Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
www.fems-microbiology.org
Received 11 December 2002; received in revised form 18 February 2003; accepted 20 February 2003
Abstract
Activated sludge systems are designed and operated globally to remove phosphorus microbiologically, a process called enhanced
biological phosphorus removal (EBPR). Yet little is still known about the ecology of EBPR processes, the microbes involved, their
functions there and the possible reasons why they often perform unreliably. The application of rRNA-based methods to analyze EBPR
community structure has changed dramatically our understanding of the microbial populations responsible for EBPR, but many
substantial gaps in our knowledge of the population dynamics of EBPR and its underlying mechanisms remain. This review critically
examines what we once thought we knew about the microbial ecology of EBPR, what we think we now know, and what still needs to be
elucidated before these processes can be operated and controlled more reliably than is currently possible. It looks at the history of EBPR,
the currently available biochemical models, the structure of the microbial communities found in EBPR systems, possible identities of the
bacteria responsible, and the evidence why these systems might operate suboptimally. The review stresses the need to extend what have
been predominantly laboratory-based studies to full-scale operating plants. It aims to encourage microbiologists and process engineers to
collaborate more closely and to bring an interdisciplinary approach to bear on this complex ecosystem.
3 2003 Federation of European Microbiological Societies. Published by Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords : Activated sludge; Enhanced biological phosphorus removal; Phosphorus accumulating organism ; ‘G-bacteria’;
Glycogen accumulating organism ; Rhodocyclus
Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100
2. Some history of EBPR processes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101
3. Which chemical transformations characterize EBPR biomass? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101
4. The biochemistry of EBPR systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102
4.1. EBPR metabolism with acetate as sole carbon source . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102
4.2. EBPR metabolism with substrates other than acetate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104
5. The nature and role of polyP storage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105
6. The microbiology of EBPR ^ the culture-dependent approach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106
7. The microbiology of EBPR ^ the culture-independent approach: chemical markers . . . . . . 107
8. The microbiology of EBPR ^ the culture-independent approach: molecular microbial ecology
of EBPR communities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107
9. What have molecular techniques revealed about the nature of EBPR microbial communi-
ties? .............................................................. 108
* Corresponding author. Present address: Biotechnology Research Centre, La Trobe University, Bendigo, Vic. 3552, Australia.
E-mail address : r.seviour@latrobe.edu.au (R.J. Seviour).
Abbreviations : CFB, Cytophaga^Flavobacterium^Bacteroides division; DAPI, diamidino phenyl indole; DGGE, denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis;
DNPAO, denitrifying polyP accumulating organisms ; EBPR, enhanced biological phosphorus removal; FISH, £uorescence in situ hybridization; GAO,
glycogen accumulating organisms ; MAR, microautoradiography ; PAO, phosphorus accumulating bacteria ; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; PHA, poly-L-
hydroxyalkanoate; PHB, poly-L-hydroxybutyrate; polyP, polyphosphate; SBR, sequencing batch reactor ; SSCP, single strand conformation
polymorphism; UCT, University of Cape Town; VFA, volatile fatty acids
0168-6445 / 03 / $22.00 3 2003 Federation of European Microbiological Societies. Published by Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/S0168-6445(03)00021-4
Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121
in 2001 to investigate technology yielding consistently low cally respire and deplete the supply of organic sub-
P levels in treated e¥uents. Although P concentrations in strates, making them no longer available for the PAO,
the in£uent will vary with its source and the cultural be- 3. strictly maintaining anaerobic conditions in the anaer-
havior of individual societies, and especially whether low P obic zone,
detergents are used, most plant e¥uents need to satisfy 4. recycling the biomass through alternating anaerobic:
discharge licence agreements and contain 6 1 mg l31 P aerobic conditions, although some of the ¢rst EBPR
[19]. Thus, chemical P removal by precipitation, with seri- systems did not incorporate this design feature.
ous environmental problems of its own, is often necessar- The reasons for these requirements and how critical they
ily incorporated to produce a treated e¥uent that meets are to EBPR will be discussed later in this review, but they
the required standards [19], and these will probably be- were developed in an empirical manner with no under-
come more stringent as governments become more envi- standing of their microbiological bases, and this is still
ronmentally sensitive and respond increasingly to lobbying largely the case. Thus, like many other aspects of EBPR,
from articulate environmental groups. our knowledge of the engineering requirements has ad-
lar storage compound synthesized aerobically by the PAO, evidence suggests that glycogen availability, and not intra-
was catabolized anaerobically to generate electrons for cellular polyP levels, may ultimately limit the ability of
PHA synthesis (Fig. 1). Evidence in favor of a key role cells to assimilate substrates anaerobically under shock
for glycogen in EBPR has increased since then and the loading conditions [44,45].
Mino model is now preferred. However, it has been pro- A similar debate has surrounded the bioenergetics of
posed that, as glycogen degradation alone would not sat- anaerobic substrate assimilation and PHA synthesis in
isfy the demands for reducing power for PHA synthesis, PAO. Early studies claimed that adenosine triphosphate
then the TCA cycle provides the remainder [43,44]. Gly- (ATP) from polyP degradation was the only energy source
cogen is thought to play a key role in EBPR by regulating used anaerobically by the PAO for substrate (i.e. acetate)
the redox balance of the PAO [17], which may be neces- assimilation, PHA synthesis and other biosynthetic re-
sary for permitting the anaerobic assimilation and metab- actions, and cell maintenance. However, glycogen cata-
olism of the diverse range of readily biodegradable sub- bolism is now also thought to provide ATP for PHA
strates encountered in full-scale systems (see below). Some production, but how much energy is made available de-
pends on the pathway used for glycogen catabolism data, Hesselman et al. [44] proposed a modi¢ed biochem-
[17,44,45]. ical model for EBPR to accommodate their ideas.
Chemical analysis of these enriched cultures can reveal However, little experimental biochemical data are yet
the bulk chemical changes taking place but contributions available to validate any of these empirical models, and
from less dominant populations may be masked, and often even NMR data are unable to explain fully the behavior
interpretation of the data is di⁄cult. In vivo nuclear mag- of the di¡erent communities, since the structure/function
netic resonance (NMR) studies have also been used to relationships of the populations involved are completely
follow metabolic £ux in mixed communities in response unknown. Thus, some of the di¡erences in chemical per-
to the supply of particular substrates under speci¢ed con- formance of biomasses from the di¡erent studies may be
ditions. This approach has allowed clari¢cation of some of explained by the presence of communities of quite di¡er-
the confusions and contradictions arising from the data ent composition developing in reactors run under very
from the chemical studies, as well as pointing out how similar conditions, a situation now documented in the lit-
poorly understood the biochemistry of EBPR communities erature [26,46]. It is strongly recommended that all future
biomass [55]. A di¡erent model to explain EBPR with meric substances associated with £ocs [64]. Its organiza-
glucose was proposed in [56], which was much more sim- tion inside PAO is less certain, with various claims sup-
ilar mechanistically to the Mino and Comeau^Wentzel porting its location in the cytoplasm, the periplasm or
suggestions, but also with little or no direct microbiolog- associated with intracellular membranes [65^67], and pos-
ical or biochemical evidence to support it. sibly complexed with proteins and DNA and RNA [18,61].
How EBPR biomass might be supported by amino acids These may re£ect stages in its synthesis, but all may be
as possible substrates has attracted surprisingly little inter- possible if PAO contain several di¡erent populations, as
est since their presence in wastewater is certain; but both now seems likely (see Section 10), and each stores polyP
glutamate and aspartate as sole carbon sources could sup- di¡erently.
port EBPR in a laboratory scale reactor [57,58]. It was Several attempts have been made to extract this polyP
suggested that anaerobic substrate storage again occurred, to determine the distribution of chain lengths in EBPR
but not all the glutamate used as substrate was stored as sludge and to fractionate it to understand more about P
intracellular PHA. Instead, storage was thought to involve £ux during its anaerobic:aerobic release and uptake. For
of bacteria, especially Escherichia coli, and are summa- cation methods used, but the presence of many previously
rized in [22,61]. Known functions include acting as a undescribed Acinetobacter spp. in activated sludge systems
source of ATP following the action of the enzymes poly- is now established [93,94]. Most of the pure cultures ob-
P :AMP phosphotransferase and adenylate kinase, by re- tained from EBPR systems could synthesize polyP and
placing ATP as a phosphate donor in the phosphorylation PHA aerobically at high levels from acetate, although
of sugars and a reserve of inorganic P, and as an intra- not all isolates synthesized both, and this ability was not
cellular bu¡er. By acting as a reservoir for Mg2þ polyP associated with any particular species [18]. A. johnsonii
may also serve to supply cells with Mg2þ under Mg2þ - strain 210A shared many of these features and its physi-
limiting conditions and to play a vital role in heavy metal ology and biochemistry have been examined most closely
(e.g. cadmium) tolerance by excreting the metal via a met- [22,89,95,96]. However, even though low levels of anaero-
al phosphate transport system [81]. PolyP synthesis in bic P release were detectable in it and many other isolates,
some bacteria occurs in response to nutritional and os- none of the isolates obtained then (or since) could assim-
motic stress, and serves as a signal for production of stress ilate acetate and synthesize PHA anaerobically concomi-
acetate uptake to P release ratio, which is known to vary trends. For example, ubiquinone Q-8, diagnostic of the
considerably in di¡erent EBPR biomasses [17,21,44], was L-Proteobacteria was the most abundant quinone in both
lower than that predicted by the models. Disappointingly, EBPR and non-EBPR plant biomass samples from both
no further data on its physiology or identity are available full-scale and laboratory scale systems, and not Q-9 asso-
in the literature. ciated with the Q-Proteobacteria which include Acineto-
bacter spp. [114]. The Actinobacteria and K-Proteobacteria
possessing ubiquinone Q-10 were also thought to be
7. The microbiology of EBPR ^ the culture-independent present in large numbers, and then the Gram-positive
approach: chemical markers low mol% G+C bacteria, the Planctomycetes and the Cy-
tophaga^Flexibacter^Bacteroides (CFB) division in smaller
In our view the importance of obtaining pure cultures of proportions. Very few (3%) of the Actinobacteria appeared
EBPR bacteria cannot be overstated [108,109], because to be M. phosphovorus. In fact there were only small di¡er-
these are essential if any basic understanding of how these ences in quinone pro¢les between the communities of the
numbers of these bacteria detected by methods like £uo- 9. What have molecular techniques revealed about the
rescence in situ hybridization (FISH) described below, nature of EBPR microbial communities?
suggesting that their DNA was not as readily obtained
as that from other bacteria (e.g. [123,124]). One sensible It is clear from the literature that almost all studies
approach is to use a combination of di¡erent extraction applying these molecular methods have used laboratory
procedures and pool the DNA obtained for analysis, as scale reactors often fed with arti¢cial sewage, and have
adopted in [30] where it was also shown from clone library undertaken either FISH and/or clone library community
analysis that each extraction method sampled a phyloge- analysis. These studies are summarized in Table 1. As
netically di¡erent community. Regardless, the biases to- pointed out [30], only two published studies have used a
gether prevent the application of such methods to quanti- full cycle rRNA approach to full-scale plants [30,124], and
tative community analyses. They apply equally to neither were EBPR systems. The data invariably derive
techniques like denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis from analysis of a single sample of biomass, and very
(DGGE) [125], single strand conformation polymorphism few studies have followed changes in population composi-
Actinobacteria (10%)
Laboratory scale anaerobic:aerobic synthetic sewage with acetate as carbon 16S rRNA clone library, FISH L-Proteobacteria (89%) Rhodocyclus-related organisms, Candidatus [29]
SBR source ‘Accumulibacter phosphatis’
Laboratory scale anaerobic:aerobic complex synthetic sewage 16S rRNA clone library, FISH L-Proteobacteria (34%) Rhodocyclus-related organisms, Candidatus [29]
SBR ‘Accumulibacter phosphatis’
Actinobacteria (20%)
CFB group (16%)
Laboratory scale anaerobic:aerobic synthetic sewage with acetate and peptone quinone pro¢les, DGGE and 16S K-Proteobacteria (n.d.) n.d. [116]
SBR as carbon sources rRNA clone library
L-Proteobacteria (n.d.)
Cyaan Magenta Geel Zwart
109
n.d., no data.
110 R.J. Seviour et al. / FEMS Microbiology Reviews 27 (2003) 99^127
were detected, while with a complex feed far more Actino- Although similarities were seen between the EBPR and
bacteria and members of the CFB division were present non-EBPR communities, Bond et al. [123] highlighted the
and fewer L-Proteobacteria were detected. increased presence of the Rhodocyclus group in clone li-
braries from their EBPR biomass. Without supplying any
9.2. Possible candidates for PAO direct proof, they implied that these organisms might play
a role in EBPR. Acinetobacters were again present in very
With these molecular methods Wagner et al. [141] were low numbers. Later, using FISH they showed [147] that
the ¢rst to raise further serious doubts about an important the L-Proteobacteria, especially members of the L-2 sub-
role for Acinetobacter spp. in EBPR systems, but left some class, together with the Actinobacteria dominated their
questions unanswered. Using a genus-speci¢c FISH probe EBPR community, adding further weight to the view
ACA23a, they suggested that Acinetobacter spp. were un- that both of these may be involved in EBPR, and support-
likely to be PAO, because they represented 6 10% of the ing data from other similar studies with FISH [141,148]
total bacteria present, and the L-Proteobacteria and Acti- and quinone pro¢ling [114]. However, other FISH studies
Table 2
Sequences and hybridization conditions for rRNA targeted probes for putative PAO and ‘G-Bacteria’/GAO in activated sludge
Trivial probe Probe sequence (5P^3P) rRNA target site Reported speci¢city Stringency : formamide Ref.
name (E. coli numbering) concentration (%)
MP2 GAGCAAGCTCTTCTGAACCG 16S rRNA (68^87) M. phosphovorus PAO?? 10 [146]
RHC175 TGCTCACAGAATATGCGG 16S rRNA (175^192) Rhodocyclus cluster 30 [29]
RHC439 CNATTTCTTCCCCGCCGA 16S rRNA (439^456) Rhodocyclus cluster 30 [29]
PAO462 CCGTCATCTACWCAGGGTATTAAC 16S rRNA (462^485) Candidatus ‘Accumulibacter 35 [139]
phosphatis’
PAO651 CCCTCTGCCAAACTCCAG 16S rRNA (651^668) Candidatus ‘Accumulibacter 35 [139]
phosphatis’
PAO846 GTTAGCTACGGCACTAAAAGC 16S rRNA (846^866) Candidatus ‘Accumulibacter 35 [139]
phosphatis’
PAO462b CCGTCATCTRCWCAGGGTATTAAC 16S rRNA (462^485) Rhodocyclus tenuis group 35 [63]
These clones revealed sequences closely related to mem- ized with the probes and, crucially, these cells also con-
bers of the genus Rhodocyclus. FISH probing showed that tained polyP, as revealed directly by staining with methyl-
those cells hybridizing with their RHC439 and RHX991 ene blue [139]. Furthermore, when these probes were
probes designed against these sequences (see Table 2) had applied to full-scale EBPR systems, a direct correlation
the same morphology as cells staining aerobically with between the P removal capacity and the numbers of Rho-
DAPI for polyP and anaerobically with Nile blue A for docyclus-related organisms was demonstrated.
PHA, thus behaving in situ as the biochemical models
require [29]. Simultaneous DAPI or Nile blue A staining
and FISH could not be carried out, a problem encoun- 10. Structure:function relationships within EBPR
tered in other laboratories (see below) and so the link communities
made between Rhodocyclus-related bacteria and polyP
synthesis was still tentative. The putative Rhodocyclus-re- These two reports [29,139] have since led to intense
lated PAO could not be cultured, but they were named research activity, often using a range of methods, to ex-
Candidatus ‘Accumulibacter phosphatis’, according to the amine structure^function relationships in EBPR commun-
rules of the International Code for Bacterial Nomencla- ities. All have been aimed at determining the importance
ture. A tree showing the phylogenetic relationships among of these Rhodocyclus-related bacteria as PAO. It is now
the suggested PAO is given in Fig. 2. clear from such studies that these bacteria are important
Further weight was soon added to the hypothesis that populations in EBPR, and where their presence has been
these Rhodocyclus-related bacteria might be important sought they have usually been found. Thus, Rhodocyclus-
PAO [139]. Clone libraries from an EBPR SBR were ex- related organisms were detected in an EBPR SBR com-
amined and a group of clones also closely related to Rho- munity by SSCP ¢ngerprinting [138]. However, this story
docyclus was found. Again FISH using three probes has not yet reached a wholly satisfactory conclusion, and
PAO462, PAO651 and PAO846 designed against these much remains to be achieved before the ecology of the
sequences (Table 2) showed that clustered cells all hybrid- PAO is comprehensively understood.
Actinobacteria and the rounded clusters consisted of the UCT plant clustered closely with Candidatus ‘Accumu-
K-Proteobacteria. These interesting observations need to libacter phosphatis’, the clones from the other plant
be con¢rmed with other biomass samples, preferably formed an independent branch 6 97% similar to the
from full-scale plants. Furthermore, because the changes others, and thus possibly were not representatives of Can-
in population levels of Rhodocyclus-related PAO did not didatus ‘Accumulibacter phosphatis’. Two additional
correspond to changes in the P removal capability of their probes (Table 2) were designed from these sequences,
plants, it was concluded that other bacteria are likely to be but have yet to be applied to other EBPR biomass samples
involved in EBPR. to determine if these or other phylogenetically di¡erent
Rhodocyclus-related organisms may be present.
10.3. Using di¡erential centrifugation to indicate A full-scale plant was also deliberately selected in [158]
PAO identity because of reservations the authors held about the validity
of using laboratory scale systems for studies of this kind.
Another approach has been to separate and enrich the The PAO detected using DAPI staining in their biomass
to run [161]. Furthermore, a lower requirement for metab- common bands was taken to imply that some populations
olizable substrates than in conventional EBPR systems were capable of both aerobic and anoxic EBPR, and two
overcomes a major problem associated with treating mu- of these bands were recovered and sequenced. Both were
nicipal wastes using EBPR [21,161]. Some systems taking L-Proteobacteria, closely related to Rhodocyclus and Dech-
advantage of these have been conceived. For example, lorimonas, known also to appear frequently in clone libra-
Bortone et al. [168] described the DEPHANOX process ries from aerobic:anaerobic EBPR type plants [26,111].
based on DNPAO activities, and with a separate aerobic FISH probing showed the Rhodocyclus-related population
reactor for nitri¢cation, were able to achieve very high P was dominant in both communities but Dechlorimonas was
uptake rates in their anoxic reactor. These bene¢ts have not. It would have been interesting to see what emerged if
not convinced all, and it has been argued strongly on the PCR protocol had used primers speci¢c for functional
theoretical grounds [169] that because of their unpredict- genes for denitrifying enzymes like the nirS and nirK genes
able nature and reduction in EBPR capacity, denitrifying [132,133], and FISH/MAR had been applied to these com-
EBPR systems are not worth bothering with. munities to assist in identifying the denitrifying popula-
whether PAO or GAO will dominate, and hence whether EBPR failure occurs in the absence of any glucose in the
EBPR is successful. In the anaerobic zone, acetate uptake feed [37,138,139,192]. Glucose dosing of a reactor [37] nei-
rates were considered to be adversely a¡ected in GAO but ther led to this morphotype appearing in larger numbers in
not in PAO at high pH, while in the aerobic zones ^ their biomass nor caused EBPR to fail, but instead glucose
although growth rates, PHA consumption rates and P enhanced it. Hence the question is still unanswered. How-
uptake rates in GAO were una¡ected by pH ^ they were ever, with a few exceptions, the ‘G-Bacteria’ in these
markedly lowered for PAO at a lower pH (6.5). So, while plants have not been obtained in pure culture, and so
the GAO were advantaged at low pH, the PAO out-com- we still know little about what they are or what they do
peted the GAO at pH 7^7.5. Jeon et al. [178] also followed there. Bearing in mind their known phylogenetic diversity
the in£uence of pH on EBPR in an SBR, and interpreted [181], as shown in Fig. 2, even if these ‘G-Bacteria’ are not
their chemical data as follows. At a controlled pH of 7, microscopically distinguishable from each other, their sig-
GAO dominated ; with no control, the pH rose, the PAO ni¢cance in plants may be di¡erent, and conclusions about
took over and good EBPR was achieved. They also sug- performance of plants containing them based only on mi-
[192] imparted £uorescence to large coccoid cells seen fore it would seem that populations, all very closely re-
dominating their biomass. These cells were similar in ap- lated phylogenetically and often indistinguishable by FISH
pearance to those reported in [29], which by FISH analy- may behave physiologically quite di¡erently to each other
ses were also members of the Q-Proteobacteria, although in activated sludge.
this community showed good EBPR performance, indicat- The work reported in [144,180,194] supports this. The
ing that these populations may be common in most anaer- tetrad-forming bacteria that dominated SBRs fed glucose
obic:aerobic systems. and with no EBPR [180] were members of the L-Proteo-
Similar results were reported in [62], where sequences bacteria, Q-Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria, and many of
from large cocci were also detected in clone libraries these were distinctive large cocci. As well as phylogenetic
from an EBPR SBR. These were considered to represent diversity, they also demonstrated considerable in situ
two physiologically di¡erent populations with a shared physiological variation in this morphotype. Thus, the
morphology. FISH showed that cells responding to the L-Proteobacteria stained DAPI 3ve and PHA +ve, which
probes in [192] and those designed using clone library di¡ers from the behavior of the cocci reported earlier by
[156,186,200]
[192]. Clone library analysis and DGGE pro¢ling of this
[193,195]
[194,201]
community were used in attempts to identify these popu-
lations, but none of the Proteobacteria or low mol% G+C
[106]
[180]
[180]
[180]
[194]
Ref.
[62]
[29]
[62]
Gram-positive bacteria could be identi¢ed, However,
among the Actinobacteria, Micropruina glycogenica [201]
Synthesis
A summary of the known anaerobic substrate assimilation patterns and intracellular storage polymer production by the ‘G-Bacteria’/GAO in anaerobic :aerobic activated sludge systems
3ve
3ve
3ve
3ve
3ve
3ve
+ve
+ve
+ve
Z
were detected. FISH using probes (Table 2) designed
against these populations showed that they accounted
glycogen
Polymer
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
+ve
+ve
3ve
3ve
3ve
3ve
n.d.
+ve
+ve
+ve
3ve
3ve
3ve
3ve
3ve
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
+ve
3ve
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
+ve
+ve
+ve
acetate in situ
and in situ
cocci in clusters
cocci in clusters
cocci in tetrads
cocci in tetrads
cocci in tetrads
L-Proteobacteria
Q-Proteobacteria
Q-Proteobacteria
Actinobacteria
Actinobacteria
Actinobacteria
Actinobacteria
Actinobacteria
Phylogenetic
M. phosphovorusa;b
Tetrasphaera spp.a
M. glycogenicab;c
phosphatis’
Unnameda
Unnameda
EBPR capacity, and that in the community with poor Rhodocyclus-related organisms. The mRNA transcribed
EBPR, glycogen formation using acetate was probably from it could also be detected. The enzyme was apparently
from the activities of the K-Proteobacteria, in the absence associated with the particulate fraction of lysed sludge
of M. glycogenica. What is known about anaerobic sub- [208], which might explain the lack of success in detecting
strate assimilation and intracellular storage polymer syn- it in earlier studies. Furthermore, the requirement of this
thesis from these di¡erent studies with the ‘G-bacteria’/ enzyme for Mg2þ could be one reason why this cation is
GAO is summarized in Table 3. essential for successful EBPR [77].
More studies are needed where communities with well- This enzymatic information is very important, since it
de¢ned chemical properties are analyzed in this way to should now provide the tools to help understand how
clarify the considerable confusion about the nature of PPK synthesis and expression in this PAO population is
the ‘G-Bacteria’ and GAO that currently exists. It is im- a¡ected in situ by factors like plant operating conditions,
portant to identify more clearly the major functional pop- and provide the means to monitor plant performance in a
ulations responsible for the chemical transformations tak- highly relevant way. More studies like this are needed to
gene cassette PCR [211] or RNA stable isotope probing accepted mathematical representation of EBPR is that
[214^216] using 13 C-labeled substrates like acetate or glu- adopted in ASM2 and ASM2d, where the basic stoichi-
cose, might help to reveal the identity of these active pop- ometry is taken from what is known about PAO metabo-
ulations. Although, if these substrates are used mainly for lism. Although glycogen clearly plays an important role in
storage and not for growth and DNA/RNA synthesis in anaerobic substrate uptake and storage by PAO
the PAO, as is believed to be the case from the biochem- [17,34,223,224] its metabolism is not modeled in ASM2
ical models, then this approach may not be appropriate. or ASM2d, since the IAWQ group deliberately sought to
Alternatively, FISH/staining already described for PAO keep both as simple as possible. They also take no account
and GAO may also provide useful information. Some in- of possible ecological interactions between di¡erent popu-
formation from studies with pure cultures of Acinetobacter lations in EBPR systems. Of special interest are the com-
sp. is available on regulation of the synthesis and de- petitive interactions between the PAO and GAO/‘G-Bac-
gradation of PHA [212,213]. Oxygen limitation is a key teria’ discussed in Section 13. Acquiring such information
trigger in PHA formation in many bacteria, arising would make a valuable contribution to EBPR modeling
studies and not to repeat the mistake, made with Acineto- Acknowledgements
bacter for example, of becoming blinkered and concentrat-
ing all the e¡ort on one population type, important R. Seviour was a Visiting Professor at the University of
though Rhodocyclus-related organisms increasingly appear Tokyo while this review was written and wishes to ac-
to be. There is now considerable evidence that EBPR com- knowledge the ¢nancial support provided by the Univer-
munity structures in di¡erent systems may vary markedly. sity of Tokyo during his stay. We also thank Dr. Helen
Equally, although the biochemical models are very helpful Stratton for supplying some of the ¢gures.
in suggesting how EBPR might work, we see no absolute
necessity for an organism to behave as these models de-
mand to be considered a PAO. It is possible for example References
that polyP synthesizing organisms like Acinetobacter may
not play a primary role in EBPR, but be crucial in scav- [1] Winkler, M. (1984) Biological control of nitrogenous pollution
in wastewater. In: Topics in Enzyme and Fermentation Biotech-
enging for P in the aerobic zone and, importantly, be
Wastewater: Principles and Practice (Sedlak, R.I., Ed.), pp. 91^112. Biological model for enhanced biological phosphorus removal. Water
Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL. Res. 20, 1511^1521.
[20] Jenkins, D. and Tandoi, V. (1991) The applied microbiology of en- [39] Smolders, G.J.F., van der Meij, J., van Loosdrecht, M.C.M. and
hanced biological phosphate removal ^ accomplishments and needs. Heijnen, J.J. (1994) Model of the anaerobic metabolism of the bio-
Water Res. 25, 1471^1478. logical phosphorus removal process ^ stoichiometry and pH in£u-
[21] Van Loosdrecht, M.C.M., Hooijmans, C.M., Brdjanovic, D. and ence. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 43, 461^470.
Heijnen, J.J. (1997) Biological phosphorus removal processes. Appl. [40] van Loosdrecht, M.C.M., Pot, M.A. and Heijnen, J.J. (1997) Impor-
Microbiol. Biotechnol. 48, 289^296. tance of bacterial storage polymers in bioprocesses. Water Sci. Tech-
[22] Kortstee, G.J.J., Appeldoorn, K.J., Bonting, C.F.C., van Niel, E.W.J. nol. 35, 41^47.
and van Veen, H.J. (2000) Ecological aspects of biological phospho- [41] Majone, M., Dirks, K. and Beun, J.J. (1999) Aerobic storage under
rus removal in activated sludge systems. Adv. Microb. Ecol. 16, 169^ dynamic conditions in activated sludge process. The state of the art.
200. Water Res. 39, 61^73.
[23] Amann, R., Ludwig, W. and Schleifer, K.-H. (1995) Phylogenetic [42] Wentzel, M.C., Lo«tter, L.H., Ekama, G.A., Loewenthal, T.E. and
identi¢cation and in situ detection of individual microbial cells with- Marais, G.v.R. (1991) Evaluation of biochemical models for biolog-
out cultivation. Microbiol. Rev. 59, 143^169. ical excess phosphorus removal. Water Sci. Technol. 23, 567^576.
[59] Carucci, A., Lindrea, K.C., Majone, M. and Ramadori, R. (1999) [78] Ro«ske, I., Scho«nborn, C. and Bauer, H.-D. (1995) In£uence of the
Di¡erent mechanisms for the anaerobic storage of organic substrates addition of di¡erent metals to an activated sludge system on the
and their e¡ect on enhanced biological phosphate removal (EBPR). enhanced biological phosphorus removal. Int. Rev. Ges. Hydrobiol.
Water Sci. Technol. 39, 21^28. 80, 1^17.
[60] Carucci, A., Ku«nhi, M., Brun, R., Carucci, G., Koch, G., Majone, [79] Lindrea, K.C., Pigdon, S.P., Boyd, B. and Lockwood, G.A. (1994)
M. and Siegrist, H. (1999) Microbial competition for the organic Biomass characterization in a NDEBPR plant during start up and
substrates and its impact on EBPR systems under conditions of subsequent periods of good and poor phosphorus removal. Water
changing carbon feed. Water Sci. Technol. 39, 75^85. Sci. Technol. 29, 91^100.
[61] Kornberg, A., Rao, N.N. and Ault-Riche, D. (1999) Inorganic poly- [80] Bonting, C.F.C., Kortstee, G.J.J., Boekestein, A. and Zehnder,
phosphate: a molecule of many functions. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 68, A.J.B. (1993) The elemental composition dynamics of large polyphos-
89^125. phate granules in Acinetobacter strain 210A. Arch. Microbiol. 159,
[62] Liu, W.-T., Nielsen, A.T., Wu, J.-H., Tsai, C.-S., Matsuo, Y. and 428^434.
Molin, S. (2001) In situ identi¢cation of polyphosphate- and polyhy- [81] Van Veen, H.W., Abee, T., Kortstee, G.J.J., Pereira, H., Konings,
droxyalkanoate-accumulating traits for microbial populations in a W.N. and Zehnder, A.J.B. (1994) Generation of a proton motive
biological phosphorus removal process. Environ. Microbiol. 3, 110^ force by the excretion of metal-phosphate in the polyphosphate-ac-
eters on polyphosphate accumulation in Acinetobacter sp. Antonie sludge for enhanced phosphate removal. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
van Leeuwenhoek 55, 67^82. 64, 992^998.
[97] Tandoi, V., Majone, M., May, J. and Ramadori, R. (1998) The [115] Auling, G., Pilz, F., Busse, H.-J., Karrasch, M., Streichan, M. and
behaviour of polyphosphate accumulating Acinetobacter isolates in Schon, G. (1991) Analysis of the polyphosphate-accumulating mi-
an anaerobic :aerobic chemostat. Water Res. 32, 2903^2912. cro£ora in phosphorus-eliminating, anaerobic^aerobic activated
[98] Brodisch, K.E.U. and Joyner, S.J. (1983) The role of microorgan- sludge systems by using diaminopropane as a biomarker for rapid
isms other than Acinetobacter in biological phosphate removal in estimation of Acinetobacter spp. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 57,
activated sludge process. Water Sci. Technol. 15, 117^125. 3685^3692.
[99] Lo‹tter, L.H. and Murphy, M. (1985) The identi¢cation of hetero- [116] Liu, W.-T., Linning, K.D., Nakamura, K., Mino, T., Matsuo, T.
trophic bacteria in activated sludge with particular reference to pol- and Forney, L. (2000) Microbial community changes in biological
yphosphate accumulation. Water SA 11, 179^184. phosphate-removal systems on altered sludge phosphate content.
[100] Maszenan, A.M., Seviour, R.J., Patel, B.K.C., Schumann, P., Burg- Microbiology (UK) 146, 1099^1107.
hardt, Y., Tokiwa, Y. and Stratton, H.M. (2000) Three isolates of [117] Sudiana, I.M., Mino, T., Satoh, H. and Matsuo, T. (1998) Morphol-
novel polyphosphate accumulating gram positive cocci, obtained ogy, in situ characterization with rRNA targeted probes and respi-
from activated sludge belong to a new genus Tetrasphaera gen. ratory quinone pro¢les of enhanced biological phosphorus removal
[132] Braker, G., Fesefeldt, A. and Witzel, K.-P. (1998) Development of [148] Ka«mpfer, P., Erhart, R., Beimfohr, C., Bohringer, J., Wagner, M.
PCR primer systems for ampli¢cation of nitrite reductase genes and Amann, R. (1996) Characterization of bacterial communities
(nirK and nirS) to detect denitrifying bacteria in environmental sam- from activated sludge : culture-dependent numerical identi¢cation
ples. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64, 3769^3775. versus in situ identi¢cation using group- and genus-speci¢c rRNA-
[133] Hallin, S. and Lindgren, P.-E. (1999) PCR detection of genes encod- targeted oligonucleotide probes. Microb. Ecol. 32, 101^121.
ing nitrite reductase in denitrifying bacteria. Appl. Environ. Micro- [149] Bjo‹rnsson, L., Hugenholtz, P., Tyson, G.W. and Blackall, L.L.
biol. 65, 1652^1657. (2002) Filamentous Chloro£exi (green non-sulfur bacteria) are abun-
[134] Bothe, H., Jost, G., Schloter, M., Ward, B. and Witzel, K.-P. (2000) dant in wastewater treatment processes with biological nutrient re-
Molecular analysis of ammonia oxidation and denitri¢cation in nat- moval. Microbiology (UK) 148, 2309^2318.
ural environments. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 24, 673^690. [150] Beer, M., Seviour, E.M., Kong, Y., Cunningham, M., Blackall, L.L.
[135] Braker, G., Zhou, J., Wu, L., Devol, A.H. and Tiedje, J.M. (2000) and Seviour, R.J. (2002) Phylogeny of the ¢lamentous bacterium
Nitrite reductase genes (nirK and nirS) as functional markers to Eikelboom type 1851, and design and application of a 16S rRNA
investigate diversity of denitrifying bacteria in paci¢c northwest ma- targeted oligonucleotide probe for its £uorescence in situ identi¢ca-
rine sediment communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66, 2096^ tion in activated sludge. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 207, 179^183.
2104. [151] Schade, M., Beimfohr, C. and Lemmer, H. (2002) Phylogenetic and
enhanced biological phosphate removal processes. Water Sci. Tech- anaerobic^aerobic activated sludge with a minimized polyphosphate
nol. 31, 25^34. content. J. Ferment. Bioeng. 77, 535^540.
[166] Meinhold, J., Arnold, E. and Isaacs, S. (1999) E¡ect of nitrite on [185] Satoh, H., Mino, T. and Matsuo, T. (1994) Deterioration of en-
anoxic phosphate uptake in biological phosphorus removal acti- hanced biological phosphorus removal by the domination of micro-
vated sludge. Water Res. 33, 1871^1883. organisms without polyphosphate accumulation. Water Sci. Tech-
[167] Nielsen, J.L. and Nielsen, P.H. (2002) Quanti¢cation of functional nol. 30, 203^211.
groups in activated sludge by microautoradiography. Water Sci. [186] Blackall, L.L., Crocetti, G.R., Saunders, A.M. and Bond, P.L.
Technol. 46, 389^395. (2002) A review and update of the microbiology of enhanced bio-
[168] Bortone, G., Saltarelli, R., Alons, V., Sorm, R., Wanner, J. and logical phosphorus removal in wastewater treatment plants. Antonie
Tilche, A. (1996) Biological anoxic phosphorus removal ^ the DE- van Leeuwenhoek 81, 681^691.
PHANOX process. Water Sci. Technol. 34, 119^128. [187] Filipe, C.D.M., Daigger, G.T. and Grady, C.P.L. (2001) E¡ects of
[169] Hu, Z.-R., Wentzel, M.C. and Ekama, G.A. (2002) The signi¢cance pH on the rates of aerobic metabolism of phosphate-accumulating
of denitrifying polyphosphate accumulating organisms in biological and glycogen-accumulating organisms. Water Environ. Res. 73,
nutrient removal activated sludge systems. Water Sci. Technol. 46, 213^222.
129^138. [188] Filipe, C.D.M., Daigger, G.T. and Grady, C.P.L. (2001) pH as a
[201] Shintani, T., Liu, W., Hanada, S., Kamagata, Y., Miyaoka, S., [217] Dawes, E.A. (1992) Storage polymers in prokaryotes. In: Prokary-
Suzuki, Y. and Nakamura, K. (2000) Micropruina glycogenica gen. otic Structure and Function : A New Perspective (Mohan, S., Dow-
nov., sp. nov., a new gram-positive glycogen-accumulating bacte- and, C. and Cole, J.A., Eds.), pp. 81^122. Cambridge University
rium isolated from activated sludge. Int J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. Press, Cambridge.
50, 201^207. [218] Wentzel, M.C., Ekama, G.A., Lowenthal, R.E., Dold, P.L. and
[202] Van Groenestijn, J.W., Bentvelsen, M.M., Deinema, M.H. and Marais, G.v.R. (1989) Enhanced polyphosphate organism cultures
Zehnder, A.J. (1989) Polyphosphate-degrading enzymes in Acineto- in activated sludge ^ part III : kinetic model. Water SA 15, 89^102.
bacter spp. and activated sludge. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 55, 219^ [219] Henze, M., Guyer, W., Mino, T., Wentzel, M.C. and Marais,
223. G.v.R. (1995) The activated sludge model no. 2. Scienti¢c and Tech-
[203] Bonting, C.F.C., Kortstee, G.J.J. and Zehnder, A.J.B. (1991) Prop- nical Report No. 3, International Association on Water, London.
erties of polyphosphate : AMP phosphotransferase of Acinetobacter [220] Henze, M., Guyer, W., Mino, T., Wentzel, M.C., Marais, G.v.R.M.
strain 210A. J. Bacteriol. 173, 6484^6488. and van Loostrecht, M.C.M. (1999) Activated sludge model no. 2d,
[204] Resnick, S. and Zehnder, A.J. (2000) In vitro ATP regeneration ASM 2D. Water Sci. Technol. 39, 165^182.
from polyphosphate and AMP by polyphosphate: AMP phospho- [221] Smolders, G.J.F., van der Meij, J., van Loostrecht, M.C.M. and
transferase and adenylate kinase from Acinetobacter johnsonii 210A. Heijnen, J.J. (1994) Stoichiometric model of the aerobic metabolism