Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Milk was analysed for chemical composition and data presented in table below.
Constituents Percentage
Fat
Protein
Carbohydrate
Ash/Minerals
Acidity
Total Solids
Source:
The data collected on the different aspects were tabulated and analyzed statistically using the
method of analysis of variance and critical difference technique. The significant and non-
significant differences observed have been analyzed critically within and between the
treatment combinations.
The analyzed data is presented in this chapter under the following headings:
1. Chemical characteristics
2. Microbial characteristics
3. Organoleptic characteristics
4. Statistical characteristics
5. Estimation of cost of production
Table 4.2: Average data for different parameters of control and experiments (in
percent)
The average values of Moisture content of laboratory made basundi are presented in table
below.
Treatments
Replication
T0 T1 T2 T3
R1 50.21 50.79 51.73 52.7
R2 50.22 50.77 51.76 50.72
R3 50.24 50.78 51.74 52.73
R4 50.23 50.76 51.75 52.71
R5 50.2 50.75 51.77 52.71
Mean 50.22 50.77 51.75 52.314
Minimum 50.2 50.75 51.73 50.72
Range Maximum 50.24 50.79 51.77 52.73
F-Test 2.178
C.D. at 5% level 0.62
From the above data on moisture percentage in samples of different treatments and control,
the highest mean moisture percentage was recorded in the sample of T3 (52.314) followed by
T2 (51.75), T1 (50.77), T0 (50.22).
Treatment Average T0 T1 T2 T3
50.22 50.77 51.75 52.314
T0 50.22 -0.55 -1.53 -2.094
T1 50.77 -0.98 -1.544
T2 51.75 -0.564
T3 52.314
C.D. 0.62
The following observations are made:
The difference between the mean values of T0-T1 (0.55) was less than the C.D. value,
0.62 Therefore, the difference was non-significant.
The difference between the mean values of T0-T2 (1.53) was greater than the C.D.
value, 0..62 Therefore, the difference was significant.
The difference between the mean values of T0-T3 (2.094) was greater than the C.D.
value, 0.62 Therefore, the difference was significant.
The difference between the mean values of T1-T2 (0.98) was greater than the C.D.
value, 0.62 Therefore, the difference was significant.
The difference between the mean values of T1-T3 (1.544) was greater than the C.D.
value, 0.62 Therefore, the difference was significant.
The difference between the mean values of T2-T3 (0.564) was greater than the C.D.
value, 0.62 Therefore, the difference was significant.
It is therefore concluded that, the difference between control and treatment was found
to be significant in treatments T0- T2, T0- T3, T1- T2, T1- T3, T2- T3.
52.50
52.00
51.50
51.00
50.50
50.00
49.50
49.00
T0 T1 T2 T3
Fig 4.3.1.1: Average percentage of moisture in the samples of control and experimental
samples.
T0 - T0 - Control prepared from milk (100:00).
T1 - Experimental sample prepared from Milk, Aloe vera gel and dried Betel leaf
powder (97:2:1).
T2 - Experimental sample prepared from Milk, Aloe vera gel and dried Betel leaf
powder (95:4:1).
T3 - Experimental sample prepared from Milk, Aloe vera gel and dried Betel leaf
powder (93:6:1).
4.3.2. Fat content of Basundi
The average values of fat content of laboratory made basundi are presented in table below.
Treatments
Replication
T0 T1 T2 T3
R1 14.74 14.33 14.04 13.74
R2 14.73 14.32 14.06 13.75
R3 14.75 14.35 14.03 13.77
R4 14.71 14.34 14.05 13.73
R5 14.72 14.36 14.07 13.76
From the above data on moisture percentage in samples of different treatments and control,
the highest mean moisture percentage was recorded in the sample of T0 (14.73) followed by
T1 (14.34), T2 (14.05), T3 (13.75).
Treatment Average T0 T1 T2 T3
14.73 14.34 14.05 13.75
T0 14.73 0.39 0.68 0.98
T1 14.34 0.29 0.59
T2 14.05 0.3
T3 13.75
C.D. = 0.02
The following observations are made:
The difference between the mean values of T0-T1 (0.39) was greater than the C.D.
value, 0.18 Therefore, the difference was significant.
The difference between the mean values of T0-T2 (0.68) was greater than the C.D.
value, 0.18 Therefore, the difference was significant.
The difference between the mean values of T0-T3 (0.98) was greater than the C.D.
value, 0.18 Therefore, the difference was significant.
The difference between the mean values of T1-T2 (0.29) was greater than the C.D.
value, 0.18 Therefore, the difference was significant.
The difference between the mean values of T1-T3 (0.59) was greater than the C.D.
value, 0.18 Therefore, the difference was significant.
The difference between the mean values of T2-T3 (0.3) was greater than the C.D.
value, 0.18 Therefore, the difference was non-significant.
It is therefore concluded that, the difference between control and treatment was found
to be significant in treatments T0- T1, T0- T2, T0- T3, T1- T2, T1- T3, T2- T3.
14.80
14.60
14.40
14.20
14.00
13.80
13.60
13.40
13.20
T0 T1 T2 T3
Series1
Fig 4.3.1.1: Average percentage of moisture in the samples of control and experimental
samples.
T0 - T0 - Control prepared from milk (100:00).
T1 - Experimental sample prepared from Milk, Aloe vera gel and dried Betel leaf
powder (97:2:1).
T2 - Experimental sample prepared from Milk, Aloe vera gel and dried Betel leaf
powder (95:4:1).
T3 - Experimental sample prepared from Milk, Aloe vera gel and dried Betel leaf
powder (93:6:1).
The average values of protein content in basundi samples are presented in table below.
Treatments
Replication
T0 T1 T2 T3
R1 8.32 8.33 8.2 7.99
R2 8.31 8.37 8.17 8.01
R3 8.33 8.35 8.19 8
R4 8.3 8.36 8.18 8.03
R5 8.29 8.34 8.16 8.02
Mean 8.31 8.35 8.18 8.01
Minimum 8.29 8.33 8.16 7.99
Range
Maximum 8.33 8.37 8.2 8.03
From the above data on moisture percentage in samples of different treatments and control,
the highest mean moisture percentage was recorded in the sample of T3 (52.314) followed by
T2 (51.75), T1 (50.77), T0 (50.22).
Treatment Average T0 T1 T2 T3
8.31 8.35 8.18 8.01
T0 8.31 -0.04 0.13 0.3
T1 8.35 0.17 0.34
T2 8.18 0.17
T3 8.01
C.D. = 0.02
The difference between the mean values of T0-T1 (0.55) was less than the C.D. value,
0.62 Therefore, the difference was non-significant.
The difference between the mean values of T0-T2 (1.53) was greater than the C.D.
value, 0..62 Therefore, the difference was significant.
The difference between the mean values of T0-T3 (2.094) was greater than the C.D.
value, 0.62 Therefore, the difference was significant.
The difference between the mean values of T1-T2 (0.98) was greater than the C.D.
value, 0.62 Therefore, the difference was significant.
The difference between the mean values of T1-T3 (1.544) was greater than the C.D.
value, 0.62 Therefore, the difference was significant.
The difference between the mean values of T2-T3 (0.564) was greater than the C.D.
value, 0.62 Therefore, the difference was significant.
It is therefore concluded that, the difference between control and treatment was found
to be significant in treatments T0- T2, T0- T3, T1- T2, T1- T3, T2- T3.
8.40
8.30
8.20
8.10
8.00
7.90
7.80
T0 T1 T2 T3
Series1
Fig 4.3.1.1: Average percentage of moisture in the samples of control and experimental
samples.
Treatments
Replication
T0 T1 T2 T3
R1 24.9 24.44 23.98 23.48
R2 25 24.45 23.94 23.46
R3 24.7 24.47 23.96 23.49
R4 25.1 24.46 23.95 23.47
R5 24.8 24.43 23.97 23.45
Mean 24.9 24.45 23.96 23.47
Minimum 24.7 24.43 23.94 23.45
Range
Maximum 25.1 24.47 23.98 23.49
From the above data on moisture percentage in samples of different treatments and control,
the highest mean moisture percentage was recorded in the sample of T3 (52.314) followed by
T2 (51.75), T1 (50.77), T0 (50.22).
Treatment Average T0 T1 T2 T3
24.9 24.45 23.96 23.47
T0 24.9 0.45 0.94 1.43
T1 24.45 0.49 0.98
T2 23.96 0.49
T3 23.47
C.D. = 0.11
The difference between the mean values of T0-T1 (0.55) was less than the C.D. value,
0.62 Therefore, the difference was non-significant.
The difference between the mean values of T0-T2 (1.53) was greater than the C.D.
value, 0..62 Therefore, the difference was significant.
The difference between the mean values of T0-T3 (2.094) was greater than the C.D.
value, 0.62 Therefore, the difference was significant.
The difference between the mean values of T1-T2 (0.98) was greater than the C.D.
value, 0.62 Therefore, the difference was significant.
The difference between the mean values of T1-T3 (1.544) was greater than the C.D.
value, 0.62 Therefore, the difference was significant.
The difference between the mean values of T2-T3 (0.564) was greater than the C.D.
value, 0.62 Therefore, the difference was significant.
It is therefore concluded that, the difference between control and treatment was found
to be significant in treatments T0- T2, T0- T3, T1- T2, T1- T3, T2- T3.
25.00
24.50
24.00
23.50
23.00
22.50
T0 T1 T2 T3
Series1
Fig 4.3.1.1: Average percentage of moisture in the samples of control and experimental
samples.
From the above data on moisture percentage in samples of different treatments and control,
the highest mean moisture percentage was recorded in the sample of T3 (52.314) followed by
T2 (51.75), T1 (50.77), T0 (50.22).
Treatment Average T0 T1 T2 T3
1.86 2.05 2.016 1.97
T0 1.86 -0.19 -0.156 -0.11
T1 2.05 0.034 0.08
T2 2.016 0.046
T3 1.97
C.D. = 0.02
The difference between the mean values of T0-T1 (0.55) was less than the C.D. value,
0.62 Therefore, the difference was non-significant.
The difference between the mean values of T0-T2 (1.53) was greater than the C.D.
value, 0..62 Therefore, the difference was significant.
The difference between the mean values of T0-T3 (2.094) was greater than the C.D.
value, 0.62 Therefore, the difference was significant.
The difference between the mean values of T1-T2 (0.98) was greater than the C.D.
value, 0.62 Therefore, the difference was significant.
The difference between the mean values of T1-T3 (1.544) was greater than the C.D.
value, 0.62 Therefore, the difference was significant.
The difference between the mean values of T2-T3 (0.564) was greater than the C.D.
value, 0.62 Therefore, the difference was significant.
It is therefore concluded that, the difference between control and treatment was found
to be significant in treatments T0- T2, T0- T3, T1- T2, T1- T3, T2- T3.
2.05
2.00
1.95
1.90
1.85
1.80
1.75
T0 T1 T2 T3
Series1
Fig 4.3.1.1: Average percentage of moisture in the samples of control and experimental
samples.
Treatments
Replication
T0 T1 T2 T3
R1 0.4 0.37 0.34 0.36
R2 0.36 0.34 0.36 0.34
R3 0.39 0.36 0.34 0.35
R4 0.38 0.35 0.38 0.32
R5 0.37 0.38 0.33 0.33
Mean 0.38 0.36 0.35 0.34
Minimum 0.36 0.34 0.33 0.32
Range
Maximu
m 0.4 0.38 0.38 0.36
From the above data on moisture percentage in samples of different treatments and control,
the highest mean moisture percentage was recorded in the sample of T3 (52.314) followed by
T2 (51.75), T1 (50.77), T0 (50.22).
Treatment Average T0 T1 T2 T3
0.38 0.36 0.35 0.34
T0 0.38 0.02 0.03 0.04
T1 0.36 0.01 0.02
T2 0.35 0.01
T3 0.34
C.D. = 0.02
0.39
0.38
0.37
0.36
0.35
0.34
0.33
0.32
T0 T1 T2 T3
Series1
Fig 4.3.1.1: Average percentage of moisture in the samples of control and experimental
samples.
Treatments
Replication
T0 T1 T2 T3
R1 50.8 49.18 48.24 47.25
R2 49.77 49.22 48.23 47.27
R3 49.79 49.2 48.25 47.24
R4 49.78 49.19 48.22 47.23
R5 49.76 49.21 48.21 47.26
Mean 49.98 49.2 48.23 47.25
Minimum 49.76 49.18 48.21 47.23
Range
Maximu
m 50.8 49.22 48.25 47.27
From the above data on moisture percentage in samples of different treatments and control,
the highest mean moisture percentage was recorded in the sample of T3 (52.314) followed by
T2 (51.75), T1 (50.77), T0 (50.22).
Treatment Average T0 T1 T2 T3
49.98 49.2 48.23 47.25
T0 49.98 0.78 1.75 2.73
T1 49.2 0.97 1.95
T2 48.23 0.98
T3 47.25
C.D. = 0.32
The difference between the mean values of T0-T1 (0.55) was less than the C.D. value,
0.62 Therefore, the difference was non-significant.
The difference between the mean values of T0-T2 (1.53) was greater than the C.D.
value, 0..62 Therefore, the difference was significant.
The difference between the mean values of T0-T3 (2.094) was greater than the C.D.
value, 0.62 Therefore, the difference was significant.
The difference between the mean values of T1-T2 (0.98) was greater than the C.D.
value, 0.62 Therefore, the difference was significant.
The difference between the mean values of T1-T3 (1.544) was greater than the C.D.
value, 0.62 Therefore, the difference was significant.
The difference between the mean values of T2-T3 (0.564) was greater than the C.D.
value, 0.62 Therefore, the difference was significant.
It is therefore concluded that, the difference between control and treatment was found
to be significant in treatments T0- T2, T0- T3, T1- T2, T1- T3, T2- T3.
50.00
49.50
49.00
48.50
48.00
47.50
47.00
46.50
46.00
45.50
T0 T1 T2 T3
Series1
Fig 4.3.1.1: Average percentage of moisture in the samples of control and experimental
samples.