Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Professor Westfall
ECE 251
10/7/18
3) Number of children: 16
4) Centers:
*Library- 2 students
*Art- 4 students
*Writing- 2 students
*Math-4 students
*Easel- 2 students
*Housekeeping-4 students
*Science- 4 students
6) Comprehensive Checklist:
1) Arrangement of Physical Space
- Centers are clearly labeled- yes, each center had a label and picture identifying each
center
- The number of students in each center is limited- yes, the students counted the
number of children before going in. If they could not remember how many could be in the center
- Children have a space that is specific to them- yes, the cubby area was right when
you walked into the room and clearly labeled with each child’s name
- Centers are easily accessible- yes, the centers are easy to access but I did not like how
the science area was pushed up against a table making it hard for students to move comfortably
-Can the teacher view each center from any point in the room? yes
-Pictures of children and their family- yes, each child had a framed picture of their
- Soft areas easily accessible- yes, tow students at a time could sit on a bean bag chair
writing center.
- Materials are natural- yes, several of the materials were natural objects or made in a
- Materials are durable- yes, except for the more expendable art materials
3) Storage of Materials
- Teachers materials are easily accessible- yes, the teacher has a cupboard above the sink that
she was able to access while still being able to have eyes on the classroom
4) Other Elements:
-Is the classroom inviting? Yes, the room was filled with the children’s work and the setup of
Diversity: in the library there were Multicultural books on display. In the housekeeping area
there were pictures of children with disabilities doing various school activities. The teacher had a
really enjoyed this center and they loved the block area. I observed a few students feeling upset
or frustrated during center time and utilize the library for a place to calm down. Both students
left the area after few minutes and returned to more social play. I observed the science area as
being one that students could explore more individually and investigate materials. The children
roamed the room freely. There were no instances of congestion. The students put materials away
when they done playing and seemed to know where they went.
Evaluation: My overall evaluation of the classroom is that it is arranged in a manner that is very
inviting and easily accessible to students. Because students showed the ability to count their
friends before entering a center shows me that the teacher has established clear guidelines during
center time that are easy for the children to follow. Watching students writing notes to their
friends in another center demonstrates a class unity and although the centers are separated the
Rating: 4
Weaknesses: The one science area that seems crammed up against the window. Not easy for
students to access.