PT.

ADIMITRA ENERGI HIDRO

PROGRESS MEETING
REVIEW ON DED - SUMBER JAYA MHPP
WEST LAMPUNG REGENCY

PT. INDOKOEI INTERNATIONAL

Engineering and Management Consultant JUNE 2019
 1. Site
Condition, 2. Hydrological Review
Topography and Energy
and Geological Production
Survey

5.Conclusion and
4. Cost Estimate Recommendation
3.Civil Structure
1. Site Condition, Topography,
and Geological Review
PROJECT LOCATION
TOPOGRAPHY CONDITION
GENERAL GEOLOGY
Weir Power House

Option-B (Long waterway)

WEIR_FS

Option-A (Short waterway)

Source: The Geology of the Kota Agung Quadrangle, 1994

Source: The Consultant

- There are two (2) units Geological Formation in the area between the intake weir and the powerhouse, such as Young Quaternary Volcanics
(Qhv, Quaternary deposits/volcanic layers) and Alluvium (Qa, Surficial deposits) are found at the field.
- The bedrock of the site seems to be laid on the Young Quaternary Volcanics Unit (Qhv). This Formation consist of Andesitic to basaltic breccia,
lavas, and tuff; source G.Sekincau (Qhvs), Pleistocene to Holocene in age
- The general morphology of the site is located in slightly steep to steep slope hills morphological unit with a various slope around 8°-35°.
- No indication of Fault activity was found at the site
GEOLOGY PROFILE
 The bedrock types along Wai Besai river seems to be laid on
Andesitic breccia.
 Andesitic breccia is gray in color, fragmental structure, sub-
Tuff in highly Andesitic breccia in slightly
angular-angular fragments, poorly sorted, contain of
weathered condition weathered condition andesite fragments sized 2-25 cm within medium-fine grain
matrix.
 Typical CM-CH class (moderately-slightly weathered),
relatively solid rock with estimated UCS 12.5-50 Mpa)
 In view of stability, the Andesitic breccia is seemed to be
enough stable for structures foundation
Tuff in highly weathered Andesitic breccia in slightly
condition weathered condition
Source: The Consultant
Photograph Outcrop of Tuff and Andesitic breccia

Andesite
boulder
Residual soil Colluvium deposit

Terrace
Tuff layer deposit

Residual soil

Andesitic breccia

Source: The Consultant

Figure. Schematic Geological Section at Sumber Jaya MHPP site Typical CM-CH class, with interval joint 50-500 mm
GEOLOGY SECTION OF PROPOSED WEIR-FS
BH-1 (left bank)
Left Bank Right
Weir of FS
Bank
Downstream

BH-2 (right bank)

Note : Coordinate of BH-1 & BH-2 are collected when field observation (by local people
Source: The Consultant information)
Photograph. Proposed Weir site of FS, view from upstream
Figure 3 Bor hole location of BH-1 and BH-2

The potential bearing layer at Weir of FS:

 BH-1 ; at depth of 6.50-20.00m, N-
Values of 50 blows/7cm until 50
blows/12cm, moderately soft rock.
 BH-2 ; at depth of 10.00 – 20.00m, N-
Values of 50 blows/7cm until 50
blows/30cm, moderately soft rock.
 Additional Core boring investigation &
laboratory test will be highly required
at the New proposed weir site (option
A & option B)
GROUND CONDITION OF TUNNEL
Outlet Tunnel 2, Silty-Clayey Soil
(±1.5m)

Figure.Waterway alignment
Inlet Tunnel 2, Silty-Clayey Soil
(±1.5m)
Source: The Consultant
Inlet Tunnel 1, Silty-Clayey Soil Outlet Tunnel 1, Silty-Clayey
(±1.5m) Soil (±1.5m)

Andesite boulders (size > 0.3-2.5m).

The ground lithology can be categorized as a soft

ground condition.
Photograph. Lithology condition of inlet and outlet tunnel
SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION AT TUNNEL
• To provide tunnel geological profile, subsurface
investigation by borings including core recovery and RQD,
in situ testing, geophysical investigations, and laboratory
material testing should be performed along the tunnel
alignment.
• Geophysical investigation by Seismic refraction/Geo-
electric could be performed along the tunnel alignment
(between inlet and outlet)
• Groundwater level should be measured in each boreholes
Tributary
at the tunnel alignment
Silty-Clayey soil;
thickness ±1.5m

Unidentified lithology & ground water condition

?
?
Seismic Refraction Survey/Geo-electric
Soft Ground Classification
Anticipated ground behavior in soft ground tunnels was first defined by Terzaghi (1950) and divided into :
- Cohesive Soils and Silty Sand Above Water Table
- Cohesionless Granular Soils including Silty Sand Below the Water Table

Following Peck’s (1969) lead for cohesive (clay) materials or

materials with sufficient cohesion or cementation to sample and test
for unconfined compression strength, an estimate of ground
behavior in tunneling can be obtained from the equation:

Where Ncrit is the stability factor, Pz is the overburden pressure to

the tunnel centerline, Pa is the equivalent uniform interior pressure
applied to the face (as by breasting or compressed air), and Su is the
undrained shear strength (defined for this purpose as one-half of the
unconfined compressive strength).
2. Hydrological Review
and Energy Production
HYDROLOGY REVIEW
HYDROLOGY REVIEW