Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
2 Please also select from one of the following options (note that if no option is Draft document will be registered
selected, the default will be the first option): as new project in the committee's
work programme (stage 20.00)
Draft document can be registered
as a Working Draft (WD - stage
20.20)
Draft document can be registered
as a Committee Draft (CD - stage
30.00)
Draft document can be registered
as a Draft International Standard
(DIS - stage 40.00)
3 In case of disapproval, do you believe that further study and consultations are Yes
needed first among committee members on this proposal as a preliminary work No
item before this proposal can be formally accepted?
4 1b. Did you consult with the range of relevant stakeholders identified in the Yes
proposal in the development of this voting position and related comments? No
5 2. Standard(s), regulation(s), and other relevant documentation existing in our Yes (references provided
country, with any remarks concerning their application if necessary and below) *
consequences for global relevance, as well as copyright information on these No
documents, are attached:
7 4. We are committed to participating actively in the development of the project, Yes (and we nominate an expert
at least by commenting on working drafts (P-members voting "Disapprove" in below) *
Qu. 1a may nevertheless nominate experts): No
-2-
© ISO 2013 – All rights reserved
ISO/CD 18278-1
ISO/TC 44/SC 6/WG 3
Secretariat: DIN
Warning
This document is not an ISO International Standard. It is distributed for review and comment. It is subject to
change without notice and may not be referred to as an International Standard.
Recipients of this draft are invited to submit, with their comments, notification of any relevant patent rights of
which they are aware and to provide supporting documentation.
Copyright notice
This ISO document is a working draft or committee draft and is copyright-protected by ISO. While the
reproduction of working drafts or committee drafts in any form for use by participants in the ISO standards
development process is permitted without prior permission from ISO, neither this document nor any extract
from it may be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any form for any other purpose without prior written
permission from ISO.
Requests for permission to reproduce this document for the purpose of selling it should be addressed as
shown below or to ISO's member body in the country of the requester:
[Indicate the full address, telephone number, fax number, telex number, and electronic mail address, as
appropriate, of the Copyright Manager of the ISO member body responsible for the secretariat of the TC or
SC within the framework of which the working document has been prepared.]
Reproduction for sales purposes may be subject to royalty payments or a licensing agreement.
Contents Page
Foreword ............................................................................................................................................................ iv
1 Scope ...................................................................................................................................................... 1
2 Normative references ............................................................................................................................ 1
3 Terms and definitions ........................................................................................................................... 3
4 Weldability .............................................................................................................................................. 3
4.1 General ................................................................................................................................................... 3
4.1.1 Metallurgical weldability ....................................................................................................................... 3
4.1.2 Operative weldability............................................................................................................................. 4
4.1.3 Constructional weldability .................................................................................................................... 4
4.2 Criteria for the evaluation of weldability ............................................................................................. 4
5 Preparation of welding equipment ...................................................................................................... 4
5.1 Welding machine ................................................................................................................................... 4
5.2 Welding electrodes ................................................................................................................................ 5
5.2.1 Spot welding .......................................................................................................................................... 5
5.2.2 Seam welding ......................................................................................................................................... 5
6 Test procedures ..................................................................................................................................... 5
6.1 General ................................................................................................................................................... 5
6.2 Basic test procedures ........................................................................................................................... 5
6.2.1 Welding current range test ................................................................................................................... 6
6.2.2 Electrode life test ................................................................................................................................... 7
6.2.3 Tests for weld properties ...................................................................................................................... 8
7 Test report .............................................................................................................................................. 9
Bibliography ...................................................................................................................................................... 11
Foreword
ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) is a worldwide federation of national standards bodies
(ISO member bodies). The work of preparing International Standards is normally carried out through ISO
technical committees. Each member body interested in a subject for which a technical committee has been
established has the right to be represented on that committee. International organizations, governmental and
non-governmental, in liaison with ISO, also take part in the work. ISO collaborates closely with the
International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) on all matters of electrotechnical standardization.
International Standards are drafted in accordance with the rules given in the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2.
The main task of technical committees is to prepare International Standards. Draft International Standards
adopted by the technical committees are circulated to the member bodies for voting. Publication as an
International Standard requires approval by at least 75 % of the member bodies casting a vote.
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of patent
rights. ISO shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights.
ISO 18278-1 was prepared by Technical Committee ISO/TC 44, Welding and allied processes, Subcommittee
SC 6, Resistance welding and allied mechanical joining.
This second/third/... edition cancels and replaces the first/second/... edition (), [clause(s) / subclause(s) /
table(s) / figure(s) / annex(es)] of which [has / have] been technically revised.
ISO 18278 consists of the following parts, under the general title Resistance welding — Weldability:
Part 1: General requirements for the evaluation of weldability for resistance spot, seam and projection
welding of metallic materials
Part 2: Alternative procedures for the evaluation of sheet steels for spot welding
1 Scope
This document specifies procedures for assessing the generic weldability for resistance welding of uncoated
and coated metals.
It is assumed for this and other linked standards that their application is entrusted to appropriately trained, skilled
and experienced personnel.
For the quality of welded structures the relevant part of standard ISO 14554 should be applicable. The
specification of procedures should follow guidelines as in standard ISO 15609-5.
c assess the weldability of differing component designs e.g. dimensional configuration, stack-up, projection
geometry, etc.
d investigate the effect of changes in welding parameters such as welding current, weld time, electrode
force or complex welding schedules including pulse welding, current stepping etc. on weldability.
Precise details of the test procedure to be used will depend on which aspect of items a) to d) is to be evaluated
relative to the welding result obtained.
2 Normative references
The following referenced documents are indispensable for the application of this document. For dated
references, only the edition cited applies. For undated references, the latest edition of the referenced
document (including any amendments) applies.
ISO 14270, Specimen dimensions and procedure for mechanized peel testing resistance spot, seam and
embossed projection welds
ISO 14271, Vickers hardness testing of resistance spot, projection and seam welds (low load and
microhardness)
ISO 14272, Specimen dimensions and procedure for cross tension testing resistance spot and embossed
projection welds
ISO 14273, Specimen dimensions and procedure for shear testing resistance spot, seam and embossed
projection welds
ISO 14323, Resistance spot welding and projection welds — Destructive testing of welds — Specimen
dimensions and procedure for impact shear test and cross-tension testing
ISO 14324, Resistance spot welding — Destructive tests of welds — Method for the fatigue testing of spot
welded joints
ISO 18592, Resistance welding — Destructive testing of welds — Method for the fatigue testing of multi-spot-
welded specimens
ISO 14327, Resistance welding — Procedures for determining the weldability lobe for resistance spot,
projection and seam weldingThis should stay with compiled headline and content until ISO 18278-2 will be discussed
ISO 14329:2003, Resistance welding — Destructive tests of welds — Failure types and geometric
measurements for resistance spot, seam and projection welds
ISO 15609-5, Specification and qualification of welding procedures for metallic materials — Welding
procedure specification — Part 5: Resistance welding
ISO 15614-12, Specification and qualification of welding procedures for metallic materials — Welding
procedure test — Part 12: Spot, seam and projection welding
ISO 17653, Destructive tests on welds in metallic materials — Torsion of resistance spot welds
ISO 17654, Destructive tests on welds in metallic materials — Resistance welding — Pressure test on
resistance seam welds
ISO 18278-2:2004, Resistance welding — Weldability — Part 2: Alternative procedures for the assessment of
sheet steels for spot welding
ISO 669:2000, Resistance welding — Resistance welding equipment — Mechanical and electrical
requirements
ISO 5182, Welding — Materials for resistance welding electrodes and ancillary equipment
ISO 10447, Welding — Peel and chisel testing of resistance spot, projection and seam welds
ISO 14373:2006, Resistance welding — Procedure for spot welding of uncoated and coated low carbon steels
ISO 14554-1, Quality requirements for welding — Resistance welding of metallic materials — Part 1:
Comprehensive quality requirements
ISO 14554-2, Quality requirements for welding — Resistance welding of metallic materials — Part 2:
Elementary quality requirements
ISO 16432:2006, Resistance welding — Procedure for projection welding of uncoated and coated low carbon
steels using embossed projection(s)
ISO 16433:2000, Resistance welding — Procedure for seam welding of uncoated and coated low carbon
steels.
ISO 17677-1, Resistance welding — Vocabulary — Part 1: Spot, projection and seam welding
3.1
weldability
<resistance welding>
the capacity of the component to be welded under the imposed fabrication conditions into a specific suitability
designed structure and to perform satisfactorily in the intended service. For resistance welding it is defined in
terms of:
Electrode life is defined by the number of welds which can be made before the need for re-dressing or
changing of the welding electrodes
3.2
welding current range
welding current domain allowing the production of spot welds without splash and of a diameter equal or more
than a pre-determined value under constant machine settings
4 Weldability
4.1 General
Weldability of a component is governed by three factors, namely material, design and production (see
Figure 1).
Figure 1 — Weldability
The less the factors governed by the material have to be taken into account when determining the welding
procedure for a given construction, the better is the metallurgical weldability of a material group.
The ease by which a material can be welded determines its metallurgical weldability
Operative weldability exists for a welding procedure if the welds envisaged for a particular construction can be
made properly under the chosen conditions of production.
The less the factors governed by the welding procedure have to be taken into account in designing a
construction for a for a specific material, the better is the operative weldability of a procedure intended for a
specific structure or component.
Constructional weldability exists in a construction, if the material concerned, the component remains capable
of functioning under the envisaged operating conditions by virtue of its design.
The less the factors governed by the design have to be taken into account when selection the material for a
specific welding procedure, the greater is the constructional weldability of a specific structure or component.
Criteria for the evaluation of the weldability in resistance welding are typically:
electrode wear and life which quantifies ability to continiue making welds*;
material hardness modificationspresence, number and size of surface or inner cracks, pores, shrink
holes, and other defects;
resistance to service stresses such as corrosion, humidity, low, elevated or fluctuating temperatures etc.
NOTE (*) Results of welding current range and electrode life investigations do not only reflect material chracteristics
but are also highly related to the characteristics of the welding equipment employed.
A final evaluation of weldability in each case can only be estimated by considering the prioritised criteria laid
down by the end user.
Both electrical and mechanical characteristics of the welding machine shall be specified in accordance with
the requirements of ISO 669.
The machine squeeze time should be of sufficient duration to overcome electrode bounce effects and
machine inertia so as to allow the electrode force to build up to 100 % of the nominal value before the welding
current is initiated.
Wherever possible, a transformer tap setting should be selected which allows the secondary welding current to
be achieved using a conduction angle greater than 120°.
The water supply to the transformer and thyristor cooling circuits should be independent of cooling water to
the electrodes. If this is not possible, the water should flow from the electrode to the thyristor/transformer
circuits and not vice versa.
The welding electrodes shall conform to alloys specified in ISO 5182 unless otherwise agreed between
contracting parties. Electrodes should be of sufficient cross sectional area and strength to carry the welding
current and electrode force without overheating, deformation or excessive deflection.
In the case of spot welding, the electrode dimensions shall conform to the requirements of ISO 5821.
Alternative electrode shapes and dimensions may be used by agreement between contracting parties.
In the case of wide wheel seam welding, the electrode face dimensions shall conform with the requirements of
ISO 693 and follow similar criteria as used for spot welding, i.e. tread width equal 5 √t. However, for thin wheel
seam welding, alternative electrode dimensions, i.e. electrode thickness and face dimensions, may be used
by agreement between contracting parties. The welding wheels should be pre conditioned by producing 10
rotations of weld wheel at a welding current which gives a stuck weld condition.
6 Test procedures
6.1 General
Tests which are considered necessary by the user for assessing the weldability shall be specified.
Acceptance criteria for each test will depend on the requirements of the product being welded and shall be
specified before commencing the test programme.
the testprocedur should be carried out according to WPS (ISO15614.-12 -13, ISO 15609-5);
The welding current range and the electrode life are influenced by:
a) the electrical and mechanical characteristics of the welding equipment, including cooling conditions
c) the electrical, mechanical and physical properties of the material being welded,
For the determination of the ability to make a weld, a welding current range shall be determined according to
procedures agreed to between the contracting parties.
The welding range testing procedure shall specify:
the welding parameters to be used for the test (except the welding current), including electrode shape,
size and material, welding force and sequence as well as holding time,
the shape, size of the workpieces to be welded, and their preparation if needed (i.e. projection shape and
size in the case of projection welding according to ISO 8167).
For spot welding of 2-sheet stack-ups, the welding current range lower limit is the minimum current level
necessary to reach a given minimum weld diameter, as specified by the welding procedure specification or
agreed by contracting parties. The procedure or the agreement between parties shall also specify:
the way to test the welds and measure the weld diameters
the criteria to determine if a current setting is in the welding current range (for example, if all the welds
done at this current level should meet the minimum diameter requirement, or only the majority, or the
average diameter or other such requirements by the WPS).
NOTE 1 This minimum weld diameter can be equal to 3.5√t, t being the thickness of the thinnest sheet of the
assembly.
NOTE 2 Other criteria can be specified for lower limit upon agreement of contracting parties, for example weld strength
under different loading conditions, or size of the nugget as measured on micrographic samples.
In other cases (seam welding, projection welding, multi-sheet spot welding), criteria for the welding range
lower limit have to be defined between the contracting parties.
The upper limit of the welding current range is the maximum current setting without splashing. The procedure
or the agreement between parties shall also specify:
the criteria to determine if a current setting is in the welding current range (for example if all the welds
done at this current level should meet the no-splash requirement, or only the majority or other such
requirements by the WPS )
NOTE 1 Other criteria can be specified for upper limit upon agreement of contracting parties, for example maximum
weld size, maximum indentation depth, or the onset of surface cracking in the weld or electrode-to-workpiece sticking.
In producing a welding current range, electrode wear can occur due to heavy splash, surface splashing,
mushrooming or alloying. This can have an adverse affect on the reproducibility and validity of the results,
particularly when welding coated steels or aluminium and aluminium alloys. To control this, the testing
procedure shall specify exactly the number of welds and their order for the determination of the welding range
limits:
number of welds to be produced (and at which place in the procedure), if any, for metallographic
examination or mechanical testing.
In addition, testing procedures should consider scatter analysis of the welding current range results, for
example through specifying a number of test replicates for standard deviation calculation, or through
regression analysis of the points used to perform an individual test.
The ability to continue making acceptable welds shall be determined by electrode life tests according to
procedures agreed to between the contracting parties.
the procedure to determine the testing welding current, for example just below the splash limit,
the procedures to increase or decrease current during the test, for example in case of splashing or
current stepping,
the shape and size of the work pieces to be welded, and their preparation if needed (i.e. projection shape
and size in the case of projection welding).
the arrangement of the welds on testing sheets, including weld spacing and distance from edges.
For spot welding of 2-sheet stack-ups, the criterion for the end of electrode life test is the given minimum weld
diameter, as specified by the WPS or agreed by contracting parties. The testing procedure shall also specify:
the method of mechanical testing the welds and measuring the weld diameter,
the criteria to decide if an evaluation meets the quality criterion (for example if all the welds done at this
testing step should meet the minimum diameter requirement, or only the majority, or the average
diameter or other such requirements by the WPS).
Note 1: This minimum weld diameter can be equal to 3.5√t, t being the thickness of the thinnest sheet of the assembly.
Note 2: Other criteria can be specified for end of electrode life upon agreement of contracting parties, for example
minimum weld strength under different loading conditions, size of the nugget as measured on micrographic samples or
discrepant shapes of the welds.
- the overall reduction in length of the electrodes, which can also be followed in-line by using dispacement sensors,
- tip profile and diameter through carbon imprints or by using optical devices,
Testing procedures should consider scatter analysis of the electrode life test results, for example through
specifying a number of test replicates for standard deviation calculation, or through regression analysis of the
points used to perform an individual test.
In other cases (seam welding, projection welding, multi-sheet spot welding), criteria for the end of electrode
life have to be defined between the contracting parties. Alternative procedures shall be specified or developed
for the evaluation of electrodes for seam welding. Generally, special variants of the seam welding process are
used to weld coated steels which eliminate the problems associated with electrode contamination, for example
in narrow wheel welding and wire seam welding.
6.2.3.1 General
The relevant tests to be used according 5.2.3.2 to 5.2.3.6 shall be specified, if necessary.
The failure mode and imperfections observed in a test depend on the material being welded and on the type
of test, for example:
a) rephosphorised steels, some high strength and ultra high strength steels can promote interface failures,
partial plug fractures and partial thickness fractures or mixed combinations of those modes depending on
the welding parameters and the applied testing conditions,
b) in the case of aluminium and aluminium alloys porosity and internal cracks may occur,
d) for the same type of material, increasing the thickness favours interfacial failures,
e) for zinc coated materials liquid metal embrittlement may occur (surface cracks within electrode
indentation).
Shop floor tests are used to determine the failure mode and the weld diameter by chisel or peel tests
according to ISO 10447 or torsion test according to ISO 17653 and can be used. The results obtained from
such tests give information on the ability to control weld quality on the shop floor.
The tensile shear testing shall be carried out according to ISO 14273.
The purpose of this test is to determine the failure mode and the maximum shear force that the test specimen
can sustain.
The mechanised peel testing shall be carried out according to ISO 14270.
The purpose of this test is to determine the failure mode and the maximum peel force that the test specimen
can sustain.
The cross tension testing shall be carried out according to ISO 14272.
The purpose of this test is to determine the failure mode and the maximum tensile force that the test
specimen can sustain.
The shape and dimension of the weld nugget together with hardness values shall be determined on etched
macrosections according to ISO 14329 and ISO 14271.
The influence of hold time should be determined if brittle fractures in test specimen are observed in the weld
zone.
7 Test report
The results of the assessment shall be given in tabular form as stipulated in ISO 15609-5 and ISO 15614-12.
h) welding process;
f) welding process;
Bibliography
E SEP 1220-2
AWS D8.9M