Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
ABSTRACT
PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS
KEYWORDS
INTRODUCTION
Scald means to burn with hot liquid or steam by contact, or immersion in,
any hot fluid. Scalded flours or cereals have references mostly in artisan or
homemade sourdough bread production. A paste was made with flour and cold
water to which boiling water or milk was added while stirring until the mixture
thickens. Such mixtures were frequently used in the making of heavily malted
brown bread. Scalding serves to kill potentially harmful bacteria, to facilitate
peeling, to inactivate enzymes that degrade lipids into substances that impart
off-flavors, speed the cooking process, help melt fat, and dissolve sugar more
easily (Daniel 1971). Besides these effects, the scalding process enhances the
flavor (in situ flavor generation) (Petersen et al. 2005), changes the color of
grains and flour, dough viscosity, Maillard and caramelization reactions,
moisture, texture and prolong the shelf life of bread.
Structure design concepts include search for new textures in baked produ-
cts (Esteller et al. 2005). All properties are the result of certain physical,
chemical or biological effects in the product, which are determined by the
choice of ingredients and processing conditions (Schubert et al. 2003). Rela-
tionship between food texture perception and food structure is of increasing
importance for companies wishing to produce texturally attractive food produ-
cts (Wilkinson et al. 2000).
Grains can be exploited in different ways leading to the design of new
cereal foods or cereal ingredients that can target specific populations
(Charalampopoulos et al. 2002). Heat (dry or steam) treatments of grains,
flours and brans have been studied for breakfast cereals production (Doehlert
1997; Stapley et al. 1999; Horrobin et al. 2003) and baked goods (Kock et al.
1999; Prakash and Rao 1999; Gélinas et al. 2001).
The aim of the present work was to evaluate the effects of scalding
process on bread crumb porosity, texture, color, specific volume and moisture
content of sponge-dough rye bread produced with addition of different
amounts of rye flour or flakes, yeast and boiling water.
weighed and mixed at 60 rpm for 1 min, and 4 min at 120 rpm (sponge) in a
planetary mixer 20-LA (Irmãos Amádio Ltda, São Paulo, Brazil) as summa-
rized in Table 1. The dough obtained was fermented during 4 h when the yeast
gradually became fully active. Rye flour and rye flakes (12% moisture, 21%
total fiber), salt, sucrose, hydrogenated vegetable fat and boiling water were
mixed into a hot paste and cooled to 25 °C, mixed to the sponge and kneaded
for 5 min by 120 rpm, and rested in bulk for 30 min. Subsequently, the dough
was hand-divided into pieces of 700 g. Each piece was rounded by hand in a
ball shape and rested again for 30 min. The next action consisted of sheeting
the dough and rolling the sheet into a cylinder, which was put into teflon-
coated pans of a dimension of 300 mm ¥ 115 mm ¥ 100 mm without cover
and proofed in an incubator (45 °C, 75% relative humidity, 1 h). At the end of
the final proof, the risen dough was put into a stationary oven 4,000 W/220 V
(Flexa de Ouro Ltda, São Paulo, Brazil) and baked for 25 minutes (220 °C).
After baking, the loaves were allowed to cool down to room temperature for
120 min on cooling racks. Individual loaves were packed in polyethylene
plastic bags and stored in an incubator at 25 °C. Testing started the following
day (Esteller et al. 2004).
Texture Analysis
Texture analysis was carried out on 12 central slices (25 mm thick) of
three loaves from the same formula on the TA-XT2 texturometer (Stable Micro
Systems, Surrey, UK). Each sample was placed on the texturometer base and
squeezed twice with the probe. Instrument settings were: measure force in
compression; cycle until count; pretest speed 2.0 mm/s; distance 6.2 mm,
trigger-type auto; force, 10 g; acquisition, 200 pps, TA-3 1-inch acrylic cylin-
der probe. The texture parameters were: firmness, springiness, cohesiveness
and chewiness.
TABLE 1.
FORMULAS USED FOR RYE FLOUR AND RYE FLAKES BREAD
Ingredient (g)
Sponge
Wheat flour 700 800 600 800 600 800 600 800 600 700 700 700 700 868 530 700
Wet gluten 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
Yeast 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
Water 350 400 300 400 300 400 400 300 400 350 350 350 350 434 250 350
Dough
Rye flour/flakes 300 200 400 200 400 200 400 200 400 300 300 300 300 132 470 300
Sucrose 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70
Fat 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
Salt 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20
Yeast 0 20 20 40 40 20 20 40 40 30 50 13 47 30 30 30
Water 140 140 140 140 140 180 180 180 180 126 194 160 160 160 160 160
PRODUCTION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF SPONGE-DOUGH BREAD
59
60 M.S. ESTELLER and S.C.S. LANNES
Color Evaluation
Bread was sliced using a slice regulator and bread knife to obtain uniform
slices of 25 mm thickness. Three loaves of each formula were used for
evaluations. Crust and crumb color was measured using a spectrophotometer
(UltraScanXE; HunterLab Company, Reston, VA) and the Universal Software
4.10 (Universal Inc., Reston, VA), adjusting for reflectance, illuminant D65,
and an angle of 10o. After calibration using white and green ceramic plates,
each slice of bread was placed with the central part of its crust and crumb
against the 1-inch port door. The International Commission on Illumination
(CIE) color values L*, a* and b* (lightness, redness and yellowness) were
recorded (CIE 1978). The results represent the mean of 10 samples.
Physical Properties
Samples were weighed (g) and loaf volume (mL) was measured using the
rapeseed displacement method. Specific volume (mL/g) was calculated. Mois-
ture content of samples were determined by the American Association of
Cereal Chemists (AACC) standard method 44-15A. The data reported are the
average of four replicates of each formula (Esteller et al. 2005).
Data Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed on the data using Statistica 7.0/2005
(StatSoft, Tulsa, OK). Tukey HSD at 5% significance level was used to define
differences among formulas.
TABLE 2.
SCALDED FLOUR AND FLAKES BREAD CRUMB POROSITY PARAMETERS
Flour 50.07 ⫾ 19.90 26.99 ⫾ 12.24 132.53 ⫾ 107.12 0.37 ⫾ 0.03 0.27 ⫾ 0.01 0.47 ⫾ 0.03a
a a a a a
Flakes 81.30 ⫾ 17.51b 53.83 ⫾ 20.53b 166.70 ⫾ 61.50b 0.45 ⫾ 0.03b 0.53 ⫾ 0.02b 0.37 ⫾ 0.03b
Flour 9.36 ⫾ 2.34a 6.06 ⫾ 0.80a 13.98 ⫾ 6.11a 0.35 ⫾ 0.01a 0.32 ⫾ 0.02a 0.39 ⫾ 0.01a
Flakes 13.01 ⫾ 2.74b 7.71 ⫾ 1..4b 17.02 ⫾ 4.14b 0.36 ⫾ 0.01a 0.31 ⫾ 0.02a 0.39 ⫾ 0.02a
Flour 78.69 ⫾ 20.54a 53.34 ⫾ 4.46a 119.66 ⫾ 59.52a 1.27 ⫾ 0.04a 1.07 ⫾ 0.16a 1.66 ⫾ 0.37a
Flakes 90.65 ⫾ 11.93b 68.97 ⫾ 15.62b 152.78 ⫾ 23.52b 1.33 ⫾ 0.08b 1.36 ⫾ 0.09b 1.94 ⫾ 0.03b
Different letters in the same row denote (P < 0.05) difference among treatments Tukey HSD.
* Maximum and minimum crumb grain dimensions obtained in different treatments.
In this analysis, the software was used to trace over any slightly broken
sections in the structure to ensure that cell walls were continuous so that the
program could measure discrete, separated cells (Table 2). For all formulas,
equal values of minimum cell area (0.016 mm2), minimum cell diameter
(0.06 mm) and minimum cell perimeter (0.13 mm) were obtained because of
the range detection of the software (results not shown).
62 M.S. ESTELLER and S.C.S. LANNES
The large granule fraction (rye flakes) caused cell coalescence and gave
a more open grain with larger cells and thicker cell walls, and small granule
fractions (rye flour) caused loaves to exhibit a more regular grain with smaller
cells and thinner cell walls.
Comparing with the control (60.07 and 0.37 mm2), an increase in the
proportion of the scalded rye flour (formula 14) decreased the maximum cell
area (26.99 mm2) and the cell mean area (0.27 mm2). Minimal proportion of
scalded rye flour in relation to white flour (formula 13) and the addition of
more water and yeast compared to the control, increased porosity, leading
maximum cell area to 132.53 mm2 and mean cell area to 0.47 mm2. The results
showed that fibers from rye exerted a deleterious effect over dough structure,
breaking gluten bonds, which allowed loss of carbon dioxide and volatiles
during the fermentation process and decreased the cell dimensions. The same
could be observed for the other porosity parameters: maximum cell diameter
(6.06 to 13.98 mm), mean cell diameter (0.32 to 0.39 mm), maximum cell
perimeter (53.34 to 119.66 mm) and mean cell perimeter (1.07 to 1.66 mm).
When scalded rye flour changes to scalded rye flakes, the same pattern
could be observed in relation to fiber amount, but large particles caused
significant changes that opened the grain: maximum cell area (53.83 to
166.70 mm2), mean area (0.37 to 0.55 mm2), maximum diameter (7.71 to
17.02 mm), mean diameter (0.31 to 0.39 mm), maximum perimeter (68.97
to 152.78 mm) and mean perimeter (1.36 to 1.94 mm).
TABLE 3.
SCALDED FLOUR AND FLAKES BREAD TEXTURE PARAMETERS
Flour 2.32 ⫾ 0.22a 0.61 ⫾ 0.06a 14.83 ⫾ 1.92a 0.73 ⫾ 0.02a 0.64 ⫾ 0.02a 0.82 ⫾ 0.02a
Flakes 2.83 ⫾ 0.25b 0.81 ⫾ 0.09b 18.46 ⫾ 1.82b 0.76 ⫾ 0.02a 0.66 ⫾ 0.03a 0.81 ⫾ 0.02a
Flour 1.46 ⫾ 0.14a 0.49 ⫾ 0.06a 7.48 ⫾ 1.16a 0.87 ⫾ 0.03a 0.78 ⫾ 0.03a 0.98 ⫾ 0.01a
Flakes 1.39 ⫾ 0.18a 0.65 ⫾ 0.06b 9.84 ⫾ 0.82b 0.91 ⫾ 0.03b 0.81 ⫾ 0.02b 0.99 ⫾ 0.01a
Different letters in the same row denote (P < 0.05) difference among treatments Tukey HSD.
* Minimum and maximum values obtained in different treatments.
(1) amount of water in each treatment – that it exerts lubricative effect on the
dough;
(2) particle size – larger particles are mechanically more difficult to treat;
(3) competition between starch granules and fibers for the water;
(4) changes in proteins – occurring polymerization processes, leaving the
dough more plasticized, shining and a little “rubbery” to the teeth.
Springiness, the percentage recovery, is important during slicing, han-
dling and storage. Values from 0.78 to 0.98 (scalded flour) and from 0.81 to
0.99 (scalded flakes) were not significantly different when compared to the
control, indicating that the thermal treatment exerted little influence in this
parameter.
Bread Color
Color is an important characteristic of baked products which, together
with texture and aroma, contributes to consumer preference. Color depends on
the physicochemical characteristics of dough and process (e.g., sugars, amino
acids content, oven temperature and relative humidity). Chemical reactions,
which cause browning of baked products during baking, include Maillard
reactions and caramelization. Maillard reactions are favored with an interme-
diate moisture content, temperatures above 50 °C and pH 4–7. During heating,
the percentage of water quickly decreases on the dough surface providing
64 M.S. ESTELLER and S.C.S. LANNES
Specific Volume
Loaf-specific volume ranged from 1.61 to 5.74 mL/g (scalded rye flour)
and 2.08 to 7.50 mL/g (scalded rye flakes) (Table 5). Addition of rye flour or
flakes promoted a disruption of the gluten protein matrix, thus changing gas
retention.
TABLE 4.
COLOR OF RYE FLOUR AND FLAKES BREAD CRUMB
Control
L* a* b*
Flour 58.65 ⫾ 1.00a 5.42 ⫾ 0.16a 20.21 ⫾ 0.25a
Flakes 66.52 ⫾ 1.36b 3.10 ⫾ 0.45b 15.60 ⫾ 0.49b
Scalded
Minimum†
L* a* b*
Flour 52.68 ⫾ 1.19a 1.49 ⫾ 0.16a 14.30 ⫾ 0.46a
Flakes 62.89 ⫾ 1.52b 1.11 ⫾ 0.30b 13.87 ⫾ 0.66a
Scalded
Maximum†
L* a* b*
Flour 65.22 ⫾ 1.61a 6.61 ⫾ 0.13a 20.87 ⫾ 0.26a
Flakes 69.23 ⫾ 1.52b 5.37 ⫾ 0.29b 18.45 ⫾ 0.20b
TABLE 5.
SCALDED RYE FLOUR AND FLAKES BREAD SPECIFIC VOLUME /MOISTURE
Flour 2.45 ⫾ 0.23a 1.61 ⫾ 0.04a 5.74 ⫾ 0.45a 41.22 ⫾ 0.29a 38.51 ⫾ 0.37a 48.15 ⫾ 0.30a
Flakes 5.37 ⫾ 0.40b 2.08 ⫾ 0.07b 7.50 ⫾ 0.04b 41.82 ⫾ 0.33b 36.62 ⫾ 0.92b 45.79 ⫾ 0.66b
Different letters in the same line denote (P < 0.05) difference among formulas Tukey HSD.
Figure 1 shows clearly the effect of scalding over the dough causing
opened grain structure especially when using scalded flakes, leaving the dough
more porous, resulting in increased specific volume.
Moisture
Moisture transfer between bread components occurs as bread ages. Dif-
ferences in vapor pressures between the crust and the internal region of the loaf
result in moisture migration from the crumb to the crust. The amount of water
lost could be correlated to porosity as a function of time. Rye fiber addition and
scalding modified the water absorption, increasing interactions between fiber
hydroxyl groups and hydrogen bonding (Table 5). From the results, we can see
that the use of rye flour increases water uptake and the moisture remains higher
than that of rye flakes bread.
The moisture ranged from 38.51 to 48.15% (scalded flour) and from
36.62 to 45.79% (scalded flakes). It can be concluded that breads produced
with small particles (flour) absorb more water than the large ones (flakes).
CONCLUSIONS
The results from the present study have shown that scalding rye flour
and flakes could change appearance, color, moisture, specific volume of breads
and could be used to create new textures. Scalded rye changed significantly
(P < 0.05) the cell area (mm2), cell diameter (mm) and cell perimeter (mm),
causing less reflectance of light and increased a* and b* values.
REFERENCES
BOURNE, M.C. 2002. Food Texture and Viscosity: Concept and Measure-
ment, Academic Press, Geneva, Switzerland.
66 M.S. ESTELLER and S.C.S. LANNES
STAPLEY, A.G.F., LANDMAN, K.A., PLEASE, C.P. and FRYER, P.J. 1999.
Modelling the steaming of whole wheat grains. Chem. Eng. Sci. 54,
965–975.
WILKINSON, C., DIJKSTERHUIS, G.B. and MINEKUS, M. 2000. From
food structure to texture. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 11, 442–450.