Is there any mention of Moses in Ancient Egypt hieroglyphics?

Joseph Holleman, CEO of Magister Technologies Inc., Author of "The Prosperity Clock"
book series.
Updated Jul 7

If you are asking if there is any glaring indication of the patriarch Moses in Egyptian
hieroglyphics then no, there is not.

In the Egyptian language, the name “Moses” simply means “born of”. In modern day
terms you might even equate it to the “X” that Malcolm X used to denote the fact that
because of his heritage as a slave that he had no idea what his true last name should be.
In short, the very name “Moses” is an act of rebellion.

But the problem with most of ancient history is that it is a ragged patchwork quilt of
information where there are seldom any clear answers. You are never going to find
anything that clearly states “MOSES WAS HERE”… “HERE IS WHERE THE EXODUS
OF THE UNGRATEFUL ISRAELITES OCCURRED WHEN THEY TOTALLY
DESTROYED EGYPT”. All too often all we have to work with are fragments that we have
to piece together like detectives to uncover what actually happened, and even then there
can rarely be 100% certainty.

Archaeologist Rolf Krauss theorized decades ago that Moses was actually one and the
same with the short tenured Egyptian King, Amenmesse.
Amenmesse - Wikipedia, ang malayang ensiklopedya

Based on my own research this makes a lot of sense because Amenmesse lived during the
period between 1228 and 1188 B.C. when the Exodus that is described in the Bible most
likely occurred (the third phase of the larger event) when you do a thorough step by step
account of all the historical events that we DO know occurred for a fact in the ancient
world.

Like I said, it is a detective story.

And there are plenty of hieroglyphics describing Amenmesse, although serious attempts
were made to remove those references because Amenmesse was considered a traitor.
Amenmesse’s name means “born of Amun”. Take away the reference to Amun, which you
would expect someone to do if they discovered they were not really Egyptian and
subsequently led a revolt against the powers that be, and you have the name “Messe” or
“Moses”. In fact the story told by Josephus from the Egyptian historian Manetho
regarding “The Revolt of Osarseph” is very likely a retelling of the revolt that Amenmesse
led in Egypt against his half brother Seti II.

Now if Amenmesse was the real Moses and the Exodus actually happened what would we
expect to see afterwards in Egypt to explain why they may not have wanted to record
anything about it?

Well, shortly after 1208 B.C., the precise time period in which I have theorized that the
Exodus occurred (there is even a total solar eclipse over Egypt at the time, likely related
to the “plague of darkness”, marking the time), Egypt was ruled by a very young, crippled
King named Siptah (also known as Ramesses). He soon died and was replaced by the
widow of Seti II, Twosret, but she did not last long either. And then Egypt experienced a
period of chaos where there was no King at all and they were subject to invasion by
enemies outside their borders. The whole country nearly fell apart until Setnakhte, the
father of Ramesses III, emerged to drive the invaders out and restore order to Egypt.

For a young and weak King like Siptah to have decided to memorialize such an
ignominious defeat, by a traitor to the Kingdom no less, allowing people considered
second class citizens to just waltz out of Egypt, and that in the course of these events a
significant portion of their armed forces had been wiped out, would have been
tantamount to posting a sign saying “INVADE ME!” In fact, that DID happen after Siptah
and Twosret died but neither wanted to extend what would have been an open invitation
to their enemies by advertising their weakness.

Now there is more I could point out but I have covered all of this multiple times in
previous answers I have given on this subject.

Suffice it to say, that in my humble opinion, there is indeed evidence , at least

circumstantial evidence, of the existence of Moses and that the Exodus did indeed occur
if you just take the time to examine the historical context with the right timeline.