Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 1

Figure 1: Research Paper Rubric

EXPERT PROFICIENT APPRENTICE NOVICE


The paper demonstrates that
The paper demonstrates that
the author fully understands
the author, for the most part, The paper does not
and has applied concepts The paper demonstrates that
INTEGRATION understands and has applied demonstrate that the
learned in the course. the author, to a certain
concepts learned in the author has fully
OF Concepts are integrated into
course. Some of the
extent, understands and has
understood and applied
KNOWLEDGE the writer’s own insights. The applied concepts learned in
conclusions, however, are concepts learned in the
writer provides concluding the course.
not supported in the body of course.
remarks that show analysis
the paper.
and synthesis of ideas.

The topic is focused narrowly


enough for the scope of this The topic is focused but lacks
TOPIC assignment. A thesis direction. The paper is about
The topic is too broad for the The topic is not clearly
statement provides direction a specific topic but the
FOCUS scope of this assignment. defined.
for the paper, either by writer has not established a
statement of a position or position.
hypothesis.
The writer has omitted
pertinent content or content Cursory discussion in all
DEPTH OF In-depth discussion & In-depth discussion &
runs-on excessively. the sections of the paper
elaboration in all sections of elaboration in most sections
DISCUSSION Quotations from others or brief discussion in
the paper. of the paper.
outweigh the writer’s own only a few sections.
ideas excessively.
Does not tie together
Ties together information For the most part, ties Sometimes ties together
information. Paper does
from all sources. Paper flows together information from information from all sources.
not flow and appears to
from one issue to the next all sources. Paper flows with Paper does not flow -
be created from
without the need for only some disjointedness. disjointedness is apparent.
disparate issues.
COHESIVENESS headings. Author's writing Author's writing Author's writing does not
Headings are necessary
demonstrates an demonstrates an demonstrate an
to link concepts. Writing
understanding of the understanding of the understanding of the
does not demonstrate
relationship among material relationship among material relationship among material
understanding any
obtained from all sources. obtained from all sources. obtained from all sources.
relationships

SPELLING & Unacceptable number of


No spelling &/or grammar Minimal spelling &/or Noticeable spelling &
spelling and/or
GRAMMAR mistakes. grammar mistakes. grammar mistakes.
grammar mistakes.

More than 5 current sources,


of which at least 3 are peer-
review journal articles or Fewer than 5 current
scholarly books. Sources sources, or fewer than 2
5 current sources, of which Fewer than 5 current sources,
include both general of 5 are peer-reviewed
at least 2 are peer-review or fewer than 2 of 5 are peer-
background sources and journal articles or
SOURCES specialized sources. Special-
journal articles or scholarly reviewed journal articles or
scholarly books. Not all
books. All web sites utilized scholarly books. All web sites
interest sources and popular web sites utilized are
are authoritative. utilized are credible.
literature are acknowledged credible, and/or sources
as such if they are cited. All are not current.
web sites utilized are
authoritative.
Cites all data obtained from Cites most data obtained Cites some data obtained
other sources. APA citation from other sources. APA from other sources. Citation
CITATIONS style is used in both text and citation style is used in both style is either inconsistent or
Does not cite sources.
bibliography. text and bibliography. incorrect.
Adapted from: Whalen, S. “Rubric from Contemporary Health Issues Research Paper”
http://academics.adelphi.edu/edu/hpe/healthstudies/whalen/HED601_r2.shtml

Вам также может понравиться