Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
3. Theories of the cognitive mechanisms and processes involved in belief formation and
decision making, which vary in their reliability or their association with proficient
performance in a domain (adapted from Simon, 1997; Gigerenzer & Selten, 2001;
Ericsson & Smith, 1991; Klein et al., 1993; Payne, Bettman, & Johnson, 1993).
Critical thinking has a multi-layered structure . The three aspects of the theory form a
spectrum from internal ratinality or coherence (mental model theory) to intersubjective
dialogue to correspondence with external reality (reliability). The concept of critical
thinking as internal or external dialogue forms the crucial brdige.
A model of critical thinking with three embedded layers: mental models, critical dialogue,
and control based on reliability.
All three of these aspects involve both empirical and normative elements. In particular,
each of the three layers is associated with distinctive criteria of performance, which
progress from internal to external in their focus:
2. At the intermediate level, mental models are embedded within a layer of critical
questioning which motivates the generation and evaluation of possibilities. Critical
questioning may take place within a single mind among different individuals, but is
evaluated by reference to norms for conducting the appropriate kinds of critical dialogue.
Dialogue types are differentiated by the purposes they serve, by the types of challenges
that are permitted to the opponent, and the scope of the permitted responses by the
proponent. At this level of analysis, errors occur when cognizers fail to ask or answer
questions associated with the appropriate argumentation scheme, use argumentation
schemes that obstruct the purpose of the dialogue, or inappropriately shift from one
dialogue type to another (Walton, 1998).
3. At the outermost layer, critical thinking is a judgment about the reliability of a cognitive
process or faculty, hence, the degree of trust that should be placed in its outputs. A
critical dialogue is only one of various cognitive or social processes that might be utilized
alone or in combination to generate beliefs and decisions. Non-deliberative processes,
such as pattern recognition, may be more reliable under some conditions and can almost
always be used to verify the results of reasoning - just as reasoning is used to check the
results of intuition. At this level, errors occur when cognizers use inappropriate or
inefficient strategies, and when they terminate a process too soon or continue it too long.
In sum, critical thinking skill is exemplified by asking and answering critical questions
about alternative possible states of affairs, with the intent of achieving the purpose of an
on-going activity.
See also: