Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
The conversation about education, considering the long history of its practice,
has only recently taken to discussing curriculum, pedagogy and inclusivity. These
discussions have been about ‘what’ curriculum is, designing positive and encouraging
bridging the gap between theory and practice (Egan, 1978; Moss, 2008; Gunn,
Valenicia & Windschitl, 2014; Ford, 2013). Increasing amount of literature and
when these discussions are not taken into account and when classroom practises do
not reflect national education policy and standards (Becker & Luthar, 2002; Santrock,
2014; Arnett, 2014; Ferfolja, Diaz & Ullman, 2015; MCEECDYA, 2008). The
Melbourne Declaration (MCEECDYA, 2008) states its goals to provide equity and
creative, confident, and successful learners, and active, informed citizens of society.
When national policies and standards are not reflected in practice, students may feel
they have no agency over their learning, alienate themselves from other students,
disappointment towards school and education (Becker & Luthar, 2002). Further,
students with emotional and behavioural issues already ‘at-risk’ may develop stronger
tendency towards drugs and alcohol abuse, criminal activity, develop mental health
by Trevor Capern and Lorraine Hammond (2014), discusses the effects of building
approach on a total of 98 year 9 and 10 students enrolled in ‘gifted and talented’ and
Hammond, 2014). This study directly utilizes student perspectives and responses to
identify teacher behaviours recommended for practice that are effective. The
positive, caring relationships with students to increase their academic success and
assists in their social-emotional development (Capern & Hammond, 2014). This essay
will use the chosen article’s recommendations for practice and apply those to a chosen
The paper clearly outlines that their recommendations for practice can be used
Hammond, 2014). The NSW Stage 6 (years 11 and 12) curriculum for English aims to
provide students with a “solid foundation of literary and numeracy”, “promote the
future challenges of further academic study and workplace, and to become “full and
relationships that assist students in attaining goals such as those in the curriculum,
both inside and outside the classroom environment (Capern & Hammond, 2014).
The article cites extensive existing literature and Western Australia education
development (Capern & Hammond, 2014). The article acknowledges the gaps in
literature where there is lack of empirical evidence for how positive student-teacher
extreme ends of academic achievement (Capern & Hammond 2014). Capern and
Hammond’s (2014) research aims to fill this gap by collecting data directly from
students about how teachers can form positive relationships with them and how these
development. Their hypothesis travels to the source of the issue, aiming to identify
specific teacher behaviours that are ‘practical’, ‘employable’ and can be used to teach
pre-service and in-service teachers about how to build and maintain positive
The article, as a mixed methods research report, utilises both qualitative and
quantitative research methods. The reasons for choosing a mixed methods approach
is outlined in the methods section of the article that states, “to generate meaning, deep
understanding, and a high quality of data interpretation” (Capern & Hammond, 2014,
researchers to gain a more thorough understanding of the data, to use one method to
explain the results of the another, or even use one method to discover
The process for collecting quantitative data required using an instrument that
measure student-teacher relationships in secondary schools did not exist, thus they
created their own from three different sources (Capern & Hammond, 2014). They
utilised Malecki, Demaray, and Elliot’s (2000) ‘Child and Adolescent Social Support
Version’, and recommendations from Suldo et al.’s 2009 study (Capern & Hammond,
Version’, intended for higher data validity (Capern & Hammond, 2014, p. 51).
Cronbach’s alpha was calculated as a measure of reliability for this section, which has
quantitatively, and open-ended questions at the end for focus group purposes. Focus
groups were conducted to collect qualitative data, these groups consisted of randomly
selected volunteer students from each program to participate in interviews (Capern &
questions from the survey were used in interviews. This allowed students to reflect on
and provide justifications for their responses, as surveys were analysed prior to
conducting focus groups. This triangulation of data ensured validity and determined
Ullman, 2015).
Three sets of findings were presented. First, survey data was presented in a
list consisting of 10 top teacher behaviours receiving the highest mean scores.
Second, data from open-ended questions was presented in a table to demonstrate the
presence of three main reoccurring themes. These themes were teacher behaviours
to students”, “supporting student learning”, (Capern & Hammond, 2014, p. 57). Third,
data from the focus groups was presented in dialogue format. In the discussion
gifted and emotional/behaviour disorder students. The findings established that most
collectively agreed that good teacher behaviours centred around assisting them
teachers needed to display patience, understanding, care and support to assist them
academically, socially and emotionally through school (Capern & Hammond, 2014).
The background research, method and findings of this article clearly outline that
student perspectives are the best sources to ascertain specific teacher behaviours
needed for positive relationship building. The recommendations for practice in this
article are simple, practical and employable by all teachers, and according to the
students the teacher behaviours work effectively and positively to build caring student-
The learning activity chosen for this essay teaches year 7 students about social
Forward’, and doing activities to debrief on the main ideas and concepts.
The activity of the lesson plan chosen for this essay is the ‘Body: Part A’ activity.
A total of 8 questions are given, requiring a 50-100 words response. This activity
The study of English literature and language in NSW schools requires more
than simply being proficient in communication via “speaking, listening, reading, writing,
viewing and representing” (NESA, 2012). The study of English requires attaining
deeper knowledge, skills and understanding via “responding to and composing a wide
language to shape and make meaning according to purpose, audience and context”
(NESA, 2012). English studies push the boundaries of students’ minds, encouraging
them to “think in ways that are imaginative, creative, interpretive and critical” (NESA,
2012). Most importantly, the study of English helps students express themselves,
understand their relationships with others and their place/purpose in world (NESA,
2012). English is a study of humanity, society, and discourse through literature and
language. Thus, the chosen learning activity is highly relevant considering it requires
where everyone has a role to play and all those roles combined create our economy
and society (Crossman & Cole, 2017). Each individual has social responsibilities and
The chosen education issue is integral to the English KLA as a subject about
humanity and society, and to the chosen learning activity about social responsibility.
approachability highly (Capern & Hammond, 2014). A teacher must embody and
practice inclusivity and fairness before passing those values and teachings to
child relationships, where students aim to emulate and learn from their teachers as
they do their parents (Davis, 2003). Thus, it is important for teachers for exhibit positive
teacher behaviours as those outlined in the chosen article, in order to effectively teach
1. Think of whether the movie concept “paying it forward” would actually work.
Would the recipient of a good deed return the favour to others? E.g. would you be
more or less inclined to do something good for another person if someone
engaged in a ‘random act of kindness’ towards you?
2. Devise a scenario whereby a simple smile to someone, a random stranger e.g.
cashier, person on a train, new neighbour, could translate into a series of 4-5
events that might ultimately change someone’s life?
3. Would you be willing to do something nice for someone with absolutely no
expectation of receiving anything in return? What about if the person wasn’t
appreciative? Should we always expect something in return for everything we do?
4. Is there a moral duty or obligation to do good for others especially when there is
little cost to oneself?
5. What happens when you notice a negative outcome of your good deed? E.g. if
you gave some money to a homeless person and saw them buy alcohol with it,
how would this make you feel? Would it change your actions the next time you
see a homeless person asking for money?
learning, concludes that there are ‘universal’ teacher behaviours for building positive
gifted students placed greater emphasis on behaviours that support their academic
activity are “allow students to get help from other students”, “give all students equal
emotional/behavioural disorder students utilized to modify the learning activity are “be
patient with me”, “listen if I have something to say”, “be willing to explain things again”,
“give me a chance to explain myself”, and “give equal attention and praise among
students” (Capern & Hammond, 2014, p. 60). The modifications address 11 out of the
recommendations for practice, including all those listed in this paragraph. The
formulating responses that reflect real-life scenarios, the modifications adhere to K-10
connections allow students to attain the “broad learning outcomes defined in the Board
of Studies K-10 Curriculum Framework and Statement of Equity Principles, and in the
thinking’, ‘ethical understanding’, and ‘personal and social capability’ (NESA, 2012).
(MCEECDYA, 2008, p.13) goals of moving “across subject disciplines to develop new
relevant in broad and specific areas of teaching. Their clearly outlined, practical and
employable recommendations for practice are even more so. This has been
Reference list
Arnett, J. J. (2014). Adolescence and emerging adulthood (5th ed.). USA: Pearson
Education Limited
10.1207/S15326985EP3704_1
Bonett, D., & Wright, T. (2015). Cronbach’s alpha reliability: Interval estimation
http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2014v39n4.5
Crossman, A., Cole, N. (2017, June 30). Understanding Functionalist Theory: One of
from: https://www.thoughtco.com/functionalist-perspective-3026625
Denisec. (2013, May 22). Social Responsibility Lesson – Paying it Forward (Film).
http://www.australiancurriculumlessons.com.au/2013/05/22/social-
responsibility-lesson-paying-it-forward-film/
doi:10.2307/1179791
Ferfolja, T., Diaz, C. J., & Ullman, J. (2015). Understanding Sociological Theory for
Gunn, A. A., Peterson, B. J., & Welsh, J. L. (2015). Designing teaching cases that
com.ezproxy.uws.edu.au/docview/1762827283?accountid=36155
Ladwig, J., & Gore, J. (2009). A classroom Practice Guide. Quality teaching in NSW
h.schools.nsw.edu.au/technology/Programs/Template/Quality%20Teaching
%20Guide.pdf
Malecki, C. K., Demaray, M. K., & Elliot, S. N. (2000). The Child and Adolescent
McDonald, M., Kazemi, E., Kelley-Petersen, M., Mikolasy, K., Thompson, J., W.
http://www.curriculum.edu.au/verve/_resources/National_Declaration_on_t
he_Educational_Goals_for_Young_Australians.pdf
https://syllabus.nesa.nsw.edu.au/english/
Ullman, J. (Ed.). (2015). Applying Educational Research: How to Read, Do, and Use
Pearson Australia.