear, but it was not possible to see
any change on the components after about 100,000 km on e-diesel and there was no sign
of wear on the crankshaft bearing.
The engine power was measured for the 5-mode test cycle by DTI. The result shows a
reduction in engine power for e-diesel in mode 6 and 8 by about 7,5% and 5,6%
respectively, see Diagram 2. For mode 1 to 4 the available engine power was the same.
300
250
Engine power (kW)
200
150
100
50
0
1 3 4 6 8
Mode no.
e-diesel Danish Diesel
Fuel smell
Another unanimous comment was that the smell when re-fueling the vehicle was much less
compared to diesel oil. The drivers also felt that there was a substantial reduction of smell
from the exhaust emissions.
Cold temperature
In respect to start when the engine was cold or warm, the drivers comment that there has
not been any problem during the test. Not even when the temperature was very low, (under
-20°C).
Operating economy
The last comment from the drivers was that the fuel consumption was higher when running
on e-diesel compare to standard diesel.
The e-diesel truck runs totally 124,173 kilometers, consuming 40,886 liter e-diesel. Which is
equal to 3,04 km/liter. According to Johs. Rasmussen the mileage for the standard diesel
reference truck was 3,53 km/liter. The mileage was then 13,9% less running on e-diesel or
the fuel consumption was 16,3% higher.
The comments from the test made by Johs. Rasmussen is summarized in Appendix 2.
To utilize the reduced emissions from E-diesel, this fuel should be used in cities by captive
fleets, such as city buses, garbage trucks, distribution vans and trucks, taxi cars et cetera.
Those fleets normally have their own refuel tank, which makes the supply and distribution of
E-diesel easy.
A standard heavy-duty diesel engine can run on ethanol-blended diesel without being
modified and there was no sign of wear and tear.
The e-diesel, consisting of 10% anhydrous bioethanol, 88% diesel and 2% solubilizer
additive Beraid® ED10, was easily splash blended and work well as a diesel fuel, both in
respect of driving and handling.
In respect of operating economy, both the increased fuel consumption and reduced engine
power has a negative effect. Concerning environment and health, this kind of fuel seems to
be a strong alternative for the future, especially in respect of the benefit from reduction of
particulate matters.