Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
I−1
RASMAG/23
Appendix I to the Report
ACTION DESCRIPTION TIME FRAME RESPONSIBLE PARTY STATUS REMARKS
ITEM
Indonesia and Malaysia and the proposed Nicobar
ADS-B station.
22/4 Indonesia would advise AAMA about the 01 December Indonesia AAMA Open Now individual airframes
possibility of access to Indonesian ADS-B data for Closed
height-keeping monitoring.
22/5 ICAO emphasised that projects supporting CNS/SG/21 2020 Bangladesh Open
necessary safety enhancements such as ADS-B
needed to be supported by governments, and that
Bangladesh should report the situation to the
CNS/SG/21 when implementation was complete.
22/6 MAAR would do a safety assessment for the RASMAG/23 MAAR Open
Taibei FIR as it was not covered by the Closed
WPAC/SCS report
22/7 RASMAG/22 agreed that the Asia/Pacific Region Ongoing AAMA MAAR to provide Open
could develop a safety bulletin, in conjunction with a template to MAWG Closed
IATA and IFALPA from the collaborative scrutiny
and the Chair asked that this activity be progressed
by the RASMAG MAWG at its next meeting
22/8 MAWG to discuss the measure used to determine RASMAG/24 MAWG Open
overall Asia/Pacific TLS compliance and make
recommendations to RASMAG/23 (APANPIRG
Conclusion 20/4 − Asia/Pacific Performance
Metrics refers) related to Hot Spots
23/1 Regarding the need for ANSPs to have an input RASMAG/24 ICAO Open
into the performance-based safety oversight
manual for oversight of ANSPs under the terms of
APRAST Conclusion 11/2, ICAO reiterated the
intention for the draft of this manual to be
circulated to RASMAG participants.
23/2 Terms of Reference (TORs) to be considered and RASMAG/24 RASMAG Chair Open
possibly developed for APAC RMAs, taking into
account the possibility of any amalgamation of
I−2
RASMAG/23
Appendix I to the Report
ACTION DESCRIPTION TIME FRAME RESPONSIBLE PARTY STATUS REMARKS
ITEM
RMAs, the future of EMAs and the PBCS
responsibilities detailed in RASMAG/23/W03 para
2.74.
23/3 The United States noted that its programme treated RASMAG/24 USA Open
communications failures without deviation from
flight plan differently from LHDs, and offered to
share information on the programme with China
and other States if requested.
23/4 China, IATA and IFALPA agreed to exchange RASMAG/24 China, IATA and IFALPA Open
information on Guangzhou communication failure
events, to determine if there were any issues other
than pilot response, as only one part of China was
reported as having this problem.
23/5 ICAO volunteered to review and improve the draft 01 October 2018 ICAO, IFALPA, Open
RASMAG Safety Bulletins in order to better RASMAG
address the intended audiences, in coordination
with IFALPA and RASMAG Chair, and RASMAG
participants
23/6 Notwithstanding the reduction in reported LHDs 30 July 2018 China Open
between the Lahore and Urumqui FIRs near
position PURPA, ICAO requested China to provide
more information on the progress of
communications and surveillance upgrades to
support these operations to the ATM/SG/6.
23/7 IFALPA requested more information about the 30 July 2018 RMAs Open
Category A and B LHDs, which the RMAs agreed
to share
23/8 Issues identified at the RASMAG/23 side meeting RASMAG/24 MAWG Open
and FL01 to be further discussed at the next
MAWG meeting, and the taxonomy amended as
appropriate
I−3
RASMAG/23
Appendix I to the Report
I−4