Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
TEKNIK PELEDAKAN
TEKNIK PEMBORAN
EKONOMI PELEDAKAN
DAMPAK PELEDAKAN
SAFE BLASTING
MAJOR FACTORS INFLUENCING BLAST EFFICIENCY
> ATTITUDE
> COMMUNICATION
GROUP EFFORT
COMMUNICATION
♦) SAFE BLASTING PRACTICES REQUIRE GOOD
COMMUNICATION.
Design Bench
Refinement Preparation
Performance
Optimum Blast Pattern
Evaluation
Performance Layout
Firing Drilling
Blast
Loading
EN
N
ER
IO
UT
GY
RIB
CO
OPTIMUM
ST
DI
NF
EXPLOSIVES
GY
IN
EM
ER
PERFORMANCE
EN
EN
T
EXPLOSIVES ENERGY LEVEL
GEOLOGICAL EFFECTS
Blasting results are influenced more by rock properties than explosive properties.
Rock properties:
♦ Rock Structure:
• Smaller drill pattern minimize the adverse effects of bedding and fractures but
• Explosives with high gas production (ANFO) are appropriate for highly jointed or
fractured rock.
• The orientation of the free face to the joints sets is also a key consideration for
♦ Water
• Static water
• Dynamic water
• Multiple priming is advised in wet blast hole
Dipping seams of factures into pit: Dipping seams into rockmass:
• unstable walls • unbroken toe
• excessive backbreak • overhang potential
uniform
fragmentation
open pit
Primers:
• Primer diameter should closely match hole dia.
• Two primers are recommended for blasthole over 15 meters
deep [ANFO] & 10 meters deep [Emulsion Blend].
BASIC DRILL / BLAST DESIGN
BENCH HEIGHT
BLASTHOLE DIAMETER
BURDEN
BURDEN STIFFNESS RATIO
SPACING
SUBDRILLING
STEMMING
DECKING / AIR DECKING
ANGLE DRILLING
TIMING DESIGN / DELAY
SURFACE BLASTING GEOMETRY
BENCH HEIGHT
If the height is not predetermined :
BH (m) >> Blasthole Dia. (mm) / 15
BLASTHOLE DIAMETER
To achieve excellent energy distribution :
DIA (mm) = Bench Height (m) x 8
If charge diameter is less than the blast hole diameter, the “decoupling effect” must be taken
into account.
As blasthole diameters increase the cost of drilling, loading & explosive generally decrease.
Smaller blast holes distribute the explosive energy better than large blast holes.
BURDEN
Burden (m) are normally equal the charge diameter (mm) x (20 – 35).
Initial Burden Estimation Guide (see table)
BSR can be improved by using smaller hole diameter or greater bench height.
Decoupling Effect on Detonation Pressure
1.8
% reduction in wet Diameter of Explosive
= 1-
Blastholes equals Diameter of Blasthole
2.6
% reduction in dry Diameter of Explosive
= 1-
Blastholes equals Diameter of Blasthole
Explosive Density x 2
+ 1.8 x Explosive Diameter
Rock Density
Burden (m) = 84
SPACING
Normally ranges from (1 to 1.8) x Burden
Optimum energy distribution:
S = 1.15 x B
Pattern is laid out in “Staggered”
SUBDRILLING
Normally ranges from ( 0.3 to 0.5 ) x Burden
or ranges from (8 – 12) x Hole diameter
to much Sub drilling produces “Excessive
Ground Vibration”
Less Sub drilling produces “Excessive toe”
To improve fragmentation the blast hole primer
should be placed at grade level.
DECKING / AIR DECKING
Minimum decking for dry holes:
Deck = hole diameter x 6
Minimum decking for wet holes:
Deck = hole diameter x 12
Air decking can reduce the amount of explosives
to achieve good results by efficiently utilising
the available explosive energy.
UNIFORM ENERGY DISTRIBUTION
Square Square, Staggered
Pattern Pattern
S=B S=B
S = B x 1.15 S = B x 1.5
Decking Alternatives
Dry Hole Wet Hole Air Deck
Deck = hole diameter x 6 deck = hole diameter x 12
Stemming
Stemming Stemming
Air Deck
Deck
Deck
Explosives
Explosives
Explosives
STEMMING
Normally ranges from (20 to 30) x Hole dia.
or equal to 0.7 x Burden.
Crushed rock confine explosive energy
Better than drill cuttings.
Wet blast holes require more stemming for
confinement than dry blast holes.
Relative Confinement (RC):
>> 1.4 : Confine
<< 1.4 : Fly rock & stemming
ejection
3.50 15,300 12,850 11,100 9,788 8,767 7,950 6,480 5,500 4,800 4,275 3,867 3,540 3,273 3,050 2,862 2,700
3.75 16,350 13,725 11,850 10,444 9,350 8,475 6,900 5,850 5,100 4,538 4,100 3,750 3,464 3,225 3,023 2,850
4.00 17,400 14,600 12,600 11,100 9,933 9,000 7,320 6,200 5,400 4,800 4,333 3,960 3,655 3,400 3,185 3,000
4.25 18,450 15,475 13,350 11,756 10,517 9,525 7,740 6,550 5,700 5,063 4,567 4,170 3,845 3,575 3,346 3,150
4.75 20,550 17,225 14,850 13,069 11,683 10,575 8,580 7,250 6,300 5,588 5,033 4,590 4,227 3,925 3,669 3,450
5.00 21,600 18,100 15,600 13,725 12,267 11,100 9,000 7,600 6,600 5,850 5,267 4,800 4,418 4,100 3,831 3,600
5.50 23,700 19,850 17,100 15,038 13,433 12,150 9,840 8,300 7,200 6,375 5,733 5,220 4,800 4,450 4,154 3,900
6.00 25,800 21,600 18,600 16,350 14,600 13,200 10,680 9,000 7,800 6,900 6,200 5,640 5,182 4,800 4,477 4,200
6.50 27,900 23,350 20,100 17,663 15,767 14,250 11,520 9,700 8,400 7,425 6,667 6,060 5,564 5,150 4,800 4,500
7.00 30,000 25,100 21,600 18,975 16,933 15,300 12,360 10,400 9,000 7,950 7,133 6,480 5,945 5,500 5,123 4,800
7.50 32,100 26,850 23,100 20,288 18,100 16,350 13,200 11,100 9,600 8,475 7,600 6,900 6,327 5,850 5,446 5,100
8.00 34,200 28,600 24,600 21,600 19,267 17,400 14,040 11,800 10,200 9,000 8,067 7,320 6,709 6,200 5,769 5,400
8.50 36,300 30,350 26,100 22,913 20,433 18,450 14,880 12,500 10,800 9,525 8,533 7,740 7,091 6,550 6,092 5,700
9.00 38,400 32,100 27,600 24,225 21,600 19,500 15,720 13,200 11,400 10,050 9,000 8,160 7,473 6,900 6,415 6,000
9.50 40,500 33,850 29,100 25,538 22,767 20,550 16,560 13,900 12,000 10,575 9,467 8,580 7,855 7,250 6,738 6,300
10.00 42,600 35,600 30,600 26,850 23,933 21,600 17,400 14,600 12,600 11,100 9,933 9,000 8,236 7,600 7,062 6,600
10.50 44,700 37,350 32,100 28,163 25,100 22,650 18,240 15,300 13,200 11,625 10,400 9,420 8,618 7,950 7,385 6,900
11.00 46,800 39,100 33,600 29,475 26,267 23,700 19,080 16,000 13,800 12,150 10,867 9,840 9,000 8,300 7,708 7,200
11.50 48,900 40,850 35,100 30,788
To calculate the relative confinement find the value that represents the stem length and charge diameter. Next
divide the value by the absolute bulk strenght of the explosives. For example, with a charge diameter of 150 mm
and a stem length of 4 m the corresponding value = 6200. Assuming that ANFO with an ABS of 3200 is the
explosives used, the relative cinfinement will equal 6200 divided by by 3200 or 1.94. Generally if the relative
confinement is greater than 1.4 the cinfinement will be adequate if the value is less than 1.4 flyrock and steming
ejection may occur.
BASIC BLAST DESIGN
Charge
Diameter
0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 0.85 0.9 0.95 1 1.05 1.1 1.15 1.2 1.25 1.3 1.35
2,500 1,500 1,625 1,750 1,875 2,000 2,125 2,250 2,375 2,500 2,625 2,750 2,875 3,000 3,125 3,250 3,375
2,550 1,530 1,658 1,785 1,913 2,040 2,168 2,295 2,423 2,550 2,678 2,805 2,933 3,060 3,188 3,315 3,443
2,600 1,560 1,690 1,820 1,950 2,080 2,210 2,340 2,470 2,600 2,730 2,860 2,990 3,120 3,250 3,380 3,510
2,650 1,590 1,723 1,855 1,988 2,120 2,253 2,385 2,518 2,650 2,783 2,915 3,048 3,180 3,313 3,445 3,578
2,700 1,620 1,755 1,890 2,025 2,160 2,295 2,430 2,565 2,700 2,835 2,970 3,105 3,240 3,375 3,510 3,645
2,750 1,650 1,788 1,925 2,063 2,200 2,338 2,475 2,613 2,750 2,888 3,025 3,163 3,300 3,438 3,575 3,713
2,800 1,680 1,820 1,960 2,100 2,240 2,380 2,520 2,660 2,800 2,940 3,080 3,220 3,360 3,500 3,640 3,780
2,850 1,710 1,853 1,995 2,138 2,280 2,423 2,565 2,708 2,850 2,993 3,135 3,278 3,420 3,563 3,705 3,848
2,900 1,740 1,885 2,030 2,175 2,320 2,465 2,610 2,755 2,900 3,045 3,190 3,335 3,480 3,625 3,770 3,915
2,950 1,770 1,918 2,065 2,213 2,360 2,508 2,655 2,803 2,950 3,098 3,245 3,393 3,540 3,688 3,835 3,983
3,000 1,800 1,950 2,100 2,250 2,400 2,550 2,700 2,850 3,000 3,150 3,300 3,450 3,600 3,750 3,900 4,050
AWS (kl/g)
3,100 1,860 2,015 2,170 2,325 2,480 2,635 2,790 2,945 3,100 3,255 3,410 3,565 3,720 3,875 4,030 4,185
3,200 1,920 2,080 2,240 2,400 2,560 2,720 2,880 3,040 3,200 3,360 3,520 3,680 3,840 4,000 4,160 4,320
3,300 1,980 2,145 2,310 2,475 2,640 2,805 2,970 3,135 3,300 3,465 3,630 3,795 3,960 4,125 4,290 4,455
3,400 2,040 2,210 2,380 2,550 2,720 2,890 3,060 3,230 3,400 3,570 3,740 3,910 4,080 4,250 4,420 4,590
3,500 2,100 2,275 2,450 2,625 2,800 2,975 3,150 3,325 3,500 3,675 3,850 4,025 4,200 4,375 4,550 4,725
3,600 2,160 2,340 2,520 2,700 2,880 3,060 3,240 3,420 3,600 3,780 3,960 4,140 4,320 4,500 4,680 4,860
3,700 2,220 2,405 2,590 2,775 2,960 3,145 3,330 3,515 3,700 3,885 4,070 4,255 4,440 4,625 4,810 4,995
3,800 2,280 2,470 2,660 2,850 3,040 3,230 3,420 3,610 3,800 3,990 4,180 4,370 4,560 4,750 4,940 5,130
3,900 2,340 2,535 2,730 2,925 3,120 3,315 3,510 3,705 3,900 4,095 4,290 4,485 4,680 4,875 5,070 5,265
4,000 2,400 2,600 2,800 3,000 3,200 3,400 3,600 3,800 4,000 4,200 4,400 4,600 4,800 5,000 5,200 5,400
4,150 2,490 2,698 2,905 3,113 3,320 3,528 3,735 3,943 4,150 4,358 4,565 4,773 4,980 5,188 5,395 5,603
4,300 2,580 2,795 3,010 3,225 3,440 3,655 3,870 4,085 4,300 4,515 4,730 4,945 5,160 5,375 5,590 5,805
4,450 2,670 2,893 3,115 3,338 3,560 3,783 4,005 4,228 4,450 4,673 4,895 5,118 5,340 5,563 5,785 6,008
4,600 2,760 2,990 3,220 3,450 3,680 3,910 4,140 4,370 4,600 4,830 5,060 5,290 5,520 5,750 5,980 6,210
4,750 2,850 3,088 3,325 3,563 3,800 4,038 4,275 4,513 4,750 4,988 5,225 5,463 5,700 5,938 6,175 6,413
4,900 2,940 3,185 3,430 3,675 3,920 4,165 4,410 4,655 4,900 5,145 5,390 5,635 5,880 6,125 6,370 6,615
Step #3
Drill satellite holes between
Cap Rock
production holes and if
possible load into hard
zone.
ANGLE DRILLING
ADVANTAGES
>> Better energy distribution
>> Reduced over break
>> Better floor control
>> Improve high wall stability
DISADVANTAGES
>> Requires attention to drill set-up
>> Generally shorter bit life
>> Greater hole deviation
>> Higher drilling cost per meter
>> Require expert drillers
>> Require wider drill benches
Normally : 10 – 18 Degree
Requires “Profiling Technique” for fresh wall.
ADVANTAGES OF ANGLE DRILLING
POOR
FRAGMENTATION
USEFUL ENERGY
WASTED ENERGY
POOR FRAGMENTATION
CORRECT DRILLING
IMPROPER DRILLING
HOLE DEVIATION ON MINING OPERATION
EXAMPLES
EXAMPLES OF
OF EFFECTS
EFFECTS OF
OF
MINING
MINING OPERATIONS
OPERATIONS HOLE DEVIATIONS
HOLE DEVIATIONS
Drilling
Drilling Extra
Extra drilling,
drilling, rods,
rods, bits,
bits, coupling,
coupling, man-hours
man-hours and
and delay.
delay.
Charging
Charging Extra
Extra explosives,
explosives, man-hours
man-hours and
and delay.
delay.
Blasting Build-ups,
Build-ups, hang-ups,
hang-ups, poor
poor fragmentation,
fragmentation, ore
ore loss,
loss, hoh
hoh
Blasting dilution
dilution and
and pillar
pillar weakening.
weakening.
Rock
Rock Support
Support Extra
Extra support,
support, extra
extra drilling
drilling for
for support
support and
and man-hour.
man-hour.
Mucking/Lashing,
Mucking/Lashing, Handling
Handling of
of unwanted
unwanted rock
rock material,
material, accelerated
accelerated wear
wear of
of
Loading
Loading and
and loaders, conveyors etc., choking of ore passes, grizzley
loaders, conveyors etc., choking of ore passes, grizzley
Transportation
Transportation work,
work, chute
chute boxes
boxes runaways
runaways and
and haulage
haulage spillage.
spillage.
Crushing
Crushing Accelerated
Accelerated wear
wear of
of crushers,
crushers, extra
extra crushing
crushing and
and delays.
delays.
Hoisting
Hoisting Extra
Extra hoisting
hoisting and
and delays
delays
Mineral
Mineral Dressing
Dressing Extra
Extra grinding/milling
grinding/milling and
and loss
loss of
of metal
metal
Planned
Planned Operational
Operational Extra
Extra Operational
Operational Costs
Costs
Total
Total Costs
Costs
TIMING DESIGN / DELAY
♦PURPOSE
• The blast’s performance will be reduced if the explosive has too little or too
much delay time.
• Delay sequencing will not overcome improper blast design (confinement, energy
distribution large toe, etc.).
♦ FRAGMENTATION REQUIRED
• Optimum fragmentation in massive rock occurs when one hole is detonated per
delay and the the delay between holes in a row is – 40 ms.
• The delay between rows should be at least 2 to 3 times the delay between
holes in a row.
♦ MUCKPILE DISPLACEMENT
• Short delay intervals (<25 ms) between holes in a row reduce fragmentation
but improve displacement.
• Longer delay intervals (> 100 ms) are required between rows to maximize
displacement.
• The type of excavator will often determine the degree of displacement
required which will dictate the delay interval between rows of blast holes.
♦ WALL CONTROL
• To short of delay intervals between holes in a row and between rows can cause excessive
over break.
• If the delay between blast holes in the back row is less than 42 ms, the charges can act
together to damage the back wall.
• Too short of delay interval between rows (<35 ms) can promote back break due to over
confinement.
TIMING DESIGN / DELAY (cont.)
• Select the time between holes in a row based on one third to one half the
considerations.
• Delay intervals between rows less than 6 ms per of burden can cause
• Multiple row blast (> 4 rows) use longer intervals in back rows.
• Bottom delay has generally the shortest delay and delay between decks in
Massive Structure
Blocky Structure
Compact Muckpile
Loose Muckpile
Improved Fragmentation
Control Flyrock
Minimize Airblast
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36
Delay Interval (milliseconds per metre of burden)
Blast Timing and
Design Configuration
Fragmentation
Site Muckpile
Sensitivity Displacement
Cost Wall
Control
Optimum
Delay
Simplicity
Sequenc e Water
Conditions
Explosives
Geology
Used
Safety
Row by Row Pattern
· · · · · · · ·
· · · · · · · ·
· · · · · · · ·
Delay configuration (ms timing shown)
PI
· · · · · · · ·
100
9
100
9
100
9
100
9
100
9
100
9
100
9
100
· · · · · · · ·
100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
· · · · · · · ·
100 109 118 127 136 145 154 163
· · · · · · · ·
200 209 218 227 236 245 254 263
Echelon Pattern
· · · · · · · ·
· · · · · · · ·
· ·
Delay configuration (ms timing shown)
· · · · · ·
PI
· 42
9
· 42
9
· 42
9
· 42
9
· 42
9
· 42
9
· 42
9
·
· 9 · 9 · 9 · 9 · 9 · 9 · 42
9 ·
· · · · · · · 42
·
Nominal firing times
· · · · · · · ·
0 42 84 126 168 210 252 294
· · · · · · · ·
51 93 135 177 219 261 303 345
· · · · · · · ·
102 144 186 228 270 312 354 396
Zig Zag Pattern
· · · · · · · ·
· · · · · · · ·
· ·
Delay configuration (ms timing shown)
· · · · · ·
PI
· 17
· 17
· 17
· 42
42
· 17
· 17
· 17
·
· 17
· 17
· 17
· 42
42 · 17
· 17
· 17
·
·
Nominal firing times
17
· 17
· 17
· 42
· 17
· 17
· 17
·
· 52
·
34
·
17
·0
·
42
·
59
·
76
·
92
· 135 ·
118 ·
101 ·84 ·
126 ·
143 ·
160 ·
177
· 219 ·
202 ·
185 ·168 ·
210 ·
227 ·
244 ·
261
Diamond Pattern
· · · · · · · ·
· · · · · · · ·
· · · · · · · ·
Delay configuration (ms timing shown)
· 25
42 · 42 · 42 · 42 · · 42 · 17
42 ·
· 25
42 · 25
42 · 25
42 · 25
42 ·
PI
17
· 17
42 · 17
42 ·
· 25
· · · · · · 17
·
Nominal firing times
· 167
·
142
·
117
·
92
·67
·
76
·93
·110
· 100 ·
75 ·
50 ·
25 ·0 ·
17 ·
34 ·51
· 219 ·
202 ·
185 ·
168 ·210 ·
227 ·244 ·261
PT. TRUMIX BETON BLASTING PLAN - BENCH : 7
QUARRY DIVISION NONEL FIRING SYSTEM
DRILL & BLAST SECTION scale 1 : 200
·
Note :
······· ········
Trunk Line Delay 17 ms - 6 meters
Trunk Line Delay 65 ms - 6 meters
Crest
·
Toe
Drill Holes
ITEM PLAN ACTUAL ITEMS PLAN ACTUAL ITEMS PLAN ACTUAL EVALUATION
Diameter (inches) 4 4 Angle (degree) 10 10 Inhole Delay No.7 30 30 Fragmentation : Good
Spacing (meters) 5.3 5.3 Digable Volume (BCMs) 15,526 15,526 Inhole Delay No.8 15 15 Displacement : Good
Burden (meters) 4.2 4.2 ANFO (Kgs) 4,025 3,950 Trunk Line Delay 17 ms 15 15 Complaint - Fly Rock :-
No of Holes 45 45 Pow ergel Magnum (Kgs) 45 80 Trunk Line Delay 65 ms 29 29 - Ground Vibration : -
Depth (meters) see table see table Pow der Factor (Kg/BCM) 0.262 0.260 Electric Detonator 2 2 : Other : Back Break behind C1-C3
Sub-drill (meters) 1.5 1.5 Date : Approved by :