Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
lessons in probabilities
Share
CONFERENCE PAPER Risk Management, Quality Management 10 October 2015
Greene-Blose, Joanne M.
How to cite this article:
Greene-Blose, J. M. (2015). Deepwater horizon: lessons in probabilities. Paper presented at
PMI® Global Congress 2015—EMEA, London, England. Newtown Square, PA: Project
Management Institute.
Background
The Deepwater Horizon rig, located at the Macondo well in the Gulf of Mexico,
exploded as a result of a blowout on April 20, 2010. Eleven crew were killed,
17 injured, and nearly 5 million barrels of oil leaked from the well that took
three months to cap, representing the largest oil spill in the history of the
petroleum industry. U.S. President Barack Obama ordered a commission to
investigate the cause behind the disaster and in January 2011, the final report
was sent to the President. The commission found that the management of
British Petroleum (BP), Halliburton, and Transocean had failed to manage the
risks of the project (National Commission, 2011, p. 90).
Learning Objectives
Through the context of the BP Deepwater Horizon disaster, we will show how
impactful an organization's culture is on an organization's risk management
strategy, including how integral cost, quality, and risk are in the decision-
making process. The following aspects of managing risk on a project will be
explored and should be taken into consideration during risk planning:
Company Overview
BP PLC, headquartered in London, England, is one of the world's largest
companies engaged in oil and natural gas acquisition, refinement, and supply
and operates in over 80 countries. Its history began with oil found in what was
then Persia in 1901. In 2010, BP was the world's 4th largest company in terms
of revenue. They were listed 75th on Interbrand's top 100 brands in 2005,
denoting them as a strong and visible brand. Its stock price on April 16, 2010
was US$59.88/share (BP PLC ADR, 2012) and their earnings in the first
quarter of that year were US$5.6 billion (The Risky Business, 2010, p. 31). By
anyone's measure, BP had been doing very well.
A Risk-Seeking Organization
Organizational culture had an enormous impact on BP's approach to risk in
2010. With a very high tolerance to risk, they would be considered a risk-
seeking organization.
Hillson and Murray-Webster (2005) characterize a risk-seeking organization
as being willing to accept threats passively or rely on reactive actions if threats
do materialize. There is a lack of commitment to taking proactive actions and
a tendency to take shortcuts where possible. Additionally, there's a tendency
to downplay threats and be overly optimistic about opportunities. Further,
there is more emphasis placed on probability than on impact when assessing
risk.
What makes BP risk-seekers includes a multitude of factors, such as a
deeply-entrenched culture of valuing cost over quality, minimal financial
repercussions in operational failure, minimal independent oversight of
operations, and deep cash reserves. All these factors together enabled the
organization to accept risk events as standard operating procedure rather
than proactively identifying and managing risk.
As an example, a BP 2007 internal report described unprecedented levels of
issues and accidents and a pervasive culture of “unwillingness to stop work
when something was clearly wrong” (Jennings, 2010). This corroborated the
general culture of the company when a survey of the crew at the Macondo
well, weeks before the April 20th incident, showed that 46% of crew members
feared reprisals if they reported an unsafe situation (National Commission,
2011, p. 222).
Revenues and cost cutting were unquestionably the driving force behind BP's
decisions and risk tolerance. Cost cutting became a common theme behind
the causal factors of a series of incidents at BP:
On June 25, 2010, BP's stock price fell to US$27.02 (BP PLC ADR, 2012). They
lost US$30 billion in stock value by year-end.
Paid US$53.8 billion as of July 2015, which includes US$5.5 billion in civil court
fines and US$18.7 billion for federal and state claims. They are still facing over
60,000 claims from private businesses (Huddleston, 2015).
Sold US$45 billion in assets to help pay for cleanup efforts (Jackson, 2011).
Suffered a net loss for 2010 of US$17 billion (Jennings, 2010).
CEO Tony Hayward was forced to resign because he would become “a walking
public-relations disaster” (Business: The Wages of Failure,, 2010).
Damage to the BP brand. Interbrand stated (Stucky, 2010) that the Deepwater
Horizon incident is strongly associated with the BP brand and that “the negative
response is long lasting.”
Were forced to cease all operations in the Gulf of Mexico for 18 months, being
allowed to resume again in October 2011. This represented a 12% drop in
production (Jackson, 2011).
Transocean lost the Deepwater Horizon rig, valued at US$350 million (National
Commission, 2011, p. 2).
BP and Transocean have pled guilty to 14 criminal charges.
And the largest cost of all: Transocean 10 ten men; BP lost one.