Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
net/publication/305370671
CITATIONS READS
0 3,870
1 author:
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Mammography Image Quality; Assessment of Image Evaluation Criteria in the Mediolateral Oblique View of the Breast View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Kelly Spuur (nee Bentley) on 18 July 2016.
doi: 10.1002/jmrs.184
ª 2016 The Authors. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of 1
Australian Institute of Radiography and New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology.
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License,
which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and
no modifications or adaptations are made.
Book Review
principles of radiography and digital technology; Upper significance due to breast screening and the development
limb, Shoulder, Lower limb; Hips, pelvis and sacroiliac of new technology, for example, digital breast
joints; Vertebral column; Thorax and upper airway; Skull tomosynthesis (DBT). No rationale is provided for this
facial bones and sinuses; Dental radiography; Abdomen and deletion by the authors. Brief reference is made to this
pelvic cavity; Ward radiography; Theatre radiography, modality in the section on Soft tissue, but this is
Paediatric radiography and Miscellaneous. Each chapter referenced against film screen technology which is
introduces the relevant anatomy and provides pertinent obsolete, ignoring the fact that film screen mammography
background information, anatomical overview, equipment has almost entirely replaced by digital image acquisition.
considerations, positioning, radiation protection and Reference to DBT is also absent from the text. Against a
essential imaging characteristics. A comprehensive list of backdrop of well-established international breast
references and further readings support student research screening programmes, this deletion is remiss and may
and learning for each chapter. persuade potential readers to source other core texts
The text contains image evaluation boxes that link and where this modality is covered.
support the usefulness of a 10-point review plan to assess The 13th edition of Clark’s Positioning in Radiography
image quality, presented in the opening chapter, and essentially retains its pre-eminence and remains a valuable
provide assessment of acceptable and repeatable educational resource for both the qualified radiographer
radiographs to support learning. The use of these boxes, and the medical radiation science student as a quality
however, at times seems ad hoc as they are neither educational as a reference text. Future editions of Clark’s
provided for every projection nor in the same position Positioning in Radiography must decide if it is to become
within the text. While being most valuable, this an all-encompassing radiography text or remain an
information may have been better placed at the end of excellent resource for its core aim: radiographic
each section as summary point. Similarly, Common faults positioning.
and remedies and Radiological consideration headings and
text are not always present. Kelly M. Spuur, PhD, BApSc (MedImag), DipHSci
Inclusion of material and references to the role of other (MedImag)
modalities, for example, dedicated dental cone beam CT, Charles Sturt University, School of Dentistry and Health
contextualises the role of plain imaging in specific patient Sciences, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, Australia
presentations and pathologies. However, the deletion of Email: kspuur@csu.edu.au
the chapter on mammography is perplexing as this Tel: +61 2 6933 4550
modality is of no lesser importance than newer content. Fax: +61 2 6933 2835
Indeed mammography is of considerable current
2 ª 2016 The Authors. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of
Australian Institute of Radiography and New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology