Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
REALaw
HOME REAL ESTATE LAW BOUNCING CHECK LAW CASE DIGESTS RELATED NEWS LEGAL DICTIONARY
Parke Davies and Company is an owner of a Patent entitled "Process for the
CASE DIGEST: Emerald
Garment vs. CA Manufacturing of Antibiotics" (Letters Patent No. 50) which was issued by the
Philippine Patent Office on February 9, 1950. The patent relates to a chemical
How to Repair Electric Fans compound represented by a formula commonly called chloramphenicol. The
patent contains ten claims, nine of which are process claims, and the other is a
CASE DIGEST: Guingona, Jr. product claim to the chemical substance chloramphenicol.
vs. Carague BLOG ARCHIVE
Doctors’ Pharmaceuticals Inc. requested that it be granted a voluntary license to ► 2017 (13)
CASE DIGEST: Philippine Nut
manufacture and produce our own brand of medicine, containing ► 2014 (1)
Industry vs. Standards Brands
chloramphenicol, and to use, sell, distribute, or otherwise dispose of the same
▼ 2012 (36)
CASE DIGEST: Kenneth Roy in the Philippines under such terms and conditions as may be deemed
▼ Dec 2012 (29)
Savege vs. Taypin reasonable and mutually satisfactory, which Parke Davies declined.
Labor Bar Exam Coverage:
Four-fold Test
CASE DIGEST: Republic vs. Doctors’ Pharmaceuticals Inc. filed a petition with the Director of Patents
PLDT The 2013 Bar Examination
requesting the Director to grant a compulsory license. After careful evaluation
and hearings, the Director granted the request of Doctors’ Pharmaceuticals. MVRB CRESAR Schedule for
Legal Forms: Motion for Hold the 2013 Real Estate Brok...
Departure Order
CASE DIGEST: Sambar vs. Levi
ISSUE: Strauss
CASE DIGEST: Habana vs.
Robles CASE DIGEST: Vargas vs. FM
Is the decision of the Director of Patents in granting Doctor’s Pharmaceutical Yaptico
CASE DIGEST: Ana Ang vs. Inc. compulsory license to use the substance chloramphenicol, valid? CASE DIGEST: Universal Mills
Toribio Teodoro Corporation vs. Unive...
CASE DIGEST: Kenneth Roy
LABELS HELD: Savege vs. Taypin
administrative law (2) CASE DIGEST: Samson vs.
Yes the decision of the Director of Patents in granting Doctor’s Pharmaceutical Tarroza
affidavits (3)
Inc. compulsory license to use the substance chloramphenicol is valid. The CASE DIGEST: Philippine Nut
bar exam (14)
Supreme Court says that patents issued to foods and medicines are not Industry vs. Standards...
bar exam coverage (1)
exclusive so as not to prevent the building up of patent monopolies. Public CASE DIGEST: Mighty vs. La
bar exam passers (1) Campana Fabrica
benefit is foremost. The Court dismissed the contention of Parke Davies that
burden of proof (3) the Director of Patents erred in granting compulsory license. The decision CASE DIGEST: Joaquin vs.
case digest (80) appealed from is affirmed, with costs against petitioner. Drilon
civil law (2) CASE DIGEST: Industrial
civil procedure (1) Refractories vs. CA
Labels: case digest, commercial law, copyright
commercial law (36) CASE DIGEST: Habana vs.
Robles
constitutional law (11) No comments:
CASE DIGEST: Frank vs. Benito
conveyancing (1)
Post a Comment CASE DIGEST: Etepha A.G. vs.
copyright (11)
Director of Patents
court of appeals (1)
Links to this post CASE DIGEST: East Pacific vs.
credit transactions (5) Director of Patents
CRESAR (1) Create a Link
CASE DIGEST: Del Monte vs.
criminal law (3) Phil. Packing Corp.
criminal procedure (2) CASE DIGEST: COMPAÑIA
current labor cases (3) GENERAL DE TABACOS DE
FILIPI...
dictionary (1)
CASE DIGEST: CARLOS GSELL
disqualification (1)
vs. VALERIANO VELOSO
election law (1) YAP...
employee (2) CASE DIGEST: La Yebana vs.
employer (1) Alhambra Cigar