Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Diana Ioana Alexan, anul II, Universitatea de Vest Timişoara, Facultatea de Chimie,
Biologie, Geografie, specializarea Biologie
Abstract
The plants are surrounded, in any environment, by biotic and abiotic stressors. In order to
protect themselves from the attack of herbivorous, fungal or bacterial infections, they
synthesize secondary metabolites. The secondary metabolites may be terpenes, phenolic
compounds or compounds containing N and S derived directly from amino acids. The
content of this review about defensive byproducts aims to classify and explain the role and
mechanism of their operation.
Introducere
In any ecosystem, plants are exposed to stress and damage caused by biotic and abiotic
environmental factors. Pests such as viruses, bacteria, fungi or consumers, grazing insects and
mammals are the main cause of the decline in the success rate of plant cultures. To protect these
factors, plants synthesize secondary metabolites. In superior plants, secondary metabolites are the
synthesized substances from the primary metabolites (carbohydrates, lipids and amino acids)
(Ramakrishna & Gokare, 2011). These protective substances are: terpenes, phenolic compounds,
alkaloids, sterols, nitrogen and sulfur compounds.
Most commonly, a variety of stress factors attack the plant simultaneously, so secondary
metabolites are not specifically produced against a particular pathogen, but depending on the need
to resist more hazards. Thus, in addition to the defense component with these metabolites, plants
use the formation of barriers to polymers against pathogens or the synthesis of enzymes capable of
degrading the cell wall of pathogens (Hammond et al., 1996). After eliminating a first infection,
plants often acquire immunity to support subsequent microbial attacks (Putnam & Heisey, 1983,
Putnam & Tang, 1986).
Natural plant products protect them against predators and pathogens, against abiotic stress
(UV rays, temperature variations, alkalinity or acidity of the soil, salinity), but also facilitate
communication processes with other plants. Secondary metabolites also contribute to the formation
of plant characteristics such as taste, odor, or specific color (Ravishankar & Venkataram, 1990). On
the other hand, they are unusable for growth and development. Moreover, it is known that the
synthesis of secondary metabolites is very expensive, reducing the growth and propagation
capacity, or that their toxins could affect the plant that produces them and the environment
(Gershenzon, 1994). One way to lower energy costs would be for biosynthesis of defensive
substances to be initiated after pathogens or consumers attack. The risk of this strategy is that the
attack may be too rapid or its effects too devastating in order for the plant to be able to defend itself
in an induced manner.
Compounds that have a negative effect on the development, multiplication or survival of
other foreign organisms have all the status of toxins, playing a role in defense mechanisms
(Gershenzon & Wittstock, 2002). These may be secondary metabolites that are constitutive
substances, called phytoanticipins, or induced, newly formed as an immune response, called
phytoalexins. Phytoanticipins are considered the first barrier to pathogens, phytoalexins being
subsequently synthesized, a process that may take several days after initiation of the attack
(Grayer & Harborne, 1994).
This article describes the types of secondary metabolites and their role in defending
mechanisms against biotic and abiotic environmental factors. Metabolites can be divided into
various groups, depending on their chemical composition, defensive action, or storage site at the
level of the plant organisms. The chemical composition classifies them in 3 major classes: products
containing terpenes, containing phenols and those containing nitrogen and sulfur.
Terpenes
It is the largest class of secondary defense compounds and acts against the attack of insect
and mammalian herbivores, representing toxins for them. These compounds are composed of 5-C
isopentanoic units, their biosynthesis being made from acetyl-coA and glycolic intermediates
(Gerhenzon et al., 1991, Grayson, 1998, Fraga 1988, Croteas 1988, Loomis and Croteas 1980,
Robinson 1980). Terpenes are divided into 5 subclasses:
1.1. Monoterpenes (C10) are toxic agents for insects. Monoterpene esters, called
pyrethroids, are located in the leaves and flowers of some species of the genus
Chrysanthemum. They have neurotoxin action on wasps, moths or beetles and are
used in commercialised insecticides because of their minimal negative effect on the
environment and mammals (Turlings et al., 1995). Monoterpenes are also present in
coniferous species (fir, pine) accumulated in needles and trunks resin channels. In
these gymnosperms, the terpenes are in the form of: limonene, myrecen, α and β-
pinene (Turlings et al., 1995).
1.2. Sesquiterpenes (C15) are cyclic esters that protect plants of various
pathogens, insects and herbivores (Picman, 1986). A complex of 4 sesquiterpene
phytoalexins was identified in a cotton plant resistant to a Verticillium dahliae
infection (Garas & Waiss, 1986).
2. Phenolic compounds
Phenols are derived from the synthesis of shikimic acid and aromatic amino acids. It is
known that the production of phenolic compounds with a role in plant defense is closely correlated
and directly proportional to the amount of light to which plant organisms are exposed (Chalker &
Fnchgami, 1989). Also, the amount of ozone in the atmosphere supports their biosynthesis
(Saviranta et al., 2010).
2.1. Coumarins are simple phenolic compounds, acting against herbivores and
fungi. Derived from shikimic acid (Murray et al., 1982), they are highly active and have high
antimicrobial potency, protecting plants from bacteria and fungi (Brooker et al., 2008). Their
halogenated derivatives are used in the exploration of new compounds with antifungal
activity due to pesticidal behavior. Thus, simple 7-hydroxy coumarins have defensive action
against the Orobanche cernua parasite, inhibiting its germination and stopping its vascular
communication at the root of the host (Serghini et al., 2001).
2.2. Furano-coumarins are spread within the Umbelliferae family (carve, celery,
etc.) and are not toxins. These substances are activated by the ultraviolet rays of Type A,
penetrate inside the DNA molecule of the pathogens, blocking the transcription process and
ultimately killing the cells (Rice, 1987).
2.4. Flavonoids are phenolic derivatives that do not play the role of toxins, but
support the plant by performing pigmentation and defenses against harmful B-rays.
Blavones and flavonols accumulate in the epidermis, thus absorbing the visible and
uninterrupted wavelengths of UV-B rays (Lake et al., 1983).
2.5. Isoflavonoids are derived from naringerin, an intermediate of flavonol.
Biosynthesis and their presence in leguminous plants has the role of helping to form the
nitrogen fixation nodules at the root level, made by symbiosis with Rhizobium bacterial
genus (Sreevidya et al., 2006).
2.6. Tannins are phenolic, toxic polymers that have rejecting effects for many
herbivores. Because of the ability of these metabolites to bind proteins, they come in
contact with those in saliva for animal users, and provide an unpleasant, pungent and
astringent sensation at the level of their mouth. Thus grazing livestock such as cattle, sheep
or goats avoids plants with high content of tannins (Oates et al., 1980).
Amino acid derivatives are known for their antimicrobial action. This class includes:
3.4. Defensins, thionins and lectins are plant proteins. These do not have the role
of organic sulfur accumulation, just like the above-mentioned metabolites, but act as
inhibitors for a wide range of mushrooms. (Thomma et al., 2002). Defenses have both an
antifungal and antibacterial role. Tionins are responsible for the action against infections, as
observed by Kang and Buchenauer by their accumulation in the cell wall of the wheat
pepper cells infected with Fusarium culmorum. Lectins are proteins that bind to certain
carbohydrates. Their defensive action occurs after ingestion when it blocks the absorption of
nutrients in the digestive system of the consumers (Peumansend Van Damme, 1995).
4. Metabolites containing nitrogen
These metabolites are derived from common amino acids and act as toxins. They
belong to this class: alkaloids, cyanogenic glucosides and non-protein amino acids.
4.1. Alkaloids are spread 20% in vascular plants, especially in herbaceous dicots,
being less common in gynosperm and monocotyledons (Hegnauer et al., 1988). These
secondary metabolites are synthesized from aspartic acid, lysine, tyrosine and tryptophan,
all of which are natural amino acids (Pearce et al., 1991). Alcaloids cause most deaths
among mammals, because the ingestion of plants containing them, such as the Lupinus and
Delphinium genus, has extremely toxic effects (Keeler, 1975). They either interfere with
consumer neurotransmitters or affect vital functions such as protein synthesis or membrane
transport (Creelman & Mullet, 1997).
4.2. Cioanogenic glycosides release hydrogen cyanide (HCN) and H2S, poisonous
volatile substances, when the plants containing them are crushed. They are common
among families Gramineae, Rosaceae and Fabaceae (Seigler, 1991). Examples of such
substances are: amigdaline present in apricot, peach, cherry and durine seeds of Sorghum
bicolor. Black bean (Phaseolus lunatus) is known to be a model plant in the production of
secondary metabolites due to the impressive cianogenicity capacity it has (Ballhom et al.,
2009).
4.3. Non-protein amino acids are either incorporated into proteins, or exist as
defensive products in free form (Johnson et al., 1989). Once ingested, it binds to existing
proteins in the herbivore system, leading to the formation of non-functional proteins (eg.
canavanine binds to arginine).
Conclusion
This paper describes the mechanisms of plant defense against pathogens, consumers and
abiotic factors, based on the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites.
Although this synthesis consumes a lot of the plant's resources, it is extremely useful,
chemically protecting plants from natural hazards, improving some functions, thus contributing to
their longevity.
Bibliography:
Ballhorn DJ, Kautz S, Heil M, Hegeman AD, 2009. Cyanogenesis of wild lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus L.) is an
efficient direct defence in nature. Plant Signaling and Behavior, 4(8): 735-745.
Bennett RN, Wallsgrove RM. Secondary metabolites in plant defence mechanisms. New Phytol 1994;
127:617-33.
Chalker-Scott L, Fnchigami LH. The role of phenolic compounds in plant stress responses. In: Paul HL, Ed.
Low temperature stress physiology in crops. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press Inc. 1989:40.
Creelman RA, Mullet JE, 1997. Biosynthesis and action of jasmonates in plants. Annual Review of Plant
Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology, 48: 355-381.
Eisner T, Meinwald J, 1995. Chemical ecology: The chemistry of biotic interaction. Eds, National Academy
Press, Washington, DC.
Garas NA, Waiss AC. 1986. Differential accumulation of antifungal sesquiterpenoids in cotton stems
inocutated witb Vertidtlium dahliae. Phytopathology 76: 1(311-1017).
Gershenzon J: Metabolic costs of terpenoid accumulation in higher plants. J Chem Ecol 1994, 20:1281-1328
Gershenzon J, Croteau R, 1991. Terpenoids. In Herbivores their interaction with secondary plant
metabolites, Vol I: The chemical participants, 2nd ed., G.A. Rosenthal and M.R. Berenbaum, eds, Academic
press, San Diego, pp: 165-219.
Grayer RJ, Harborne JB, 1994. A survey of antifungal compounds from higher plants 1982– 1993.
Phytochemistry, 37: 19-42.
Gross D, Porzel A, Schmidt J, 1994. Phytoalexine mit Indolstruktur aus Kohlrabi [Phytoalexins with indole
structure from Kohlrabi]. Zeitschrift fur Naturforschung, 49(5–6): 281–285.
Hammond-Kosack KE, Jones JDG, 1996. Resistance gene dependent plant defence responses. Plant Cell, 8:
1773-1791.
Hegnauer R, 1988. Biochemistry, distribution and taxonomic relevance of higher plant alkaloids.
Phytochemistry, 27: 2423-2427.
Jagendorf AT, 1967. Acid base transition and photophosphorylation by chloroplast. Federation Proceedings,
26: 1361-1369.
Johnson R, Narvaez J, An G, Ryan C, 1989. Expression of proteinase inhibitors I and II in transgenic tobacco
plants: Effects on natural defence against Manduca Sexta larvae. Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences of the USA, 86: 9871-9875.
Kang SY, Kim YC, 2007. Decursinol and decursin protect primary cultured rat cortical cells from glutamate-
induced neurotoxicity. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 59(6): 863-870.
Keeler RF, 1975. Toxins and teratogens of higher plants. Lloydia, 38: 56-86.
Klein RM, 1987. The green world: An introduction to plants and people. New York: Harper and Row.
Lake JA, Field KJ, Davey MP, Beerling DJ, Lomax BH, 2009. Metabolomic and physiological responses reveal
multi-phasic acclimation of Arabidopsis thaliana to chronic UV radiation. Plant, cell & envirnment, 32(10):
1377-1389.
Lewis NG, Yamamoto E, 1990. Lignin: Occurrence, biogenesis and biodegradation. Annual Review of Plant
Physiolgy and Plant Molecular Biology, 41: 455-496.
Mithen R, 1992. Leaf glucosinolate profiles and their relationship to pest and disease resistance in oilseed
rape. Euphytica, 63: 71–83.
Mordue AJ, Blackwell A, 1993. Azadirachtin: an update. Journal of Insect Physiology, 39: 903-924.
Murray RDH, Mendez J, Brown SA, 1982. The natural coumarins, Wiley, New York.
Oates JF, Waterman PG, Choo GM, 1980. Food selection by the south Indian leaf-monkey, Presbytis johnii,
in relation to leaf chemistry. Oecologia, 45: 45-56.
Pearce G, Strydom D, Johnson S, Ryan CA, 1991. A polypeptide from tomato leaves induces wound inducible
protienase inhibitor proteins. Science, 253: 895-898.
Peumans WJ, Van Damme EJM, 1995. Lectins as plant defence proteins. Plant Physiology, 109: 347- 342.
Picman AK, 1986. Biological activities of sesquiterpene lactones. Biochemical systematics and Ecology, 14:
255-281.
Putnam AR, Heisey RM, 1983. Allelopathy chemical interaction between plants. What’s New in Plant
Physiology, 14: 21-24.
Putnam AR, Tang CS, 1986. The science of allelopathy, Wiley New York.
Ravishankar GA, Venkataraman LV. Food applications of plant cell cultures. Curr Sci 1990; 57:381-3
Rice EL, 1984. Allelopathy, second edition. Academic Press, New York.
Savirnata NM, Jukunen-Titto R, Oksanen E, karjalainen RO, 2010. Leaf phenolic compounds in red clover
(Trfolium Pratense L.) induced by exposure to moderately elevated ozone. Environmental Pollution, 158(2):
440-446.
Seigler DS, 1981. Secondery metabolites and plant systematic. Conn EE (ed), The biochemistry of plants, Vol
7. Secondery plant products. Plenum, New York and London, pp: 139-176.
Serghini K, Perez De Lugue A, Castejon MM, Garcia TL, Jorrin JV, 2001. Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.)
response to broomraoe (Orobanche cernua loefl.) parasitism: induced synthesis and excretion of 7-
hydroxylated simple coumarins. Journal of Experimental Botany, 52: 227-234.
Sreevidya VS, Srinivasa RC, Rao C, Sullia SB, Ladha JK, Reddy PM, 2006. Metabolic engineering of rice with
soyabean isoflavone synthase for promoting nodulation gene expression in rhizobia. Journal of
Experimental Botany, 57(9): 1957-1969.
Thomma BPHJ, Cammue BPA, Thevissen K, 2002. Plant defenses. Planta, 216(2): 193–202.
Turlings TCJ, Loughrin JH, Mccall PJ, Roese USR, Lewis WJ, Tumlinson JH, 1995. How caterpillardamaged
plants protect themselves by attracting parasitic wasps. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences of
the USA, 92: 4169-4174.
Van Etten HD, Mansfield JW, Bailey JA, Farmer EE, 1994. Two classes of plant antibiotics: Phytoalexins
versus “phytoanticipins”. Plant Cell, 6: 1191-1192.
Ramakrishna Akula & Gokare Aswathanarayana Ravishankar (2011) Influence of abiotic stress signals on
secondary metabolites in plants, Plant Signaling & Behavior, 6:11, 1720-1731
Ute Wittstock and Jonathan Gershenzon. 2002. Constitutive plant toxins and their role in defense against
herbivores and pathogens. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 2002, 5: 1369-1386.