Process Planning Review (PPR) QRA RESULT PPR Date:

Next Mtg.
Performed by: Customer Date:

FIAT Group Automobiles Supplier

Part Number: OdM Project: Supplier:

ONE PAGE REPORT
ONE PAGE REPORT
Part Description: SQE: Supplier Code: Supplier Site:

PROCESS VERIFICATION (VP) PRE-SERIES (PS) RELEASE TO PROD. (DaP) CURRENT PRODUCTION
Material Reg. Date: Material Reg. Date: Material Reg. Date: Material Reg. Date: PPR RESULT:
Build Date: Build Date: Build Date: Build Date:

REQS. 2 - PROGRAM & TOOLING 3 - PROGRAM & PROCESS 4 - OPERATIONS & 6 - IMPLEMENTATION OF
1 - QUALITY DOCUMENTATION 5 - PRODUCT QUALIFICATIONS
REQS. TIMING MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION QUALITY

Technical Documentation / Source

Design
Package
Release / Acceptance Sub-tier Management Work Instructions Capacity, Volumes, Ramp-up Curve,
Part & Product
Process Mix
Approval
A
DA DA DA DA DA DA
Open
Open Issue
Issue Open
Open Issue
Issue Open
Open Issue
Issue Open
Open Issue
Issue Open
Open Issue
Issue Open
Open Issue
Issue

Risk Assessment Design Model Status Sub-tier Components Maintenance Tooling & Equipment Verification Self-Qualification Tests
B
DA DA DA DA DA DA
Open
Open Issue
Issue Open
Open Issue
Issue Open
Open Issue
Issue Open
Open Issue
Issue Open
Open Issue
Issue Open
Open Issue
Issue

Program Lessons Learned & MPFMEA

Special Characteristics / GD&T
Sub-tier Raw Materials / Tool Makers Packaging Testing Equipment & Facilities Integrative Tests
C
DA DA DA DA DA DA
Open
Open Issue
Issue Open
Open Issue
Issue Open
Open Issue
Issue Open
Open Issue
Issue Open
Open Issue
Issue Open
Open Issue
Issue

Design FMEA Program Timing Gages & Measuring Devices Material Handling & TraceabilityStatus of Last Process Audit Reliability Plan
D
DA DA DA DA DA DA
Open
Open Issue
Issue Open
Open Issue
Issue Open
Open Issue
Issue Open
Open Issue
Issue Open
Open Issue
Issue Open
Open Issue
Issue

Process Flow Diagram & Floor Plan

Tooling Release & Timing Error & Mistake Proofing Project Development Team Readiness Evaluation Benestare / Part Qualif. Process (PQP)
E
DA DA DA DA DA DA
Open
Open Issue
Issue Open
Open Issue
Issue Open
Open Issue
Issue Open
Open Issue
Issue Open
Open Issue
Issue Open
Open Issue
Issue

Process FMEA Prototype Phase Special Processes Training Safe-Launch Activity Matchability
F
DA DA DA DA DA DA
Open
Open Issue
Issue Open
Open Issue
Issue Open
Open Issue
Issue Open
Open Issue
Issue Open
Open Issue
Issue Open
Open Issue
Issue

Control Plan Pilot Phase IMDS Interim Approval Quality Perception

G
DA Open DA DA DA DA
Open Issue
Issue Open
Open Issue
Issue Open
Open Issue
Issue Open
Open Issue
Issue Open
Open Issue
Issue Open
Open Issue
Issue

DOCUMENTS ACCEPTABLE
NA - Not Applicable 1 - JOB 2 - JOB 3 - Moderate 5 - Implem.
4 - NO Risk SCORING DEFINITIONS
NV - Not Valuated STOPPER STOPPER Risk Issue Activity SCORING DEFINITIONS OPEN ISSUES & OBS.
OPEN ISSUES & OBS.
Resp.
Contact Supplier: Signature: SQE: Signature: Prod. Line: Signature:
Contact
List Name in block letters Name in block letters Name in block letters
List
Buyer: Signature: Stab.: Signature: Quality: Signature:
Name in block letters Name in block letters Name in block letters
BACK
BACKTO
TOPPR
PPRFORM
FORM
# Section Requirements Documents Reference
* Scheda Prodotto * Engineering Standards
* Source Package Supplier Distribution
* Design Model / GD&T * FIAT Orange
Verify that the Supplier has the latest Technical Documentation, including the design model, GD&T, access to * AQR
the latest Customer Engineering Standards, access to color/gloss/graining masters, etc. Review the completed * SOR
Technical Documentation / Source Package, Additional Quality Requirements, and Statement of Requirements, noting key information and
1A Source Package program deliverables. Verify all issues raised by potential Suppliers during the sourcing phase have been
discussed and adequately addressed. Ensure engineering specifications and Quality and Supply requirements
are understood by the Supplier.

* QRA or IRE
Review the results of the Quality Risk Assessment (QRA) or Initial Risk Evaluation (IRE) with the team. Verify
1B Risk Assessment the progress of any planned corrective actions from QRA or IRE open issues. Are they complete / on track?

* MPFMEA
Review the Master PFMEA for this part/commodity and ensure all potential failure modes have been * Corrective actions from past
Program Lessons Learned & accounted for in the Supplier's PFMEA and process. Review quality spills and lessons learned from previous programs * eCIMS/NCT
1C * SQP
MPFMEA and similar products / processes. Verify that issues resulting in past quality spills, yardholds, or Field Actions * applicable warranty system
are adequately error-proofed or completely designed out of the part in the new process.

* Design FMEA * Potential Failure Mode &

Has the DFMEA been reviewed with the Customer and Supplier? Verify it has been updated to the latest Effects Analysis manual (4th
design release. Ensure it was developed taking into account lessons learned from previous programs and Edition)
1D Design FMEA action plans exist for items with the highest risk. Verify items with a Severity greater than or equal to 8 are * FIAT Norm 0770 / 0771
adequately error-proofed or actions are taken to minimize the severity via design. Note: if the Customer is * ISO/TS-16949 7.3.3.2
design responsible and no DFMEA exists, mark the item "N/A"

* Process Flow Diagram

Process Flow Diagram & Floor Ensure the Process Flow Diagram, floor plan, and work station layout reflect the planned process. All processes * Work station layout /
1E and sub-processes shall be included, from raw material receiving to final assembly shipping, including manufacturing floor plan
Plan rework/scrap areas. Verify that all are at the latest level of the process.

* Process FMEA * Potential Failure Mode &

* Supplier PFMEA Audit Summary Effects Analysis manual (4th
Evaluate the Supplier's PFMEA using the Supplier PFMEA Audit Summary form. Ensure it was developed taking Edition) AIAG
into account lessons learned from previous programs and action plans exist for items with the highest risk. * FIAT Norm 00271
1F Process FMEA Verify items with a Severity greater than or equal to 8 (or per Customer requirements, if more stringent) are * ISO/TS-16949 7.3.3.2
adequately error-proofed or actions are taken to minimize the severity via design.

* Control Plan * Advanced Product Quality

* Part I/S Planning & Control Plan
Regularly review the status and content of the Supplier's Control Plan, both for Prototype (if applicable) and manual (2nd Edition)
Production processes. Verify the linkage between the Process Flow Diagram, PFMEA, and Control Plan. Ensure * FIAT norm 9.01102
controls are adequate and match those described in the Design and Process FMEAs. Verify that the Control * ISO/TS-16949 7.5.1.1
1G Control Plan Plan is updated to the latest design revision level. Review the Supplier's plan for certification of incoming and * ISO/TS-16949 App. A
outgoing material. Review the Supplier's plan for monitoring the process, including SPC methods, performance * P&SQ Book of Knowledge
data (scrap, efficiency, etc.), and boundary samples. When required, review the Part Inspection Standard (Part (Part Inspection Standard
I/S) timing and status (including the manufacturing quality representative). process)
BACK
BACKTO
TOPPR
PPRFORM
FORM
* Design model

Review the design release date. It is consistent with prototype availability and with the program timing?
2A Design Release / Acceptance Ensure the latest mathematics are available and are consistent with the latest release.

* Design model
Verify the Supplier has the latest design model. Ensure that as changes occur, appropriate modifications are * Change Management procedure
made to program timing and other deliverables, as required. Also verify appropriate risk mitigation activities
2B Design Model Status are planned when deliverables become late to their required milestones. Review the Supplier's Change
Management process and ensure they have a method of communicating to sub-tier suppliers.

* Design model / GD&T

Is the design model complete with all Special / Critical Characteristics, other dimensional characteristics,
2C Special Characteristics / GD&T functional characteristics, GD&T, and datums defined? Ensure that datums are consistent with vehicle/part
mating points. Verify that engineering has agreed to all special / critical characteristics.

Review the Supplier's plan for program timing. Ensure they are aware of all key milestones, and that key * Program timeline * CPCP / PTCP
2D Program Timing program deliverables are scheduled according to their required milestones. * PSP
* Tooling timing plan
Review the Tooling Kick-off date. Is it consistent with the program timing? Ensure the timing allows for parts * Tooling Kick-off
off of production tooling by the required build / milestone. Note that the Tooling Kick-off date is the date that
tools actually begin construction (i.e., "cutting steel"). Once tools are kicked-off, follow their progress. Are
2E Tooling Release & Timing toolmakers aware of the latest design changes? If tool completion timing changes, ensure adequate risk
mitigation plans are in place (as required). Note: for tooling followed by TAG, obtain status updates from the
TAG representative.

* Prototype delivery plan

Review the Suppliers plan for delivery of prototypes. Are quantities and timing included? Does the plan
2F Prototype Phase include evaluation of part quality (measurement of critical characteristics, etc.)?

* Pilot build delivery plan

Review the Supplier's plan for delivery of parts for the applicable Pilot builds. Does it include quantities and
2G Pilot Phase timing (for each phase)? What are the quality requirements for each pilot build, and is the Supplier aware of
them? Ensure parts off of production tools will be available for the required milestone (e.g., VP).
BACK
BACKTO
TOPPR
PPRFORM
FORM
Review the Supplier's management of existing sub-tier suppliers. Ensure they have a process for evaluating * Sub-tier Management Plan
3A Sub-tier Management sub-tier performance and a method of determining which ones are acceptable for new business. Does a sub- * List of approved sub-tier suppliers
tier list exist and is it available for the applicable product?
* Sub-tier component management
Review the Supplier's plan for management of the sub-tier components. Ensure all sub-tier suppliers have plan
been approved and the appropriate risk assessments have been done on the components. Review that the
Supplier's timing for Process Audits / PDRs and PPAP of the sub-components supports overall program timing,
3B Sub-tier Components and check the status of each component. Verify the Supplier has ensured sub-tier capacity. If potential supply
issues or risks (e.g., long distance) exist, ensure that appropriate risk mitigation activities are in place (e.g.,
safety stock, expediting, etc.). For components that are not inspected (i.e., "dock-to-stock"), does the Supplier
have appropriate plans in place to begin inspection in the case of a defect?

* List of raw material suppliers and * Engineering Approved

Review the list of raw material suppliers and tool makers that the Supplier will be using. Are they all on the toolmakers Supplier List (EASL)
Sub-tier Raw Materials / Tool Customer-approved lists for the job / material they will be supplying (as applicable)? Do they have the
3C Makers appropriate certifications or approvals (as applicable)? If potential supply issues or risks (e.g., long distance)
exist, ensure that appropriate risk mitigation activities are in place (e.g., safety stock, expediting, etc.).

* AQR
Review status of gages, fixtures, measurement devices, and testing equipment. Are they adequate for the job? * PFMEA
Has the PFMEA been used to determine the appropriate measurement method? Ensure that each device is * List of planned gages and
3D Gages & Measuring Devices appropriate for the measurement taken (e.g., not an attribute gage for characteristics where SPC is expected). measuring devices
Verify that gages have been updated to the latest design level. Also verify that all gage requirements from the
AQR have been addressed.

* Error and Mistake Proofing plan

Review status of Error and Mistake Proofing plan. Ensure all items with a Severity of "8" or higher (or per
Customer requirements, if more stringent) on the Design and Process FMEAs have adequate Error and Mistake
3E Error & Mistake Proofing Proofing. Ensure the Supplier has an adequate back-up plan in the event that applicable Error and Mistake
Proofing fails (e.g., sensors, End-of-Line Testers, etc.).

* Special processes plan

Review which special processes are required for the part (e.g., painting, plating, heat treat, surface treatments * Control Plan
for corrosion protection, etc.). What is the Supplier's plan for management and control of these processes? * Engineering standards
3F Special Processes Are the specifications clearly defined? Review the Supplier's planned control methodology to determine
adequacy. If Boundary Samples are needed, when will they be available, and are there plans for Customer
approval?
BACK
BACKTO
TOPPR
PPRFORM
FORM
* Work Instructions: operator, set-up,
changeover, 1st Piece Approval,
Review status of the Supplier's operating instructions, both prototype and production (as applicable). Are they Mistake Proofing, rework/repair,
updated to the current level of the part? Do they allow an adequately-trained operator to be able to perform gage, inspection, packaging
4A Work Instructions the task? Work instructions include process set-up, gage operating, shipping & receiving, rework & repair,
process work instructions, etc.

Review the Supplier's Maintenance Plan. Ensure all equipment, tooling, and gages used in the process are * Maintenance Plan
included. Verify that the Supplier has a way to document both planned and unplanned maintenance, and that
4B Maintenance responsible personnel are identified. How does the Supplier develop their maintenance plan and required
activities?
* Packaging plan
Review the Supplier's packaging plan and ensure it is not missing from the "scheda prodotto". Ensure they * Packaging specifications
have the latest shipping specifications and returnable containers for pilot builds (plus an expendable back-up).
4C Packaging Verify that internal containers (i.e., for Work-in-Process) are adequate and prevent damage to parts stored
within (and ensure that Customer-owned containers are not used for this purpose).

* FIFO procedures
* Material handling and re-stock * ISO/TS-16949 cl, 7.5.3 &
Review the Supplier's FIFO plan and plan for traceability on components. Do they have adequate controls to procedures 7.5.3.1
4D Material Handling & Traceability assure FIFO is followed and that traceability is maintained (and not FIFO-dependent)? Are storage locations * Traceability procedures * FIAT norm 9.01102
adequately sized, positioned relative to the process, and do they protect stored materials? * FIAT standard 07611
* FIAT standard 07170
* Contact list
Review the Supplier's team and resources devoted to the program. Are enough resources given? Is the
4E Project Development Team commitment of the members adequate? Are the obligations respected? Is the contact list complete?

* Training plan *
Review the Supplier's plan for hiring and training all personnel needed for the production process. Ensure the Training records
plan is adequate to provide fully-trained personnel to support each pilot build, launch ramp-up, and full * List of operations and operators
volume production. Are special processes requiring training identified? Is there a skill or certification matrix requiring special certifications
4F Training showing those operations requiring special training and identifying who has had that training (such as via a
RASIC chart)? Review all plans for permanent rework and repair, and ensure responsibilities are clearly
defined.

* IMDS Process * www.mdssystem.com

Review the Supplier's plan for management of International Materials Data System (IMDS) submission. Ensure * Fiat Cap. 9.01102 – Fiat Cap.
they are registered to www.mdssystem.com, and that they keep copies and records of their submissions. 9.01108
4G IMDS Verify they have appropriate controls in place to manage sub-tier supplier IMDS submissions and are aware
whenever a sub-tier supplier makes a change that could require a new submission.
BACK
BACKTO
TOPPR
PPRFORM
FORM
* Purchase Order
Verify the Supplier has the latest information about the requested volumes, the sequence of the launching
Capacity, Volumes, Ramp-up version, the ramp-up curve, and the product mix. Review the quoted Contract Capacity with the Supplier and
5A Curve, & Product Mix determine the required line speed for the Readiness Evaluation and PDR. Review the shift pattern to ensure
that it supports production and allows enough time for PM activities.

* Tooling & equipment list

Verify that Customer tooling & equipment (complete or under construction) is consistent with that which was * Supplier Tool Record (STR)
5B Tooling & Equipment Verification determined needed during the sourcing phase. Any modifications (e.g., more tools required, some tools not
needed/built, etc.) with respect to which was declared during sourcing shall be promptly reported to the
Buyer. Review the Supplier's plan / procedure for release of tools and equipment to the production floor.

* Supplier lab certification (if * ISO/IEC 17025

Review the Supplier's testing facilities and equipment. Does the team feel the Supplier is able to perform the applicable)
tests and dimensional layouts expected of them? Review any appropriate certifications. If the Supplier is not * 3rd Party labs & certification (if
5C Testing Equipment & Facilities able to perform the tests and/or dimensional layouts expected of them, review their plan to use 3rd party applicable)
ISO/IEC 17025 certified labs.

* Previous Process Audit(s)

Write the result of the last Process Audit made on the same concerned process or a similar one. E.g., if the last
Process Audit has been fully approved, enter "5"; if it has not, then enter the appropriate score. Verify if the
5D Status of Last Process Audit required corrective actions have been implemented. Review items that prevented approval to ensure they do
not reoccur.

* Program timeline * Process Audit

Review the planned date for the Readiness Evaluation and ensure it supports program timing (including the
test plan, as samples for testing come from this run). In order to be used for testing, parts must have a result
5E Readiness Evaluation of 3 or better on the Process Audit form (no Job Stoppers or Job Stopper Risks). In addition, all parts shall be
within specification (show capability or be 100% inspected), off of production tools (homeline), have
production-intent sub-components, and be inspected with measuring devices with acceptable R&R.

* FPSC Plan or Strengthened Control * FPSC

Plan * PIC / PAC
Review the Supplier's plan for Safe-Launch (FPSC or Strengthened Control Plan). Have they included all
* FIAT norm 07171
5F Safe-Launch Activity critical / special characteristics? Is the duration acceptable (or will it need to be longer)? Will the PIC/PAC or
* Book of
Launch Risk Mitigation processes be required for this product?
Knowledge (Launch Risk
Mitigation)
If the component doesn't meet the quality requirements for the program milestones, what is the level of risk * Interim approvals (as applicable)
for the issuing of an interim approval for the use of the part? Ensure adequate risk mitigation activities are in
5G Interim Approval place when an interim approval is required. Review the status of any existing interim approvals (and
corresponding engineering changes).
BACK
BACKTO
TOPPR
PPRFORM
FORM
* Program timeline
Review the Supplier's planned dates for the Process Audit, Stage 1 & Stage 2 Production Demonstration Runs, * Production Demonstration
and PPAP. Are they adequate to support program timing? If any of these will be late to the required milestone, Run
6A Part & Process Approval are acceptable Risk Mitigation activities in place? Ensure that if any of these deliverables are late, an * Process Audit
appropriate interim approval is issued, as necessary. * PPAP Manual (4th Edition)

* Self-Qualification plan
Review the Supplier's Self-Qualification plan. Is the forecasted closing date of Self Qualification Tests consistent
with the timing of Project? Has the plan been shared with Customer Engineering? Review the status of the
6B Self-Qualification Tests testing (completed tests, on-going tests, approval status, etc.). For on-going tests, what is the risk of a negative
result?

* Integrative Test samples delivery

plan
Is the forecasted delivery date of Integrative Tests samples consistent with the timing of Project (taking into
6C Integrative Tests account also the lead time of Fiat Lab.'s)? What is the risk of a negative result of Integrative Tests?

Review the Supplier's reliability plan. Has it been shared with Customer Engineering? Is it updated according * Reliability Plan
6D Reliability Plan to the development level of the Project?
Review the plan for obtaining Customer Assembly Plant approval. Is the forecasted delivery date of samples * Benestare / PQP submission plan * Benestare process
Benestare / Part Qualification consistent with program timing (taking into account the lead time of the Plant Lab / Metrology Center)? * PQP Process
6E Process (PQP) Ensure appropriate Risk Management activities and corrective actions are in place in the event of Yellow or
Red result.
* Matchability plan
Review the plan for matchability submission. Is the availability of samples consistent with the timing of the
6F Matchability Project? Ensure that there is a timing "safety factor" in the event of reoccurrence of the tests due to failures.

* D/PFMEA * Potential Failure Mode &

* MPFMEA Effects Analysis manual (4th
Is there risk that the current part configuration will result in a high evaluation on internal indicators for quality Edition)
6G Quality Perception perception audits (e.g., CPA, TOC, ICP)? Ensure that issues resulting in high scores on previous programs for * Customer Perception Audit
similar products have been evaluated and corrected in the design, DFMEA, and PFMEA, as appropriate. * TOC/ICP
 BACK
BACKTO
TOPPR
PPRFORM
FORM

Score Classification Advance Quality Definition

• Very late to required milestone and will cause other required deliverables to be late to their required milestone/vehicle launch
• Risk Mitigation Plan does not exist
1 JOB STOPPER • Certain to cause delay in milestone/vehicle launch
• Has resulted in critical build/launch issues and certain to cause critical quality spills in production (yardholds, PRIs, field campaigns, etc.)
• Total lack of quality system or systemic control

• Late to required milestone and may cause other deliverables to be late to their required milestone/vehicle launch
JOB STOPPER • Risk Mitigation Plan exists but is not acceptable or requires unrealistic timing to meet milestone
2 RISK
• May cause delay in milestone/vehicle launch
• Has resulted in moderate build/launch issues or may cause critical quality spills in production (yardholds, PRIs, field campaigns, etc.)
• Chronic quality system or systemic control failures

• Potentially late to required milestone

• Risk Mitigation Plan exists and is acceptable
3 MODERATE ISSUE • Low Risk to milestone/vehicle launch
• May result in moderate quality spills in production not impacting critical / safety characteristics
• Non-chronic quality system or systemic control failures

• Progressing according to required milestone timing

4 NO RISK • No Risk to milestone/vehicle launch
• Isolated documentation issue

5 IMPLEMENTED
Complete and approved
ACTIVITY

na NOT APPLICABLE Item does not apply for this audit

nv NOT EVALUATED Item was not evaluated at this audit or not available; will be evaluated at a later date
 BACK TO PROCESS PLANNING
REVIEW MATRIX HIDE EMPTY ROWS SHOW ALL
BACK TO PROCESS PLANNING HIDE EMPTY ROWS SHOW ALL
REVIEW MATRIX

OPEN ISSUES - PROCESS PLANNING REVIEW N°…

AUDITOR REMARKS (SQE)

QUESTION RANKING OBSERVATION / ISSUE CORRECTIVE ACTION RESPONSIBLE

A1 0
B1 0
C1 0
D1 0
E1 0
F1 0
G1 0
A2 0
B2 0
C2 0
D2 0
E2 0
F2 0
G2 0
A3 0
B3 0

Supplier Responsible____________________ SQE_____________________

(Name and signature) (Name and signature)
 BACK TO PROCESS PLANNING
REVIEW MATRIX HIDE EMPTY ROWS SHOW ALL
BACK TO PROCESS PLANNING HIDE EMPTY ROWS SHOW ALL
REVIEW MATRIX

OPEN ISSUES - PROCESS PLANNING REVIEW N°…

AUDITOR REMARKS (SQE)

C3 0
D3 0
E3 0
F3 0
G3 0
A4 0
B4 0
C4 0
D4 0
E4 0
F4 0
G4 0
A5 0
B5 0
C5 0
D5 0
E5 0

Supplier Responsible____________________ SQE_____________________

(Name and signature) (Name and signature)
 BACK TO PROCESS PLANNING
REVIEW MATRIX HIDE EMPTY ROWS SHOW ALL
BACK TO PROCESS PLANNING HIDE EMPTY ROWS SHOW ALL
REVIEW MATRIX

OPEN ISSUES - PROCESS PLANNING REVIEW N°…

AUDITOR REMARKS (SQE)

F5 0
G5 0
A6 0
B6 0
C6 0
D6 0
E6 0
F6 0
G6 0

Supplier Responsible____________________ SQE_____________________

(Name and signature) (Name and signature)
 SHOW ALL
SHOW ALL

ESS PLANNING REVIEW N°…

R REMARKS (SQE)

DEPARTMENT OPEN DATE TARGET DATE ACTUAL DATE STATUS

Supplier Responsible____________________ SQE_____________________

(Name and signature) (Name and signature)
 SHOW ALL
SHOW ALL

ESS PLANNING REVIEW N°…

R REMARKS (SQE)

Supplier Responsible____________________ SQE_____________________

(Name and signature) (Name and signature)
 SHOW ALL
SHOW ALL

ESS PLANNING REVIEW N°…

R REMARKS (SQE)

Supplier Responsible____________________ SQE_____________________

(Name and signature) (Name and signature)
 BACK TO PPR FORM
BACK TO PPR FORM

Contact List
Attended
[Y/N] NAME COMPANY TITLE TELEPHONE NUMBER MOBILE NUMBER E-MAIL
 ONE PAGE REPORT N° ___ Supplier Quality

Project: ODM/Rev Lvl:

Part Description: Supplier Name: Back
BackToTo
Part Number: Supplier Code:
Family/MY: Manufact. Plant:
Date: SQE:

List issues in order of severity:

Program Milestone or
Build:

Problem / Root cause:

Containment / Corrective Actions: (Insert responsible and date)

Timings:
1st Try out: Sampling for Integr. Tests:
1st Part: Sampling for Match./Ben.:
Interim: Batch VP, Pre-Serie:
Sampling for AQF:

PROCESS RELEASE TO CURRENT

VERIFICATION (VP)
PRE-SERIES (PS)
PROD. (DaP) PRODUCTION

Distribution: SQE Coord. Project Coord. SQM

SQD Buyer Sviluppo Piattaforma
QPL E&D Supplier
 Checklist

1. Toolings requirements
S. No. Tooling Description Remarks

2. New Machines / Equipment requirements

S. No. Machine / Equipment Description Remarks

3. Material Handling Equipment requirements

S. No. Equipment Description Remarks

4. Gauges/Test Equipment requirements

S. No. Gauges / Instruments / Test Equipment Description Remarks

____________________ ________ ______ _______________ ________ _____

Supplier Team Member Signature Date TAG Team Member Signature Date
Date
15-Jun-12

30-Nov-12

17-Sept-13

14-Mar-14
26-Jun-14
Revision Description
Initial Release v1.1
Version 1.2: Corrected grammar and typing errors
Modified item 5C - Testing Equipment and Facilities to remove PPAP Self-Certification
Added code to change logo with sector selected
Added "Department", "Open Date", "Target Date", and "Closed Date" columns
Added conditional formatting to "Status" column
v1.3: Added hyperlinks, modified the look and feeling. Logo changement accordingly company
selected and fixed some minor issues
v1.4: Revised FIAT Industrial logo to CNH Industrial logo
Updated One Page Report
v1.5: Removed CNH, Iveco; added Maserati and logo
Sheet
All
Requirements
Requirements
PPR Module
Open Issues
Open Issues
All
All
One Page Report
All