Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Problem Statement:
Design the reinforced concrete deck slab and sketch the details of reinforcements in the
longitudinal and cross-sectionals of the slab. The design should conform to the specifications of
Step 1: Data
Clear Span = 6 m
Kerbs = 600 mm
fck = 25 MPa m = 11
= 200 MPa
Assume thickness of the slab at 80 mm per metre of span for highway bridge decks.
The bending moment will be maximum for IRC Class AA-tracked vehicle and hence computations
will be made for this class of loading. Impact factor of class AA-tracked vehicle is 25 % for 5 m
be = k.x {1 – (x/L)} + bw
Referring to Fig 2
bw is the length of load due to width of tyre at the bottom of wearing coat.
From table 20.1, for [B/L] = 1.36, simply supported slabs, k= 2.77
be = 2.77 * 3.2 [ 1 – 0.5] + 1.01 = 5.442 m
The tracked vehicle is placed close to the kerb with the required minimum clearance as shown in
Fig 3a.
Net effective width of dispersion = 6.996 m
Total load of two tracks with impact = 700 * 1.197 = 838 kN.
Average intensity of load = 838 / (4.76 * 6.996) = 25.17kN/m2 (Refer Fig 3b)
For maximum shear at support, the IRC Class AA tracked vehicle is arranged as shown in Fig 4
be = k.x{1 – (x/L)} + bw
d= √
d = 417 mm
Ast =
Here, d=429 mm
For slabs, τ shall not exceed half of the value of τmax. clause 304.7.1.2 (IRC 21-2000)
Clause 304.7.1.3, τ = k τc
k = 1.00
As = 1227.5 mm2
100 * 1227.5 / (1000 * 447.5) = 0.27, corresponding value for τc is 0.24 Mpa
Since, τ is less than τmax, the shear stresses are within the safe permissible limits.