Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Accused, JUAN DELA CRUZ, through the Public Attorney’s Office and
unto this Honorable Court respectfully states, that:
1. In a certification dated July 21, 2014, it was revealed that the instant case
was ordered ARCHIVED on April 29, 1999. A copy of the certification is attached
herein as Annex “A”.
2. Accused did not receive any notice concerning this case. He had no
knowledge of its existence until he filed an application for the issuance of an
Ombudsman Clearance, where he learned that he had a pending criminal case
filed before this Honorable Court.
3. Upon his inquiry, accused learned that the instant case was filed against
him before this Honorable Court on February 20, 1998 and ordered archived on
April 29, 1999.
4. The accused also learned that the records of this case were also eaten by
termites as stated in the certification.
5. The accused never intended to evade the instant case. He was not aware
of its existence. He has not received any notice from this Honorable Court.
Neither had he been arrested pursuant to this case.
6. The accused moves that the instant case be reopened so that he could
face the accusations against him and be able to defend and clear himself.
7. Thus, the accused request unto this Honorable Court to order the
reopening of this case and reconstitute its records pursuant to its inherent power
under Rule 135 Sec. 5 of the Rules of Court in relation to Act 3110 1.
8. Pursuant to the mentioned rule, this Honorable Court has the power to
restore and supply deficiencies in its records and proceedings, thus;
(c) To compel obedience to its judgments, orders and processes, and to the
lawful orders of a judge out of court, in a case pending therein;
(g) To amend and control its process and orders so as to make them
conformable to law and justice;
9. Accused tried to gather relevant records of the instant case in order to aid
this Honorable Court in the reconstitution. He visited the concerned parties,
namely; the Office of the Ombudsman, Office of the Provincial Prosecutor of
Pinatubo and the Office of the Clerk of Court, RTC, Pinatubo.
10. However, the accused failed to get a copy of the Information from the
mentioned offices.
11. Be that as it may, the investigation of the Office of the Ombudsman would
be helpful. They found out that the instant case resulted from the case reviewed
by their office which they docketed as OMB-1-23-4567. The latter case was
previously docketed as OMB-2-34-5678.
PRAYER
Other reliefs just and equitable under the premises are likewise prayed
for.
COUNSEL
2nd Floor, RTC Building,
Pinatubo City
By:
ECM
City Prosecutor
Pinatubo
GREETINGS:
Please take notice that the undersigned counsel is submitting the foregoing
“motion” for the consideration and approval of this Honorable Court on March 2, 2016,
Wednesday, or at the time and date that it may be conveniently scheduled.
ECM
EXPLANATION
ECM