Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Page 5
Page 6 AlNAMO AND LÖE
Table 1
Number of Teeth Studied
Children Students Older patients
Tooth 3-10 years 21-27 years 29-72 years Total
Max. Mand. Max. Mand. Max. Mand.
Ii, ii 33 24 40 40 49 70 256
I2,12 34 35 40 40 44 77 270
Ci, c 40 40 40 40 49 69 278
Pi, mi 37 35 37 39 27 63 238
P2,m2 34 30 38 37 29 47 215
Mi 38 34 21 15 108
M2 37 37 27 31 132
Total 178 164 270 267 246 372 1,497
adult patients (20) consisted of females the gingival crevice from the distance
only, and the non-treated adult patients between gingival margin and the muco-
(32) were all males. This distribution is gingival junction (Bowers 1963). In the
shown in Table 1. The state of the facial case of frenum and muscle attachment
gingiva was scored for the Gingival the width of the gingiva was measured
Index (Löe & Silness 1963)4 and only from the gingival margin to the most
gingiva scoring 0 or 1 was included in coronal part of the insertion.
the study. The location of the gingival
margin on the enamel or on the cemen- B. Twenty-five permanent teeth of students
tum was recorded. A gingival groove and 23 teeth of the non-treated male
was considered present when a distinct adults which exhibited a gingival groove
groove could be observed on part of or were subjected to a closer examination.
on the entire facial gingiva of the tooth. The distance from the gingival margin
The following measurements were made to the gingival groove was measured
to the nearest millimeter by means of a with calipers, the opening of which
graduated pocket probe: could be controlled by a threaded screw.
The distance from the gingival margin
(a) gingival margin to the muco- to the bottom of the gingival crevice was
gingival junction determined by inserting a 0.05 mm thick
and 1.0 mm wide contoured celluloid
(b) gingival margin to the gingival strip to a point where definite resistance
groove was met. A sharp probe was used to
mark the level of the gingival margin on
the strip. Both measurements were re-
(c) gingival margin to the bottom of corded to the nearest 0.1 mm by means
the gingival crevice. of a micrometer.
Only teeth showing a gingival crevice of C. The gingival groove was also studied
2mm or less were included in the study.
during the development of experimental
gingivitis (Löe, Theilade, Börglum Jen-
The width of the attached gingiva was sen 1965).5 During this study marginal
calculated by subtracting the depth of inflammation was produced in the nor-
Gingival Anatomy Page 7
Table 2
The Frequency of Occurrence of a Gingival Groove on Different Teeth in the
Deciduous and Permanent Dentitions (in per cent)
i7i2 mi c it ii h It C Pi P2 Mi M%
Maxilla 38 35 27 32 27 21 31 31 22 24 24 36
Mandible 23 26 30 49 29 27 37 52 39 31 18 21
gingival groove was studied in color most often seen in the mandibular lateral in-
slides picturing the clinical appearance cisors and the maxillary molars.
of the labial gingivae of maxillary and
mandibulary anterior teeth before, dur- Gingiva of permanent teeth showed ap-
ing and after the experimental period. proximately the same frequency of occur-
rence of the gingival groove in the two
D. teeth of dogs, monkeys and sexes, and no difference seemed to exist be-
Sixty-two
humans were examined for the struc- tween teeth when the free gingiva was lo-
tural arrangement of the marginal perio- cated on the enamel and on the cementum.
dontium. Decalcified unstained sections Normal gingiva showed the presence of the
and sections stained by Mallory and Van gingival groove in 27% of the maxillary and
Gieson connective tissue stains were in 38% of the mandibular teeth. The corre-
studied in polarized and non-polarized sponding figures for mildly inflamed gingiva
were 22% for maxillary and 28% for man-
light. No clinical history of the presence
or absence of a gingival groove was dibular teeth. Studied as one group the gin-
available. Therefore, two groups of gival groove was found in 31 % of the per-
teeth were studied: one presenting the manent teeth. The highest incidence of the
histologic evidence of a gingival groove, gingival groove was on the lower permanent
and the other showing no such groove. canine (Table 2).
The histologic study also included ex-
amination of sections from dog teeth Examination of color slides from the gin-
that had been subjected to experimental giva of the students who took part in the
gingivectomy and that had an observa- experimental gingivitis study showed that in
no instance did a gingival groove that was
tion period exceeding 40 days (Löe &
Silness 1961).3 observed prior to the experiment disappear
during the development of mild marginal
OBSERVATIONS
inflammation.
Thegingival groove. Because no differ- The mean distance from the gingival mar-
ence appeared to exist regarding the preva- gin to the gingival groove in primary teeth
lence of a gingival groove on the gingivae was 1.1 mm for both jaws. Average depth
of the left as compared with the right side, of the gingival crevice measured 1.0 mm.
the teeth of the two sides were pooled. The mean distance from the margin to the
In the primary dentition a gingival groove groove in the students was 1.2 mm and the
was observed on the facial surface of the average depth of the gingival crevice was
gingiva in 111 out of 347 teeth examined. 1.1 mm. In older non-treated patients the
No difference in frequency of occurrence corresponding figures were 1.6 mm and 1.7
was observed between males and females or mm. Measured with calipers and a microm-
between maxillary and mandibular teeth eter the distance from margin to groove
(Table 2). Mild inflammation (GI score of averaged 1.19 mm in students and 1.58 mm
AlNAMO AND LÖE
Fig. 1. Section of marginal gingiva of monkey stained with Wilder's silver method for reticulin. A gingival
groove (GG) is seen slightly apical to the level of CEJ (left). Corresponding to the notch in the keratinized epi-
thelium is an extension of the epithelial ridge (ep) into the connective tissue (right).
Table 4
The Width of Attached Gingiva in Deciduous Teeth and in Permanent Teeth with the
Gingival Margin on Enamel and on Cementum (in millimeters)
Maxilla Mandible
Permanent teeth Permanent teeth
Tooth Deciduous GM GM Deciduous GM GM
teeth enamel cementum teeth enamel cementum
mean range mean range mean range mean range mean range mean range
11.11 3.6 0-6 3.5 0-6 4.3 3-6 2.9 0-4 3.3 1-6 2.9 1-5
12.12 3.8 2-7 4.5 2-7 4.3 3-6 2.6 0-4 3.9 1-6 3.6 2-6
C,c 2.1 0-6 2.7 0-6 2.9 0-6 1.9 1-3 2.6 1-5 2.4 0-4
Pi, mi 1.4 0-6 1.9 0-6 2.2 1-4 1.2 0-2 1.8 0-4 1.8 0-6
P2,m2 1.8 1-5 2.7 1-5 2.4 1-5 1.9 1-3 2.1 1-4 1.7 1-4
discussion
The fact that less than half of all normal Fig. 4. Section of marginal periodontium of monkey.
Well denned fan shaped fiber arrangement emerging
gingivae exhibit a gingival groove, and that from the cementum between the cemento-enamel junc-
tion (cej) and the alveolar crest (bo). The extended
it persists during mild gingival inflammation epithelial ridge corresponding to the gingival groove is
located in the angle produced by the fiber systems
indicates that the gingival groove is not di- (fi).
Gingival Anatomy Page 11
Mean width of attached gingiva in the primary and permanent
human dentition.
Deciduous teeth
Fig. 5. Diagram.
rectly related to the health of the free gin- gival groove may be dependent upon a spe-
giva. Consequently, the presence of a gingi- cial arrangement of the supra alveolar col-
val groove cannot be used as a clinical lagen fibers running from the cementum into
criterion of the normal gingiva. the free and attached gingiva. The special
configuration of the fiber systems probably
The measurements show that the gingival arises when a certain number of dimen-
groove is located between 0.8 and 2.1 mm sional relationships exist between the differ-
from the gingival margin and that when a ent anatomical features of the marginal
gingival groove is present it is located ap- periodontium (Fig. 6).
proximately level with the bottom of the
gingival crevice. This relationship would In view of the fact that a gingival groove
suggest that the presence or absence of the is found only in one third of the normal gin-
gingival groove is dependent on the depth givae it is unreasonable to assume that this
of the gingival crevice or pocket, and that
its location is in some way determined by the
represents the dividing line between free and
attached gingivae. A more suitable demarca-
location of the bottom of the gingival crev-
tion would be an imaginary horizontal plane
ice (the base of the epithelial attachment).
which can be drawn from the bottom of the
However, both clinical measurements and
microscopic examination have shown that gingival crevice to the surface at the gingival
the width of the free gingiva and the depth groove or in the absence of a groove, at a
of the gingival crevice seldom fully coincide. level corresponding to the bottom of the
gingival crevice. In this way the free gingiva
Microscopic investigation of the spatial may be defined as a three-dimensional con-
relationship between the gingival groove and cept comprising the surface epithelium of
the structural elements of the marginal peri- the marginal gingiva, the gingival margin
odontium indicates that the presence or and the gingival crevice as well as the inter-
absence, as well as the location of the gin- connecting fibrous tissue.
Page 12 AlNAMO AND LÖF,
between free and attached gingiva is primary and permanent dentitions. The
width of the attached gingiva in adults
suggested to be represented by the pro- where the gingival margin was on
jection of the bottom of the gingival enamel did not appreciably vary with
crevice on to the gingival surface. those resting on cementum.
REFERENCES
1. Bowers, G. M.: A study of the width of attached 5. LÖe, H., Theilade, Else and Börglum Jensen, S.:
gingiva. J. Periodont. 34:201-209, 1963. Experimental gingivitis in man. J. Periodont. 36:177-
2. Fehr, Carin and Mühlemann, H. R.: The surface 187, 1965.
of the free and attached gingiva studied with the replica
method. Oral Surg. 8:649-655, 1955. 6. Orban, B.: Clinical and histologic study of the
3. Löe, H. and Silness, J.: Tissue reactions to a new surface characteristics of the gingiva. Oral Surg. 1:827-
gingivectomy pack. Oral Surg. 14:1305-1314, 1961. 841, 1948.
4. Löe, H. and Silness, J.: Periodontal disease in
pregnancy. I. Prevalence and severity. Acta Odont. 7. Orban, B.: Oral histology and embryology. 3rd
Scand. 21:533-551, 1963. ed London, Henry Kimpton, 1953, p. 364.