FOR THE WRIT OF THE RECAPTION

FOR THE JOINDER FOR THE JUDGE

IN THE COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF THE EASTERN-DISTRICT OF THE STATE
OF THE WISCONSIN OF THE UNITY-STATES OF THE AMERICA

Miller
PLAINTIFF
V FOR THE WRIT OF THE RECAPTION
Honorable-Thomas: Grover, [Judge] COMPLAINT: FOR THE JOINDER OF THE NEW-PARTIES
Honorable-Earl W. Schmidt, [Judge] JOINDER UNDER THE F.R.C.P. RULE: 19
Amy: Greenwood, [ASST. ATT.] TITLE: 28: U.S.A. CODES: SECTION: 1361
Gary: Bruno, [ATTORNEY] WRIT FOR THE MANDAMUS
COUNTY OF THE SHAWANO: IN THE. (A PERSON)
IN THE INCORPORATION OF THE CASE: 97-C-O111
CONTRACT-NOTICE: FOR THIS DISCLAIMER IS FOR THE UNITY-STATES/PARTY, FOR THE RESPONSIBILITY,
UNDER THE TERMS OF THIS CONTRACT BY THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE INCORPORATION OF THE CITATION-NO.
Cv-0012345- OF THE C.U.S.A.F.-CONTRACT. FOR THE TERMS ARE UNDER THE RULES OF THE DISCOVERY
OF THE TRUTH, UNDER THE AMERICAN-FLAG OF THE U.S.A. BY THE OATH AND AFFIRMATION BY THE
SWEARING FOR THE DECLARATION OF THE AFFIRMATION OF THE TRUTH BY THE FIDUCIARY-PARTY(s) OF
THE COURT, UNDER THE TERMS IN THE C.U.S.A.F.-CONTRACT OF THE UNITY-STATES/PARTY(s) IN THE
INCORPORATION-CASE-TITLE-HEREIN. FOR THE STATE OF THE COURT IS UNDER THE LAW OF THE
AMERICAN-FLAG WITHIN THE STATE OF THIS INCORPORATION OF THE CASE, BY THE FILING WITH THE
CLERK OF THE COURTS OF THIS INCORPORATION OF THE CASE. FOR ANY FOREIGNIFICTION-JURISDICTION
IS UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF THE TRUTH WITH THE SOVEREIGN-CITIZEN IN THE PARTY. FOR ANY
BREACH OF THIS C.U.S.A.F.-CONTRACT IS UNDER THE TERMS, RULES AND DEFINITIONS OF THE
INCORPORATION-CASE-TITLE-HEREIN. FOR ANY BREACH OF THE C.U.S.A.F.-CONTRACT IS UNDER THE
PROVISION FOR THE SANCTIONS. WHEN THE C.U.S.A.F.-CONTRACT IS OF THE SURRENDER BY ANY PARTY
INTO THE FOREIGN/FICTION-JURISDICTION, BY THE BREACH OF THIS OATH AND AFFIRMATION-CONTRACT
UNDER THE C.U.S.A.F.-CONTRACT, THEN THE CHARGES “FOR THE PERJURY OF THE OATH” ARE UNDER THE
TITLE: 18: U.S.A. CODES: SECTION: 1621: [5-YEARS—$5,000. PENALTY—FEE] FOR THE TERMS OF THE
CONSTITUTION/CONTRACT! CONSTRUCTIVE-TREASON AGAINST THE C.U.S.A.F.-CONTRACT FOR THE FALSE-
SWEARING OF THE OATH. NOTE: FOR THE FACTS ARE IN THE NOUNS FOR THE JURISDICTION IN THE
COURTS OF THE UNITY-STATES UNDER THE TRUTH. FOR THE VIOLATION OF THE NOUNS AS THE VERB OR
ADJECTIVES ARE FOR THE CAUSE OF THE MAIL—FRAUD /FICTITIOUS-NAMES UNDER THE TITLE: 18: U.S.A.
CODES: SECTION: 1342: FOR THE USE OF THE FICTITIOUS-NAMES FOR THE EXTORTION OF THE MONEY
FOR THE TITLE: 18: U.S.A. CODES: SECTION: 1001: [5—YEARS AND $5,000.—PENALTY-FEE] FOR THE
FICTITIOUS-USE OF THE NOUNS AS THE VERBS AND ADJECTIVES, ARE UNDER THE VIOLATION OF THE
C.U.S.A.F.-CONTRACT FOR THE RIGHTS OF THE SOVEREIGN-CITIZENS IN THE PARTY.

FOR THE PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT IS OF THE SOVEREIGN-CITIZEN IN THE PARTY, OF THE AFFIRMATION BY THE DECLARATION OF
THE TRUTH BY THE FIRSTHAND-KNOWLEDGE OF THE FACTS:

ABBREVIATIONS: F. R. C. P. = FOR THE FEDERAL-RULES OF THE CIVIL-PROCEDURE

herein U.S.A. CODES© = OF THE UNITY-STATES OF THE AMERICA-CODES
U.S.A. = OF THE UNITY-STATES OF THE AMERICA
A, AN, THE, THIS = (ARTICLE) FOR THE SPECIFIC
UNITY-STATES = FOR THE INCORPORATION OF ANY TWO OR MOPE-PARTIES IS BY THIS
CONTRACT/CONSTITUTION
C. U. S .A. F. = FOR THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITY-STATES UNDER THE AMERICAN-FLAG.
FOR THE ARTICLE OF THE ONE(1) = FOR THE RIGHT OF THE TRUTH IS IN THE LANGUAGE OF THE NOUN.
FOR THE ARTICLE OF THE TWO(2) = FOR THE RIGHT OF THE JUDGEMENT IS IN THE TRUTH.
FOR THE ARTICLE OF TEE THREE(3) = FOR THE RIGHT OF THE TRUTH IS IN THE SPEECH, WRITINGS,
RELIGION, PRESS, AND GRIEVANCE;
FOR THE ARTICLE OF THE FOUR(4) = FOR THE RIGHTS IN ANY COURT-ACTION ARE IN THE LANGUAGE OF
THE TRUTH.
FOR THE ARTICLE OF THE FIVE(5) = FOR THE RIGHT OF THE FREEDOM OF THIS CONSTITUTION IS IN
THE TRUTH.
FOR THE ARTICLE OF THE SIX(6) = FOR THE RIGHT OF A TRUE-ARREST-WARRANT OR TRUE-SEARCH
WARRANT IS UNDER THE SIGNATURE OF THE JUDGE OF THE OATH AND AFFIRMATION IN THE TRUTH.
FOR THE ARTICLE OF THE SEVEN(7) = FOR THE RIGHT OF THE DUE-PROCESS IS FOR THE WITNESS IS
IN THE TRUTH FOR THE ONE—SELF.
FOR THE ARTICLE OF THE EIGHT(8) = FOR THE RIGHT OF THE WITNESSES, COUNSEL AND EVIDENCE IS
IN THE TRUTH IN THE COURT FOR THE SPEEDY-TRIAL WITHIN THE 45-DAYS.

/ UNDER THE COPYRIGHT 7-29-99 BY THE DAVID-WYNN: MILLER, LAW-PROCEDURES

FOR THE ARTICLE OF THE NINE(9) = FOR THE RIGHT OF THE TRIAL IS BY THE (12) PARTY-JURY IN
THE TRUTH.
FOR THE ARTICLE OF THE TEN(1O) = FOR THE PUNISHMENT IS tN THE TRUTH, FOR THE REASONABLE-BAIL
IS IN THE TRUTH FOR ALL CITIZENS.
FOR THE ARTICLE OF THE ELEVEN(11) = FOR THE OFFICERS ARE BY THE APPOINTMENT OR ELECTION
UNDER THE OATH OR AFFIRMATION FOR THE UPHOLDING OF THE C.U.S.A.F.-CONTRACT IN THE UNITY-
STATES OF THE AMERICA IN THE TRUTH.
FOR THE ARTICLE OF THE TWELVE(12) FOR THE CONSTITUTION/CONTRACT IS UNDER THE RESERVATION
OF THE C.U.S.A.F.-CONTRACT, FOR THE RESERVATION IS BY THE MUTUAL-AGREEMENT BY THE TITLE-
PARTIES-HEREIN.
FOR THE ARTICLE OF THE THIRTEEN(13) = FOR THE TRUTH OF THE FOREIGN/FICTION-LANGUAGL~ IS FOR
THE FICTION-COURT AND IS FOR THE JURISDICTIONS IN THE TRUTH OVER THE SOVEREIGN-CITIZEN IN
THE PARTY, FOR THE JUDICIAL-LANGUAGE OF THE UNITY-STATES IS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION FOR THE
EXTENSION IN ANY SUIT IN THE LAW OR IN THE EQUITY FOR THE COMMENCEMENT OR FOR THE
PROSECUTION AGAINST ANY ONE OF THE UNITY-STATES BY THE CITIZENS OF THE OTHER-STATES OR BY
THE CITIZENS OR BY THE SUBJECTS OF ANY FICTION-STATE IN THE TRUTH. FOR THE NEW-STATE UNDER
THE TRUTH IS FOR THE ERECTION OF THE NEW-STATE WITHIN THE STATE FOR THE FORMATION OF A
TRUTHFUL-STATE WITHIN THE UNITY-STATES.

FOR THE COURT OF THE CIRCUIT OF THE U.s.A. IS UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF THE TRUTH OF THE
ORIGINAL-JURISDICTION UNDER THE TITLE: 28: U.S.A. CODES: 1331 AND SECTION: 1343: FOR THE
EOUAL-PROTECTION-CLAUSE; AND UNDER THE TITLE: 4: U.S.A. CODES: SECTION: 1,2&3: FLAG OF THE
U.S.A. FOR THE CLERK OF THE COURT IS UNDER THE COURT OF THE CIRCUIT OF THE U.S.A. UNDER
THE TITLE: 28: U.S.A. CODES: SECTION: 1869 AND 1361, BY THE FILING OF THIS INCORPORATION-
CASE UNDER THE ORDER OF THE PROCEDURES OF THE TITLE: 28: U.S.A. CODES: SECTION: 1361: FOR
THE COMPLIANCE OF THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE DUTY OF THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK. FOR THE COURT
IS UNDER THE FOREIGN-SOVEREIGN-IMMUNITY—ACT: DATE: OCTOBER/21/1976: FOR THE TITLE: 28:
U.S.A. CODES: SECTION: 1605 FOR THE COURT IS UNDER THE PERPETUAL-EXISTENCE OF THE
C.U.S.A.F.-CONTRACT OF THE CASE-NUMBER-TITLE-HEREIN. FOR ALL PARTIES MUST BE IN THE PRESENT-
TENSE-AGREEMENT OF THE FACTS OR BY THE PRESENT-TENSE—DECISION OF THE TRIAL BY THE JURY.

1. FOR THE U.S. MARSHAL, DEPUTY-U.S. MARSHAL OR OTHER-PARTY OF THE AUTHORIZATION FOR THE
SERVING AND EXECUTION OF THE WRITS IN THE PROVISIONS IN THE TITLE: 42: U.S.A. CODES:
SECTION: 1990: FOR THE MARSHAL IS FOR THE OBEYING-PRECEPTS; OR BY THE REFUSING FOR THE
RECEIVING OR EXECUTING-PROCESS:
---FOR EVERY MARSHAL AND DEPUTY-MARSHAL IS UNDER THE ORDER AND EXECUTION FOR ALL WARRANTS
OR OTHER-PROCESS, FOR THE DIRECTION OF THE MARSHAL, IS UNDER THE ISSUE OF THE PROVISIONS
IN THE TITLE:42: SECTION: 1989. FOR EVERY MARSHAL AND DEPUTY-MARSHAL IS BY THE REFUSAL FOR
THE RECEIVING OF ANY WARRANT OR OTHER-PROCESS FOR THE TENDERING ONTO THAT PARTY, OR FOR THE
ISSUING IN THE TRUTH WITH THE PURSUANCE OF THE PROVISIONS OF THE TITLE:42: SECTION: 1990,
IS FOR THE REFUSAL OR NEGLECTS OF THE USE OF ALL PROPER-MEANS, OF THE DILIGENCE FOR THE
EXECUTING OF THE SERVICE, IS UNDER THE LIABLE FOR A FINE IN THE SUM OF THE $1,000, FOR THE
BENEFIT OF THE PARTY OF THE AGGRIEVEMENT.

FOR THE MARSHAL(S) IS/ARE HEREBY, UNDER THE COMMAND FOR THE SERVING OF THIS JOINDER UNDER
THE F.R.C.P. RULE: 19, ON THE HONORABLE-JUDGE Rudolph T. X_X OF THE COURT OF THE DISTRICT
OF THE U.S.A., EASTERN-DiSTRICT OF THE WISCONSIN, 517-EAST-WISCONSIN-AVE., IN THE CITY OF
THE MILWAUKEE, IN THE STATE OF THE WISCONSIN, 53201.

FOR THE CONTEMPT OF THE PETITIONER’S-WRIT OF THE REPLEVIN, FOR THE “WRIT OF THE ERROR”, AND
DEFAULT-JUDGMENT UNDER THE F.R.C.P. RULE: 55; AND FOR THE BREACH OF THE OATH AND AFFIRMATION
BY THE CONTEMPT FOR THE C.U.S.A.F.-CONTRACT, AND FOR THE PERJURY OF THE OATH OF THE OFFICE
UNDER THE TITLE: 18: U.S.A. CODES: SECTION: 1621; FOR THE CONSTRUCTIVE-TREASON IS BY THE
SURRENDERING FOR THE C.U.S.A.F.-CONTRACT INTO THE FOREIGN/FICTION-JURISDICTION AND FOR THE
FALSE-SWEARING OF THE OATH AND AFFIRMATION OF THE FIDUCIARY—RESPONSIBILITY IS UNDER
UPHOLDING OF THE OATH OF THE OFFICE FOR THE ELECTION OR APPOINTMENT OF THE OFFICIALS. FOR
THE ACTIONS UNDER THE DEFAULT IS UNDER THE F.R.C.P. RULE: 55 AND F.R.C.P. RULE: 8(a) AND
F.R.C.P. RULE: 8(d) FOR AN ANSWER BY THE SERVICE IN THE TRUTH WITH THE COMPLAINT IS UNDER
THE TIME-ALLOWANCE AND FOR THE UNITY IN THE TRUTH UNDER THE F.R.C.P. RULE: 12(b)7) IN THE
DIRECTION OF THE C.U.S.A.F.-CONTRACT IS UNDER THE COMMERCIAL-AGREEMENT OF THE FOREIGN-
SOVEREIGN-IMMUNITY—ACT UNDER THE TITLE: 28: U.S.A. SECTION: 1605, FOR THE FILING OF THE
COMPLAINT UNDER THE REQUIREMENT BY THE BREACH OF THE C.U.S.A.F.-CONTRACT BY THE OFFICERS
OF THE COURT UNDER THE TITLE OF THE C.U.S.A.F.-CONTRACT OATH AND AFFIRMATION IN THE CONTRACT
OF THE INCORPORATION OF THE CASE-NO. 97-C-O111, FOR THE SURRENDERING OF THE C.U.S.A.F.
CONTRACT INTO THE FOREIGN/FICTION-JURISDICTION BY THE WITNESSING BY THE PLAINTIFF AND BY
THE 12-PARTY-JURY IN THE COURT OF THE JUDGE: Rudolph T. XX.

UNDER THE COPYRIGHT© 7/29/99, BY THE DAVID-WYNN: MILLER, LAW-PROCEDURES

3
FOR THE PLAINTIFF BY THE AFFIRMATION IS OF THE INJURY BY THE NEGLECT OF THE AFFIRMATION,
HEREIN, BY THE BREACH OF THE OATH AND AFFIRMATION IN THE USE OF THE NOUNS(SUBJECT-MATTER)
IN THE USE AS THE VERB AND ADJECTIVE-FICTION IN THE LANGUAGE AND IS UNDER THE FRAUD OF THE
F.R.C.P. RULE-9(b) BY THE JUDGE Rudolph T. X_X.

2. FOR THE U.S. MARSHAL IS UNDER THE COMMAND BY THE ORDER FOR THE WRIT OF THE RECAPTION,
FOR THE OBTAINING OF THE PROPERTY-SOUGHT BY THE ATTACHMENT: WRIT OF THE REPLEVIN AND FOR
THE OBTAINING OF THE SIGNATURE ON THE WRIT OF THE REPLEVIN BY THE PRESIDING-JUDGE OF THE
COURT OF THE DISTRICT: TITLE-HEREIN. FOR THE MARSHAL OF THE U.S.A. HAS JURISDICTION WHEN
THE PLAINTIFF IS UNDER THE AFFIRMATION FOR THE INJURY BY THE NEGLIGENCE FOR THE LANGUAGE-
PROCEDURES FOR THE CORRECT-AFFIRMATION IN THE RESPONSE-PLEADING FOR THE FICTITIOUS USE OF
THE LANGUAGE BY THE JUDGE UNDER THE TITLE: 42: U.S.A. CODES: SECTION: 1986: FOR THE
KNOWLEDGE OF THE LAW IN THE TRUTH FOR THE CORRECTION OF THE WRONG UNDER THE TITLE: 28
U.S.A. CODES: 1361 FOR THE BREACH OF THE C.U.S.A.F.—CONTRACT UNDER THE TITLE: 28 : U.S.A.
CODES: 1361, BY THE SIGNATURE IN THE TRUTH(NOUN) FOR THE WRIT OF THE REPLEVIN, FOR THE U.S.
MARSHAL HAS WITHIN THE JURISDICTION FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF THE WRIT OF THE RECAPTION, WHICH
IS UNDER THE DEFAULT-JUDGMENT OF THE F.R.C.P. RULE: 55, AND UNDER THE TITLE: 28 : U.S.A.
CODES: 1361 FOR THE OPERATION OF THE JOB-TITLE OF THE JUDGE, BY THE FAILURE AND NEGLECT OF
THE OATH AND AFFIRMATION OF THE OFFICE IS FOR THE UPHOLDING OF THE JUSTICE AND DUE-PROCESS
OF THE LAW. FOR THE TRIAL BY THE JURY IS UNDER THE GUARANTEE BY THE FILE-STAMP-DATE:
MAY/6/1997. FOR THE PLAINTIFF IS OF THE INJURY FOR THE DEFAULT OF THE JUDGMENT AGAINST THE
RESPONDENTS. BY THE NEGLECT OF THE RESPONSE UNDER THE F.R.C.P. 8(a) AND 8(d), FOR THE RULES
OF THE DEFAULT-JUDGMENT UNDER THE F.R.C.P. RULE: 55, IN THE TIME FOR THE ALLOWANCE IS UNDER
THE EXPIRATION FOR THE ANSWERING OF THE COMPLAINT AND WRIT OF THE REPLEVIN, BY THE FILE
STAMP OF THE CLERK OF THE COURTS FOR THE SERVICE OF THE PROCESS UNDER THE F.R.C.P. RULE:
12(b) (5) AND FOR THE PROCESS OF THE SERVICE UNDER THE F.R.C.P. RULE: 12 (b)4). FOR THE
PLAINTIFF IS OF THE INJURY BY THE DEFAULT-ENFORCEMENT BY THE Hon. JUDGE Rudolph T. X_X.

3. FOR THE PLAINTIFF BY THIS AFFIRMATION IS OF THE INJURY BY THE BREACH OF THE OATH AND
AFFIRMATION FOR THE DUE-PROCESS UNDER THE C.U.S.A.F.-CONTRACT BY THE ARTICLE OF THE
SEVEN(7); AND UNDER THE TITLE: 28: U.S.A. CODES: 1361 FOR THE COMPLIANCE OF THE DUTIES OF
THE OFFICERS UNDER THE JOB-TITLE-INSTRUCTIONS AND UNDER THE TITLE: 18: U.S.A. CODES:
SECTION: 1343, FOR THE EQUAL-RIGHTS-VIOLATIONS BY THE NEGLECT OF THE JUDGE OF THE COURT OF
THE DISTRICT OF THE U.S.A. IN THE FOLLOWING FOR THE LAWS FOR THE ENACTMENT OF THE WRIT OF
THE REPLEVIN, BY THE SIGNATURE IN THE TRUTH FOR THE ORDER OF THE WRIT OF THE REPLEVIN AFTER
THE DEFAULT IS WON, BY THE PLAINTIFF. FOR THE INVESTIGATION INTO THE CONSPIRACY IS UNDER
THE TITLE: 18: U.S.A. CODES: SECTION: 2384: FOR THE SEDITION-CONSPIRACY IS FOR THE HINDERING
OF THE EXECUTION OF THE LAWS OF THE U.S.A. AND FOR THE TORTS FOR THE PROTECTING OF THE
OFFICERS IN THE COURT OF THE STATE BY THE OFFICERS OF THE COURT OF THE FEDERAL FOR THE
BREACH OF THE CONTRACT OF THE OATH AND AFFIRMATION FOR THE STOPPING AND CORRECTING FOR THE
WRONGS BY THE OFFICERS OF THE COURT.

4. FOR THE TIME IN THE DEFAULT IS UNDER THE DEFAULT-JUDGMENT AND FOR THE WRIT OF THE
REPLEVIN FOR THE SIGNATURE BY THE JUDGE, UNDER THE LAW, FOR THE MARSHALS OF THE U.S.A., ARE
UNDER THE JURISDICTION FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF THE WRIT OF THE RECAPTION OVER THE JUDGE OF
THE DISTRICT. FOR THE FILING OF THE INCORPORATION OF THE CASE: 97-C-0111, FOR THE
RESPONDENTS ARE IN THE JOINDER UNDER THE F.R.C.P. RULE: 12(b) (7), WITH THE PLAINTIFF AND
AT ALL TIMES, ARE UNDER THE OATH AND AFFIRMATION AS THE FIDUCIARIES IN THE TRUTH OF THE
COURT AND OF THE C.U.S.A.F.-CONTRACT, OF THE CLERKS, ATTORNEYS AND U.S. MARSHALS, JUDGES.

5. FOR THE FIRST-CONTRACT OF THE COMMERCE OF THE PLAINTIFF-AFFIRMATION’S IS FOR THE RIGHTS
OF THE COURTS, FOR THE CASH-PAID BY THE FILING-FEE WITH THE RETURN-RECEIPT, FOR AN ACT IS
IN THE COMMERCE AND UNDER THE JOINDER-RESPONSIBILITY UNDER THE FOREIGN-SOVEREIGN-IMMUNITY
OF THE OCTOBER/21/1976, FOR THE OFFICERS OF THE COURT ARE UNDER THE AFFIRMATION MID
DECLARATION FOR THE TRUTH FOR THE UPHOLDING FOR THE C. U. S . A. F. -CONTRACT BY THE FILING OF
THE WRIT OF THE RECAPTION, FOR THE PLAINTIFF’S-AFFIRMATION IS OF THE INJURY, WHEN THE COURT
IS IN THE BREACH OF THE PLAINTIFF’S-ACCESS OF THE COURT FOR THE REDRESS OF THE GRIEVANCES
AND WRONGS AGAINST THE PLAINTIFF-AFFIRMATION BY THE RESPONDENTS.

FACTS (AS THE NOUN)

6. FOR THE RESPONDENTS ARE “ATTORNEYS AT LA.W” (sic) (LAW IS USED AS A VERB; FOR THESE WORDS
ARE IN THE FICTION AND REQUIRE THE REFILING WITH THE CASE IN THE TRUTHFUL-LANGUAGE WHERE
THE NOUNS ARE NOUNS. FOR THE WORD IN THE FICTION IS AS THE VERB: IN LAW OR AT LAW). FOR THE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE(sic) [PAST—TENSE, ADJECTIVE-FICTION-OPINION, OF THE
FICTION-COURT OF THE JUDGE(FICTION)]OF THE DISTRICT AND UNDER THE APPOINTMENT FOR THE
INCORPORATION OF THE CASE NO. 97—C-011l IS Honorable Rudolph X_X.

UNDER THE COPYRIGHT© 7/29/99, BY THE DAVID-WYNN: MILLER, LAW-PROCEDURES

7. ON THE MAY/6/1997, FOR THE PLAINTIFF UNDER THIS AFFIRMATION IS UNDER THE FILING WITH THE
CLERK OF THE COURT FOR THE INCORPORATION OF THE CASE NO. 97-C-01l1, IN THE EASTERN-DISTRICT
OF THE STATE OF THE WISCONSIN FOR THE COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF THE U.S.A. AND IS UNDER THE
C.U.S.A.F.-CONTRACT BY THE OATH AND AFFIRMATION-CONTRACT FOR THE COMMERCIAL-ACT BY THE•
RECEIPT FOR THE TRIAL OF THE INCORPORATION OF 4THE CASE: 97-C-0111 BY THE RESPONDENT: JUDGE
Rudolph T. X_X. -

8. FOR THE PLAINTIFF UNDER THE AFFIRMATION FOR THE HAVING IN THE PLAINTIFF’S-POSSESSION OF
THE PROPER-LAWS AND GUARANTEES ARE UNDER THE CONTRACT WITH THE EMPLOYMENT OF THE RESPONDENT:
JUDGE Rudolph T. X_X AS THE JUDGE, FOR THE EXAMINATION OF THE LAW C.U.S.A.F.-CONTRACT— RIGHTS OF THE INCORPORATION OF
THE CASE: 97-C-0111, FOR THE SCHEDULING OF A TRIAL IN THE
CORPORATION OF THE CASE: 97-C-0111 FOR THE TRIAL BY THE JURY, BY THE HON. JUDGE Rudolph T.
X X.

9. FOR THE RESPONDENT, IN THE CONSIDERATION OF THE INCORPORATION OF THE CASE: 97—C—0111,
IS OF THE PAYMENTS FOR THE RESPONDENT, OF THE DEMAND OF THE FEE($150.00), FOR THE FILING
OF THE COMPLAINT FOR THE EXAMINATION OF THE ARGUMENTS AND LAWS BY THE IN THE PRESENTATION-OF
THE PLEADINGS BY THE PLAINTIFF UNDER THE C.U.S.A.F.-CONTRACT-LAWS, FOR THE SWEARING FOR THE
DECLARATION AND FOR THE AFFIRMATION OF THE TRUTH UNDER THE OATH AND AFFIRMATION OF THE TRUTH
BY THE JUDGE Rudolph T. X_X.

10. FOR THE PLAINTIFF AS THE WITNESS IS UNDER THE AFFIRMATION WITH THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE LAW
FOR THE NEGLECT OF THE C.U.S.A.F.-CONTRACT-LAWS AND CIVIL-RIGHTS UNDER THE TITLE: 28: U.S.A.
CODES: 1343, FOR THE EQUAL-PROTECTION OF THE LAW FOR THE NEGLECT OF THE LAW IS UNDER THE
VIOLATION OF THE TITLE: 28: U.S.A. CODES.: SECTION: 2072(2), FOR THE VACATING OF ANY ORDERS
FOR THE VIOLATION OF THE C.U.S.A.F.-CONTRACT ARE WITHIN THE RIGHTS OF THE CITIZEN IN THE
PARTY FOR THE SUING OF THE COMPLIANCE UNDER THE AFFIRMATION AND UNDER THE DECLARATION OF
THE TRUTH. FOR THE ISSUE OF THE ATTORNEY’S-OATH AND JUDGE’S-OATh ARE FOR THE UPHOLDING OF
THE C.U.S.A.F.-CONTRACT AND IS BY THE AFFIRMATION WITHIN THE C.U.S.A.F.-CONTRACT BY THE
JUDGE X_X AND BY THE RESPONDENTS.

11. FOR THE DUE-PROCESS OF THE C.U.S.A.F.-CONTRACT IS UNDER THE C.U.S.A.F.-CONTRACT BETWEEN THE PLAINTIFF AND THE
COURT?

12. FOR THE PLAINTIFF UNDER THE AFFIRMATION IS BY THE NEGLECT OF THE DUE-PROCESS OF THE LAWS
OF THE C.U.S.A.F.-CONTRACT BY THE ARTICLE: OF THE SEVEN(7), FOR THE PLAINTIFF IS OF THE
INJURY UNDER THE COLOR OF THE LAW, BY THE DECEPTION OF THE COURT. FOR THE PROLONGED-
LITIGATION BETWEEN DATE FEBRUARY/5/1997, IN THE CASE. NO. 97-C-01l1, FOR THE C.U.S.A.F.
CONTRACT IS UNDER THE COMMERCIAL-CONTRACT OF THE $150. OF THE FILE-STAMP AND, FOR THE
INCURRING [LARGER] FEES OF THE STATE AND PLAINTIFF, BY THE RESPONDENTS IN THE EMPLOYMENT
FOR THE COURT OF THE FEDERAL-GOVERNMENT.

13. FOE THE LONG-LITIGATION IS OF THE INJURY OF THE PLAINTIFF-AFFIRMATION OF THE C.U.S.A.F.CONTRACT FOR THE RIGHTS-
GUARANTEE UNDER THE C.U.S.A.F.-CONTRACT BY .THE RESPONDENT(S).

CONCLUSION
14. FOR THE PLAINTIFF UNDER THIS AFFIRMATION IS UNDER THE PROCEDURES IN THE LAW AND UNDER
THE LANGUAGE—PROCEDURE OF THE TRUTH. FOR THE TITLES AND CODES MUST BE REWRITTEN IN THE TRUTH
AS THE PROCEDURES OF THE ENGLISH—STYLES—MANUAL, PROVIDE, UNDER THE DUE-PROCESS OF THE LAW
OF THE C.U.S.A.F.-CONTRACT FOR THE JUSTICE. FOR THE PLAINTIFF IS IN THE GOOD-FAITH OF THE
NOTICE OF THE WRONGS OF THE COURT AND FOR THE CORRECTION OF THE LANGUAGE BY THE COURT..

15. FOR THE PLAINTIFF, DEMANDS JUDGMENT, IN THE CORPORATION OF THE CASE NO. 97-C-0111, IN
THE SUM OF THE $4,000,000.00, (FOUR-MILLION-DOLLARS) PLUS—COSTS AND DISBURSEMENTS AS SET
FORTH IN THE COMPLAINT: WRIT OF THE ERROR IN THE #1-PARAGRAPH AND IN THE WRIT OF THE
REPLEVIN, DEFAULT-JUDGMENT, WRIT OF THE ERROR IN THE DEMAND OF THE TRIAL BY THE JURY FOR
THE VIOLATIONS BROUGHT IN THE INCORPORATION OF THE CASE NO. 97-C-0111. FOR THE PLAINTiFF
UNDER THE AFFIRMATION FOR THE COMMANDS OF THE ATTORNEY FOR THE U.S.A. OF THE OFFICE UNDER
THE TITLE: 28: U.S.A. CODES: 1361, FOR THE EXECUTION OF THE COURT IN THE CORRECTION OF THE
VIOLATIONS BY THE AFFIRMATIONS AND WITNESS BY THE David—Wynn: Miller AS THE INJURY FOR THE
INCORPORATION OF THE CASE NO. 97-C-0111 FOR THE NEGLECT OF THE RESPONDENTS AND THE HON.
Rudolph T. XX,

16. FOR THE PLAINTIFF IS OF THE INJURY BY THE KIDNAPPING OF THE PLAINTIFF BY THE COURT, IN
THE NEGLECT OF THE TITLE: 28: U.S.A. CODES: 1361, UNDER THE C.U.S.A.F.-CONTRACT BY THE
ARTICLE OF THE SIX(6) FOR THE WARRANT IS-NOT-BEING IN THE EXISTENCE OF THE SIGNING BY THE
JUDGE OF THE OATH AND AFFIRMATION, ON THE JANUARY/15/1997, AND APRIL/21/1996, IN THE
VIOLATION OF THE DUE-PROCESS UNDER THE C.U.S.A.F.-CONTRACT: BY THE ARTICLE OF THE SEVEN(7)
AND TITLE: 28: U.S.A. CODES: SECTION: 1343, FOR THE LOSS OF THE FREEDOM, OF THE LOSE OF THE

UNDER THE COPYRIGHT© 7/29/99, BY THE DAVID-WYNN: MILLER, LAW-PROCEDURES

5
STANDING IN THE COMMUNITY BY THE COUNTY OF THE SHAWANO: COURT, COUNTY OF THE SHAWANO, STATE
OF THE WISCONSIN, AND BY THE RESPONDENTS-TITLE-HEREIN.

17. UNDER THE TITLE: 42: U.S.A. CODES: SECTION: 1985: CONSPIRACY AT THE NOTE: 69: DAMAGES.
IN THE CLAIM FOR THE VIOLATION OF THE C.U.S.A.F.-CONTRACT BY THE RIGHTS, DAMAGES ARE
RECOVERED, AND NOMINAL-DAMAGES MAY IN THE APPROPRIATE-CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE AWARDING OF THE
SUPPORT OF THE EXEMPLARY-DAMAGES BY THE COURT.

18. FOR THE FOREIGN/FICTION-SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY-ACT, UNDER THE TITLE: 28: U.S.A. CODES:
SECTION: 1602 THROUGH 1611, WITH THE ATTENTION OF THE 1605, FOR THE LOSS OF THE IMMUNITY,
FOR THE VIOLATIONS OF THE TREATY, IS IN THE FILE OF THE COURT OF THE UNITY-STATES OF THE
U.S.A. AS THE CONSPIRACY FOR THE OBSTRUCTION OF THE JUSTICE UNDER THE TITLE: 18: U.S.A.
CODES: SECTION: 1512 AND TITLE: 42: U.S.A. CODES: SECTION: 1985(2), IN THE PROTECTION OF
THE PARTIES RESPONSIBLE FOR THE NEGLECT: UNDER THE TITLE: 42: U.S.A. CODES: SECTION: 1986:
OF THE DUE-PROCESS IN THE CONDUCTING OF THE TRIAL BY THE JURY UNDER THE F.R.C.P. RULE: 38(a)
FOR THE CHARGES OF THE BREACH AND VIOLATIONS OF THE INCORPORATED OF THE CASE: 97-C—0111 BY
THE JUDGE X X.

WITH
19. FOR THE PLAINTIFF UNDER THE AFFIRMATION. IS THE TITLE: 28: U.S.A. CODES: SECTION:
1605: GENERAL-EXCEPTIONS BY THE JURISDICTIONAL-IMMUNITY OF THE FOREIGN/FICTION: COURT: OF
THE STATE OF THE FOREIGN/FICTION IS BY THE CONDITION OF THE LAW OF THE FLAG FOR THE CONTRACT
OF THE UNITY-STATE—-(a) FOR THE STATE OF THE FOREIGN/FICTION-STATE IS UNDER THE TRUTH OF
THIS JURISDICTION OF THE COURTS OF THE U.S.A. OR OF THE UNITY-STATES IN ANY C.U.S.A.F.
CONTRACT.

20. FOR THE TITLE: 28: U.S .A. CODES: SECTION: 1605 (2).. FOR THE SUBJECT-MATTER IN THE ACTION
IS OF THE ACTIVITY IN THE COMMERCE-ACTION IN THE U.S.A. UNDER THE FOREIGN-SOVEREIGN-
IMMUNITY-ACT, FOR THE FOREIGN/FICTION-LANGUAGE UNDER THE LAW OF THE FLAG UNDER THE
FOREIGN/FICTION-FLAG IS OVER THE COST OF THE $21.00 U.S.A. DOLLARS OF THE FILING-FEE IN THE
COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF THE U.S.A., IS BY THE RECEIPT, FOR THE ESTABLISHING OF THE
COMMERCE, FOR THE SUIT IS IN THE CIVIL-LAW. FOR THE CONDITION OF THE UNITY-STATE IS IN AN
ACT OF THE COMMERCE, FOR THE ENRICHMENT BY THE STATE; UNDER THE CONDITION OF THE BREACH IN
THE LANGUAGE OF THE COURT AND OFFICERS-THEREOF FOR THE FOREIGN/FICTION-LANGUAGE, BY THE
C.U.S.A.F.-CONTRACT, AND WITHIN THE TERRITORY OF THE U.S.A., OF THE C.U.S.A.F.-CONTRACT BY
THE ARTICLE OF THE NINE(9) TRIAL BY THE JURY, UNDER THE F.R.C.P. RULE: 38(a) AND UNDER THE
TITLE: 28: U.S.A. CODES: SECTION: 1605: OF THE FOREIGN-SOVEREIGN-IMMUNITY-ACT.

21. FOR ANY VIOLATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL-TREATY IN THE USE OF THE FOREIGN/FICTION-LANGUAGE
IS FOR AN OPERATION AGAINST THE C.U.S.A.F.-CONTRACT BY THE COURT. FOR THE TREATY-DISPUTE
BETWEEN SOVEREIGN-CITIZENS OF THE U.S.A., UNDER THE C.U.S.A.F.-CONTRACT AGAINST THE
SOVEREIGN-FOREIGN/FICTION-LANGUAGE OF THE STATE-SET-UP UNDER THE FOREIGN/FICTION-FLAG, IS
UNDER THE TREATY OF THE FOREIGN-SOVEREIGN-IMMUNITY—ACT-JURISDICTION. FOR THE REQUIREMENT
UNDER THE TREATY-LAW BY THE RESPONDENTS AS THE OFFICERS OF THE COURT. FOR THE FIDUCIARY OF
THE COURT IS IN THE INCORPORATION OF THE CASE NO. 97-C-0111, UNDER THE C.U.S.A.F.-CONTRACT
BY THE JUDGE XX.

22. FOR THE PLAINTIFF IN THIS AFFIRMATION IS UNDER THE C.U.S.A.F.-CONTRACT AGREEMENT
(TREATY) BY THE OATH AND AFFIRMATION FOR THE SUPPORTING AND DEFENDING OF THE C.U.S.A.F.
CONTRACT. WHEN THE SURRENDERING OF THE OATH AND AFFIRMATION IS INTO THE FOREIGN/FICTION
JURISDICTION USE OF THE FICTION-LANGUAGE FOR THE ACT OF THE CONSTRUCTIVE-TREASON, CONTEMPT
FOR THE C.U.S.A.F.-CONTRACT , FALSE-SWEARING AND PERJURY OF THE OATH UNDER THE TITLE: 18:
U.S.A. CODES: SECTION: 1621, AND FOR THE NEGLECT OF THE RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE JOB
ASSIGNMENT UNDER THE TITLE: 28: U.S.A. CODES: SECTION: 1361, BY THE RESPONDENT-OFFICERS OF
THE COURT.

23. FOR THE PLAINTIFF UNDER THE AFFIRMATION IS AGAINST THE VIOLATIONS, WHEN THE PLAINTIFF’S-
RIGHT OF THE PERSONAL-PROPERTY-FILING-FEE-PAID FOR THE TRUTH IN THE TRIAL BY THE COURT. FOR
THIS IS OF THE BREACH OF THE C.U.S.A.F.-CONTRACT IN THE ISSUE FOR THE FEES FOR THE EXCHANGE
FOR THE PLAINTIFF’S-DAY IN THE COURT IN THE JURISDICTION OF THE U.S.A. FOR THE COMMERCE IN
THE U.S.A. IS UNDER THE RETURN BY THE FICTION-LANGUAGE FOR THE EXTORTION OF THE PROPERTY
OF THE PLAINTIFF BY THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT) (sic) OF THE FICTION-LANGUAGE OF THE
AGENCY OR INSTRUMENTALITY IS FOR THE ENGAGEMENT IN THE ACTIVITY OF THE FRAUDULANT-COMMERCE
IN THE U.S.A.. FOR THE $150.00 FILING-FEE IS BY THE COMMERCE OF THE PROPERTY FOR THE
INVOLVEMENT OF A LAW-SUIT OVER THE $21.00 DOLLARS U.S. AND OF THE FEES-PAID FOR THE SERVICE
OF THE COURT OF THE TRUTHFUL-JURISDICTION BY THE COURT.

UNDER THE COPYRIGHT© 7/29/99, BY THE DAVID-WYNN: MILLER, LAW-PROCEDURES

PLAINTIFF:
David-Wynn: Miller
P.O. BOX- 787,
BROOKFIELD, WISCONSIN 53008—0787
U.S. MARSHAL X
24. (B) FOR THE PLAINTIFF UNDER THE AFFIRMATION IS AGAINST ANY BREACH OF THE C.U.S.A.F.
CONTRACT WITHIN THE TERMS OF THE C.U.S.A.F.-CONTRACT WITH THE SUPPORT OF THE FILING-FEES
FOR THE TRIAL BY THE JURY UNDER THE F.R.C. P. RULE: 38 (a)’ AND BY THE ARTICLE OF THE NINE (9),
IS FOR AN ACTION UNDER THE TITLE: 42: U.S.A. CODES: SECTION: 1986: FOR THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE
LAW IN THE TRUTH FOR THE CORRECTION OF THE WRONG AGAINST THE RESPONDENTS IN THE PARTY FOR
THE COURT-TITLE—HEREIN.
 25. FOR THE PLAINTIFF UNDER THE AFFIRMATION )IS AGAINST THE ACTION-BROUGHT, EITHER BY THE
ENFORCEMENT OF AN AGREEMENT MADE BY THE FOREIGN/FICTION-LANGUAGE-STATES WITH THE PLAINTIFF,
OR FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE PARTY BY THE SUBMITTING FOR THE DEFINED LEGAL—RELATIONSHIP,
WHETHER CONTRACTUAL BY THE ARBITRATION. EXAMPLE: FOR THE JUDGES OATH AND AFFIRMATION IS FOR
THE SUPPORTING OF THE C.U.S.A.F.-CONTRACT.

26. (B) FOR THE PLAINTIFF UNDER THE AFFIRMATION IS FOR THE AGREEMENT OR AWARD BY THE
ARBITRATION OVER THE TREATY OR OTHER-AGREEMENTS BY THE INTERNATIONAL-TREATY-LANGUAGE FOR
THE U.S.A. BY THE AFFIRMATION IS FOR THE RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF THE AWARDS BY THE
ARBITRATION. FOR THE OATH OR AFFIRMATION IS UNDER THE C.U.S.A.F.-CONTRACT.

27. FOR THE PROVISIONS OF THE FOREIGN-SOVEREIGN-IMMUNITY-ACT, DATE: OCTOBER/2/1976, IS UNDER

THE TITLE: 28: U.S.A. CODES: SECTION: 1602 THROUGH THE SECTION: 1611, ABOVE, FOR THE
PROTECTION OF THE C.U.S.A.F.-CONTRACT IS IN THE TRUTH FOR ALL PARTIES IN THE LAW.

28. FOR THE PLAINTIFF AFFIRMS BY THE MOTION, DEMANDS UNDER THE CONDITIONS OF THE WRIT OF
THE RECAPTION, UNDER THE TITLE: 28: C.U.S.A.F.-CONTRACT SECTION: 1361, BY THE UPHOLDING OF
THE DUTY OF THE OFFICER, ELECTED OR APPOINTED BY “WE THE PEOPLE” OF THE OFFICE, OF THE
COURT, FOR THE UPHOLDING AND THE RECEIVING OF THE COMPENSATION BY THE CITIZENS OF THE STATE,
FOR THE OATH AND AFFIRMATION AND THE PROTECTIONS OF THE C.U.S.A.F.-CONTRACT . BY THE TAKING
OF THE FEES FOR THE UPHOLDING FOR THE DUTY OF THE C.U.S.A.F.-CONTRACT HEREIN. FOR THE
OFFICER OF THE COURT IS IN THE FICTION FOR THE EMBEZZLEMENT OF THE FEES AND AGAINST THE
C.U.S.A.F.-CONTRACT BY THE FRAUD AND DECEPTION OF THE FICTION-LANGUAGE UNDER THE LAW OF THE
FICTION-FLAG WITH THE FRINGE BY THE RESPONDENT: X_X.

[CUT AND PAST THE DEFINITIONS IN THE DWMLP-BOOK 8-99]

ORDER
David-Wynn: Miller FOR THE WRIT OF THE RECAPTION
PLAINTIFF V COMPLAINT: FOR THE UNITY OF THE JUDGE JOINDER UNDER
Honorable-Thomas: Grover, [Judge) THE F.R.C.P. RULE: 19 TITLE: 28: U.S.A. CODES: SECTION:
Honorable-Earl W. Schmidt, [Judge)
1361
Amy: Greenwood, [ASST. APT.]
Gary: Bruno, [ATTORNEY)
COUNTY OF THE SHAWANO: (A PERSON)
IN THE INCORPORATION OF THE CASE: 97-C-Ol1l

FOR THE U.S. MARSHAL IS BY THE COMMAND FOR THE JOINING INTO THE INCORPORATION OF
THE CASE: 97-C-O111. FOR THE RESPONDENT: Judge X X UNDER THE LAW OF THE JOINDER
OF THE F.R.C.P. RULE: 19, FOR THE AFFIRMATION-HEREIN. FURTHER, FOR THE U.S.A.
MARSHAL IS OF THE COMMAND OF THE C.U.S.A.F.-CONTRACT FOR THE SIGNATURE OF THE
JUDGE X X OR WRIT OF THE RECAPTION OF
PLAINTIFF: David-Wynn: Miller.

BY THE SIGNATURE ON THIS

THE DEMAND, ‘BY THE DEFAULT, FOR THE
DAY OF THE , 1999

UNDER THE COPYRIGHT© 7-29-99 BY THE DAVID-WYNN: MILLER, LAW-PROCEDURES

92
12—12—99

FOR THE JUSTICE IS:

1. FOR THE PEOPLE WITH THE KNOWLEDGE ARE OF THE JUSTICE IN THE COURTS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA---
HOWEVER? ‘ -

2. FOR THE PEOPLE WITH THE KNOWLEDGE ARE WITH THE FACTS OF THE JUSTICE WITH THE INTENT FOR THE REMOVAL OF THE TRUTH
AND FACT(nouri) IN THE TRUTH (noun).

3. FOR THE PEOPLE WITH THE KNOWLEDGE ARE FOR THE UNDERSTANDING BY THE DEFINITION OF THE
WORD: ‘JUSTICE’ IS FOR THE MEANING: OUTSIDE OF THE LAW FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF THE PEOPLE
AND FOR THE FICTION OF THE BLACK-ROBES [FOR THE MORNING OF THE JUSTICE].

4. FOR THE PEOPLE WITH THE KNOWLEDGE ARE FOR THE STUDY OF THE PREFIX OF THE WORD: ‘JU’:
JUST, JUSTICE, JUDGE, JUDGMENT, JUDICIAL, JUDICIALLY, JUDICATORY, JUDICATIVE,
JUDICIOUS(LY), JURY, JURATORY, JURIDICIAL(LY), JURISCONSULT, JURISDICTION, JURISDICTIONAL,
JURISPRUDENCE, JURISPRUDENT, JURIST, JUROR,

SHALL NOT THE LJUDGE OF ALL THE EARTH DO RIGHT: GEN. 17 * (DPV=DANGLING-PARTICIPIAL-VERB) 1—6 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1
DPV2 = (1*ADVERB) (2*VERB) (6*FtJTURE_TENSE)

For all things in the present-tense are with the jurisdiction of the Court by the contract. For the incorporation of the pleading is
with the free-will of the petitioner.

FOR THE FOREMAN OF THE JURY IS FOR THE JUDGMENT OF THE LAW AND OF THE FACTS.
8 9 4 8 9 4 2 8 9 4 8 9 4 08 9 4
(8*PREPOSITION) (9*ARTICLE) (4*NOUN) (2*VERB) [WEBSTER(1828))
For the number—codes with the words are for the space—saving of the procedural— identification—translation of the
identification of that procedure of the word:
1 = adverb * (modifier of the verb, adverb, adjective) can-not modify with the noun or fact
for the change of. the condition of the fact is with the prejudice.
2 verb (for the motion of the thinking) (will of the intent) is/are
3 = adjective (modifier of the noun color of the thinking
4 = noun
5 = past-tense-time (lacks--jurisdiction, lacks-in-jury in the present-tense)
6 future-tens—time (presumption, opinion, assumption, future-did—not—happen)
7 = pronoun (presumption, assumption, opinion of the fact or noun)
8 = preposition (quality for the assigrunent of the authority with the article)
9 = article (must always precede the noun)
0 = conjunction and, or, (neutral-word, either-or, between the nouns or facts)
For the numbers with the words are for the removal of the emotional-influence of the
subj ect-matter—pictures with the mind.

2 + 2 = 4, too + to = for, 22 ways for this sound, affirmation-equals-truth

4 + 4 = 8, for + four = ate 12 ways for this sound,
3 + 3 = 6, three plus three equals from six: ‘from’ is in the past—tense and as an adverb
modifying the (6) six as a verb. For the six is with the modification as the verb.
28 94 8 94 8 94 89 42 2 28 94
HOW, DOES THE 6, BECOME A VERB? FOR THE 6, AS THE NOUN, CAN-NOT-BE FOR THE MODIFICATION
89 48 94 4 40 22 89 4
OF THE FACT. FOR THE FACT-IS-FACT AND MUST—STAND ON THE FACT.
FOR THE 6 CAN-NOT-BE FOR THE ADJECTIVE, FOR NO WORD IS WITH THE FOLLOWING FOR THE
MODIFICATION OF THE 6.
SAME RULE WITH THE 6 AS AN ADVERB, FOR NO MODIFICATION. FOR THE VERB IS WITH THE ACT OF THE
ACTION OF THE THINKING FOR THE MODIFICATION AND DOES NOT MODIFY.
4 89 4 8 9 40 8 94
FOR THIS PAPER IS FOR AN EXAMPLE FOR THE CAUSE OF THE PLEADINGS BY THESE
PETITIONER WITH THE TRUTH IN THE DOCUMENTS WITH THIS CASE. FOR THIS CASE
IS IN THE GOOD-FAITH FOR THE EDUCATIONAL-UNDERSTANDING OF THE LANGUAGE AND
HOW IT EFFECTS WITH THE TRUTH OF THE FACTS OF THIS CASE.

WITH THE COPYRIGHT 12-7-999 BY THE DAVID-WYNN: MILLER, LAW-PROCEDURES 4