Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
*
G.R. No. 111933. July 23, 1997.
______________
* SECOND DIVISION.
http://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/000001611ce6ff9e8f20b7a2003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 1/9
1/22/2018 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 276
does not give rise to the conclusion that, indeed, respondent was a
party to such anomalous transaction.
ROMERO, J.:
______________
http://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/000001611ce6ff9e8f20b7a2003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 4/9
1/22/2018 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 276
______________
http://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/000001611ce6ff9e8f20b7a2003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 5/9
1/22/2018 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 276
______________
http://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/000001611ce6ff9e8f20b7a2003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 6/9
1/22/2018 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 276
“It need not be emphasized here that there were lapses in certain
operational aspects of the respondent company which made the
irregularity possible, for indeed there exists a mystery about the
serviceability of the subject telephone line. That there were
personnel of the respondent company involved who could have
restored what was earlier disconnected permanently appears
certain. Nonetheless, exacting the ultimate blame upon the
respondent (complainant) in the absence of concrete inculpatory
proofs of her6complexity (sic) to an anomaly if there be one, cannot
be justified.”
______________
http://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/000001611ce6ff9e8f20b7a2003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 7/9
1/22/2018 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 276
______________
http://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/000001611ce6ff9e8f20b7a2003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 8/9
1/22/2018 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 276
——o0o——
http://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/000001611ce6ff9e8f20b7a2003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 9/9