Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 9

ASME B31.

3-2014

(a) For P-Nos. 3, 4, 5A, 5B, 5C, and 15E materials, (d) if all the items examined as required by (c) above
examinations shall be performed after completion of are acceptable, the defective item(s) shall be repaired or
heat treatment. However, examinations need not be replaced and reexamined as specified in para. 341.3.3,
repeated on welds or portions of welds that are subjected and all items represented by the additional sampling
to additional heat treatments and have not been repaired shall be accepted, but
by welding. (e) if any of the items examined as required by (c)
(b) For a welded branch connection the examination above reveals a defect, all items represented by the pro-
of and any necessary repairs to the pressure-containing gressive sampling shall be either
weld shall be completed before any reinforcing pad or (1) repaired or replaced and reexamined as
saddle is added. required, or
(14) 341.3.2 Acceptance Criteria. Acceptance criteria (2) fully examined and repaired or replaced as nec-
shall be as stated in the engineering design and shall at essary, and reexamined as necessary to meet the require-
least meet the applicable requirements stated below. ments of this Code
(a) Welds (f ) If any of the defective items are repaired or
(1) For radiography and visual, see Table 341.3.2. replaced, reexamined, and a defect is again detected in
(2) For magnetic particle, see para. 344.3.2. the repaired or replaced item, continued progressive
(3) For liquid penetrant, see para. 344.4.2. sampling in accordance with (a), (c), and (e) is not
(4) For ultrasonic, see para. 344.6.2. required based on the defects found in the repair. The
defective item(s) shall be repaired or replaced and reex-
(b) Castings. Acceptance criteria for castings are spec-
ified in para. 302.3.3. amined until acceptance as specified in para. 341.3.3.
Spot or random examination (whichever is applicable)
(14) 341.3.3 Defective Components and Workmanship. is then performed on the remaining unexamined joints.
Defects (imperfections of a type or magnitude not
acceptable by the criteria specified in para. 341.3.2) shall 341.4 Extent of Required Examination
be repaired, or the defective item or work shall be
replaced. 341.4.1 Examination — Normal Fluid Service. Piping
Examination shall be as follows: in Normal Fluid Service shall be examined to the extent
(a) When the defective item or work is repaired, the specified herein or to any greater extent specified in the
repaired portion of the item or work shall be examined. engineering design. Acceptance criteria are as stated in
The examination shall use the same methods and accept- para. 341.3.2 and in Table 341.3.2, for Normal Fluid
ance criteria employed for the original examination. See Service unless otherwise specified.
also para. 341.3.1(a). (a) Visual Examination. At least the following shall be
(b) When the defective item or work is replaced, the examined in accordance with para. 344.2:
new item or work used to replace the defective item or (1) sufficient materials and components, selected at
work shall be examined. The examination shall use any random, to satisfy the examiner that they conform to
method and applicable acceptance criteria that meet the specifications and are free from defects.
requirements for the original examination. See also (2) at least 5% of fabrication. For welds, each weld-
para. 341.3.1(a). er’s and welding operator’s work shall be represented.
(3) 100% of fabrication for longitudinal welds,
341.3.4 Progressive Sampling for Examination. except those in components made in accordance with a
When required spot or random examination reveals a listed specification. See para 341.5.1(a) for examination
defect, then of longitudinal welds required to have a joint factor, Ej ,
(a) two additional samples of the same kind (if of 0.90.
welded or bonded joints, by the same welder, bonder, (4) random examination of the assembly of
or operator) from the original designated lot shall be threaded, bolted, and other joints to satisfy the examiner
given the same type of examination that they conform to the applicable requirements of
(b) if the items examined as required by (a) above para. 335. When pneumatic testing is to be performed,
are acceptable, the defective item shall be repaired or all threaded, bolted, and other mechanical joints shall
replaced and reexamined as specified in para. 341.3.3, be examined.
and all items represented by these two additional sam- (5) random examination during erection of piping,
ples shall be accepted, but including checking of alignment, supports, and cold
(c) if any of the items examined as required by (a) spring.
above reveals a defect, two further samples of the same (6) examination of erected piping for evidence of
kind shall be examined for each defective item found defects that would require repair or replacement, and
by that sampling for other evident deviations from the intent of the design.

78
Copyright c 2015 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.
(14) Table 341.3.2 Acceptance Criteria for Welds — Visual and Radiographic Examination
Examination
Criteria (A to M) for Types of Welds and for Service Conditions [Note (1)] Methods
Normal and Category M Fluid
Service Severe Cyclic Conditions Category D Fluid Service
Type of Weld Type of Weld Type of Weld

Connection [Note (2)]


[Note (3)]
Connection [Note (2)]
[Note (3)]
[Note (3)]

Girth, Miter Groove & Branch


Longitudinal Groove
Fillet [Note (4)]
Girth, Miter Groove & Branch
Longitudinal Groove
Fillet [Note (4)]
Girth and Miter Groove
Longitudinal Groove
Fillet [Note (4)]
Branch Connection [Note (2)]
Visual
Radiography

Weld Imperfection
A A A A A A A A A A Crack ✓ ✓

A A A A A A C A N/A A Lack of fusion ✓ ✓

B A N/A A A N/A C A N/A B Incomplete penetration ✓ ✓

79
E E N/A D D N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Rounded Indications ... ✓

Internal slag inclusion, tungsten


ASME B31.3-2014

inclusion, or elongated
G G N/A F F N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A indication ... ✓

H A H A A A I A H H Undercutting ✓ ✓

Surface porosity or exposed slag


A A A A A A A A A A inclusion [Note (5)] ✓ ...

Copyright c 2015 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers.


N/A N/A N/A J J J N/A N/A N/A N/A Surface finish ✓ ...

K K N/A K K N/A K K N/A K Concave surface ✓ ✓

No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.


Weld reinforcement or internal
L L L L L L M M M M protrusion ✓ ...

GENERAL NOTES:
(a) Weld imperfections are evaluated by one or more of the types of examination methods given, as specified in paras. 341.4.1, 341.4.2,
341.4.3, and M341.4, or by the engineering design.
(b) “N/A” indicates the Code does not establish acceptance criteria or does not require evaluation of this kind of imperfection for this type of
weld.
(c) Check (✓) indicates examination method generally used for evaluating this kind of weld imperfection.
(d) Ellipsis (. . .) indicates examination method not generally used for evaluating this kind of weld imperfection.
(14) Criterion Value Notes for Table 341.3.2
Criterion
Symbol Measure Acceptable Value Limits [Note (6)]

A Extent of imperfection Zero (no evident imperfection)


B Cumulative length of incomplete penetration ≤ 38 mm (1.5 in.) in any 150 mm (6 in.) weld length
or 25% of total weld length, whichever is less
C Cumulative length of lack of fusion and incomplete ≤ 38 mm (1.5 in.) in any 150 mm (6 in.) weld length
penetration or 25% of total weld length, whichever is less
D Size and distribution of rounded indications See BPV Code, Section VIII, Division 1, Appendix 4
E Size and distribution of rounded indications For T w ≤ 6 mm ( 1⁄4 in.), limit is same as D
For T w > 6 mm ( 1⁄4 in.), limit is 1.5 ⴛ D
F Slag inclusion, tungsten inclusion, or elongated indication
Individual length ≤ T w /3
Individual width ≤ 2.5 mm ( 3⁄32 in.) and ≤ T w /3
Cumulative length ≤ T w in any 12T w weld length
G Slag inclusion, tungsten inclusion, or elongated indication

80
Individual length ≤ 2T w
Individual width ≤ 3 mm ( 1⁄8 in.) and ≤ T w /2
Cumulative length
ASME B31.3-2014

≤ 4T w in any 150 mm (6 in.) weld length


H Depth of undercut ≤ 1 mm (1⁄32 in.) and ≤ T w /4
I Depth of undercut ≤ 1.5 mm ( 1⁄16 in.) and ≤ [T w /4 or 1 mm ( 1⁄32 in.)]
J Surface roughness ≤ 500 min. Ra in accordance with ASME B46.1
K Depth of surface concavity Total joint thickness, incl. weld reinf., ≥ T w [Note (7)]
L Height of reinforcement or internal protrusion [Note (8)] in For T w , mm (in.) Height, mm (in.)
any plane through the weld shall be within limits of
1
the applicable height value in the tabulation at right, ≤ 6 ( ⁄4 ) ≤ 1.5 (1⁄16 )

Copyright c 2015 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers.


except as provided in Note (9). Weld metal shall merge > 6 ( 1⁄4 ), ≤ 13 ( 1⁄2 ) ≤ 3 ( 1⁄8 )
smoothly into the component surfaces. > 13 ( 1⁄2 ), ≤ 25 (1) ≤ 4 ( 5⁄32 )

No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.


> 25 (1) ≤ 5 ( 3⁄16 )
M Height of reinforcement or internal protrusion [Note (8)] Limit is twice the value applicable for L above
as described in L. Note (9) does not apply.

Notes follow on next page


(14) Table 341.3.2 Acceptance Criteria for Welds — Visual and Radiographic Examination (Cont’d)
NOTES:
(1) Criteria given are for required examination. More stringent criteria may be specified in the engineering design. See also paras. 341.5 and 341.5.3.
(2) Branch connection weld includes pressure containing welds in branches and fabricated laps.
(3) Longitudinal groove weld includes straight and spiral (helical) seam. Criteria are not intended to apply to welds made in accordance with a standard listed in Table A-1 or
Table 326.1. Alternative Leak Test requires examination of these welds; see para. 345.9.
(4) Fillet weld includes socket and seal welds, and attachment welds for slip-on flanges, branch reinforcement, and supports.
(5) These imperfections are evaluated only for welds ≤ 5 mm ( 3⁄16 in.) in nominal thickness.
(6) Where two limiting values are separated by “and,” the lesser of the values determines acceptance. Where two sets of values are separated by “or,” the larger value is

81
acceptable. T w is the nominal wall thickness of the thinner of two components joined by a butt weld.
(7) For circumferential groove welded joints in pipe, tube, and headers made entirely without the addition of filler metal, external concavity shall not exceed the lesser of 1 mm
(1⁄32 in.) or 10% of the joint nominal thickness. The contour of the concavity shall blend smoothly with the base metal. The total joint thickness, including any reinforcement,
ASME B31.3-2014

shall not be less than the minimum wall thickness, tm.


(8) For groove welds, height is the lesser of the measurements made from the surfaces of the adjacent components; both reinforcement and internal protrusion are permitted in a
weld. For fillet welds, height is measured from the theoretical throat, Fig. 328.5.2A; internal protrusion does not apply.
(9) For welds in aluminum alloy only, internal protrusion shall not exceed the following values:
(a) 1.5 mm ( 1⁄16 in.) for thickness ≤ 2 mm ( 5⁄64 in.)
(b) 2.5 mm ( 3⁄32 in.) for thickness > 2 mm and ≤ 6 mm ( 1⁄4 in.)
For external reinforcement and for greater thicknesses, see the tabulation for symbol L.

Copyright c 2015 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers.


No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.
ASME B31.3-2014

Fig. 341.3.2 Typical Weld Imperfections

82
Copyright c 2015 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.
ASME B31.3-2014

(b) Other Examination of the piping under all conditions of startup, operation,
(1) Not less than 5% of circumferential butt and and shutdown will be accommodated without undue
miter groove welds shall be examined fully by random binding or unanticipated constraint.
radiography in accordance with para. 344.5 or by ran- (b) Other Examination. All circumferential butt and
dom ultrasonic examination in accordance with miter groove welds and all fabricated branch connection
para. 344.6. The welds to be examined in each designated welds comparable to those shown in Fig. 328.5.4E shall
lot shall include the work product of each welder or be examined by 100% radiography in accordance with
welding operator whose welds are part of the lot. They para. 344.5, or (if specified in the engineering design)
shall also be selected to maximize coverage of intersec- by 100% ultrasonic examination in accordance with
tions with longitudinal joints. When a circumferential para. 344.6. Socket welds and branch connection welds
weld with an intersecting longitudinal weld(s) is exam- that are not radiographed shall be examined by magnetic
ined, at least the adjacent 38 mm (11⁄2 in.) of each inter- particle or liquid penetrant methods in accordance with
secting weld shall be examined. In-process examination para. 344.3 or 344.4.
in accordance with para. 344.7 may be substituted for (c) In-process examination in accordance with
all or part of the radiographic or ultrasonic examination para. 344.7, supplemented by appropriate nondestruc-
on a weld-for-weld basis if specified in the engineering tive examination, may be substituted for the examina-
design or specifically authorized by the Inspector. tion required in (b) above on a weld-for-weld basis if
(2) Not less than 5% of all brazed joints shall be specified in the engineering design or specifically
examined by in-process examination in accordance with authorized by the Inspector.
para. 344.7, the joints to be examined being selected to (d) Certification and Records. The requirements of
ensure that the work of each brazer making the produc- para. 341.4.1(c) apply.
tion joints is included.
341.4.4 Examination — Elevated Temperature Fluid (14)
(c) Certifications and Records. The examiner shall be
Service. Piping in Elevated Temperature Fluid Service
assured, by examination of certifications, records, and shall be examined to the extent specified herein or to
other evidence, that the materials and components are of any greater extent specified in the engineering design.
the specified grades and that they have received required Acceptance criteria are as stated in para. 341.3.2 and
heat treatment, examination, and testing. The examiner in Table 341.3.2, for Normal Fluid Service, unless the
shall provide the Inspector with a certification that all requirements for severe cyclic conditions apply or other-
the quality control requirements of the Code and of the wise specified.
engineering design have been carried out. (a) Visual Examination. The requirements of
341.4.2 Examination — Category D Fluid Service. para. 341.4.1(a) apply with the following exceptions:
Piping and piping elements for Category D Fluid Service (1) All fabrication shall be examined.
as designated in the engineering design shall be visually (2) All threaded, bolted, and other joints shall be
examined in accordance with para. 344.2 to the extent examined.
necessary to satisfy the examiner that components, (3) All piping erection shall be examined to verify
materials, and workmanship conform to the require- dimensions and alignment. Supports, guides, and points
ments of this Code and the engineering design. Accept- of cold spring shall be checked to ensure that movement
ance criteria are as stated in para. 341.3.2 and in of the piping under all conditions of startup, operation,
Table 341.3.2, for Category D fluid service, unless other- and shutdown will be accommodated without undue
wise specified. binding or unanticipated constraint.
(b) Additional Examination. The examination require-
341.4.3 Examination — Severe Cyclic Conditions. ments of para. 341.4.1(b) apply with the following
Piping to be used under severe cyclic conditions shall exceptions:
be examined to the extent specified herein or to any (1) Fabrication for longitudinal and spiral (helical
greater extent specified in the engineering design. seam) welds in P-No. 4 and P-No. 5 materials, except
Acceptance criteria are as stated in para. 341.3.2 and in those in components made in accordance with a listed
Table 341.3.2, for severe cyclic conditions, unless other- specification, shall be examined by 100% radiography
wise specified. in accordance with para. 344.5, or by 100% ultrasonic
(a) Visual Examination. The requirements of examination in accordance with para. 344.6.
para. 341.4.1(a) apply with the following exceptions: (2) Socket welds and branch connection welds in
(1) All fabrication shall be examined. P-No. 4 and P-No. 5 materials that are not radiographed
(2) All threaded, bolted, and other joints shall be or ultrasonically examined shall be examined by mag-
examined. netic particle or liquid penetrant methods in accordance
(3) All piping erection shall be examined to verify with para. 344.3 or 344.4.
dimensions and alignment. Supports, guides, and points (c) Additional Examination Required for Autogenous
of cold spring shall be checked to ensure that movement Welds, Without Filler Metal, in Austenitic Stainless Steel

83
Copyright c 2015 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.
ASME B31.3-2014

and Austenitic High Nickel Alloys. Autogenously welded 342.2 Specific Requirement
pipe shall receive nondestructive examination in accor- For in-process examination, the examinations shall be
dance with the material specification. Autogenously performed by personnel other than those performing
welded expansion joint bellows shall be examined in the production work.
accordance with para. X302.2.2(c).
(d) Certification and Records. The requirements of
para. 341.4.1(c) apply. 343 EXAMINATION PROCEDURES
Any examination shall be performed in accordance
341.5 Supplementary Examination
with a written procedure that conforms to one of the
Any of the methods of examination described in methods specified in para. 344, including special meth-
para. 344 may be specified by the engineering design to ods (see para. 344.1.2). Procedures shall be written as
supplement the examination required by para. 341.4. required in the BPV Code, Section V, Article 1, T-150.
The extent of supplementary examination to be per- The employer shall certify records of the examination
formed and any acceptance criteria that differ from those procedures employed, showing dates and results of pro-
in para. 341.3.2 shall be specified in the engineering cedure qualifications, and shall maintain them and make
design. them available to the Inspector.
341.5.1 Spot Radiography
(a) Longitudinal Welds. Spot radiography for longitu- 344 TYPES OF EXAMINATION
dinal groove welds required to have a weld joint factor
Ej of 0.90 requires examination by radiography in accor- 344.1 General
dance with para. 344.5 of at least 300 mm (1 ft) in each 344.1.1 Methods. Except as provided in
30 m (100 ft) of weld for each welder or welding operator. para. 344.1.2, any examination required by this Code,
Acceptance criteria are those stated in Table 341.3.2 for by the engineering design, or by the Inspector shall
radiography under Normal Fluid Service. be performed in accordance with one of the methods
(b) Circumferential Butt Welds and Other Welds. It is specified herein.
recommended that the extent of examination be not less
than one shot on one in each 20 welds for each welder 344.1.2 Special Methods. If a method not specified
or welding operator. Unless otherwise specified, accept- herein is to be used, it and its acceptance criteria shall
ance criteria are as stated in Table 341.3.2 for radiogra- be specified in the engineering design in enough detail
phy under Normal Fluid Service for the type of joint to permit qualification of the necessary procedures and
examined. examiners.
(c) Progressive Sampling for Examination. The provi- 344.1.3 Definitions. The following terms apply to
sions of para. 341.3.4 are applicable. any type of examination:
(d) Welds to Be Examined. The locations of welds and
100% examination: complete examination of all of a speci-
the points at which they are to be examined by spot
fied kind of item in a designated lot of piping1
radiography shall be selected or approved by the
Inspector. random examination:2 complete examination of a per-
centage of a specified kind of item in a designated lot
341.5.2 Hardness Tests. The extent of hardness test- of piping1
ing required shall be in accordance with para. 331.1.7
except as otherwise specified in the engineering design. spot examination:2 a specified partial examination of
each of a specified kind of item in a designated lot of
341.5.3 Examinations to Resolve Uncertainty. Any piping,1 e.g., of part of the length of all shop-fabricated
method may be used to resolve doubtful indications. welds in a lot of jacketed piping
Acceptance criteria shall be those for the required
examination. 1
A designated lot is that quantity of piping to be considered
in applying the requirements for examination in this Code. The
quantity or extent of a designated lot should be established by
342 EXAMINATION PERSONNEL agreement between the contracting parties before the start of work.
More than one kind of designated lot may be established for differ-
(14) 342.1 Personnel Qualification and Certification ent kinds of piping work. See Pipe Fabrication Institute Standard
ES-48, Random Examination, for examples of lot selection.
Personnel performing nondestructive examination to 2
Random or spot examination will not ensure a fabrication prod-
the requirements of this Code shall be qualified and uct of a prescribed quality level throughout. Items not examined
certified for the method to be utilized following a proce- in a lot of piping represented by such examination may contain
defects that further examination could disclose. Specifically, if all
dure as described in BPV Code, Section V, Article 1, radiographically disclosable weld defects must be eliminated from
T-120(e) or (f). a lot of piping, 100% radiographic examination must be specified.

84
Copyright c 2015 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.
ASME B31.3-2014

random spot examination:2 a specified partial examina- (3) four or more relevant rounded indications in a
tion of a percentage of a specified kind of item in a line separated by 1.5 mm (1⁄16 in.) or less, edge to edge
designated lot of piping1
344.4 Liquid Penetrant Examination (14)
344.2 Visual Examination 344.4.1 Method. Examination of castings is covered
344.2.1 Definition. Visual examination is observa- in para. 302.3.3. Liquid penetrant examination of welds
tion of the portion of components, joints, and other pip- and of components other than castings shall be per-
ing elements that are or can be exposed to view before, formed in accordance with BPV Code, Section V,
during, or after manufacture, fabrication, assembly, erec- Article 6.
tion, examination, or testing. This examination includes 344.4.2 Acceptance Criteria. Liquid penetrant indi-
verification of Code and engineering design require- cations are caused by the bleed-out of a visible or fluores-
ments for materials, components, dimensions, joint cent dye from a surface discontinuity in the area under
preparation, alignment, welding, bonding, brazing, bolt- test. However, all such indications are not necessarily
ing, threading, or other joining method, supports, imperfections, since excessive roughness, poor surface
assembly, and erection. preparation, etc., may produce nonrelevant indications.
344.2.2 Method. Visual examination shall be per- Inadvertent evidence of penetrant not related to actual
formed in accordance with the BPV Code, Section V, bleed-out is classified as a false indication. Indications
Article 9. Records of individual visual examinations are shall be verified as being relevant, nonrelevant, or false.
not required, except for those of in-process examination Additional surface preparation and/or other test meth-
as specified in para. 344.7. ods may be used as needed to verify the relevance of
an indication.
(14) 344.3 Magnetic Particle Examination An indication of an imperfection may be larger than
the imperfection that causes it; however, the size of the
344.3.1 Method. Examination of castings is covered indication is the basis for acceptance evaluation. Only
in para. 302.3.3. Magnetic particle examination of welds indications that have any dimension greater than 1.5 mm
and of components other than castings shall be per- (1⁄16 in.) shall be considered relevant.
formed in accordance with BPV Code, Section V, (a) Indications
Article 7. (1) A linear indication is one having a length greater
than three times its width.
344.3.2 Acceptance Criteria. Magnetic particle indi-
cations are caused by the attraction of the test media to (2) A rounded indication is one of circular or ellip-
surface or near-surface discontinuities in the area under tical shape with a length equal to or less than three times
its width.
test. However, all such indications are not necessarily
imperfections, since excessive roughness, magnetic per- (b) Examination. All surfaces to be examined shall be
meability variations, etc., may produce nonrelevant indi- free of
cations. Inadvertent accumulation of particles not (1) relevant linear indications
related to magnetic attraction is classified as a false indi- (2) relevant rounded indications >5.0 mm (3⁄16 in.)
cation. Indications shall be verified as being relevant, (3) four or more relevant rounded indications in a
nonrelevant, or false. Additional surface preparation line separated by 1.5 mm (1⁄16 in.) or less, edge to edge
and/or other test methods may be used as needed to
344.5 Radiographic Examination
verify the relevance of an indication.
An indication of an imperfection may be larger than 344.5.1 Method. Radiography of castings is cov-
the imperfection that causes it; however, the size of the ered in para. 302.3.3. Radiography of welds and of com-
indication is the basis for acceptance evaluation. Only ponents other than castings shall be performed in
indications that have any dimension greater than 1.5 mm accordance with BPV Code, Section V, Article 2.
(1⁄16 in.) shall be considered relevant. 344.5.2 Extent of Radiography
(a) Indications (a) 100% Radiography. This applies only to girth and
(1) A linear indication is one having a length greater miter groove welds and to fabricated branch connection
than three times its width. welds comparable to Fig. 328.5.4E, unless otherwise
(2) A rounded indication is one of circular or ellip- specified in the engineering design.
tical shape with a length equal to or less than three times (b) Random Radiography. This applies only to girth
its width. and miter groove welds.
(b) Examination. All surfaces to be examined shall be (c) Spot Radiography. This requires a single exposure
free of radiograph in accordance with para. 344.5.1 at a point
(1) relevant linear indications within a specified extent of welding. For girth, miter,
(2) relevant rounded indications >5.0 mm (3⁄16 in.) and branch groove welds the minimum requirement is

85
Copyright c 2015 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.
ASME B31.3-2014

(1) for sizes ≤ DN 65 (NPS 21⁄2), a single elliptical (c) fit-up, joint clearance, and internal alignment prior
exposure encompassing the entire weld circumference to joining
(2) for sizes > DN 65, the lesser of 25% of the inside (d) variables specified by the joining procedure,
circumference or 152 mm (6 in.) including filler material
For longitudinal welds the minimum requirement is (1) (for welding) position and electrode
152 mm (6 in.) of weld length. (2) (for brazing) position, flux, brazing tempera-
ture, proper wetting, and capillary action
344.6 Ultrasonic Examination (e) (for welding) condition of the root pass after clean-
ing — external and, where accessible, internal — aided
344.6.1 Method. Examination of castings is covered
by liquid penetrant or magnetic particle examination
in para. 302.3.3; other product forms are not covered.
when specified in the engineering design
Ultrasonic examination of welds shall be performed in
(f) (for welding) slag removal and weld condition
accordance with BPV Code, Section V, Article 4, except
between passes
that the alternative specified in (a) and (b) below is
permitted for basic calibration blocks specified in (g) appearance of the finished joint
T-434.2.1 and T-434.3. 344.7.2 Method. The examination is visual, in
(a) When the basic calibration blocks have not accordance with para. 344.2, unless additional methods
received heat treatment in accordance with T-434.1.5, are specified in the engineering design.
transfer methods shall be used to correlate the responses
from the basic calibration block and the component.
Transfer is accomplished by noting the difference 345 TESTING
between responses received from the same reference 345.1 Required Leak Test
reflector in the basic calibration block and in the compo-
Prior to initial operation, and after completion of the
nent and correcting for the difference.
applicable examinations required by para. 341, each pip-
(b) The reference reflector may be a V-notch (which
ing system shall be tested to ensure tightness. The test
must subsequently be removed), an angle beam search
shall be a hydrostatic leak test in accordance with
unit acting as a reflector, or any other reflector that will
para. 345.4 except as provided herein.
aid in accomplishing the transfer.
(a) At the owner ’s option, a piping system in
(c) When the transfer method is chosen as an alterna-
Category D fluid service may be subjected to an initial
tive, it shall be used, at the minimum
service leak test in accordance with para. 345.7, in lieu
(1) for sizes ≤ DN 50 (NPS 2), once in each 10 of the hydrostatic leak test.
welded joints examined
(b) Where the owner considers a hydrostatic leak test
(2) for sizes > DN 50 and ≤ DN 450 (NPS 18), once impracticable, either a pneumatic test in accordance with
in each 1.5 m (5 ft) of welding examined para. 345.5 or a combined hydrostatic-pneumatic test in
(3) for sizes > DN 450, once for each welded joint accordance with para. 345.6 may be substituted, recog-
examined nizing the hazard of energy stored in compressed gas.
(d) Each type of material and each size and wall thick- (c) Where the owner considers both hydrostatic and
ness shall be considered separately in applying the trans- pneumatic leak testing impracticable, the alternative
fer method. In addition, the transfer method shall be specified in para. 345.9 may be used if both of the follow-
used at least twice on each type of weld joint. ing conditions apply:
(e) The reference level for monitoring discontinuities (1) a hydrostatic test would
shall be modified to reflect the transfer correction when (a) damage linings or internal insulation
the transfer method is used. (b) contaminate a process that would be hazard-
344.6.2 Acceptance Criteria. A linear-type disconti- ous, corrosive, or inoperative in the presence of moisture
nuity is unacceptable if the amplitude of the indication (c) require significant support modifications for
exceeds the reference level and its length exceeds the hydrostatic test load or
(a) 6 mm (1⁄4 in.) for T w ≤ 19 mm (3⁄4 in.) (d) present the danger of brittle fracture due to
/33 for 19 mm < T w ≤ 57 mm (221⁄4 in.)
(b) T w / low metal temperature during the test
(c) 19 mm for T w > 57 mm (2) a pneumatic test would
(a) present an undue hazard of possible release
344.7 In-Process Examination of energy stored in the system or
(b) present the danger of brittle fracture due to
344.7.1 Definition. In-process examination com- low metal temperature during the test
prises examination of the following, as applicable: (d) Unless specified in the engineering design, lines
(a) joint preparation and cleanliness open to the atmosphere, such as vents or drains down-
(b) preheating stream of the last shutoff valve, need not be leak tested.

86
Copyright c 2015 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.