Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Marks:
Experiment done on: 01/02/2018
100
4 Sample calculations 20
Batch: B
Group: B11
Aim
Theory
Partial molar properties are the thermodynamic properties which vary with the molar composition of the components.
It helps us to understand:
When solids, liquids or gases are combined, the thermodynamic quantities of the system experience a change as a result
of the mixing.
A solution is created when two or more components mix homogeneously to form a single phase. Studying solutions is
important because most chemical and biological life processes occur in systems with multiple components. Understanding
the thermodynamic behaviour of mixtures is integral to the study of any system involving either ideal or non-ideal solutions
because it provides valuable information on the molecular properties of the system.
Introduction
Enthalpy of Solution
A solution is a homogeneous mixture of two or more substances and can either be in the gas phase, the liquid phase, the
solid phase. The enthalpy change of solution refers to the amount of heat that is released or absorbed during the
dissolution process (at constant pressure). This enthalpy of solution (ΔHsolution) can either be positive (endothermic) or
negative (exothermic). When understanding the enthalpy of solution, it is easiest to think of a hypothetical three-step
process happening between two substances. One substance is the solute, let’s call that A. The other substance is the
solvent, let’s call that B.
The two most important state sizes to describe the energy/ heat content change of a substance are the inner energy and
the enthalpy. The shortest form to describe change of inner energy is given in the so called first sentence of
Thermodynamics.
dU = δQ + δW
Where δQ is the heat and δW the work change of the regarded system. In the following, many different ways of heat
production are considered but for the work change is taken care of volume work. The enthalpy is in some ways more
convenient and easier to control state size than the inner energy, where changes are described through
dH = dQ + d(pV) = δQ + Vdp
Both inner energy and enthalpy are only defined in so called closed systems (exchange of energy and/ or heat, no
exchange of matter). Formula (1) and (2) can be simplified if pressure or volume are constant
CH 2016: Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics Laboratory, January-May 2018
dU = δQ (for V = const.)
dH = δQ (for p = const.)
At constant pressure as regarded in 4.), enthalpy changes are directly proportional to the heat added and to a specific
size Cp of a system, where Cp is the heat capacity [J mol−1 K−1] by constant pressure of the given substance. This
correlation can be described through
∆H = ∆Q = Cp∆T
One can find the characteristic size Cp of substances listed at tables in the literature. Therefore, through knowing Cp and
temperature change of a chemical transformation by constant pressure, the heat loss or gain of the transformation can be
calculated and therefore directly ∆H too.
Calculations:
dΔhmix
̅1 − h1 = Δhmix − x2 ∗ (
h )
𝑑𝑋2
dΔhmix
̅ 2 − h2 = Δhmix − x1 ∗ (
h )
𝑑𝑋1
Experiment Details
Materials Required
1. Chemicals:
Iso Propyl Alcohol
Distilled Water
2. Instruments:
Weighing Balance: Useful when determining required weights for water Iso Propyl Alcohol mixtures.
Least Count: 0.001g
Beaker(250,150ml): Used to store water and Iso Propyl Alcohol
Magnetic Stirrer: Ensures uniform heat transfer and temperature throughout the mixture
Adiabatic Flask: Holds the water Iso Propyl Alcohol mixture and ensure minimal heat leakage to
surroundings
Electric Heater: Heats the mixture inside the adiabatic flask. P=250W
Thermocouple: Measures the temperature of the mixture. Least Count: 0.1K
Measuring Flask
Calibration
Make sure all the apparatuses are clean and ready to use
First place the Adiabatic Flask over the magnetic stirrer
CH 2016: Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics Laboratory, January-May 2018
Pour 100 gms of water into the flask using the measuring flask
Now close the lid of the flask and insert both the electric heater and thermocouple into the flask through the holes
in the lid
Measure the steady state temperature of water
Now switch on the 250W heater for 10 seconds
Note down the steady state temperature after the heating
As a result, α (flask constant) can be calculated by using the equation described below
Experiment
Now as per our objective we mix Iso Propyl Alcohol and water with Iso Propyl Alcohol mole fraction equal to
0.2,0.4,0.5,0.6,0.8 in different cases and put it inside the flask.
Record the steady state temperature of the mixture
Now heat the mixture with the 250W heater for 10 seconds and record the steady state temperature
Now calculate Cpmix from the equation given below
Using the Cpmix and alpha value calculated from calibration find Qmix
This Qmix divided by total no. of moles will give hmix
Repeat these steps for the cases and calculate hmix for each case
Q = (Cp * m + α )* ΔT
Sample Calculation:
Q = (Cp,mix * m + α )* ΔT
Sample Calculation:
Q = 2500 J ; ΔT = ; m = 100 g; α=
Δhmix = -Qmix/ntotal
Sample Calculation:
Cp,mix = 5.5258 Jg-1K-1 ; ΔTmix = 6.5 K; m = 100 g; α = 340.2721 JK-1; ntotal = 4.2373 moles;
Δhmix = -5803.5714/4.2373
MATLAB Code
CH 2016: Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics Laboratory, January-May 2018
Result
The heat loss coefficient of the flask was calculated to be 340.2721 JK -1.
The Cp,mix was calculated for various compositions by supplying a known amount of heat and measuring
temperature change.
The Cp calculated decreases with increase in mole fraction of Iso Propyl Alcohol . It is initially close to Cp,water and
approaches Cp,Iso Propyl Alcohol .
The ∆hmix was calculated for varying ratios of mixing and was plotted against mole fraction of water and Iso
Propyl Alcohol .
The ∆hmix is negative implying an Exothermic Reaction.
Comparison of ∆hmix from experiment with the values from literature show significant deviations.
∆hmix decreases in magnitude as we increase X1 and increases in in magnitude with increase in X2
∆hmix
was plotted against x1 and a quadratic fit was developed which yielded the equation
x1 x2
∆𝐡𝐦𝐢𝐱 = −𝐱 𝟏 . 𝐱 𝟐 . (𝟐𝟔. 𝟏𝟐𝟖𝟑𝐱 𝟏𝟐 − 𝟑𝟕. 𝟗𝟎𝟕𝟕𝐱 𝟏 + 𝟏𝟒. 𝟗𝟐𝟑𝟑)𝐊𝐉
The quadratic fit was plotted alongside the experimental data and was found to explain the trend in data
sufficiently.
We get a 4th order expression for ∆hmix in mole fraction of Iso Propyl Alcohol or water.
By plotting the ∆hmix vs X1 and ∆hmix vs X2 and using the slope intercept formula, the relative partial molar
enthalpies at different mole fractions was calculated.
For small mole fractions, the relative molar enthalpy becomes very small and thus the partial molar enthalpy
becomes close to molar enthalpy of the pure species.
For large mole fractions, the relative molar enthalpy increases and the partial molar enthalpy approaches the
infinite dilution partial molar enthalpy.
Discussions
The flask is not an ideal adiabatic wall, Therefore the coefficient of heat loss had to be calculated.
To simplify the experiment, α was taken to be a constant property of the flask independent of the liquid used,
temperature and time.
Theoretically the Cp,mix should follow the equation
Cp,mix = x1 ∗ Cp1 + x2 ∗ Cp2
CH 2016: Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics Laboratory, January-May 2018
But we find Cp,mix to be greater than Cp1 and Cp2. This may be because of the wrong assumption that α doesn’t
change with T and liquid used.
Cp,mix however approaches Cp1 when X1 is large and vice-versa implying that the species precent in higher
concentration contributes more to the heat capacity as predicted by the linear relation.
Iso Propyl Alcohol and water do not form an ideal mixture. Therefore . ∆ℎ𝑚𝑖𝑥 ≠ 0
The ∆ℎ𝑚𝑖𝑥 was negative implying a positive deviation from Raoult’s law as heat is evolved by mixing.
The A-B bonds between H2O and Iso Propyl Alcohol are stronger than the A-A and B-B interactions.
This is because of H-Bonding between Iso Propyl Alcohol and Water which form more stable bonds and thus
releases more energy than is required to break A-A and B-B bonds.
As number of Iso Propyl Alcohol molecules increases, they compete with the limited water molecules and thus
due to steric effects, the H-Bonding becomes less efficient. So with increase in X1, the∆ℎ𝑚𝑖𝑥 becomes smaller in
magnitude.
However, as the mole fraction of water is increased, the H-Bonding becomes more prominent and thus increases
the heat evolved on mixing.
∆ℎ𝑚𝑖𝑥
The plot of showed polynomial trends and was thus fitted with a quadratic equation. A cubic equation,
𝑥1 𝑥2
improves the fit only by a marginal amount.
Since, there are only 5 data points the fit is cannot be generalised.
∆ℎ𝑚𝑖𝑥
The determinant for is negative and the coefficient of x2 is also negative. This shows that the enthalpy of
𝑥1 𝑥2
mixing is negative irrespective of the concentration.
At mole fractions tending to unity for a species, the entire contribution to the enthalpy of mixture is from that
species. This is seen as the relative partial molar enthalpy approaches 0 and the partial molar enthalpy value
tends close to the pure species molar enthalpy.
Comparing ∆ℎ𝑚𝑖𝑥 with literature gives a significant deviation because of the underlying assumptions made -
o Both liquids are at the same temperature prior to mixing
o 𝛼 is a constant of the flask.
o Cp is constant in the given temperature range.
o Heat Loss in flask is linearly dependant on Temperature.
However, the model is useful to show the decreasing trend on negative enthalpy of mixing.
Conclusion
Iso Propyl Alcohol and water form a non-idea mixture and exhibit positive deviation from Raoult’s Law at all
concentrations.
The Enthalpy of mixing is negative and decreases with increase in Iso Propyl Alcohol concentration in the given
range of concentrations.
∆ℎ𝑚𝑖𝑥
By regression for vs X1 a good fit can be obtained for ∆ℎ𝑚𝑖𝑥 which is 4th order in mole fraction.
𝑥1 𝑥2
The ∆ℎ𝑚𝑖𝑥 was plotted and using tangent-intercept method, relative partial molar enthalpies were obtained at
various concentrations.
References:
M. D. Koretsky, Engineering and Chemical Thermodynamics; 2nd Edition, Wiley: New York, 2012; pp 263-287.