HRE 125 – PRACTICAL RESEARCH 2
Performance Task 1 – Title Proposal
Research Title: ______________________________________________________________________________________________
Group Evaluation Criteria Excellent
5 4
The proposal is well-focused.
It previews the topics, present
the study in an interesting
Research Presentation
way, and shows how it will be
conducted.
All relevant information was
obtained and information
sources were valid. Analysis
Supporting Material
and design considerations
were well supported by the
information.
Individual Evaluation Excellent
Criteria 5 4
The speaker provides a variety
of types of content
appropriate for the task, such
as generalizations, details,
Content examples and various forms
of evidence. The speaker
adapts the content in a
specific way to the listener
and situation.
The speaker delivers the
message in a confident,
poised, enthusiastic fashion.
The volume and rate varies to
add emphasis and interest.
Pronunciation and
Delivery
enunciation are very clear.
The speaker exhibits very few
disfluencies, such as "ahs,"
"uhms," or "you knows."
Name
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Good
The proposal is focused and
explains how the presenters
introduce and present the
study in a comprehensible
way.
Sufficient information was
obtained and most sources
were valid. Analysis and design
considerations were mostly
supported by the information.
Good
The speaker focuses primarily
on relevant content. The
speaker sticks to the topic. The
speaker adapts the content in
a general way to the listener
and the situation.
The volume is not too low or
too loud and the rate is not
too fast or too slow. The
pronunciation and enunciation
are clear. The speaker exhibits
few disfluencies, such as "ahs,"
"uhms," or "you knows.
Individual Grade
Group Grade
Content
Date: _____________
Group Grade: ______________
Satisfactory
3 2
The organization may be
understandable to the
audience, but the proposal
could be more focused and
better organized.
Insufficient information was
obtained and/or sources lack
validity. Analysis and design
considerations were not
supported by the information
collected
Satisfactory
3 2
The speaker includes some
irrelevant content. The
speaker wanders off the topic.
The speaker uses words and
concepts which are
inappropriate for the
knowledge and experiences of
the listener (e.g., slang,
jargon, technical language).
The volume is too low or too
loud and the rate is too fast or
too slow. The pronunciation
and enunciation are unclear.
The speaker exhibits many
disfluencies, such as "ahs,"
"uhms," or "you knows." The
listener is distracted by
problems in the delivery of
the message and has difficulty
understanding the words in
the message.
Delivery
Evaluated by:
Mr. John Cristian A. Ramos
Date: ________________
Fair
The topic’s focus is too
narrow or too general. The
proposal shows some
organization, but it may not
provide enough guidance
for the audience.
Not valid and reliable
information were collected
and presented.
Fair
The speaker says practically
nothing. The speaker
focuses primarily on
irrelevant content. The
speaker appears to ignore
the listener and the
situation.
The volume is so low and
the rate is so fast that you
cannot understand most of
the message. The
pronunciation and
enunciation are very
unclear. The speaker
appears uninterested.
Total