0 оценок0% нашли этот документ полезным (0 голосов)
10K просмотров3 страницы
This document is a letter written by Earl Blackburn to the members of the Informal Council (Rich Jensen, Mike McKnight, and Tedd Tripp). It was cc’d to Don Lindblad, Walter J. Chantry, and Dale Smith. It discusses Earl Blackburn’s belief that Tom Chantry had been wronged by the IC and cites the “Report Written by Don Lindblad for Earl Blackburn dated 4/15/2002” multiple times.
This document is a letter written by Earl Blackburn to the members of the Informal Council (Rich Jensen, Mike McKnight, and Tedd Tripp). It was cc’d to Don Lindblad, Walter J. Chantry, and Dale Smith. It discusses Earl Blackburn’s belief that Tom Chantry had been wronged by the IC and cites the “Report Written by Don Lindblad for Earl Blackburn dated 4/15/2002” multiple times.
This document is a letter written by Earl Blackburn to the members of the Informal Council (Rich Jensen, Mike McKnight, and Tedd Tripp). It was cc’d to Don Lindblad, Walter J. Chantry, and Dale Smith. It discusses Earl Blackburn’s belief that Tom Chantry had been wronged by the IC and cites the “Report Written by Don Lindblad for Earl Blackburn dated 4/15/2002” multiple times.
Trinity Reformed Baptist Church
14407 East Rosecrans Avenue + La Mirada, California 90638 + 562-944-3366
April 18, 2002
Mediators of Informal Prescott Council
Pastor Rich Jensen
Elder Mike McKnight
Pastor Tedd Tripp
Dear Brethren,
‘Warmest greetings in the name of our great King and Savior. I trust each of you is prospering in
the particular tasks assigned to you in the kingdom of God’s dear Son.
My purpose for writing involves our discussion on Thursday morning, March 7, 2002, in
Bremen, Indiana at the General Assembly. I would like to revisit that in the context of this letter. That
morning, during the meeting you requested, Mike McKnight asked me if | agreed with the informal
Council. [told you that I wanted to carefully choose my words and I then replied, “Yes and no.” By that I
‘meant, as I explained, that you sought to be generous and kind to Tom Chantry by giving him an
opportunity to deal with matters and, hopefully, in time, reenter the ministry. For that I was and am
thankful. However, as I explained, the situation in Prescott did not develop in a vacuum. I expressed that
1 did not agree with you not allowing Tom to speak fully and to address all issues that were of concern to
him. All of you immediately spoke up and said that was not the case at all. You then told me that Tom
had the opportunity on two different occasions, during your meetings in Arizona, to say whatever he
wanted to say. Frankly, I was stunned at your response. I then stated that what you were telling me was
contrary to what Tom Chantry, Don Lindblad, and Walt Chantry had told me. You reassured me that
Tom did have every opportunity to address his concerns. We finally finished our discussion and then
went to lunch.
The final day of GA was busy as usual and I had no time to speak with Don Lindblad at the
Bremen church. That night I saw him in the hotel and briefly told him what you had told me during our
morning meeting. He immediately stated that you were not correct in your claim. He said that he didn’t
have time to explain everything. I asked him then, and later followed up that request with a phone call, to
‘write a report of the meeting and send it to me. I have enclosed for each of you a copy of that report.
When I read Don’s report, I was troubled. What you told me and what he wrote do not match up.
After reading his report, I phoned him to ask if he could substantiate his claims. He told me that he has
“pages of detailed notes” which he took before the informal Council and during it. I have known Don for
many years and he has always been “Judgment Day” honest with me. There have been times when he has
been truthful to his own hurt. I trust him implicitly. Furthermore, I know him to be meticulous, almost to
2 fault, and very precise in what he says and writes. In other words, brothers, I believe his written report.
“Unto Him be glory inthe church by Christ Jesus throughout all ages, world without end. Amen.” Ephesians 3:21Mediators of Informal Prescott Council
April 18, 2002
Page 2
Apart from Don’s veracity, there is further evidence to support my belief. During the informal
Council, Don phoned me two or three times seeking advice and counsel. He told me two different times
that you were not allowing Tom Chantry to voice his concerns. I told Don that he must get you mediators
to allow Tom to address all his concerns or there would be serious and unsettling ramifications. Each
must be allowed to have his “say,” even if no one agrees with him. It was then that I encouraged Don to
do what he was already planning to do: to phone Tedd and plead with him to allow Tom the opportunity
to speak all of his concems. He said he would do so and this he
After hanging up with Don, | tried to phone him to get Tedd’s hotel room phone number. Since
‘Tedd was the most experienced pastor, I wrongly assumed he was the chairman of the informal Council. 1
wanted to speak with Tedd and ask him that Tom be allowed to address all of his concerns. Don’s line
‘was busy and I could not get through. After a while, I placed a call to Elder Rich Howe in Prescott in
‘order to get Tedd’s hotel room phone number. Nobody was at the Howe home and I left a message on
their answering machine asking Rich to call me back that night, no matter how late, and give me Tedd’s
‘number. He never returned my call. Since there was nothing I could do I prayed, committed the matter to
the Lord, and went to bed around 2:00 AM Saturday morning,
The rest is history. The informal Council ended Saturday morning and Tom Chantry immediately
drove to my home. | asked him if you allowed him to address all of his concerns (he confirmed that you
did not) and Don Lindblad phoned me that evening confirming the same. Now you have Don’s written
report. Page one, paragraphs three and four of Don's report reveal an inconsistent shift on the part of the
Prescott Elders and focus on what I had spoken to you about the entire incident not having taken place in
a vacuum. Why the shift and why was Tom Chantry not allowed to address this? At this I am bothered.
Just as I predicted, serious and unsettling ramifications have followed the Arizona meetings.
Pastor Walt Chantry is very bothered that his son was not given a full and fair hearing, so much so that he
has stated to me via letter and phone that he will never have anything to do with ARBCA again. Also,
‘your refusal to allow Tom Chantry to fully address all of his concerns has caused prolonged problems in
the Carlisle Eldership. This does not include a number of other ARBCA pastors who have heard and are
concerned about your refusal.
Please understand, neither I, nor anyone else I know, (including Pastor Walt Chantry), condones
in any form or fashion Tom Chantry's spanking the children. It was as foolish as it was sinful. In dealing
with Tom about these matters you sought to be fair and merciful. However, in dealing with Tom’s
concerns, I believe you were not. Whether his concerns were valid or not, he had the right to be heard at
the proper time. This you did not allow him. Since 1992, I have been involved both directly and
indirectly with five church Councils. All of them, except this one, has ended peacefully with no
‘unwarranted and unsettling ramifications. It is my earnest opinion that Don’s report is accurate, that
things could have been put to rest, and that there would not have been protracted problems in the Carlisle
Eldership if you had only allowed Tom to address fully his concerns at the appropriate time.
What is done is done. We cannot turn back the hands of time. There is, I think, something each of
‘you can do to help put matters to rest and bring about peace. Since you no longer have any authority to
act as an informal Council, I ask that you individually consider and act upon my following suggestions.‘Mediators of Informal Prescott Council
April 18, 2002
Page 3
‘You, of course, are under no compulsion to do so. One, prayerfully search your hearts and if you believe
that Don is correct in his report and that you were wrong, then admit it to yourself and each other. Two,
individually write a letter to Tom Chantry acknowledging your wrong in this particular matter and ask
his forgiveness. Three, do the same with Pastor Walt Chantry. This would go a long way toward settling
matters and restoring integrity in their minds about you and ARBCA. It would also help bring peace to
the Carlisle Eldership and keep peace in ARBCA.
do not writ this letter as a lord over you or as one with authority. The Holy Scriptures instruct
us not to hate our brother in our heart (Leviticus 19:17). There is no hate in my heart for either of you,
nor do I want this matter to cause me to harbor bad thoughts or ill feelings towards you. I simply write as
1 brother and fellow pastor who loves and esteems you in Christ and who desires to “clear the air” and be
“above board” with you in al things. If you believe I am wrong in this matter, | am open at any time to
discuss any and all of what I have written. I look forward to many long and prosperous years of laboring
together in our beloved Association.
May the blessing of the Lord, which makes rich and adds no sorrow with it, be your portion and
strength.
Your servant in the best of bon
Earl M.Bfackburn
Pastor & Chairman of the ARBCA
Administrative Council
2001 W. Oak Avenue
Fullerton, CA 92833-3624
(714) 447-3412 (Study)
enclosure:
Pastor Don Lindblad
Pastor Walter J. Chantry
Pastor Dale Smith (Chairman of the ARBCA Membership Committee)