Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
The research focuses on comparing packing density between two grain shapes of propellant
to get the one with highest packing density.
utilization all spaces area in propellant charges to give high performance for generate huge
gases and heat
1 Introduction
????
Furthermore, the shapes of these extrusions for propellant play crucial roles in gun
performance and charge packing density
2 LITERATURE REVIEW
In the previous chapter, the researcher presented the focus of this paper including the
contributions it will add to the existing literature once it is completed. In this chapter,
however, a review of relevant literature in order to assess the state of research on the topic.
As stated above, the indirect firing artillery systems, such as 155mm artillery, use the
modular charge system (MCS) as their propulsion system of choice. It is incrementally
based and contains several distinct combustible cases (known as charge or zone)
bound together in unique fashion. Each case is filled with varying amounts of
propellant. The range of the projectile can be accustomed by manipulating the amount
of charges used in the system’s chamber. Increasing the number of charges increases
the muzzle velocity of the projectile thus increasing the range and vice versa. When
the MCS is attuned with the elevation angle of the barrel, it offers wider range
coverage. However, MCS requires complex igniting devices that ensures optimal
ignition. If the igniting system fails to carry proper ignition to MCS, it could lead to the
development of an axial pressure wave, which might destroy the system (Minor, 1985
). Figure (3.1) shows a typical example of MCS of mortar as well as 155mm heavy
artillery systems (operation manual 155mm MCS for M71S). The number of charges
per system normally ranges from one to six charges:
Figure 3.1: (MCS) modular charge system
As demonstrated in Figure 3.1 they are missing spaces in the packing. This chapter
will later offer a solution to the utilization of this area inside the charge.
Range (km)
Standard
Zone Gun Primer Projectile
MV (m/s)
Min Max
M107 HE; M110A2
554 7.2 14.5
WP
M71S M82G
P108 ICM HB 533 6.2 13.9
HE ERFB BB; WP
823 16.0 33.1
ERFB BB
FH88 M82G
P108 ICM HB 815 12.0 22.7
HE ERFB BB; WP
925 19.3 40.7
ERFB BB
6 FH2000 M82G
P108 ICM HB 917 15.2 27.1
2.4 Commercial Nesting Packages for Performance Testing Commented [AA1]: Could you please write review. The
file attached
3 Design and measurement
2
Achrge = 17376.27 mm
h = 163.68 mm
The following table shows the ideal measurements of the proposed geometric shape. We
observe the approximate results of the surface area to the reference, which is 73.52 mm.
Face area = 73.52
3.3 Rosette
4 Metholedgy
After we determine the optimum the web grain for all the candidate become easier to find
which one of them achieves the highest packing density for the charger and then compare it
with the reference.
During this chapter we will explain that software to nesting or another software
propellant grains to get the maximum packing density for propellant inside the
charges for all proposed grain propellant shapes. How many grains will fit in the charge
if we assume the grain same length (20.43 mm) as reference. The surface area for charge
13776.27 mm2
4.1 Verify
Use two software for packing (nesting) or matlab software
4.2 Result
5.1 Recommendation
5.3 Summery