Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Th e m a n u script wa s received on 3 Ja n u a ry 2010 a n d wa s a ccepted a fter revision for pu blica tion on 22 April 2010.
DOI: 10.1243/ 09576509JPE953
Ab str a ct: In th e p resen t article, th erm od yn am ic an d th erm oecon om ic an alysis are ap p lied to fin d
th e op tim u m valu es of d esign p aram eters for water-tu be h eat recovery steam gen erators (HRSGs)
in com b in ed cycle p ower p lan ts. Design variables op tim ized in th is article are p in ch p oin t an d gas-
side velocity. Op tim ization is carried ou t based on two differen t objective fu n ction s. Th e first on e
is th erm od yn am ic, wh ich is th e su m m ation of exergy loss du e to an ou tflow of h ot gas escap in g
from th e HRSG th rou gh stack, an d exergy d estru ction du e to in tern al irreversibility in side th e
HRSG. Th e secon d on e is a th erm oecon om ic objective fu n ction , wh ich is th e su m m ation of exergy
loss an d destru ction in term s of exp en ses in clu din g th e cost of fu el an d electricity, an d th e cap ital
cost of HRSG in term s of th e fu tu re valu e of m on ey accordin g to th e in terest rate. Th e cap ital
cost of HRSG in clu des p rocu rem en t an d erection of p ip in g an d in su lation , electrical p an els an d
wirin g, con trol an d in stru m en tation equ ip m en t, in su ran ce, tax, en gin eerin g, an d su p ervision .
Th e effects of p in ch p oin t an d gas-sid e velocity on th e com p on en ts of ob jective fu n ction s are
in vestigated in details. Th e p in ch p oin t an d gas-side velocity th at m ake th ese ob jective fu n ction s
m in im u m are called op tim u m valu es.
Keyword s: h eat recovery steam gen erator, com b in ed cycle, th erm odyn am ic, th erm oecon om ic,
p in ch p oin t, op tim ization
for overall h eat tran sfer coefficien ts in th e eco- 4. Exergy loss th rou gh stack is n eglected in p reviou s
n om izer, evap orator, an d su p er-h eater. However, works. As a p ractical p oin t of view, p rofession al
h eat tran sfer p h en om en a in HRSGs, is n on -lin ear design ers ten d to fin d op tim al ways to redu ce th e
becau se of n on -lu m in ou s rad iation . Sin ce a redu c- p in ch p oin t in order to keep th e stack th erm al loss
tion in p in ch p oin t leads to a redu ction in gas sm aller. Neglectin g th is loss in an y op tim ization
tem p eratu re, n on -lu m in ou s radiation , wh ich is sig- tech n iqu e is m ean in gless. In th is work, th e su m of
n ifican tly d ep en den t on th e gas tem p eratu re, m ay exergy destru ction an d exergy loss th rou gh stack is
h ave d ifferen t valu es at d ifferen t gas tem p eratu res. con sidered as a com p on en t of objective fu n ction s.
Th erefore, con siderin g th is m isleadin g assu m p -
tion m ay u n d erestim ate th e op tim u m p in ch p oin t.
2 FIRST AND SECOND LAW OF
In th is article, m ore accu rate calcu lation on h eat
THERMODYNAMICS IN HRSGS
tran sfer is p erform ed , in wh ich con vective an d n on -
lu m in ou s h eat tran sfer coefficien ts are fou n d as a
fu n ction of th e HRSG geom etry, gas tem p eratu re, Th e first step in th e design of HRSGs is u sin g th e first
an d th erm op h ysical p rop erties. law of th erm odyn am ics to fin d u n kn own p aram eters
2. Pressu re drop is an im p ortan t factor in th e design by u sin g oth er given data. Kn owin g th e in let gas m ass
of HRSGs wh ich is d ep en den t on th e geom etry of flow an d tem p eratu re, p in ch p oin t, an d ap p roach
HRSG. Th is factor h as a sign ifican t in flu en ce on p oin t, th e steam m ass flow m ay be calcu lated by tak-
th e gas tu rb in e p ower gen eration . Destru ction of in g a con trol volu m e arou n d th e su p er-h eater an d
exergy du e to p ressu re drop is n ot calcu lated in evap orator as follows
referen ces [7] an d [8]. In th e p resen t article, p res-
ṁ g CP g H L (Tg1 − Tg3 ) = ṁ s (h s − h w3 ) (1)
su re drop is con sid ered as a factor th at affects th e
op tim u m valu e of th e p in ch p oin t. In add ition , op ti- Kn owin g th e tem p eratu re of water en terin g th e
m u m valu e of th e gas-sid e velocity can be fou n d econ om izer, th e gas tem p eratu re leavin g th e econ o-
by a trad e-off between th e p ressu re d rop an d cap - m izer m ay be fou n d by takin g a con trol volu m e arou n d
ital cost of HRSG. Meth ods exclu din g th e p ressu re th e econ om izer as follows
drop m ay n ot be u sed to fin d th e op tim u m gas-side
velocity. ṁ g CP g H L (Tg3 − Tg4 ) = ṁ s (h w 3 − h w 2 ) (2)
3. A com p reh en sive econ om ic stu d y is don e in th is
article in clu din g all p aym en ts for con stru ctin g a By takin g a sim ilar con trol volu m e arou n d p re-
n ew HRSG. Th ese p aym en ts con sist of h eat tran s- h eater, exh au st gas tem p eratu re m ay b e fou n d too
fer su rface areas, casin g an d stru ctu res, equ ip m en t,
an d oth er p aym en ts wh ich are tabu lated in Tab le 1. ṁ g CP g H L (Tg4 − Tg5 ) = ṁ s (h w 2 − h w 1 ) (3)
Ign orin g an y of th ese p aym en ts, as don e in refer-
en ces [7] an d [8], leads to u n derestim atin g th e cap - In a HRSG, in let exergy con sists of ch em ical an d
ital cost of HRSG. In th e p resen t article, econ om ic p h ysical exergy of th e h ot gas. Ch em ical exergy m ay
stu dy is d on e based on in form ation wh ich h as b een n ot be recovered an d it will b e exh au sted to th e atm o-
p rovided by FAP Com p an y (Fan n Azm ayan Pooyan - sp h ere th rou gh th e stack. Th erfore, th e in let p h ysical
deh ) as an in tern al rep ort in clu din g all exp en ses to exergy of th e h ot gas is con sidered as th e fu el exergy.
con stru ct HRSGs for th ree differen t p rojects in Iran . Th is p h ysical exergy is u sed to gen erate h igh -p ressu re
h ot steam in side th e HRSG. Th e in crease in th e exergy
of water is con sidered as th e p rodu ced exergy.
Du e to th e irreversibility of th e h eat tran sfer p ro-
Ta b le 1 Coefficien ts to estim ate th e cost of h eat cess, a fraction of th e fu el exergy is destru cted . Also, an
recovery steam gen erators ∗ ou tflow of th e h ot gas exh au sts an oth er fraction of th e
fu el exergy to th e atm osp h ere wh ich is con sidered in
Item Associated valu e for α
th is article as th e exergy loss. Accordin g to th e con ser-
Heat tran sfer area 1 vation of exergy, exergy destru ction m ay be fou n d by
Casin g an d stru ctu re 0.205 u sin g th e followin g equ ation
Processin g equ ip m en ts 0.216
Pip in g an d in su lation 0.078
Con trol an d in stru m en tation 0.098
ĖDestru ction = ĖFu el − ĖProdu ction − ĖLoss (4)
Electrical p an els an d wirin g 0.093
En gin eerin g an d su p ervision 0.031 in wh ich accordin g to referen ces [10] an d [11] th e
Tax 0.075 am ou n t of ĖFu el , ĖProdu ction , an d ĖLoss can be fou n d as
In su ran ce 0.115
Profit of th e p roject 0.095 follows
Oth er costs 0.125
Total 2.31 ĖFu el = ṁ g [CP g (Tg1 / T0 ) − T0 (CP g ln (Tg1 / T0 )
∗ Given data is from referen ce [9]. − R ln (P g1 / P 0 ))] (5)
be m in im ized in ord er to m axim ize th e efficien cy of secon d on e (f2 ) sp ecifies cap ital cost of th e HRSG
th e p lan t. Th is m eth od of op tim ization m ay lead to
u n reason able an d im p ractical cap ital cost, becau se f1 = ( ĖLoss + ĖDestru ction )ηn et HCe (24)
econ om ic an alysis is on e of th e m ost im p ortan t fac-
Sin ce th e cap ital cost of HRSG in clu des variou s com -
tors th at sh ou ld b e taken in to accou n t. Th erefore,
p on en ts, u n it p rices of h eat tran sfer su rface areas are
an oth er typ e of op tim ization is con sidered in th is arti-
defin ed as follows an d oth er p aym en ts h ave b een
cle, stan din g for th erm od yn am ic con cep ts com b in ed
con sidered as a m u ltip le of th ese p rices accordin g to
with econ om ic issu es. In th is m eth od, th e HRSG is
Tab le 1 in order to m ake th e objective fu n ction m ore
th erm oecon om ically op tim ized by u sin g an objective
p recise
fu n ction in clu din g cost of equ ip m en t, exergy loss an d
destru ction , an d oth er associated item s as m en tion ed ⎧ 2
⎪⎪ k Eco = 103.24 $/ m p re-h eater
in Table 1. In th e p resen t article, in order to m ake a ⎨
k Eco = 103.24 $/ m 2 econ om izer
com p arison between th erm od yn am ic an d th erm oe- (25)
⎪⎪ k Eva = 86.38 $/ m 2 evap orator
con om ic op tim ization s, both of th em are stu d ied . ⎩ 2
k SH = 218.96 $/ m su p er-h eater
su m m ation of oth er p aym en ts in term s of h eat tran sfer Tab le 3 Fixed design p aram eters ∗
su rface areas listed in Tab le 1.
Item Valu e
i(1 + i) Lf
CRF = (27) Ou tsid e tu b e diam eter (cm ) 5
(1 + i) Lf − 1 In side tu be d iam eter (cm ) 4.25
Pip in g arran gem en t In lin e
Th e n on -dim en sion al form of th e th erm oecon om ic Lon gitu d e an d tran sverse p itch (cm ) 10
ob jective fu n ction m ay be written as follows Fin con figu ration s in th e p re-h eater (No. of fin s p er 3/ 0.2/ 1.5
in / fin th ickn ess (cm )/ fin h eigh t (cm ))
f1 + f2 Fin con figu ration s in th e econ om izer (No. of fin s 4/ 0.2/ 1.5
f = p er in / fin th ickn ess (cm )/ fin h eigh t (cm ))
ṁ g Cp g T0 H ηn et Ce Fin con figu ration s in th e evap orator (No. of fin s p er 5/ 0.2/ 1
in / fin th ickn ess (cm )/ fin h eigh t (cm ))
ĖLoss + ĖDestru ction αCRF Fin con figu ration s in th e su p er-h eater (No. of fin s 2/ 0.1/ 1
= + p er in / fin th ickn ess (cm )/ fin h eigh t (cm ))
ṁ g Cp g T0 ṁ g Cp g T0 H ηn et Ce
∗ Fin con figu ration in each section is extracted from referen ce [6].
× (k Pre APre + k Eco AEco + k Eva AEva + k SH ASH ) (28)
In th e above equ ation , n et efficien cy of th e p lan t is th e m islead in g assu m p tion u sed in referen ces [7] an d
assu m ed as 45.6 p er cen t accordin g th e referen ce [14] [8]. Th ey illu strate th at zero p in ch p oin t, wh ich m ay
an d th e cost of sellin g electricity in Iran is assu m ed as be obtain ed from exclu d in g of p ressu re drop, is n ot
0.03 $/ kWh . really p ossible, b ecau se it leads to in fin ite h eat tran sfer
su rface areas.
5 RESULTS Th erm odyn am ic objective fu n ction versu s p in ch
p oin t is sh own in Fig. 6. As seen , th e m in im u m valu e
5.1 Th er m od yn a m ic op tim ization of th e objective fu n ction corresp on ds to th e op ti-
m al valu e of th e p in ch p oin t wh ich is abou t 4.4 ◦ C.
In itial in form ation n eeded to design a sam p le HRSG, In referen ces [7] an d [8] zero valu e is su ggested for
in clu din g th e gas an d steam sp ecification s is given th e p in ch p oin t op tim ized th erm od yn am ically. Th is
in Tables 2(a) an d (b). In ad dition , som e fixed design u n d erestim ation is du e to n eglectin g p ressu re drop
p aram eters su ch as th e HRSG geom etry are listed in in side th e HRSG.
Table 3.
Heat tran sfer su rface area of th e p re-h eater, eco-
n om izer, evap orator, an d su p er-h eater versu s p in ch 5.2 Th er m oecon om ic op tim ization
p oin t is illu strated in Fig. 4. As seen , su rface areas of th e Th erm oecon om ic objective fu n ction versu s p in ch
p re-h eater an d su p er-h eater do n ot vary sign ifican tly, p oin t is p resen ted in Fig. 7. As seen , th e m in im u m
as th e p in ch p oin t ch an ges; bu t a m ean in gfu l in crease valu e of th e objective fu n ction corresp on ds to th e
in th e econ om izer an d evap orator su rface areas are op tim u m p in ch p oin t wh ich is abou t 14.9 ◦ C. Th e cal-
ob servable. Pressu re drop versu s p in ch p oin t, wh ich cu lated valu e seem s reason able as com p ared to wh at
is on e of th e m ost sign ifican t diagram s, p resen ted in is su ggested by design ers’ exp erien ce.
Fig. 5. As seen , p ressu re d rop is in creased by th e redu c- Th e secon d op tim ized p aram eter is gas-side velocity
tion of th e p in ch p oin t. Figu res 4 an d 5 sh ow effects of wh ich is d efin ed as equ ation (29)
drop, an d tran slates in to an in crem en t at th e cost can n ot b e p lotted in a th ree-dim en sion al diagram ,
of exergy destru ction . Th u s, in creasin g th e gas-side becau se th e n u m ber of p aram eters wou ld be m ore
velocity affects b oth ; p ositive (decrease of equ ip m en t th an th ree. Th u s, op tim u m valu es of th e design p aram -
costs) an d n egative (in crease of irreversibility costs). eters an d th e corresp on din g valu e of th e objective
Th erefore, th ere sh ou ld be an op tim u m valu e for th e fu n ction in th is case, m ay be fou n d by u sin g th e
gas-side velocity. software develop ed by th e au th ors. Resu lts are listed
Alm ost all design ers u se a u n iform cross-section in Table 4.
alon g th e HRSG wh ich m ean s th e u n iform gas-side
velocity th rou gh p re-h eater, econ om izer, evap orator,
an d su p er-h eater. Th erefore, by m akin g th is assu m p - Tab le 4 Op tim u m valu es for th e p in ch p oin t
tion , a th ree-dim en sion al diagram can be drawn in an d gas-side velocity u sin g th erm o-
order to fin d op tim u m valu es for design p aram e- econ om ic objective fu n ction
ters of th e HRSG sim u ltan eou sly. Figu re 8 rep resen ts
th is diagram . As seen , th e m in im u m objective fu n c- Item Valu e
tion corresp on d s to th e p in ch p oin t of 16 ◦ C an d th e Pin ch p oin t(◦ C) 14.9
gas-side velocity of 15 m / s. Gas-side velocity in th e p re-h eater (m / s) 13.9
Assu m in g d ifferen t cross-section s for th e p re- Gas-side velocity in th e econ om izer (m / s) 14.7
h eater, econ om izer, evap orator, an d su p er-h eater, Gas-side velocity in th e evap orator (m / s) 14.1
Gas-side velocity in th e su p er-h eater (m / s) 12.3
th e objective fu n ction versu s th e design p aram eters
6 CONCLUSIONS
© Au th ors 2010
REFERENCES
Fig. 11 Pie diagram for exergy com p on en ts (p in ch p oin t 1 Gan a p ath y, V. Wa ste h ea t boiler deskbook, 1st edition ,
is th erm oecon om ically op tim ized) 1991 (Th e Fairm on t Press, In d ia).
2 Bu tch er, C. J. an d Red d y, B. V. Secon d law an alysis of a hi h eat tran sfer coefficien t in sid e tu bes
waste h eat recovery based p ower gen eration system . In t. (W/ m 2 K)
J. Hea t Ma ss Tra n sf., 2007, 50, 2355–2363. hN n on -lu m in ou s h eat tran sfer coefficien t
3 Moh agh egh i, M. an d Sh ayegan , J. Th erm od yn am ic op ti- (W/ m 2 K)
m ization of d esign variab les an d h eat exch an gers lay-
ho h eat tran sfer coefficien t ou tside tu bes
ou t in HRSGs for CCGT u sin g gen etic algorith m . Appl.
(W/ m 2 K)
Th erm . En g., 2009, 29, 290–299.
4 Fr an co, A. an d Gia n n in i, N. Op tim u m th erm al d esign hs en th alpy of p rodu ced steam (kJ/ kg)
of m odu lar com p act h eat exch an gers stru ctu re for h eat h w1 en th alpy of feed water en terin g th e
recovery steam gen erators. Appl. Th erm . En g., 2005, 25, deaerator (kJ/ kg)
1293–1313. h w2 en th alpy of water en terin g th e econ om izer
5 Fr an co, A. an d Gian n in i, N. A gen eral m eth od for th e (kJ/ kg)
op tim u m d esign of h eat recovery steam gen erators. h w3 en th alpy of water leavin g th e econ om izer
En ergy, 2006, 31, 3342–3361. (kJ/ kg)
6 Ga n ap ath y, V. In du stria l boilers a n d h ea t recovery stea m H n u m b er of p lan t workin g h ou rs p er year
gen era tors, 1st edition , 2003 (Marcel Dekker, New York). (h / year)
7 Fr an co, A., an d Ru sso, A. Com bin ed cycle p lan t effi-
HL h eat loss factor (1 p er cen t h eat loss m ean s
cien cy in crease b ased on th e op tim ization of th e h eat
H L = 0.99)
recovery steam gen erator op eratin g p aram eters. In t. J.
Th erm . Sci., 2002, 41, 843–859. i an n u al in terest rate (%)
8 Ca sa r osa , C., Don a tin i, F., an d Fr a n co, A. Th erm oeco- k th erm al con du ctivity (W/ m K)
n om ic op tim ization of h eat recovery steam gen erators k Eco econ om izer u n it p rice of su rface area ($/ m 2 )
op eratin g p aram eters for com b in ed p lan ts. En ergy, 2004, k Eva evap orator u n it p rice of su rface area ($/ m 2 )
29, 389–414. k Pre p re-h eater u n it p rice of su rface area ($/ m 2 )
9 Soleim an i, M. Cost a n a lysis of h ea t recovery stea m k SH su p er-h eater u n it p rice of su rface area
gen era tors, 2006 (In tern al rep ort, FAP Co., Teh ran ), ($/ m 2 )
h ttp :/ / www.fap dec.org Lf life tim e of th e system (year)
10 Bejan , A., Tsat sa r on is, G., an d Mor a n , M. Th erm a l design ṁ m ass flow rate (kg/ s)
a n d optim iza tion , 1996 (Joh n Wiley an d Son s, Can ada).
M m olecu lar m ass
11 Kotas, T. J. Th e exergy m eth od of th erm a l pla n t a n a l-
Nd n u m b er of tu be rows (deep direction )
ysis, 4th edition , 1995 (Krieger Pu blish in g Com p an y,
Malabar). Nu Nu sselt n u m b er
12 Ga n ap ath y, V. Applied h ea t tra n sfer, 1st edition , 1982 P p ressu re (kPa)
(Pen n Well Pu blish in g Com p an y, Tu lsa). Pr Pran dtl n u m ber
13 Stu ltz, S. C. an d Kitto, J. B. Stea m , its gen era tion a n d u se, R gas con stan t (kJ/ kg K)
40th edition , 1992 (Th e Bab cock an d Wilcox Com p an y, Re Reyn olds n u m b er
Barberton , OH). s en tropy (kJ/ kg K)
14 Keh lh ofer, R. Com bin ed-cycle ga s a n d stea m tu rbin e T tem p eratu re (K)
power pla n ts, 1997 (Pen n Well Pu blish in g Com p an y, U overall h eat tran sfer coefficien t (W/ m 2 K)
Tu lsa). V velocity (m / s)
xk p artial p ressu re of com p on en ts in th e gas
(atm )
APPENDIX xke p artial p ressu re of com p on en ts in th e
en viron m en t (atm )
Notation
α cost factor u sed in th erm oecon om ic
A h eat tran sfer su rface area (m 2 ) ob jective fu n ction
Ce cost of electricity ($/ kWh ) P p ressu re drop (kPa)
CP sp ecific h eat (kJ/ kg K) εg gas em issivity
CRF cap ital recovery factor η fin effectiven ess (%)
d d iam eter (cm ) ηn et n et efficien cy of th e p lan t (%)
Ė exergy (kW) μ viscosity (Pa s)
f th erm oecon om ic ob jective fu n ction ρ den sity (kg/ m 3 )
f th erm od yn am ic objective fu n ction σ Steffan –Boltzm an con stan t
ff fou lin g factor (m 2 K/ W) (5.669 × 10 − 8 W/ m 2 K4 )
fg friction factor u sed in gas p ressu re drop
fu n ction Su bscripts
G m ass velocity (kg/ m 2 s)
hc con vective h eat tran sfer coefficien t 0 en viron m en tal con dition s
(W/ m 2 K) Eco econ om izer
hf fin h eigh t (cm ) Eva evap orator