Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Bidit Rawal
Introduction
The debate on leadership and management has persisted for decades. As the changes take
place in business environment, the idea of leadership versus management becomes prominent. In
this contemporary era, comparing leadership and management is a challenging task to do as both
the phenomena goes side by side in an organization. This concept has been aptly conveyed by an
American educator through his statement “Management is efficiency in climbing the ladder of
success, leadership determines whether the ladder is leaning against the right wall” (Covey.
2015, p. 109). It is now accepted fact that a business will not survive if it is operated by leaders
or managers alone.
In addition, the 21st century is the age of evolution and innovation where the environment
is dynamic and competitors are ruthless than ever. The social environment is changing rapidly
along with the outburst of economic and technical change. Due to this reason, challenges and
should be managed with a new attitude towards the manager’s work. A modern manager must be
a leader who is able to empathize with their employees and direct them to collaborate and work
in a team. A famous French diplomat, Charles Maurice de Talleyrand explicitly said that, “I am
more afraid of an army of 100 sheep led by a lion than an army of 100 lions led by a sheep” (as
cited in Robbins, Judge & Vohra, 2012, p. 361). Thus, in response to this changing environment,
it is the contemporary need of a manager to possess lion like characteristics such as being
Understanding leadership
Firstly, it must be acknowledged that leadership is one of the four major functions of
management. Leadership is a complex, multidimensional phenomena which has been defined as:
specifically, leadership is understood as an act of aligning people to the vision which includes
buy-in and communication, motivation and inspiration. However, leadership has not yet received
the importance that it should get. Burns (1978) supports this by remarking that “Leadership is
one of the most observed and least understood phenomena on the earth” (p. 2).To further
have been developed to define the concept of leadership yet they are still in search for the apt
answer to explain key question: What makes an effective leader? In comparison, traditional
approaches of leadership were considered narrower in perspectives. The trait and behavior theory
separated leaders from non-leaders. But in certainty, classical approach failed to present
substantial evidence of a leader’s particular trait or behavior that contributed to the emergence of
Adding on to the traditional theories, due to the complexities arising from business
environmental changes, there has been intensive research conducted on this subject addressing
leadership from a variety of perspectives. For instance, the Leader–Member Exchange (LMX)
theory conceptualizes leadership as a process of interaction between leader and follower and
centers on the dyadic exchange relationships between both (Winkler, 2010, p. 47). Likewise,
learning which contains reciprocal interaction between behavior and its controlling environment
(Winkler, 2010, p. 85-91). Thus, there are mainly two approaches; one who can articulate what is
needed and one who sets examples by getting into complex situation and ultimately inspiring
Management and leadership terms have been used differently by different people. Some
believe it to be used interchangeably while others view them as two completely different words.
However, the majority appreciate some similarities and differences between them. The word
management itself is connected with the history of mankind. If we look back at our history it
shows that management has been practiced for centuries. For instance, from the time of
Sumerians in the early 3000 B.C to Venetians in 500 A.D, essence of management has been used
for book keeping, governance, organizing, communication and control (George Jr. 1972). Thus,
we cannot ignore the fact that the existence of management in the human history is long in
comparison to leadership.
one hand, management is the allocation of scarce resources to achieve organization’s objective,
the setting of priorities, the design of work and the achievement of results (as cited in Covey,
2015, p. 363). Leadership, on the other hand, focuses on the creation of a common vision. It is all
about motivating people to contribute to the vision and encouraging them to align their self-
interest with that of the organization (Weathersby, 1999, p. 5).Moving on, some important
differences that set leaders apart from managers are shown in the table (Arruda, 2016).
Leadership over Management 5
Leaders Managers
Coach Direct
Keeping in mind all these differences, the environment in which the organization
operates also plays an important role in aiding to strike a balance between the need for
economy with massive technological transformation, leadership and management both are
essential. The task is not just to manage people but to lead the people towards the right direction.
The traditional manager’s functions like planning, organizing and controlling to manage back
office jobs is essential, but at the same time, strong leadership is needed to cope with the above-
mentioned changes. To have a better understanding, let us consider some examples pointed by
The concept of business blogging was once new in the business world. No one was ready
to take the initiative. IBM, a multinational technology company took the initiative and
encouraged their 320,000 employees to start writing company blogs. IBM’s leader’s drafted a
corporate blogging policy that encouraged employees to be themselves, speak in the first person
and respect their coworkers. As a result, their company blogs are now some of the most trusted
technology blogs that generates tons of page views and links back to IBM. Instead of fearing the
new technology, IBM embraced and embarked it, making their customers and employees very
happy. Cass (2007) stated “ IBM blog has been successful in terms of thought leadership,
building a community, and getting information out to audience quickly, thus IBM has a sales of
Starbucks tragedy
Starbucks, an American coffee company is known for its outstanding treatment towards
their employees. In 1997, tragedy struck in one of the Starbucks outlet situated in Washington
D.C as three of their employees were killed in a bungled robbery. Instead of issuing a press
release or calling a legal counsel, CEO Howard Schultz flew straight to D.C. and spent the entire
week with the employees and their families in the area. Schultz's empathy, compassion and
Every organization can survive catastrophe if its people are honest, open and accept
responsibility. At that time, what Starbuck’s CEO did was simple, he was a human being
first and his heart went out to all the people affected. When you follow the principles of
personal leadership, you open yourself up and you can deal with anything. That’s what
leaders do. They influence, inspire and lead and set an example to the world.
Costco, one of the strong rivals of Wal-mart in the retail industry is run by a man known
for his influential leadership traits, CEO Jim Sinegal. In an age where CEOs are paid in millions,
Sinegal pays himself a yearly salary of $35000. While other CEOs are spending thousands of
dollars just decorating their offices, Sinegal’s plain office at the company headquarters did not
even have walls. He states that he should not be paid more than 12 employees working on the
floor. He frequently visits a dozen Costco stores a day and states, “no staff in any business feels
very good if the boss is not interested enough to come and see them” (Goldberg & Ritter, 2006).
Leadership over Management 8
With such strong humility and honest relationships, his employees are highly motivated at work.
As a result, Costco’s employee turnover rate is the lowest in the retail industry, over five
times less than its rival Wal-mart (Stansberry, 2010). Costco’s stock price has doubled over the
past five years and revenue continues to grow at an impressive rate. Today, Costco is one of the
All the above examples show how a strong and influential leadership can bring fruitful
changes in an organization. Like those CEOs, leaders are the one who drive organization towards
success by influencing others. They have strong visions, goals and a unique style of approaching
problems and uncertainties. Considering all the complexities and competitiveness in today’s
world, managers need to renew their traditional attitudes, managerial skills, behaviors and should
possess strong leadership traits to cope with the inevitable changes in the business environment.
In short, being a leader and a manager are two different things, but it is for sure that where there
is management, there is leadership. Henceforth, in this contemporary era where social, economic
and technological factors are changing, the faces of leadership and management should also
change.
Conclusion
Good leadership is essential to businesses as they transform potential into reality. It has
been said that without leadership, all other business elements lie dormant. Leadership acts as a
catalyst that makes all other elements work together. However, in a time of technological driven
well. Whether it related to a start-up or a multinational company with many subsidiaries, one
Leadership over Management 9
needs to possess leadership qualities along with appropriate managerial competences for true
effectiveness. On one hand, leadership creates a road map to a common vision through
motivating and inspiring employees. On the other, management allocates the limited resources,
sets up the priorities and designs the work to reach the common vision set by the leaders
(Weathersby 1999, p.5).Therefore, to sum it up; contemporary organizations need a perfect blend
of both leadership and management to deal with the complexities and uncertainties that the ever-
References
Algahtani, A. (2014). Are Leadership and Management Different? Management Policies and
http://www.successfulmeetings.com/strategy/meeting-strategies/leadership-vs--
management/
Arruda, W. (2016). 9 differences between a leader and manager. Retrieved September 6, 2017,
from https://www.forbes.com/sites/williamarruda/2016/11/15/9-differences-between-
being-a-leader-and-a-manager/#5e64f9bb4609
Behar, H. (2008). Java and Sympathy – a former Starbucks president tells how to succeed. A
http://incharacter.org/archives/compassion java-and-sympathy-a-former-starbucks-
president-tells-how-to-succeed-in-business-without-putting-peop/
2017
from:https://books.google.com.np/books?hl=en&lr=&id=gP5uJlefgMgC&oi=fnd&pg=
PA209&dq=contemporary+leadership+theories&ots=xHwYh0Zadv&sig=plNx1sINwL
p4EhuIiMnhGaMJh4&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=contemporary%20leadership%20the
ories&f=false
Burns, J.M. (1978). Leadership. New York, NY: Harper & Row
Cass, J. (2007). Strategies and Tools for Corporate Blogging. New York. Routledge Taylor &
Francis Group.
Leadership over Management 11
Covey, S. (2015). The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People (1st ed.). New York. Mango Media
Inc.
George Jr, C. S. (1972). The history of management thought. (2nd ed). Upper Saddle River, NJ:
Prentice Hall:
Robbins, S., Judge, T., & Vohra, N. (2012). Organizational Behavior (14th ed.). New Delhi.
Dorling Kindersley.
articles/10- examples-of-tremendous-business-leadership-1/
Weathersby, G. B., 1999. Managmeent vs. Leadership. Management Review [online]. Retrived
31bdee40c04/1?pq-origsite=gscholar